Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.2.0-RC6

+1 I checked: - git tag verified - pgp signature matched - checksum matched - all components build with `./pkg -v` - TO install and run on fresh Centos 7.4 VM On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:52 PM Jeff Elsloo wrote: > +1 > > Signature validates and tests performed previously were

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.2.0-RC6

in the wiki. > > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey, Rob, I'm not voting yet since I've only verified the checksums and > > signature, but the email still mentions md5 and sha1 checksums -- only > > sha512 c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.2.0-RC6

Hey, Rob, I'm not voting yet since I've only verified the checksums and signature, but the email still mentions md5 and sha1 checksums -- only sha512 checksum and pgp signature are there. I think the correct files are provided and the email is incorrect. -dan On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:22 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.2.0-RC4

+1 I tested: - signature and checksum good - `./pkg -v` builds all components successfully - traffic_ops installs on clean Centos 7 VM - postinstall properly configures - a couple of basic traffiic_ops calls return proper json output On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:58 PM, David Neuman

Re: [VOTE] Resolution for Traffic Control graduation to TLP

> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Traffic > > Control Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of > > the projects within the scope of responsibility

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.2.0-RC2

Hank, fyi -- from the top level of trafficcontrol, `./pkg -v` will build all components. -dan On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Hank Beatty wrote: > +1 > > Lab Testing: > > - Docker build - Could not figure out how to get all components to build > at once > - build/build.sh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.2.0-RC2

+1 -- I checked: - hashes and signature good - builds all from `./pkg -v` - TO rpm installs cleanly on a fresh VM - TO basic functionality works (no extensive testing..) On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) < efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: > +1 > > I checked the following: > -

Re: Github PR/Issues Format Templates

o be `git -amend`ed. > > I definitely wouldn't want a PR that contained that information only > in the PR body, > and there's not a whole lot of value in asking them to re-type it. The > "copy/paste" thing > at the top is already a bit of duplication anyway. > > O

Re: Github PR/Issues Format Templates

followup: rather than `What is the best way to verify this PR? ` what about `What effect should I expect to see from this change?` On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on keeping it short and to the point... > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2

Re: Github PR/Issues Format Templates

+1 on keeping it short and to the point... On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > Chris, I really wanted the PR template to be less daunting and super short > and to the point. It's intention is to give a super quick summary of what's > included in

Re: [VOTE] CHANGELOG.md file (second try)

+1 On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > I like that format. Bullets seems nice and simple with external links where > more info is required. > > I would be in favor of a PR to add these sections so it's easy for the next > person to add a bullet to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.2.0-RC1

-1 because of an issue building traffic_ops from source: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/issues/1916 PR to fix this is forthcoming.. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Steve Malenfant wrote: > Maybe I should have mentioned a few more details... > > As

Re: Golang Proxy Validation Dependencies

+1 -- agree with Jeff -- the validation of the fields of deliveryservice is something that is incomplete in the Perl traffic_ops. These libraries make for concise code to do the validation so it will be easier to extend without much extra code. It will not be called on every API function, but

Re: [VOTE] CHANGELOG.md file (second try)

with the caveat that the name should be CHANGELOG.md or Changelog.md to make it stand out in the directory listing and to use the standard suffix. [X] +1 to adding a changelog.MD file [] -1 to adding a changelog.MD file [] +1 to adding a changelog label in github [X] -1 to adding a changelog

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

Hi Henk..I think those issues should now be resolved: - 1.8.x files removed from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol - links to checksum and .asc signature files no longer point to the mirror thanks for pointing these out! Dan Kirkwood On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

My apologies -- Henk Penning -- not Hank... On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to removing the 1.8.0 and 1.8.1 releases per Hank's instructions... > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

ps://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/2.1.0/RC2/ > > >>> Please rename >>> apache-trafficcontrol-2.1.0-incubating.tar.gz.sha > > >> I have renamed the file. > > > Some more points ; in dist/incubator/trafficcontrol/ > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC3

+1 On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Nir Sopher wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Jeremy Mitchell > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Steve Malenfant >> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 20,

Re: Remove file with invalid license

; >>>> That's correct. No RPM, unfortunately. License is here: >> > > >>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects/OWASP_SecLists_Project. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> -1 on downloading during rpmbuild, or especially posti

Re: OWASP SecLists license

I do think, however, that we should have an actual download link so the origin can be confirmed. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > wow.. nicely done! > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) > <efri

Re: OWASP SecLists license

wow.. nicely done! On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Daniel Miessler > > > Subject: Re: OWASP SecLists license > Date: December 18, 2017 at

Re: Remove file with invalid license

d or postinstall. >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) >> > <efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: >> > > It can be downloaded from Github. >> > > >> > > I think this is the file (Rob correct me if I picked

Re: Remove file with invalid license

e wrong variant): > https://github.com/danielmiessler/SecLists/blob/master/Passwords/10_million_password_list_top_10.txt > > —Eric > > On Dec 18, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood > <dang...@gmail.com<mailto:dang...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Rob, is there

Re: [VOTE] CHANGELOG.md file (second try)

+1 as well... This query should show all PRs merged since the 2.1 branch: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+merged%3A%3E%3D2017-08-04+base%3Amaster On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > This

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: incubator-trafficcontrol-PR #732

FYI -- apparently the Fedora project is doing some infrastructure maintenance which is causing the builds to fail... Hopefully will be resolved before long.. https://status.fedoraproject.org/ -dan On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See >

change to cdn.conf

Hi, all.. With our ongoing effort to move Traffic Ops from the Perl Mojolicious framework to Go, one thing that's hampered this effort is duplication of configuration. The cdn.conf has always been in Perl hash form. To prevent the need to parse Perl constructs in Go, I've introduced a

Re: Traffic Ops Rewrite Golang Dependency - sqlx

As one ready to jump in and add more endpoints, I'm a strong +1 on using sqlx. I agree that adding a new dependency should not be done without consideration, but I find the sqlx version much more readable and easier to approach than either your or dew's version of non-sqlx and would be much

traffic_ops postinstall/rpm update changes

PR for review later this week. thanks.. Dan Kirkwood

Re: [VOTE] Bugtracking in Github Issues

+1 On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) wrote: > We currently use JIRA Issues to track all of the Traffic Control bugs. > > Now that we have write access to Github, we can move back to GH Issues for > bug tracking. > > This will be a better workflow

Re: Pull Request Builder on Apache Jenkins

quot; for a one time test run > > What is the difference between these two? > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:46 PM Volz, Dylan (Contractor) < > dylan_v...@comcast.com> wrote: > >> Perhaps it could check for WIP prefix to prevent noisy(?) failures on >> incomplete

Re: Pull Request Builder on Apache Jenkins

looks like it will skip if the title contains [skipXXXci] where XXX is any non-whitespace.. Not sure why that form, but it's possible. I'll wait for other feedback before making any change to that.

Re: Proposal for PR requirements

Thanks, Jason..I'll look into that. +1 on Dave's comments -- the process shouldn't be that heavy-weight. Yes -- there *should* be Jira tickets for anything not trivial, but should be at the discretion of the PR reviewer whether to request it or not.. -dan On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:55 AM,

Re: 2.1 RM

Thanks, Hank..feel free to ping either me or Eric if anything is unclear in the release manager notes. -dan On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Hank Beatty wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I would like to volunteer. > > Thanks, > Hank > > On 07/05/2017 03:38 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC6)

+1 I checked: - git tag verified - gpg sig is good - checksums match source tarball - tarball has correct name and structure - rpms build from tarball - traffic_ops installation and postinstall on a clean Centos7 VM - some basic traffic_ops UI functionality - docs no longer mention build area to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC5)

+ builds from source extracted from tarball + rpm for traffic_ops installs on clean machine -dan On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > I checked the signature, but didn't get Eric's key from the gpg > refresh. He's looking into that now.. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC5)

I checked the signature, but didn't get Eric's key from the gpg refresh. He's looking into that now.. Meanwhile, I'm going to build and install fresh. btw, Eric -- the Changes section above should be: > Changes since 1.8.1: >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating

The vote passes with three +1 and no -1 votes. Thanks! The Apache Traffic Control (Incubating) team

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC4)

; On 06/08/2017 11:30 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: >> >> not that I'm aware of... please do file an issue for it, though and >> attach that to the PR. >> >> thanks! Dan >> >> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating (RC0)

:49 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 June 2017 at 22:12, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > > DROPPED user@ list - see below. > >> Hello Incubator PMC, >> >> The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a >> proposa

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating (RC0)

the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC4)

+1 -- signature and hashes checked. All components build from source tarball. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Elsloo wrote: > +1 again. Signature and hashes validate. > -- > Thanks, > Jeff > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC3)

unfortunately, have to -1. Building traffic_ops from the tarball using docker-compose gives me this error: traffic_ops_build_1 | The build area has been initialized. traffic_ops_build_1 | Building the rpm. traffic_ops_build_1 | error: line 26: Tag takes single token only: Release:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating (RC0)

With 4 +1 votes and no -1 votes, this release candidate passes. I'll send out a vote to the Incubator PMC later today. thanks! Dan On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello All, > > I've prepared the first candidate release for incubator

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating (RC0)

Hello All, I've prepared the first candidate release for incubator-trafficcontrol v1.8.1 (RC0) Changes since 1.8.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.8.0...RELEASE-1.8.1-RC0 This corresponds to git: Hash: cc56e76320f6d63f611d4070a1aca1e82d235a61 Tag:

Re: TC 2.1 postinstall errors

Hi, Amir.. We are using Centos 7.2 for traffic ops installation, and using docker-compose to build. Follow the instructions in `BUILD.md` (at the top level of trafficcontrol) and then installation instructions in `traffic_ops/INSTALL.md`. Today is a holiday in the U.S., but I'll check email

Re: TC Contributers to Publish list of Planned/WIP Items for Better Community Sync

I'm also with Dave on using github (preferably not Jira) for tracking this..Some enterprising individual could use the github api to produce such a report as well showing what's being worked and what isn't... -dan On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Dewayne Richardson wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

+1 On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > In > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E > Dave > mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in >

Re: 2.0 release?

Rob removed those from master -- I just merged it. He'll be cherry-picking for a 2.0.x PR shortly. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > by "HEAD", I meant "master"... > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dan Kirkwoo

Re: [VOTE] Adding a CHANGELOG.md file

yeah -- what Hank said... On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Hank Beatty wrote: > -1 for a manual changelog - doing a compare between branches/commits in > github is relatively simple. > > +1 for a scripted changelog - > https://github.com/skywinder/github-changelog-generator

Re: 2.0 release?

by "HEAD", I meant "master"... On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > yep -- it appears that > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/commit/ad28f33fea62cc5ce2c5a7a667b8cf9f06b7b7a2 > removed the juju/persist

Re: 2.0 release?

one else's >> understanding >> > > as >> > > > well? >> > > > Does anyone know of any showstopper issues that still exist? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Dave >> > > > >> > &

Re: Moving Traffic Control the "full" github

+1 here as well.. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) wrote: > I am all for one less tool to use. Also I think it will lower bar to bringing > more people into our project if they don’t have to sign up for the ASF JIRA > separately. > > —Eric > >> On

Re: Goose installer script

ependency, which is difficult since few package managers have a modern Go > package. Goose is MIT, > https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary suggests we can, yes? > > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ughh..

Re: Goose installer script

ughh.. I'd forgotten I'd done that in all this.. Again -- catch-22. On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Mark Torluemke wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Gelinas, Derek > wrote: > >> +1 on both of these. >> >> > On Apr 30, 2017, at

Re: 2.0 release?

+1 On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, David Neuman wrote: > Since the Cookie Jar functionality is new to 2.0 and 2.0 is not yet > released, why don't we just remove the `ResumeSession` method all together > and eliminate the dependency? Otherwise we are deprecating

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0 (incubating)

The Apache Traffic Control team would like to announce the release of Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0 (incubating). More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at: http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded here:

Re: Traffic Control Wiki Organization

+1 On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > thanks for doing that, Ashish. I would say go ahead and move pages to where > they seem appropriate. That would be a great starting point. thanks again. > > Jeremy > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Durfey,

docker-compose for builds

Hi all..I've submitted a PR (https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/327) for building using docker/docker-compose that eliminates pulling the source code from github and instead builds from your local source tree. There have been questions in the past about the github

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

The vote is now closed and RC11 passes with 5 +1 votes and no -1 votes. I'll craft a new vote to the IPMC starting today and ending on Friday. Thanks, all! Dan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

>>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Looks like only licenses were changed. >>> >>> >>> On 02/17/2017 03:07 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> I've prepared another release

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

Hello All, I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC11). I apologize for the confusion on RC10 -- we had a glitch in our tagging process. RC11 is identical to RC10, but we decided to redo the process to ensure the integrity of the release. The source tarballs are identical in content --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC10)

Good thing I waited..Something went wrong with my git clone and a bunch of changes went in from master... -1 -- I'll get a new one in tomorrow. -dan On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: > ok -- a bit premature.. I'll wait until tomorro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC10)

We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed! I'll send out the email to the IPMC shortly... Thanks all.. -dan On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello All, > > I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10) > > Changes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC10)

+1 I put together the tarball myself, but also downloaded the tarball and verified checksums and signature from the downloaded files. Also built from source. Dan On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello All, > > I've prepared

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC10)

Hello All, I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10 This corresponds to git: Hash: 14ef03fd251b6306e67627c935f9111efb0284af Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10 Which can be

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

data - login from UI, navigating parts of UI On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello All, > > I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC9) > > Changes since 1.7.0: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC8)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here:

Re: [VOTE] incubator-trafficcontrol-1.8.0-RC8

nd signatures good > - incubating in name > - tarball builds successfully > - git tag good > > —Eric > >> On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks, Hank..I don't think the double-license or double-use >>

[VOTE] incubator-trafficcontrol-1.8.0-RC8

Hello All, I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC7) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC8 This corresponds to git: Hash:597e7795c48ab65fe57175642973481b9dc020e6 Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC8 Which can be verified

Re: [VOTE] incubator-trafficcontrol-1.8.0-RC6

, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:15 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC6) >> >> Changes since 1.7.0: >> https://github.com/

[VOTE] incubator-trafficcontrol-1.8.0-RC6

Hello All, I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC6) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC6 This corresponds to git: Hash: 20d7e37b57b9aa47e7731595641920de268ea219 Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC6 Which can be verified

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5

One correction: The signed source tarball and checksums are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC5/

[VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5

Hello All, I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC5) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5 This corresponds to git: Hash: b30cbc5d32c991e472c082b97f9bfd73a7699c66 Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5 Which can be verified

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4

wrote: > >> On Dec 8, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC4) >> >> Changes since 1.7.0: >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4

share! Thanks.. Dan On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have no control over the mentors :-)Yes -- since you chimed in, > I'm happy to wait for your input.. > > -Dan > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Leif Hedstrom

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4

Reminder -- 1.8.0-RC4 is open for voting until 5pm MST today. Please vote by replying to this email. The release is available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC4/ On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >

[VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4

Hello All, I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC4) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4 This corresponds to git: Hash: 7d8a88d0512ffe0354c2bc079ddbf2e7b67b6c3e Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4 Which can be verified

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3

y set something up in our private Jenkins if theres not a > better option. > > —Eric > >> On Dec 8, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> FYI -- we decided to -1 this based on more license issues.. The >> .rat-excludes file

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3

On Dec 2, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks again for the feedback, Leif..There is a .rat_excludes >> file at the top level, but it looks like we didn't get it fully >> populated. The .json files should certainly be excl

Re: Apache license in source files

On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to >> keep in compliance with Apache license guidelines, each source file >> should have the Apache license comment -- nor

Re: Apache license in source files

: > +1 and sorry for merging a PR without. I will make sure all files have them > before merging in the future. > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 15:48 Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to >>

Apache license in source files

Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to keep in compliance with Apache license guidelines, each source file should have the Apache license comment -- normally at the head of the file, but I think that's somewhat flexible. Still going thru files adding them, but

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3

as well :-) We'll work on this more on Monday. thanks! Dan On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Dec 1, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I've prepared another

[VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3

Hello All, I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC3) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3 This corresponds to git: Hash: daf585eacdcae4f57d60f14b4b6170b004058559 Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3 Which can be verified with

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2

I'd also love to ditch the RPMs,but I'll abstain from voting since it directly impacts me immediately (less work for me!). Would anyone else like to weigh in on this? Dan On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Phil Sorber

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2

file name, we've been following that convention in the rpm name for a while. Do you think it should be dropped from the tarball? That's written to BUILD_NUMBER before it's created.. -Dan On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Nov 3

[VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2

Hello All, I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC2) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2 This corresponds to git: Hash: 8766dbcb38105fbc97b955b4733defe40c83db00 Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2 Which can be verified with the

Re: Help the poor RMs

Still relevant tho..yes, please help the poor RMs :-) On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:28 PM, David Neuman wrote: >> >> I actually don't think we can do milestones, labels, or assignees in github >>

license details

Hi all, I'm looking at files that are missing license details per Leif's email from earlier today. I'm finding that some aren't clear. For instance, it appears that some files in `docs/source/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme` have a statement like this: > :copyright: Copyright 2007-2013 by

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

ok -- tarball and armored signatures are now included in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC1/ . Adding that to the instructions for future release mgrs... I'll work on getting the NOTICE updated and creating a KEYS file as well.Once those are done,

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

Thanks for looking at that, Leif.. I'm sure we have a few more details to get right.. I'm pretty sure most of those are from external sources, so need to be added to NOTICE.. -Dan On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Nov 8, 2016,

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

e project name > and "incubating" (e.g. traffic_control_incubating_1.8.0_source.tar.gz). > We can also include the RPMs but we should note that they are for > convenience only and therefore they shouldnt need incubating in the name. > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Dan

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

: > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basics > > > On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood > <dang...@gmail.com<mailto:dang...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Leif, we are aware of that and wa

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1) >> >> Changes since 1.7.0: >> https://github.com/

Re: incubator-trafficcontrol

Hi Burak, The best place to ask questions is one of the mailing lists -- for using traffic control, you can subscribe at users-subscribe@trafficcont rol.incubator.apache.org, and for development: dev-subscr...@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org. We have been working on adding docker containers