Re: Contributing to Zookeeper as a newbie

Hi, that was me that denied you - the infra team has been sensitive about account creation. I just re-read through the latest guidelines though and it seems they have updated, at least from what I remembered. Given that and your interest I approved the request just now, you should see the notificat

Re: Subscribe for contributing to Zookeeper

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 7:34 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > On 2024/03/13 18:30:56 Abhijeet Sinha wrote: > > Hey > > > > I want to understand and contribute to Zookeeper. > > > > Thanks and Regards > > Abhijeet Sinha > > Welcome aboard, Abhijeet. > > As with any open source project, the way to get involv

Re: Backport to active branches by default

on branch-3.8? > > I can agree with that, but 3.9 can still receive more patches. > > Andor > > > > > On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 13:16 -0700, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > Shouldn't we only backport critical fixes into the non-mainline > > branch? The > > whol

Re: Backport to active branches by default

Shouldn't we only backport critical fixes into the non-mainline branch? The whole idea is that that's the "stable" release while the mainline is the most current... Regards, Patrick On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:54 PM Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi ZK committers, > > I've come across recently that patc

Re: Moving 3.7 to End-of-Life

Markmail search for apache mail archive is gone? and unfortunately Apache mail archive search seems to be broken (no results coming back...) I managed to track this ref down https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8sm8gxmohs9gl4vrltd2jr4slqvrg9n but I distinctly remember seeing something about this, just

Re: Good first tickets for beginners

here is already a pending Jira account request associated with this email > address. Please wait for it to be processed > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:23 PM Muthuraj Ramalinga kumar < > muthu90t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Cool thanks > > > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2

Re: Good first tickets for beginners

hanks > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:15 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > You can request an account here, mention that you need to submit a fix. > > https://selfserve.apache.org/jira-account.html > > > > Patrick > > > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:10 PM Muthuraj Ramal

Re: Good first tickets for beginners

ally create temp files in > system temp directory and clean them after test run. > > But I don't have a Jira ticket to work on that and donot have the > permission to create one. > > Is it possible to create a ticket on my behalf ? > > Thank you > > > On Sat,

Re: Good first tickets for beginners

Try adding tests or fixing flakey tests? There are also some jira which might be appropriate , I don't think it's been curated in

FYI: ZK owasp checks failing

FYI all of the current codelines are failing owasp check with the following. We should try to get it into the next release... https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/view/ZooKeeper/job/zookeeper-multi-branch-owasp/ 16:51:13 [ERROR] jetty-io-9.4.52.v20230823.jar: CVE-2023-44487(7.5), CVE-2023-36478(7.5) 16:5

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.2 candidate 0

+1 - xsums validated, rat ran clean, was able to compile successfully, owasp check is green, able to run multiple configurations/ensembles successfully. Patrick On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 3:06 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi ZK folks, > > This is a release candidate for 3.7.2. > > This is a bugfix rele

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.3 candidate 0

+1 - xsums validated, rat ran clean, was able to compile successfully, owasp check is green, able to run multiple configurations/ensembles successfully. Patrick On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 3:50 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi, > > This is a release candidate for 3.8.3. > > This is a bugfix release for t

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.9.1 candidate 0

+1 - xsums validated, rat ran clean, was able to compile successfully, owasp check is green, able to run multiple configurations/ensembles successfully. Note: there are a few license files which don't have accompanying jars, I think this is fine. For the jars/licenses we do carry they matched OK.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.9.0 candidate 1

+1 - xsum/sig verified, rat ran clean, I was able to compile, run the owasp checker, and start various ensemble sizes manually w/o issue. lgtm. Patrick On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > This is release candidate for ZooKeeper 3.9.0. > > It is a major release and it introduce

Re: FIPS: removing ZKTrustManager

"remove ZKTrustManager entirely from the codebase" - what is the impact on backward compatibility if this is done? Why wouldn't we keep this as an option (not the default?) to ensure folks won't experience a "gap" when migrating to new versions. We could phase it out over time as part of such a pla

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.1 candidate 1

+1 - xsums validated, rat ran clean, built/compiled fine and I was able to run some manual tests on various cluster sizes. Regards, Patrick On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 8:39 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is the second release candidate for 3.8.1. > > This is a bugfix release. The full release no

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.1 candidate 0

Will do, thanks Enrico! Patrick On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:09 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Patrick > > Il giorno lun 23 gen 2023 alle ore 23:11 Patrick Hunt > ha scritto: > > > > Thanks Enrico - off the bat I did notice a couple license file > mis-matches, > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.1 candidate 0

Thanks Enrico - off the bat I did notice a couple license file mis-matches, not sure how you want to handle those: -rw-r--r-- 1 phunt staff11366 Jan 23 05:25 netty-common-4.1.76.Final.LICENSE.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 phunt staff 654571 Dec 16 05:34 netty-common-4.1.86.Final.jar -rw-r--r-- 1

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 0

Does the build/test pipeline need to be updated to verify this? Why make it a manual/release step. Patrick On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:35 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > Thanks for checking! > > I don't have a strong opinion. It would make sense to support newer gcc > versions in a new release. On t

Re: I would like to send a PR related to zookeeper C client

This reminds me - I saw recently that Infra is sunsetting TravisCI. I think we added support for that a while back? I'm not sure clear on the details tbh. Whoever was involved - can you take a look? It seems like it's behind a gated page on cwiki, which lists ZK explicitly, if you can't access the

Re: Some ADs are in the bug list

Thanks for the repor Guoxiongt, I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23507 Regards, Patrick On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 4:48 AM Guoxiong Li wrote: > Hi all, > > I notice there are some ADs in the bug list. Could somebody handle this > situation? Closing these bugs or putting the rel

Re: On-demand Backup and Restore with Streaming Capability

ing feedback. I can do it through jira/email but it's hard to capture/reference context. This is a big feature set, otw I wouldn't mention. :-) Patrick > Bests, > > Li > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:08 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > I think this could be a usef

Re: On-demand Backup and Restore with Streaming Capability

I think this could be a useful feature for folks. However it immediately raises a number of concerns if we want to ship it as a "mainline" feature, I briefly started capturing here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4570?focusedCommentId=17565127&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 1

+1. xsum/sig are fine. rat ran clean. The build issue I encountered with rc0 is now fixed. I did some manual testing with various cluster sizes and it all came clean. Patrick On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:09 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté < szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a bugfix release candida

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 0

maven build is failing for me - should it? I can't remember if we "officially" supported maven in 3.5? [phunt:apache-zookeeper-3.5.10] $ mvn --version Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0) Maven home: /opt/homebrew/Cellar/maven/3.8.5/libexec Java version: 18.0.1, vendor: Ho

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.1 candidate 1

+1 xsum/sigs are valid, rat ran clean as did the dep checks. I tested with various sized clusters manually and it all ran fine. Regards, Patrick On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 1:01 AM Mohammad Arshad wrote: > This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.7.1. It contains 64 fixes. > > The full release not

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.1 candidate 0

The dependency checker is failing. We had a similar discussion about the impact of this on a recent release candidate . The decision was to address the problem rather than push it downstream to end users. iow this type of error resul

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new ZooKeeper PMC member: Mate Szalay-Beko

Kudos Mate! Regards, Patrick On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:42 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I am happy to announce that Mate Szalay-Beko has been invited to join > the Apache ZooKeeper PMC and he accepted. > > Mate is doing great work for our community. > > Please join me in congratulating with him

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 1

r managing this release! Nice job!! :) > > > > Best regards, > > Mate > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 1:10 PM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > with 4 positive +1 votes (3 bindings): > > > - Enrico Olivelli > &

Re: Can't assign jira ticket to myself

t up the > jira account. > > -regards > Manu Mathew > > From: Patrick Hunt > Date: Friday, March 11, 2022 at 12:10 PM > To: DevZooKeeper > Subject: Re: Can't assign jira ticket to myself > NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or

Re: Can't assign jira ticket to myself

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:12 AM Mathew, Manu wrote: > Hi, > > I have a fix for ClientX509Util keystore/truststore automatic reload, and > would like to contribute. > Going through the existing issues, I could see that > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3806 is already reported > fo

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 1

+1 - xsum/sig verified. Rat ran clean, compiled fine and I was able to run some manual clusters successfully. Regards, Patrick On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:32 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is the second release candidate for 3.8.0. > > It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new featu

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 1

The license file in the binary (which also comes from the src) doesn't match the jar version: -rw-r--r-- 1 phunt staff 327135 Jan 16 23:54 commons-io-2.11.0.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 phunt staff11359 Feb 25 00:47 commons-io-2.7.LICENSE.txt Is this something you want to fix, or not a releas

Re: Jira permission request

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:16 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Patrick, > > Il Lun 21 Feb 2022, 17:37 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > Actually we do have a "Contributor" role that allows eg jira assignment. > > > I missed this asset > No worries at all. I t

Re: Jira permission request

Actually we do have a "Contributor" role that allows eg jira assignment. I added Kezhu to the list. Regards, Patrick On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 5:05 PM Kezhu Wang wrote: > Hi Enrico, > > I will ping you at jira for issue assignment and discussion. > > Thanks. > > Best, > Kezhu Wang > > On Mon, F

Re: Moving 3.5 to EOL

ersion of ZooKeeper server is able to accept connections > > from > > clients as long as they don’t want to use new features. > > > > - Curator already supports later versions - Is it true for 3.6, 3.7? > > > > It’s February now, so if we nail down the above p

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 0

gt; > > > > Now I just re-run and this error disappeared, I assume nvd.nist.gov > was > > > > down for a while. > > > > Now the owasp is failing for me with this error: > > > > > > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > &

Re: Moving 3.5 to EOL

out to release 3.8.0 soon, so we’ll end up having four > versions in maintenance. What should we do with it to reduce the > maintenance cost? > > Andor > > > > > > On 2022. Feb 4., at 17:58, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andor Molna

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 0

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:36 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Any comments? > owasp is still red - as such I assumed this release candidate is on hold until that's fixed. Is that not the case? Patrick > > Il Ven 4 Feb 2022, 12:07 Enrico Olivelli ha > scritto: > > > This is a release candidate for

Re: Cutting 3.8.0 release

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 2:29 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il Ven 4 Feb 2022, 19:27 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > The branches, including 3.8.0, are still failing the owasp check due to > > netty-tcnative > > > > > https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/view/ZooKeeper/job

Re: Cutting 3.8.0 release

The branches, including 3.8.0, are still failing the owasp check due to netty-tcnative https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/view/ZooKeeper/job/zookeeper-multi-branch-owasp/job/branch-3.8.0/3/console I see this jira was closed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4462 and I can't find any other

Re: Moving 3.5 to EOL

an, > 2023)? > > Andor > > > > > On 2022. Feb 1., at 16:41, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > "LTS" typically has meaning for folks beyond just what the words say. JDK > > LTS. Ubuntu LTS. etc... I think it would be less confusing to stay with > the >

Re: Moving 3.5 to EOL

"LTS" typically has meaning for folks beyond just what the words say. JDK LTS. Ubuntu LTS. etc... I think it would be less confusing to stay with the stable/latest labels we have had in the past and plan ahead a bit in terms of giving notice when releases will be removed from support. Patrick On

Re: Logback

lf4j) whatever they want. Perhaps we could even ship "samples" for the various options if there is interest... Regards, Patrick > On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:57 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > ... > > > > I also see that there is interest (upstream/apache I mean) in > > resurrecting log4j1 - imo that could also be a good path for us. > > > > > > >

Re: Logback

Thanks Chris, et. al. I have been monitoring this thread already, but I appreciate you following up. :-) I checked out the log4j2 source repo as part of my remediation efforts inside my employer. tbh I was/am shocked at the amount of code and esp the number of dependencies, for something that shou

Re: ZooKeeper downloads and the new Apache CDN.

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:03 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Patrick, > > Il Gio 14 Ott 2021, 21:36 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > I just noticed this Apache post: > > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache-software-foundation-moves-to > > I h

ZooKeeper downloads and the new Apache CDN.

I just noticed this Apache post: https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache-software-foundation-moves-to I haven't been tracking such infra changes of late. However I do notice that our download page is impacted: https://zookeeper.apache.org/releases.html#download clicking on a release binar

Re: FYI: Snyk JVM Ecosystem Report 2021

ain/master/next/develop branches for Java projects should probably be > focusing on 11 or higher. > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 9:35 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > Questions come up every so often on what jvm versions we should > > support/test/etc... Granted this is la

FYI: Snyk JVM Ecosystem Report 2021

Questions come up every so often on what jvm versions we should support/test/etc... Granted this is larger than our community but I think it provides some useful insight: https://snyk.io/jvm-ecosystem-report-2021/ Regards, Patrick

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.3 candidate 2

+1 xsum/sig validate. rat ran clean. I ran dependency check and launched/tested a few different cluster sizes manually and they all ran fine. Patrick On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:19 AM Mohammad Arshad wrote: > This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.6.3. It fixes 52 issues, > including multiple

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.3 candidate 0

+1 xsum/sig validate. rat ran clean. I manually tested a few cluster sizes and everything worked fine for me (jdk11). Regards, Patrick On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 6:31 AM Mohammad Arshad wrote: > This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.6.3. It contains 51 fixes. > > The full release notes is avai

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 2

+1 xsum/sig validate. rat ran clean and I was able to compile (dep/cve check passed) and manual verification of a few different cluster sizes was successful. Regards, Patrick On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:06 AM Damien Diederen wrote: > > Greetings, all! > > After a long delay, here is a third rel

Re: write performance issue in 3.6.2

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 3:28 PM Li Wang wrote: > Hi Enrico, Sushant, > > I re-run the perf test with the data consistency check feature disabled > (i.e. -Dzookeeper.digest.enabled=false), the write performance issue of 3.6 > is still there. > > With everything exactly the same, the throughput of

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 1

+1. xsum/sig verified. rat ran clean. built and dependency checks are fine. Tried running some manual clusters and it was successful. Regards, Patrick On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 12:11 PM Damien Diederen wrote: > > Dear all, > > This is a second release candidate for ZooKeeper 3.7.0. Compared to

Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 0

> - Original Message - > From: Patrick Hunt > To: DevZooKeeper > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 0 > Date: 2021-01-23 05:09 > > +1 - xsum/sig validated. Compiles/runs fine on macos+jdk11. Verified some > larger ensemble sizes manually and it

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 0

+1 - xsum/sig validated. Compiles/runs fine on macos+jdk11. Verified some larger ensemble sizes manually and it worked ok. I looked at a few of the new features listed - they look great! I did notice some changes without documentation though (whoami eg), would be good for committers to ensure that

Re: ZooKeeper Operator

ueira wrote: > It sounds like a good idea to document it and add relevant pointers, Pat. > > -Flavio > > > On 18 Jan 2021, at 19:00, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > FYI: The awesome operator list has a few including Pravega: > > https://github.com/operator-framew

Re: ZooKeeper Operator

FYI: The awesome operator list has a few including Pravega: https://github.com/operator-framework/awesome-operators I've seen a few more while investigating kubebuilder, operator-sdk (rh) and the like: https://github.com/Ghostbaby/zookeeper-operator Perhaps the first thing we might consider is ad

Re: New committer: Justin Mao Ling

Kudos Justin! Patrick On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:10 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > Congratulations Maoling!!! :)) > > Regards, > Mate > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:48 AM Norbert Kalmar > wrote: > > > Congratulations Maoling! Well-deserved! > > > > - Norbert > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:43

Re: JIRA spammer

I deleted them. Thanks Christopher. Regards, Patrick On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:02 AM Christopher wrote: > Hi ZK Devs, > > I saw that a spammer had created a bunch of JIRA issues, between > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4059 and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEP

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.9 candidate 2

+1. verified sig/xsum. rat ran clean. compiled and ran a few manual tests successfully. Patrick On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:10 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.9. It contains 25 fixes, > including CVE fixes. > (Note: rc1 had a third party CVE which was only no

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.9 candidate 0

Thanks Damien! I reviewed and it looks good except for one small comment I hope we can also address (commented on PR). Regards, Patrick On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:05 PM Damien Diederen wrote: > > Hi Patrick, all, > > > -1 - the dependency check is failing with a known CVE > > > > $ mvn clean pa

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.9 candidate 0

More minor: I notice that ./zookeeper-server/src/main/resources/lib/jetty-client-9.4.34.v20201102.LICENSE.txt is included in the release even though the jar is no longer used. It should be removed. Regards, Patrick On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:53 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > -1 - the depende

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.9 candidate 0

-1 - the dependency check is failing with a known CVE $ mvn clean package -DskipTests dependency-check:check ... [ERROR] One or more dependencies were identified with vulnerabilities that have a CVSS score greater than or equal to '0.0': [ERROR] [ERROR] jetty-server-9.4.34.v20201102.jar: CVE-2020-

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Require JDK 11 to build for 3.7

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 9:03 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > As far as I know Hbase, Solr and Kafka are already Java 11 ready. > > IMHO contributors of those projects should also put efforts into moving > forward. > > We’re not saying that you _have_ to move to Java 11. > Staying on Java 8? No problem,

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Require JDK 11 to build for 3.7

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 8:04 AM Brent wrote: > As a slightly different consideration, if you look at the Long-Term Support > (LTS) roadmaps for Java, currently Java 8 is set to have full support until > 2030 from Oracle and at least 2026 from OpenJDK & Corretto: > > https://www.oracle.com/java/te

Re: [DISCUSS] Log4j2 in ZooKeeper

base (any project relying on zk) and then comparing the impact? Patrick > Regards, Tamaas > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:24 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 11:00 AM Tamas Penzes > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Log4j2 in ZooKeeper

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 11:00 AM Tamas Penzes wrote: > Hi All, > > I would open a discussion about log4j2 update. > Would we consider going up to log4j2 in a minor release (e.g. 3.7) or only > in a major one, like 4.0? > The latest log4j1 version (1.2.17) is really old and vulnerable, but log4j2 >

Re: CI build issues

andor/ > > Not so nice, but that’s what we have for now. > > Andor > > > > > On 2020. Sep 15., at 22:54, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:55 PM Andor Molnar wrote: > > > >> Hi Michael, > >> > >> I was w

Re: CI build issues

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:55 PM Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I was working on the CI migration and there’re still a few things which is > not available in the new system. I haven’t found any solution for the > “retest” trigger, but I’ll take another look tomorrow. I need to dig the > bu

Re: CI build issues

Also - how do we get the owasp check added back? Are we manually adding jobs through the UI or is there a new process? Patrick On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 2:02 PM Michael Han wrote: > Folks, > > I am seeing some CI build issues. Specifically: > > * Comment on github PR with "retest maven build" doe

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.2 candidate 1

+1. xsum/sig validate. RAT ran clean. Was able to build and do manual testing with various ensemble sizes successfully. lgtm. Patrick On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:01 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is a release candidate for 3.6.2. > > It is a minor release and it fixes a few critical issues and b

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

-) Patrick > Stay tuned > Enrico > > Il giorno ven 4 set 2020 alle ore 02:35 Michael Han ha > scritto: > > > Haven't fully tested the RC but I didn't experience any of the lag > through > > the cli. > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

t; > > >> Ted > >> The branch is release-3.6.2 and not 3.6.1 > >> Thanks foe testing > >> Enrico > >> > >> Il Gio 3 Set 2020, 19:50 Ted Dunning ha > scritto: > >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 a

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 5:19 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Patrick, > > Il giorno gio 3 set 2020 alle ore 08:48 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: > > > > > > > Il giorno mer 2 set 2020 alle ore 22:03 Patrick Hunt > > ha scritto:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

efore - likely resulting from the change to jline? Patrick On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:55 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > -1 - the license files are inconsistent for both jline and netty libraries. > > Patrick > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:35 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> This

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

-1 - the license files are inconsistent for both jline and netty libraries. Patrick On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:35 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is a release candidate for 3.6.2. > > It is a minor release and it fixes a few critical issues and brings a few > dependencies upgrades. > > The full

Re: jUnit5 migration review

What's the impact of such a change on projects incorporating//depending upon ZK test libraries? Is that still a thing? Patrick On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 2:32 PM Tamas Penzes wrote: > Hi All, > > If you have (a lot of) free time and would like to review my pull request I > would be over the sevent

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

adding jobs is > >>>>> > >>>>> https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/view/ZooKeeper/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Andor > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> This is an example from Apache Maven projec

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:47 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il Lun 20 Lug 2020, 18:41 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:20 PM Andor Molnar wrote: > > > > > Hi Pat, > > > > > > I have admin rights in the new system too and

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

the results. I've seen this before, I assume it's a feature of jenkins itself? Patrick > Andor > > > > > On 2020. Jul 17., at 2:51, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > I updated the job I linked earlier based on what's the latest on the > legacy >

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

ew jenkins plugins. That's just maven master though. Not sure about the rest. Can we do more of a "matrix" config in the new system vs cloning all the time? Patrick On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:31 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:22 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > &

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:22 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:56 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> FYI >> > > Fun. I do notice it says "Hadoop and related projects have their own > migration path to follow" - any insight o

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:56 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > FYI > Fun. I do notice it says "Hadoop and related projects have their own migration path to follow" - any insight on that? We are or are not lumped in? I would assume we are? This (eventual migration) came up a while back on the Hadoop

Re: An official API for starting ZooKeeper from a Java program

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:45 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il Gio 25 Giu 2020, 22:13 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:20 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > we recently got into ZOOKEEPER-3803 > FileTxnSnapL

Re: An official API for starting ZooKeeper from a Java program

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:20 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > we recently got into ZOOKEEPER-3803 FileTxnSnapLog.fastForwardFromEdits() > throws NPE if TestingServer is started from another thread (see [1]) > and I have similar cases in other non OS products that run ZooKeeper from > Java. > > T

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.8 candidate 0

+1. xsum/sig verified. rat ran clean. Compiled and ran various manual tests successfully. Patrick On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:03 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - release notes looks good, > - documentation looks good, > - licence files look good, > - run java unit tests on Java 8 & 11,

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 1

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:20 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno mer 22 apr 2020 alle ore 16:14 Norbert Kalmar > ha scritto: > > > Only thing I found is that the bin has netty-codec-4.1.49 license file > > while the jar included is 4.1.48. I think the license version has a typo > in > > the bu

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 1

+1. xsum/sig verified. compiled fine and I was able to run some manual test successfully. lgtm Patrick On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:16 PM Christopher wrote: > +1 (non-binding); overall, looks great! > > Good: > * Source tarball matches tag (git sha1 at > 104dcb3e3fb464b30c5186d229e00af9f332524b) >

Re: Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

3.6 branch. PR #1314 has been updated to address the same > > issues and more for master/3.7 > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 11:47 Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > > I can take a look. Does this need to go into just 3.6.1 or other > branches > > > as well? The JIRA

Re: Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

gt; > ** git commit hashes don't match up with the branch > (commits > >> > >>>> appear > >> > >>>> > > cherry-picked and exclude ZOOKEEPER-3726, mentioned above) > >> > >>>> > > > >> > >>>> > This is

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

+1 - xsum/sig validated, rat ran clean, I was able to compile and ran some manual tests on varying cluster sizes. Patrick On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:44 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is a release candidate for 3.6.1. > > It is a bugfix release and it introduces a few bugfixes and new features

Re: No tag for 3.6.0?

etching tags for some reason. > I did `git fetch --tags`, then `git tag --delete $(git tag)`, then > `git remote update` and it worked. > So weird. Sorry for the noise. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:44 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > Christopher - I believe it's r

Re: No tag for 3.6.0?

Christopher - I believe it's release-3.6.0 - I have it from either gh or apache gitbox, eg: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.6.0 Patrick On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 6:26 PM Christopher wrote: > Hi ZK Devs, > > I don't see a tag for 3.6.0 in git. Is there one available that hasn't

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

I notice that the owasp check is failing due to netty: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3794 doesn't seem super critical but might be worth knocking off if we're still not ready to create an RC: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:5.3.0:check (default-cli

Re: Contribs as separate git repos

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Answers inline > > Il Gio 9 Apr 2020, 05:28 Christopher ha scritto: > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:01 PM Damien Diederen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Christopher, > > > > > > > I am just curious if anybody has thought about, or perhap

Re: [DISCUSS] Sending 3.4 release line to End-Of-Life status

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:59 PM Christopher wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:57 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:14 PM Christopher wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:20 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: ZooKeeper snapCount Tuning

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:19 AM David Mollitor wrote: > Hello Community, > > The configuration zookeeper.snapCount defaults to a value of 100,000 and > has been at this default for 11 years now. > > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/e87bad6774e7269ef21a156aff9dad089ef54794/zookeeper-serve

Re: [DISCUSS] Sending 3.4 release line to End-Of-Life status

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:14 PM Christopher wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:20 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:15 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > > > > > Alright. Not sure how to coordinate this properly, let’s try to discuss > > > the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Mate Szalay-Beko

Kudos Mate! Patrick On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 3:07 AM tison wrote: > Kudos Mate! > > Best, > tison. > > > Tamas Penzes 于2020年4月3日周五 下午5:53写道： > > > Congrats Mate! > > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020, 10:42 Andor Molnar wrote: > > > > > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Mate a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >