** Summary **
"" HTML tag and "Link: rel=preload" HTTP response
header are a web technology allowing web developers to tell the browser
to early load and pre-cache resources that will be used by the currently
loading web page, specifically scripts, stylesheets, images, fonts and
fetch (for
This might be a cookie isolation, or something missing to recognize if
the cookie storage is allowed for the channel. Is the `userContextId`
the same all the time? If yes, can you capture a log with
nsHttp:5,cookie:5? Checking browser console for errors may tell you
something too.
CC'ing
There is no official or standardized way to "force" authentication,
because this is really a non-standard thing you do.
I would more suggest a login request path like
"https://foo.com/login.php; or whatever scripting is used, that would
return 401 with the challenge response header.
On 2019-09-10 15:45, john.bieling--- via dev-platform wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I do not want to manually add a `Authentication` request header, as I also do
not know what methods are allowed without having seen the WWW-Authentication
header (and just trying basic auth is not an option
Hi,
adding a custom `Authentication` request header is the right way to do
this. Not sure what you mean by "I want nsIHttpChannel to do all the
auth stuff" when it doesn't know it has to authenticate to the site. We
need a 401 response to produce and cache `Authentication` request
headers
On 2019-09-05 23:14, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
Yeah, let's not add a new prefix please.
I don't like aFoo either, though it's everywhere so consistency is
better than nothing :/.
That being said, it shouldn't be hard to write some clang plugin or
such that automatically renames function
Bug 1574882 has landed and will ship in Firefox 70. Our XPCOM (MOZ_LOG
driven) log files now all have .moz_log extension. The extension cannot
be changed.
-hb-
On 2019-08-19 18:59, Honza Bambas wrote:
I'm about to land a patch that will automatically add `mozlog`
extension to all log
I'm about to land a patch that will automatically add `mozlog` extension
to all log files from all processes produced with MOZ_LOG/_FILE env
vars, command line args or via about:networking#logging. It **will
not** be possible to remove that extension by setting custom extensions,
like
./mach python-test testing/xpcshell/selftest.py
-hb-
On 2019-04-12 20:48, Honza Bambas wrote:
After I installed all the necessary packages (mozinfo, mozunit,
pytest, mozbuild, which, mach, mozversioncontrol) I'm getting:
`mozbuild.base.BuildEnvironmentNotFoundException: Could not find
Mozilla
After I installed all the necessary packages (mozinfo, mozunit, pytest,
mozbuild, which, mach, mozversioncontrol) I'm getting:
`mozbuild.base.BuildEnvironmentNotFoundException: Could not find Mozilla
source tree or build environment.`
mozinfo.json is missing in my tree, here I got stuck.
This sounds great! One nit - could this be done also for unit
(xpcshell) tests? good examples are in netwerk/test/unit/ and unit_ipc/.
Thanks!
-hb-
On 2019-04-01 20:54, Jared Hirsch wrote:
This sounds great! I land features in the tree periodically, but
infrequently enough to forget lots of
Damn you, reply-to field :) Sorry for spam everyone! Intended to
Sylvestre only.
-hb-
On 2019-03-12 12:50, Honza Bambas wrote:
Hi, replying privately, because I want to expose some crazy idea I had
a long time and this seems like a good opportunity.
I miss two things in bugzilla from
Hi, replying privately, because I want to expose some crazy idea I had a
long time and this seems like a good opportunity.
I miss two things in bugzilla from the developer point of view:
- when I use it as a tool to look into the code's history (understand
changes made in the past)
- and be
On 2018-12-07 04:23, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:10 PM Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Can someone elaborate on what this means for debugging on Windows, and
for our onboarding story on Windows?
At least in terms of stepping through, examining variables, etc.,
clang-cl is on par with
On 2018-11-29 17:49, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> No, I didn't. :-) That's exactly what the hg-formatsource extension
does for you, it reformats your local changes on the fly as the rebase
is in progress, so you will get no collisions.
\o/
No, those are old days and long gone, my friend. We
On 2018-11-29 17:12, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:00 AM Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/29/18 7:38 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
This extension will automatically rebase the local changes to avoid
conflicts.
Sylvestre,
Will it also update mq patches, or just in-repo commits?
I
On 2018-11-20 15:38, john.bieling--- via dev-platform wrote:
For me it would be interesting to understand, if you consider the header send
by contacts.icloud.com to by invalid, even though it fully complies with the
spec
Our implementation reflects the reality we can see in the wild. I
On 2018-11-20 10:31, john.bieling--- via dev-platform wrote:
@Anne van Kesteren
Solved that by checking getRequestHeader("Authorization") in case of 401 and if
that is missing, I know nsIHttpChannel did not try to authenticate.
First, I can confirm that we expect multiple authentication
On 2018-09-27 17:19, Aaron Klotz wrote:
* If you use Visual Studio, you may install the Child Process
Debugging Power Tool [3] which, once configured, will make the VS
debugger automagically attach to the launcher's child processes.
I'm using "Spawned Process Catcher X" that works better, but
On 2018-04-18 19:13, David Teller wrote:
No plans yet, but it's a good idea. The only reason not to do this (that
I can think of) is that we might prefer switching to the Bytecode Cache,
which would probably give us even better speed ups.
I understand that we can't use the Bytecode Cache for
On 8/31/17 8:00 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
Maybe this is stylesheet delay is related to Context Driven Priority
(CDP) project that changes how network requests are prioritized?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=CDP
CSS preload requests (made by html parser when is hit) are left
tl;dr: if you need to analyze a log file (MOZ_LOG), you may want to make
it easy with https://janbambas.cz/moz/logan/
Long version: have a 1TB log to dive into? Yeah.. been there :) So,
couple months back I started to work on a log analyzer that would make
filtering and reading large,
On 8/13/17 6:42 PM, Ed Morley wrote:
For the short term, Nightly users therefore have the following options:
a) Use latest nightly with legacy extensions disabled, and make do without
their extensions.
There is also a2): find webext based alternatives "by hand" (what I have
done and intend to
What you are looking for sounds pretty much like my Backtrack project
[1]. It's still under development, tho, but I have strong motivations
to move it forward in Q4/17. The goal of Backtrack is exactly what you
are looking for - find the right scheduling prioritization. It's said
we don't
is purpose.
Cheers,
Botond
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Honza Bambas <hbam...@mozilla.com> wrote:
In light of using PRxx formatting macros from inttypes.h, what is the right
approach to printf size_t types (like our nsTArray::Length()) ?
Not sure if to use "%zu&qu
In light of using PRxx formatting macros from inttypes.h, what is the
right approach to printf size_t types (like our nsTArray::Length()) ?
Not sure if to use "%zu" directly.
Thanks.
-hb-
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
tl;dr: protocol handlers no longer set the LOAD_REPLACE flag, instead
set loadInfo.resultPrincipalURI to channel.URI to change the address bar
displayed URL.
More details in bug 1319111 [1].
In a bit more details - state BEFORE:
- The URL used for the result principal of the document (and
Use NS_NAMED_LITERAL_CSTRING, see [1] for plenty of examples.
-hb-
[1]
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=NS_NAMED_LITERAL_CSTRING=false
On 7/4/17 3:47 PM, Dexter wrote:
Hi everyone!
Could you tell me please, how I can clearly convert char ()[N] to
nsACString?
I tried
I have a very similar setup, with even way more exceptions added, but
none of them has the desired effect. Unfortunately, the only way to make
MsMpEng shut up is to disable run-time protection completely for the
time of the build. I think it's a bug in Defender.
On a 20 core system it saves
Thanks for bringing this up here, Ehsan.
I have to concur. For more then just trivial patches I usually ask for
a description of the patch in bugzilla - the commit message is usually
not enough. Anything that can help the review by understanding the
intention and structure of the patch
I presume that when a test is disabled a bug is filed and triaged within
the responsible team as any regular bug. Only that way we don't forget
and push on fixing it and returning back to the wheel.
Are there also some data or stats how often tests having a strong orange
factor catch actual
Few questions:
- Are there any plans on a higher contrast version of the new UI?
Honestly, having titles overs comments light gray on a light gray
background is at least pretty sad. Also citations are again gray making
navigation among comments pretty hard just making my eyes more tired.
-
Thanks everyone for answers. This is helpful, but why don't I see any
help like this right on DXR? Why do I have to ask on dev-platform?
According identifiers not found on DXR I presume MXR might suffered the
same issue, so no blame for DXR here. I was just confused by not being
able to
Today I tried to search for an identifier on DXR. Something that was so
easy with MXR...
I wanted to find usage of a member called "io_pending". Typing that
string to the DXR search field gives me a number of results that are
definitely not what I'm looking for, like lines containing
On 8/8/2016 15:35, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/8/16 9:02 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
Would that make it harder for people to jump into some file directly via
history (or awesome bar)?
I _think_ the suggestion is as follows:
When you click a link to a particular line in dxr, that would normally
On 5/21/2016 2:36, Ben Kelly wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Ben Kelly <bke...@mozilla.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ben Kelly <bke...@mozilla.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Honza Bambas <hbam...@mozilla.com>
wrote:
And I do! :) A
On 5/19/2016 17:04, Ben Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
FYI, I've landed a new IPDL type in bug 1093357 called IPCStream. This is
intended to make it easier to serialize nsIInputStreams across IPC.
In short, IPCStream:
1) Supports our existing serializable nsInputStreams.
2) Also automatically handles
On 3/21/2016 18:17, Nicholas Alexander wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Honza Bambas <hbam...@mozilla.com> wrote:
tl;dr: Start migrating to use of MOZ_LOG_* instead of NSPR_LOG_*. Don't
worry about backward compatibility tho, when MOZ_LOG_* is not set, we
fallback to NSPR_LOG_*
tl;dr: Start migrating to use of MOZ_LOG_* instead of NSPR_LOG_*. Don't
worry about backward compatibility tho, when MOZ_LOG_* is not set, we
fallback to NSPR_LOG_* values.
The longer version:
Since the new logging code sits in XPCOM and has no longer anything to
do with NSPR and NSPR
On 1/28/2016 6:30, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
Honza Bambas writes:
On 1/25/2016 20:23, Steve Fink wrote:
For navigation, there's a list of changed files at the top
(below the fixed summary pane) that jumps to per-file anchors.
Not good enough for review process.
Are you saying you want tabs
Do we have any agenda for extensions? I'm using FireGestures and it's
broken since this has landed, just shouting out a lot of "unsafe CPOW
usage" (missing the "forbidden" tho).
Is the action here limited to just file a bug on the add-on side to fix
this or can we do anything on our side? (I
On 1/26/2016 16:46, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 1/26/2016 10:26 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/26/16 7:38 AM, Axel Hecht wrote:
Which is basically what I do whenever I want to do something. I have a
clear idea and intention on what I want to show up on bugzilla, but not
on what to do on
Writing both as a patch author and a reviewer as well.
- as a patch author I want a full control on when the patch actually
lands (dependencies, any other timing reasons, that only the author
knows the best), "Don't land yet" comment somewhere will easily be
overlooked
- as a reviewer I don't
Nice idea although unfortunately incomplete. On Windows this has no
effect at all. We cannot use it for common users. When you set the
pref, it logs only to the debug output that can be captured only with
visual studio or similar software being attached. Not something to ask
for a common
On 1/15/2016 21:02, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2016-01-15 2:21 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
Has anyone measured recently whether there's still a significant perf
win to making IIDs 32-bit? If we stop using them as a versioning tool,
we could potentially relax our uniqueness requirements, and save a lot
On 10/30/2015 2:35, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2015-10-29 9:47 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
The main thread of the current chrome/content process.
Indeed, animations are one of my two use cases, the other one being
user-input latency, but I'm almost sure I know how to deal with the
On 7/29/2015 22:51, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Honza Bambas wrote:
I've recently introduced a class making parsing string inputs much
safer and simpler.
http://www.janbambas.cz/string-parsing-made-simple-with-mozillatokenizer/
Nice! How does it act when hitting 64bit
On 7/29/2015 19:40, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
I've recently introduced a class making parsing string inputs much safer and
simpler. Please see xpcom/ds/Tokenizer.h. It's simplification of a lexical
analyzer and it successfully
I've recently introduced a class making parsing string inputs much safer
and simpler. Please see xpcom/ds/Tokenizer.h. It's simplification of a
lexical analyzer and it successfully hides boundary checks on the input
buffer from consumers. From now on this simple parser class should be
used
On 7/18/2015 1:42, Kyle Huey wrote:
To be abundantly clear, no I/O should be happening (or is, to my knowledge)
on the main thread when you use XHR. The limitation today is that various
Necko state operations (e.g. opening a channel) can only happen on the main
thread.
The main offenders here
On 7/8/2015 3:08, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Jeff Gilbert jgilb...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Eric Rahm er...@mozilla.com wrote:
I'm not a huge fan of the 'aFoo' style, but I am a huge fan of
consistency. So if we want to change the style
On 7/7/2015 19:38, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/7/15 11:49 AM, Mike Conley wrote:
I suspect that knowing what things were passed into a method or function
is something that can be divined via static analysis.
Aren't there tools for our (admittedly varied) editors / IDEs
And debuggers. And dxr
On 7/7/2015 21:27, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
I'm strongly against removing the prefix. I got used to this and it has
its meaning all the time I inspect code (even my own) and doing reviews.
Recognizing a variable is an argument
I'm strongly against removing the prefix. I got used to this and it has
its meaning all the time I inspect code (even my own) and doing
reviews. Recognizing a variable is an argument is very very useful.
It's important to have it and it's good we enforce it!
-hb-
On 7/7/2015 5:12, Jeff
with the prefix, whereas otherwise I would
have to step backwards through each frame to see where the variable is
coming from. I'll probably find some way to adapt if we remove the
prefix though.
kats
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
I'm strongly against removing
On 4/30/2015 2:08, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
Just let you know about my intensive work on Backtrack or Caller Chain
which is about connecting Gecko Profiler and Task Tracer together to catch
all (instrumented) inter-object
Just let you know about my intensive work on Backtrack or Caller
Chain which is about connecting Gecko Profiler and Task Tracer together
to catch all (instrumented) inter-object and inter-thread calls + IO
blocking, lock waits, queuing, event (nsIRunnable) dispatches, network
query/response
One more place:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1147921
-hb-
On 3/26/2015 16:14, Patrick McManus wrote:
good catch.. looking at
https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/ident?i=NS_SOCKETTRANSPORTSERVICE_CONTRACTID
the only uses I see other than the one Ehsan unearthed are
On 7/8/2014 21:23, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David Rajchenbach-Teller schrieb:
5. Upon the next restart, display a bottom doorhanger on all windows
Firefox or an add-on encountered a problem [a few seconds ago / on July
4rd, 2014] and recovered. If you wish, Firefox can report it
automatically so
Hi all,
yesterday we have landed a patch that switches the pref to use the new
HTTP cache (bug 913806). It is enabled for all infra tests, talos and
Nightly users.
In case of any catastrophic problems it's easy to switch back (nothing
more then flipping the pref back). So far we know
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way, this is more obvious that we might not be doing the right
things, as long as we are careful to refuse AtomicHandler references
in reviews.
I personally don't think this
On 4/2/2014 5:24 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:03:53PM +0200, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way, this is more obvious that we might not be doing the right
things
On 2/21/2014 7:31 AM, Yuan Xulei(袁徐磊) wrote:
That's really good!
I'm looking forward to eclipse project generation feature.
+1
-hb-
PS: Gregory, thanks for your work on VS project generation! It's a
pretty good stuff.
___
dev-platform mailing
On 2/19/2014 11:25 PM, Neil wrote:
Is the conversion straightforward?
The API is mostly similar, we've took it more as a chance for a cleanup
since some modification were necessary anyway.
In particular, the API calls I'm interested in:
1. Given an HTTP or FTP URI, return the size of
On 2/20/2014 7:01 PM, Neil wrote:
Honza Bambas wrote:
On 2/19/2014 11:25 PM, Neil wrote:
In particular, the API calls I'm interested in:
1. Given an HTTP or FTP URI, return the size of the cached data
How do you do that now? Only way known to me (with the old cache is
visit of a cache
On 2/20/2014 10:25 PM, Neil wrote:
Well, that was confusing.
The old contract ID was @mozilla.org/network/cache-service;1
The new contract ID is @mozilla.org/netwerk/cache-storage-service;1
Turns out that there are two differences, not one.
Yes, forgot to mention, sorry. Hoped it's obvious
On 2/19/2014 11:09 PM, Neil wrote:
Honza Bambas wrote:
On 2/19/2014 1:56 AM, Neil wrote:
Where can I find documentation for the new necko cache? So far I've
only turned up some draft planning documents. In particular, I
understand that there is a preference to toggle the cache. What does
An optional /* @reviewer: m...@foo.com */ comment under the license would
do. If not present, find reviewer the usual way (not always hitting the
right person).
Reason is that despite we have peer lists, sometimes files are
written/maintained by non-peers of the module a file is in or should
Hi all,
I've just landed a simple patch that allows you to setup NSPR log
modules to get an NSPR log from a try push.
Instructions:
* Open the script file testing/mochitest/runtests.py
* Search for NSPR_LOG_MODULES = , should look as:
# Set the desired log modules you want an
On 12/6/2013 6:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I was talking about filing a bug where we would take the patch that
you attached to the previous email. I don't think any of those bugs
that you referenced is the right place to do that.
Cheers,
Ehsan
My patch is probably not something that should
On 12/6/2013 7:24 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 12/6/2013, 1:19 PM, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 12/6/2013 6:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I was talking about filing a bug where we would take the patch that
you attached to the previous email. I don't think any of those bugs
that you referenced
On 11/28/2013 12:56 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
As many of you know, Session Restore is something of a performance hog,
for many reasons – we have reports of. One of the reasons is that we
store so very many things in sessionstore.js and sometimes keep stuff
for a very long time.
As
On 7/10/2013 3:09 PM, smaug wrote:
Splitting patches is usually useful, but having a patch containing all
the changes can be also good.
If you have a set of 20-30 patches, but not a patch which contains all
the changes, it is often hard to see the big picture.
Again, perhaps some tool could
On 5/16/2013 8:12 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
A dependency system for startup/shutdown isn't free. It's going to
have runtime cost, and it's going to make the code more complicated.
Given the fact that we've managed to get by just fine without one for
years, I think we should continue to do
If you guys don't need transactions and only a simple key+value storage,
the new localstorage code be used. Only thing needed to make it work in
a completely non-blocking way is to expose API telling the consumer that
localstorage has loaded from disk and is fully cached in memory and thus
Thanks for bringing this up Mike. True is that our appcache
implementation and APIs a bit suck. But good news is that it is going
to be much better with APIs being currently newly proposed and discussed
for Necko's disk cache (so far, privately, soon it will open).
To answer your issue:
This new method provides much lower performance hit time interval where
high precision timing is not needed. Implemented in bug 827287, landed
on m-c today.
On the Windows platform it gives resolution of aprox 16ms, using
GetTickCount() which is by a magnitude cheaper to call then
On 1/7/2013 1:40 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Probably. I'd suggest adding a TimeStamp::LowResNow() as an alias for
Now() and filing a bug about getting a cheaper implementation of that
function on Windows. FWIW, Chrome has something similar to this as
well. -Jeff
I was recently talking about
On 11/30/2012 8:25 AM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
On Nov 29, 11:15 pm, Honza Bambas hbam...@mozilla.com wrote:
You may QI the channel to nsIApplicationCacheChannel and check for
loadedFromApplicationCache attribute.
ok, works for me, thanks.
I'm just interested in how you recognize a bfcache
Hi all,
I'm completely re-implementing localStorage (and sessionStorage)
implementation to be simpler and faster.
One of features of the new code is a way to start async background cache
preload as soon as we know global window is going to load a content page.
The question is: where is a
On 11/21/2012 4:06 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/21/12 9:50 AM, Honza Bambas wrote:
The question is: where is a good place where nsGlobalWindow already
knows its associated principal to trigger the preload?
Outer window, or inner window?
The same window localStorage getter is called on, so
On 11/8/2012 12:26 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 11/7/12 12:00 PM, Honza Bambas wrote:
Hi all. I'd like to ask for help.
tl;dr: a new JS component needs to be accessible by xpcshell and
mochitest, how to do that?
It's not clear to me why this needs to be a component. Since we
already have
Few reasons:
- I really don't believe we will soon/ever have a good OOP Firefox
implementation
- content JS execution very often kills my Firefox UI (and it is not I/O
that blocks)
- sync APIs like localStorage would not block the UI
- content JS GC would stop blocking UI as well
- generally
Hi all. I'd like to ask for help.
tl;dr: a new JS component needs to be accessible by xpcshell and
mochitest, how to do that?
Details:
I'm introducing a new JS implemented component that is used to control
ssltunnel (a part of our testing infrastructure). I want test harnesses
use it.
On 9/28/2012 12:58 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:45:24AM -0400, Benoit Jacob wrote:
2012/9/28 Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
I actually held out on you with the initial landing of mach: there is more
On 8/2/2012 3:19 PM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
According to the MDN here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Observer_Notifications#HTTP_requests
HTTP-ON-EXAMINE-MERGED-RESPONSE is:
called *instead* of http-on-examine-response when a response will be
read partially from cache, and partially from
86 matches
Mail list logo
