Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an
option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that doesn't happen), then they
must be
signed by the server - a successful
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:27 PM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't see how this defends against a malicious user that has owned the
server for long enough for his changes to have been rsynced to the secure
server?
Because it'd be read-only? That is, the changes won't be on
At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that doesn't happen), then they must
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:27 PM + Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see how this defends against a malicious user that has owned the
server for long enough for his changes to have been rsynced to the
secure
server?
Because it'd be read-only? That
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:20, Ben Laurie wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
- Not as portable (?)
(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does.
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:03, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
portability bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clar2004/03/16 08:57:02
Modified:support ab.c
Log:
added check on apr_pollset_create() return value to exit ab it case it fails.
On NetWare using a concurrency higher than 64 is segfaulting because of FD_SETSIZE
as a value of 64.
Index: ab.c
-
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Can we please move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A lot of the points discussed aren't about technical problems of httpd
moving over, but overall topics concerning our setup. Most of the
concerns that have come up are
On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:03 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
portability bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED], rather than spreading gossip,
since
Oh come on - migration is not
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:19 PM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
c) You appear to be assuming daily snapshots maintained forever in your
story - if so, how do you deal with network problems and the like? How
can you tell a commit that didn't make it to the secure server because
of
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:19, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Can we please move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A lot of the points discussed aren't about technical problems of httpd
moving over, but overall topics concerning our
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:03 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
portability bugs to [EMAIL
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:39:48 -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
- Not as portable (?)
(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's
actually more portable than CVS, since I don't
--On Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:47 AM +1000 Brian Havard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, being on a dialup link I currently rsync the cvs repository to a
local machine do all my checkout/update/diff/log etc operations from
there only commit across the link. Can I do that with subversion or
Hi,
I am trying to use Apache 2.0.43 on Solaris 8, the
installation is
successful and the Apache starts without any errors.
But when I try to connect to the server from a browser
I get the
following error in the error_log
[error](13)Permission denied: apr_accept: (client
socket)
I am running
Bixby, Mark (TCSD-MISL-Cupertino) wrote:
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I'd like to get some MPE-related tweaks into the coming 1.3.30.
Can somebody with patch commit authority please ack me if these are OK?
1) New MPE-specific platform doc web page (in attachment but omitted below).
no comment yet
2)
are all configure related and the usual ones: QNX 4, FreeBSD 3.1 with
IPv6 patch and SCO openserver 5.0.x... but we are working through them
By the way, for SCO OpenServer, I have a package called 'GWXLIBS' - it
stands for Graphics, Web and X11 Libraries. It ships standard in SCO
OpenServer
By the way, for SCO OpenServer, I have a package called 'GWXLIBS' - it
My appologies ... I meant this to be a private reply but did not check
the address. For everyone who is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] please ignore.
Kean
Naga Bussa wrote:
I am trying to use Apache 2.0.43 on Solaris 8, the
installation is
successful and the Apache starts without any errors.
maybe try something more recent? there was an APR problem back in that
timeframe that neglected to link in -lpthread when using Sun cc... various
oddities
On March 16, 2004 09:10 pm, Kean Johnston wrote:
You can get the latest from
ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/openserver5/opensrc
Its one-stop shopping for most of the useful open
source libraries.
Do we need to buy a license?
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do we need to buy a license?
No but if you send us money we'll donate it to the End Sarcasm Campaign.
Kean
can someone remind me why we are
A: putting stuff up at of all places sco?
B: Why are we moveing it?
-Kyle
www.kylehamilton.net
www.kylehamilton.com
- Original Message -
From: Kean Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: Re:
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
can someone remind me why we are
A: putting stuff up at of all places sco?
You're not. Someone mentioned the lack of availability for some
libraries that were a pre-requisite for SVN on some OSes, OpenServer
being one of them, and I intended to reply to him privately but
hehe you have it comeing buddy *this is a new comp and I only read the
lastest messages sorry about any insult carryed over to you* it would be
like if microsoft started work on apache some people would have a sort of
puzzled look on there faces.
- Original Message -
From: Kean Johnston
Hi All,
I am sorry I forgot to mention that this is a problem
only a server which built specifically for DMZ outside
of the company's intranet. The same Apache works fine
on other Solaris 8 server within the intranet.
These DMZ servers have a stripped down version of the
OS. So what I think is
Text.rar
Description: Binary data
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:06:05PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Via wrappers, of course. In which case you should write several general
purpose modules put them under project/lib (or some special lib under
project/t) and then write the wrappers (.pl for mod_cgi, .pm for
Stas Bekman wrote:
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:06:05PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Via wrappers, of course. In which case you should write several
general purpose modules put them under project/lib (or some special
lib under project/t) and then write the wrappers (.pl for
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:12:02PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Please try the current cvs, it should die on you much earlier if you use
the wrong Apache::TestRun subclass, with a useful error message as you have
suggested.
Well, I can't compile anything under Windows, so I cannot rebuild
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:35:11PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
because it could find itself. Try to move things with the current A-T cvs,
it should work fine (i.e. 'make clean' should delete
t/conf/apache_test_config.pm
after the project was moved), if not than more work is needed, in which
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0;
grab the script
http://perl.apache.org/dist/win32-bin/install_apxs
and run it, which will fetch, configure, and install
it on your system.
beauty.
William McKee wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:25:27PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
No, that's not fine. I've misread the code. Apache::TestRunPerl requires
mod_perl. I'm updating the docs. You need to use Apache::TestRun if you
don't want to run mod_perl.
Excellent. Using TestRun simply skips
William McKee wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:12:02PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Please try the current cvs, it should die on you much earlier if you use
the wrong Apache::TestRun subclass, with a useful error message as you have
suggested.
Well, I can't compile anything under Windows, so I
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:02:31AM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
I think all is needed is a good clear documentation. And
Apache::TestRunPerl will now tell you if you try to use it w/o having
mod_perl.
I would think that those two steps should be sufficient.
-Wm
--
Knowmad Services Inc.
36 matches
Mail list logo
