As subject says, I'll be packaging a 0.10 RC today for T&R.
With regards,
Daniel.
Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
The tree can be inspected at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/tree/a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8
+1 from me
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 10:04 Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>
> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
>
> The tree can be inspected at
>
> https://github.c
On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>
> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
>
> The tree can be inspected at
> https://github.com/apache/incu
+1 as committer and IPMC member. Nice to see a new (formal) release!
--
- Shane
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
Daniel Gruno wrote on 2/9/18 5:03 AM:
> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>
> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
> branc
On 09/02/2018 11:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
The tree can be inspected at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/tree
On 02/09/2018 12:38 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>>
>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
>> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
>>
>> The tree can be i
+1 ship all the ponies
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:04 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>
> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
>
> The tree can be inspected at
>
> h
On 9 February 2018 at 13:52, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 12:38 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>>>
>>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
>>> branch with commit hash a8ea8a04
These are the sigs for the vote:
MD5: 065197e47fc8854d030b1a67104a827b
SHA256: d1d09334b6890e76733f8a3996ce573a4b3609582c0298a7912df969f4799b79
It's all in version control, so you can correlate the vote if need be.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 02/09/2018 04:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 February 2018 at
On 9 February 2018 at 15:05, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> These are the sigs for the vote:
> MD5: 065197e47fc8854d030b1a67104a827b
> SHA256: d1d09334b6890e76733f8a3996ce573a4b3609582c0298a7912df969f4799b79
Thanks.
> It's all in version control, so you can correlate the vote if need be.
I don't think t
On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>
> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
>
> The tree can be inspected at
> https://github.com/apache/incu
On 02/09/2018 04:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>>
>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
>> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
>>
>> The tree can be i
I'm also +1 binding btw.
On 02/09/2018 02:55 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> +1 ship all the ponies
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:04 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>>
>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
>> branch with commit ha
On 9 February 2018 at 15:40, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 04:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>>>
>>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
>>> branch with commit hash a8ea8a04
On 02/09/2018 05:07 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> Not so; a release must be capable of being built *and tested*.
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
>
> Whilst the code currently has very few tests, there are some, and
> users should be able to run them.
That's a matter of i
On 9 February 2018 at 16:17, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 05:07 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>>
>> Not so; a release must be capable of being built *and tested*.
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
>>
>> Whilst the code currently has very few tests, there are some, and
>
17 matches
Mail list logo