Intent to T&R 0.10 later today

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
As subject says, I'll be packaging a 0.10 RC today for T&R. With regards, Daniel.

[VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. The tree can be inspected at https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/tree/a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Ulises
+1 from me On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 10:04 Daniel Gruno wrote: > Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! > > This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 > branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. > > The tree can be inspected at > > https://github.c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! > > This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 > branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. > > The tree can be inspected at > https://github.com/apache/incu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Shane Curcuru
+1 as committer and IPMC member. Nice to see a new (formal) release! -- - Shane https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources Daniel Gruno wrote on 2/9/18 5:03 AM: > Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! > > This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 > branc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 09/02/2018 11:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. The tree can be inspected at https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/tree

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 02/09/2018 12:38 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! >> >> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 >> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. >> >> The tree can be i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread John D. Ament
+1 ship all the ponies On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:04 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! > > This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 > branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. > > The tree can be inspected at > > h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2018 at 13:52, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 02/09/2018 12:38 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! >>> >>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 >>> branch with commit hash a8ea8a04

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
These are the sigs for the vote: MD5: 065197e47fc8854d030b1a67104a827b SHA256: d1d09334b6890e76733f8a3996ce573a4b3609582c0298a7912df969f4799b79 It's all in version control, so you can correlate the vote if need be. With regards, Daniel. On 02/09/2018 04:00 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 February 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2018 at 15:05, Daniel Gruno wrote: > These are the sigs for the vote: > MD5: 065197e47fc8854d030b1a67104a827b > SHA256: d1d09334b6890e76733f8a3996ce573a4b3609582c0298a7912df969f4799b79 Thanks. > It's all in version control, so you can correlate the vote if need be. I don't think t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! > > This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 > branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. > > The tree can be inspected at > https://github.com/apache/incu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 02/09/2018 04:29 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! >> >> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 >> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8. >> >> The tree can be i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
I'm also +1 binding btw. On 02/09/2018 02:55 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 ship all the ponies > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:04 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! >> >> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 >> branch with commit ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2018 at 15:40, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 02/09/2018 04:29 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 February 2018 at 10:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks! >>> >>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10 >>> branch with commit hash a8ea8a04

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 02/09/2018 05:07 PM, sebb wrote: > > Not so; a release must be capable of being built *and tested*. > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages > > Whilst the code currently has very few tests, there are some, and > users should be able to run them. That's a matter of i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2018 at 16:17, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 02/09/2018 05:07 PM, sebb wrote: > >> >> Not so; a release must be capable of being built *and tested*. >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages >> >> Whilst the code currently has very few tests, there are some, and >