Re: December 2015 Report

ined via git log --pretty=oneline > --since=2015-11-02 | wc -l) > > > Deron > > > Thanks Deron, I have updated the report to the Incubator wiki page https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2015 -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Runtime package refactoring

all the file content changes as a second git commit (imports, docs, javadocs, etc) - Create a full build to make sure there is no breakages - Let the team review to make sure we are not loosing history on the files or something similar. Thanks -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~

SystemML github mirror is behind one commit

. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Runtime package refactoring

he following : - Perform the refactor on your own fork (not on apache git) - Move the files as one git commit - Do all the file content changes as a second git commit (imports, docs, javadocs, etc) - Create a full build to make sure there is no breakages - Let the team review to make sure we are not loosi

Re: SystemML Committer Git Guide

." to the end of a commit message and > then push to Apache, GitHub will automatically close pull request 4, and > the commit will contain a link to that pull request. > > > --- > > > Cheers! > > > - Mike > > > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Maven profiles for distributions

ution" profile ? mvn clean package -P distribution Thoughts ? [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/6 -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Next SystemML Release

l.*) Since the > > > project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to > > > make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This > > > affects all Java files in the project. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > >

Re: Incubator logo on project website

n the apache-website-template, we got most of the guidelines from free, the missing one, which is optional, is the incubator logo... I will see if I can incorporate in the template to resolve this issue for us. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Cleanup SparkTC/systemml repository

uot; is still referring to the old repository. > > @Luciano: Could you please delete the SparkTC/systemml repository if nobody > objects by this Friday? Thanks. > > > Regards, > Matthias > I have made the repository private, will delete after couple weeks if nobody objects. -

Re: Cleanup SparkTC/systemml repository

ormation in some of the pull request > > conversations from the old repository that I would like to consult (with > > regards to the JIRA issues that I'm cleaning up because of the problems > > with the import to Apache JIRA). Could you please grant me access to see > > the priv

Re: Closing pull requests

On Sunday, December 20, 2015, Reynold Xin wrote: > Unfortunately only the PR submitter or the ASF infra team can close them. > > You can also push a commit to master and close it by using the "close #xxx" > message. > > +1, i guess there isn't much more we can do. > > On

Re: Permission denied when commit to website SVN repo

This should be resolved now. On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fantastic! Thank you. > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:

Re: SystemML JIRA Site Is Live!

g handled by > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10714 and I did not see the > >> comment. I will request the notifications scheme in the 10714 comments. > >> > >> Deron > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

Off course, my +1. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.10.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, > We

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.10.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, > Wednesday 25 and

Re: missing release candidate checksums?

t overkill? > > Deron > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > >

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

justifies a -1 vote for this release? == -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or regressions should not block this release. -- Luciano Resende http

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.10.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, > Wednesday 25 and

Re: SystemML Daily Test Builds

> Thanks to Alex! > > > > > > -Mike > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release

s > > Most of the wait time on the release is either waiting for other jiras to get fixed or for infra issues, as the release process is very quick. Anyway, branch 0.9 created https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-systemml.git -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.or

Re: SystemML JIRA Site Is Live!

;> going to the email list, and with time zone delays I thought it was a > good > >>> idea to get things rolling as soon as possible. We can add further > comments > >>> if they are required. > >>> > >>> Deron > >>> > >>> &

Re: Workflow for assigning issues to users

e good to settle on such a workflow now that our JIRA server is > up to avoid confusion. > > Luciano, is there an Apache standard that we should be following? > > Deron > There is no Apache standard, each project can discuss their preference. -- Luciano Resende http:

Project folder structure

they are looking for. Also, I would like to suggest creating a README.md on some of these folders (e.g. samples) that describes what the contents of the folder are. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2016 is coming

] http://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html [3] http://s.apache.org/gsoc2016ideas [4] http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

SystemML Notebook docker image

-- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Project folder structure

t purposes. I am not keen on "simplicity via minimality" neither "simplicity via common structure"... I am keen on what makes sense I (and thus drive adoption) for someone that is first trying to look trough SystemML code, particularly folks that are already used to some best practice

Re: Project folder structure

ndly, particularly with all other ml algorithms already there ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

SystemML 0.9.0 IPMC Release Approval is underway

Just FYI, the IPMC release approval is underway and folks that are not subscribed to general@a.o can follow the thread at https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg53110.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http

Re: February 2016 SystemML Incubator Podling Report - Draft

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see you edited the report on the incubator wiki. Thank you! > > I had to review as a mentor, did a quick update. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lr

Re: Release source package

> This should be ok... > Deron > Please create a sub-task under SYSTEMML-463 to track this issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-463 -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: SystemML Hadoop version support

nt to update the pom with > profiles for Hadoop 1 and 2. > > Deron > Even Spark is moving away of supporting some old versions of Hadoop, etc... I would really like us to be moving kind of together with other dependencies, in the sense of supporting Hadoop 2.6 and up, and Spark 1.6 an

Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.9-incubating (RC1)

t; Date: 01/20/2016 05:30 AM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.9-incubating (RC1) > > +1 > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > >> On Jan 20,

Re: SystemML Notebook docker image

document may help you out. > > > > Also, in case it helps, I found the open-source Pro Git book to be very > > useful when I started working with Git (https://progit.org/). > > > > Luciano recently created a samples/zeppelin-notebooks directory, so that > is > > the place

Re: Creating a new SystemML maintenance release: 0.9.1

ou need to get the released approved in the IPMC before making it public. This means another vote on general@a.o > We are currently at step 1. Please reply to this thread with (a) JIRA IDs > of resolved issues that you believe should be in the mainentance release > and (b) JIRA ids of open is

Re: Discussion SYSTEMML-593 MLContext Resign

ing against both MLContext and JMLC, so we > should support them separately until our major 1.0 release. > > > Regards, > Matthias > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Creating a new SystemML maintenance release: 0.9.1

m/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/71a3fde27f800576d746c50ae9694aad75276b4e > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/71a3fde27f800576d746c50ae9694aad75276b4e> > * > https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/61183f24ba2a9c3cd185ad0c579debf508c07ea8 > <https:/

Properly closing JIRAs

be good to set these when closing the jiras. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

justifies a -1 vote for this release? == -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or regressions should not block this release. -- Luciano Resende

Re: branch for 0.10?

o the 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT. > > Deron > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Starting a SystemML 0.10 release?

ny other > updates be included? Does anyone have any additional concerns? > > Please let me know when this is in then. > Luciano, would you be available as RM for this SystemML release? > Sure. > > Deron > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Starting a SystemML 0.10 release?

gt; wrote: > >> > >>> sounds good to me - in addition to PR167, I'd also like to get PR162 > >>> into this release. Furthermore, it would be good to run our full > >>> performance testsuite (at least up to 80GB) but this could be done on > the >

ALS Algorithm

ake it runs max_iter * 2. Is there any reason for this behavior ? Otherwise let me know and I can create a jira/fix. Thanks -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Discussion on GPU backend

shield the trunk of issues these experiments can cause. I would just recommend to avoid making the branch stale, and keep rebasing it with latest master, which will make integration much easier in the future. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

That was going to be my suggestion... In Zeppelin, we just introduced support for different versions of scala and added support for spark 2.0 based on profiles and a bit of reflections... Do we have to do anything related to Scala versions as well ? On Thursday, August 4, 2016, Matthias Boehm

Preview tag, was Re: [2/2] incubator-systemml git commit: Preparing SystemML development version 0.11.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.

SystemML > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ > scm:git:g...@github.com:apache/incubator- > systemml > scm:git:h > ttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-systemml developerConnection> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p= >

Re: Preview tag, was Re: [2/2] incubator-systemml git commit: Preparing SystemML development version 0.11.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.

d created a new > "spark-1.x-stable" tag simply pointing to a previous commit that was tested > on Spark 1.x. > > Thanks! > > -Mike > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent fr

Re: February Podling Report

would have reduced to only the last one. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: 0.12.0 Votes

s mentioned by Justin and Sergio. > > Would any of our active mentors (Luciano, Henry, Reynold) be available to > review the 0.12.0 release? > > Thanks! > Deron > > -- > Deron Eriksson > Spark Technology Center > http://www.spark.tc/ > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Building releases now that we have branches

the RC based on the commit hash from the top of the 0.12 branch and do a little investigation/research if there is any other changes to make the release prepare to modify the pom from the branch and google is probably your friend here. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http

Re: Building releases now that we have branches

e version, and them modify to the new development version. I just want to make sure it will make these changes on the branch and not on master. Not sure if maven needs any additional magic for that, it will be our first time running the script on a branch. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Corrupt SystemML 0.12 release download

Note that we Must not just update the artifact, as whatever we publish should be voted. I would suggest just doing a 0.12.1 release On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:14 PM Berthold Reinwald wrote: > yes, that is the current consensus. It is probably a bug in the release >

Re: Pull Request Reviews

Apache usually have two ways for revieweing: REview then commit, Commit then review. If review is becoming a bottleneck, just use CTR, maybe waiting for a PR build to be green. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:03 AM wrote: > Thanks, Deron, for bringing up this topic! PRs,

Re: SystemML 0.13 Release plan

any stop shipment issues.If you are working on any critical issue/s, > please try to get in change/s by EOD Friday (2/17/2017) PST. > > ThanksArvind > -- Arvind Surve Spark Technology Center > http://www.spark.tc/ -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

New SystemML website design

have published a in-progress version at: http://home.apache.org/~lresende/systemml/ -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: New SystemML website design

; > point to one of the beginner's guide rather than point to the Download > > page ? Alternatively we can add a link in Download page instructing what > > the user should do next after downloading. > > > > Again, absolutely love the new website :) :) > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

> > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias &

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

8, there > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting > for > >

Re: [VOTE] Please vote to have Apache SystemML 0.11 release

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Please vote on making Apache SystemML 0.11 release available > > -Arvind What are we voting on ? Where are the artifacts that need to be reviewed ? RC tag, etc ? -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lr

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML with Spark 2.0 support and roadmap

dalone.jar > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz (also rename) > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip (also rename) > > This would decrease the number of our artifacts by 30% which means that we > can validate the release faster, and the release candidate will also b

Re: Support for 'pip install SystemML'

is done, or periodically as dev, which I believe is similar to the concept of SNAPSHOTS in maven (see https://pypi.python.org/pypi/toree). -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache SystemML Release 1.0.0

a truly great release. > > Deron > > > I am not suggesting to rush a release, just that we would not call 0.11 and 1.0. The time frame is based on when we are ready. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

justifies a -1 vote for this release? == -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or regressions should not block this release. -- Luciano Resende

Re: Scala support ?

t; > There is usually one version of the jar on the distribution (e.g. the default like _2.10), but then, during release, they make the two versions published to maven, so in case of building applications, you don't have to actually have to build the framework with the version of Scala bei

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

ase make sure you review this RC as well, so we get all issues fixed by RC2. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Building a community around SystemML

their first experience with the project very smooth and without much problems. - Create simple JIRAs and flag them for initial contributors (e.g. documentation, simple fix, etc) Any other ideas ? And how do we execute this with some priority to get us to graduate ? -- Luciano Resende http

Re: Scala support ?

se with Scala 2.11, which then will be a mismatch and the user will have to hack it's way to be able to change the necessary places in the pom and rebuild it. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Scala support ?

publish both _2.10 and _2.11 versions to maven ? -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Continuing development on the website

-- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Continuing development on the website

on master for the website. However, I do not > feel strongly about this issue. > > Anyone else any thoughts? > > Deron > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I have created a PR [1] porting the Jekyll b

Re: Continuing development on the website

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, master now have the "in progress" version of the refactored jekyll > website and the previous working version has been tagged as v0.1. > > I am also trying to list the remaining websi

Enhancing SystemML JavaDocs

to build SystemML and fix a few of the Javadoc issues. If we can get a few PRs per week, we can fix this very quick for the next release. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

mML > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on. > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <luck

Re: SystemML Medium Blog

up for writing an article or two, let me know as well! > > Luciano, do you see any issues from an Apache standpoint? > > Thanks! > Madison +1, just make sure "republish" are done by the blog authors or with their explicit permission archived on this mailing list. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

out what is causing some of these regressions. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: UX Research

synthesized so. I'd love > >> input/thoughts from everyone. > >> > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2__Aw0kKn-uTWJ4S0ZvcHhhTE0/view > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Jeremy > >> > >> ... > >> > >> Jeremy Anderson > >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective > >> > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

Please note the minor correction on the RC tag name (the actual tag hash is correct): The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc3 ( 1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3) And off course, my +1 On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: >

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

? == -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or regressions should not block this release. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http

Couple of questions on website contents

like cleanups), I think we might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the live website. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself. > > I like option $4 myself as well. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

ache/incubator-systemml/pull/269> in 0.11 release > ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Niketan Pansare > > IBM Almaden Research Center > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com > > *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar* > > <

Re: Couple of questions on website contents

gt;> >> Navigation Menu: >> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few >> >> duplications. >> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We >> also >> >> have >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Off course, my +1. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.11.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >

Re: [DRAFT] November monthly report

um-Product Optimization and > Operator > > > Fusion for Large- Scale Machine Learning" has been accepted at CIDR'17. > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > The main project has had 213 commits since August 1. The website > project > > > has > > > had 51 commits since August 1. Since August 1, 241 issues have been > > > reported > > > on our JIRA site and 137 issues have been resolved or closed. 79 pull > > > requests > > > have been created since August 1, and 72 pull requests have been > closed. > > > > > > Date of last release: > > > > > > 2016-06-15 (version 0.10.0-incubating) > > > > > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > > > > > 2016-05-07 Glenn Weidner > > > 2016-05-07 Faraz Makari Manshadi > > > > > > > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

I should have changed the subject to [RESULT] On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Please vote on releasing the following

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

? == -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or regressions should not block this release. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http

Re: Getting new users to adopt SystemML

o > best handle this, I'd love to hear. :) > +1 to incorporate this as one page in the systemml website or doc -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

? == -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or regressions should not block this release. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http

SystemML Branch for any fixes related to Spark 1.6x

For creating dev branches for 1.6, first go to you local 1.6 branch and continue with your regular steps such as git branch -b JIRA-222 And good luck !!! -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: SystemML Branch for any fixes related to Spark 1.6x

in > line with the naming scheme that Spark uses for its branches, and should > cause less confusion. > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Jan 13, 2017, at

Re: Release cadence

rs discuss the roadmap and release blockers, and also enable users to provide feedback sooner on the areas we are developing. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap SystemML 1.0

c ? as I don't think we should wait for 2017/Q2 to do a 1.0 release. I believe in release early, release often, particularly to attract new users, that can help verifying and contributing to specific releases. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: SystemML 0.14 release build plan

What is planned for 0.14? When the contents and dates where discussed? On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:02 PM Arvind Surve wrote: > Hi, > We will be building SystemML 0.14 on Monday 04/03/2017 PST. > Please plan on getting your changes by EOW 04/02/2017 PST > Thanks, > Arvind

Re: SystemML 0.14 release build plan

Ok, I looked in the "Release Cadence" thread and found the recent discussions for 0.14 Here is a link to recent conversation for the benefit of others https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01518.html On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Luciano Resend

Re: Next Steps in the graduation process

y.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html > > Regards, > Matthias > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Arvind Surve <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> > > wrote:

Re: Java compiler for code generation

default. > >> > >> However, I'm raising this here as Janino would add another explicit > >> dependency (with BSD license). Fortunately, Spark also uses Janino for > >> whole-stage-codegen. So we should be able to mark Janino as provided > >> library. The only issue is a pure Hadoop environment, where we still > want > >> to use code generation for CP operations. To simplify the build, I could > >> imagine using the javax.tools.JavaCompiler for hadoop execution types, > but > >> Janino by default. > >> > >> If you have any concerns, please let me know by Monday; otherwise I'd > like > >> to push this change into our upcoming 0.14 release. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Matthias > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Branch 0.14 based on SystemML-0.14 RC1 has been deleted

uild gets approved. > -Arvind Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/ -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Board resolution for SystemML as a TLP project

e...@apache.org> * Glenn Weidner <gweid...@apache.org> * Henry Saputra <hsapu...@apache.org> * Holden Karau <hol...@apache.org> * Joseph Bradley<jkbrad...@apache.org> * Luciano Resende

Re: Next Steps in the graduation process

I have updated the community/project portion of the SystemML podling page http://incubator.apache.org/projects/systemml.html Please take a look and let me know if I missed anything. On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great, thank you for

Re: Next Steps in the graduation process

> > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 2:14 PM > Subject: Re: Next Steps in the graduation process > > I have updated the community/project portion of the SystemML podling pag

Re: Next Steps in the graduation process

by ASF legal? > > - Henry > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I have updated the community/project portion of the SystemML podling page > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/systemml.html > >

  1   2   >