Hi all..
I've made changes to the way we can use docker for building rpms for
traffic control, and I'd love to get feedback. docker and docker-compose
are both required for this, but the remaining toolset is handled within
docker containers.
I'm adding these instructions to the build/README.md
? Is it possible to build a
> local reoo?
>
> On Oct 19, 2016 7:54 PM, "Dan Kirkwood" wrote:
>
> > Hi all..
> >
> > I've made changes to the way we can use docker for building rpms for
> > traffic control, and I'd love to get feedback. docker a
Hi Burak,
The best place to ask questions is one of the mailing lists -- for using
traffic control, you can subscribe at users-subscribe@trafficcont
rol.incubator.apache.org,
and for development: dev-subscr...@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org.
We have been working on adding docker containers
Hi Sarp,
the docker implementation is still very experimental. I can help, but I
need more detail on what you have tried and what errors you see. Please
provide the exact commands you used, capture the output to a file, and
send that file as an attachment to the email. Also provide the vers
org and
us...@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org on this announcement.
Thanks.. Dan Kirkwood
Still haven't created the 1.8.x branch since I'm still new to this release
management stuff.. This should happen tomorrow morning.
Dan
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello, all...
>
> We're planning on creating a 1.8.x branch from master at c
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC0)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC0
This corresponds to git:
Hash: eca09c597ce9db2e050fc216a36aa6c816455aa6
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC0
Which can be verified with the fo
I forgot to mention the download location for built rpm's.. They
can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC0/
And I must -1 already because of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC-23
-Dan
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Dan Kir
Hello All,
I am working on creating a 1.8.0-RC1 release candidate today. If you
know of anything else that needs to be pulled in for this release
candidate, please respond to this list ASAP.
Keep in mind that the only changes that should be pulled in at this
point are fixes to regressions from
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1
This corresponds to git:
Hash: bebf63eedce2d3912752c65b0d52d739f820e0ac
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1
Which can be verified with the fol
ov 8, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1)
>>
>> Changes since 1.7.0:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/
.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basics
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood
> mailto:dang...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Leif, we are aware of that and want to get to that point. We've
&g
;incubating" (e.g. traffic_control_incubating_1.8.0_source.tar.gz).
> We can also include the RPMs but we should note that they are for
> convenience only and therefore they shouldnt need incubating in the name.
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
>&g
Thanks for looking at that, Leif.. I'm sure we have a few more
details to get right.. I'm pretty sure most of those are from
external sources, so need to be added to NOTICE..
-Dan
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM,
ok -- tarball and armored signatures are now included in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC1/
. Adding that to the instructions for future release mgrs...
I'll work on getting the NOTICE updated and creating a KEYS file as
well.Once those are done, we
Hi all,
I'm looking at files that are missing license details per Leif's email
from earlier today. I'm finding that some aren't clear. For
instance, it appears that some files in
`docs/source/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme` have a statement like this:
> :copyright: Copyright 2007-2013 by the
fyi -- we are -1 on this because of these two issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC-24
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC-37
Another RC will be created after these are resolved.. However,
please keep testing!
Thanks.. Dan
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote
Still relevant tho..yes, please help the poor RMs :-)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:28 PM, David Neuman wrote:
>>
>> I actually don't think we can do milestones, labels, or assignees in github
>> anymore. We lost that when we moved to the i
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC2)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 8766dbcb38105fbc97b955b4733defe40c83db00
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2
Which can be verified with the fol
git hash in the file name, we've been following
that convention in the rpm name for a while. Do you think it should
be dropped from the tarball? That's written to BUILD_NUMBER before
it's created..
-Dan
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>>
I'd also love to ditch the RPMs,but I'll abstain from voting since
it directly impacts me immediately (less work for me!).
Would anyone else like to weigh in on this?
Dan
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>>
>> http:/
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC3)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3
This corresponds to git:
Hash: daf585eacdcae4f57d60f14b4b6170b004058559
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3
Which can be verified with t
to include sha1 as well :-)
We'll work on this more on Monday.
thanks! Dan
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Dec 1, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC
Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to
keep in compliance with Apache license guidelines, each source file
should have the Apache license comment -- normally at the head of the
file, but I think that's somewhat flexible.
Still going thru files adding them, but whe
merging a PR without. I will make sure all files have them
> before merging in the future.
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 15:48 Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
>> Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to
>> keep in compliance with Apache license guidel
Hi Leif,
There's a .rat-excludes in the PR I posted today
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/121) -- I'm
sure it's too liberal, but wanted to make sure we don't go backward..
-dan
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On
FYI -- we decided to -1 this based on more license issues.. The
.rat-excludes file previously mentioned has been updated and those
issues resolved. I'll be putting together a RC4 this morning.
-Dan
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Dec 2, 2016, a
in our private Jenkins if theres not a
> better option.
>
> —Eric
>
>> On Dec 8, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> FYI -- we decided to -1 this based on more license issues.. The
>> .rat-excludes file previously mentioned has been updated and those
&g
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC4)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 7d8a88d0512ffe0354c2bc079ddbf2e7b67b6c3e
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4
Which can be verified wi
Reminder -- 1.8.0-RC4 is open for voting until 5pm MST today. Please
vote by replying to this email. The release is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC4/
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I&#x
So that makes us +1 overall, since you're the only vote :-)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:45 AM, David Neuman wrote:
> A little late, but I am +1.
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> Reminder -- 1.8.0-RC4 is open for voting until 5pm MST
I have no control over the mentors :-)Yes -- since you chimed in,
I'm happy to wait for your input..
-Dan
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> So that makes us +1 overall,
lease share!
Thanks.. Dan
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> I have no control over the mentors :-)Yes -- since you chimed in,
> I'm happy to wait for your input..
>
> -Dan
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
&g
t; On Dec 8, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC4)
>>
>> Changes since 1.7.0:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RE
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC5)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5
This corresponds to git:
Hash: b30cbc5d32c991e472c082b97f9bfd73a7699c66
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5
Which can be verified wi
One correction: The signed source tarball and checksums are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC5/
not 1.3
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 13:52 David Neuman wrote:
>>
>> This was functionality introduced in 1.7. Either we say we don't support
>> riak > 1.3 or we fix it.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 13:43 Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>>
>>>
cense headers in RC4 and
>>>> the license was there. Since the only thing that changes between RCs was
>>>> the license files, I am going to rely on my original testing and vote +1.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kirkwood >>
On Dec 21, 2016, at 11:44, David Neuman wrote:
>>>
>>> I spot checked a few files that were missing license headers in RC4 and the
>>> license was there. Since the only thing that changes between RCs was the
>>> license files, I am going to rely on my or
Kirkwood
Thanks to everyone who voted. I'll open the second VOTE thread on
theIncubator general list shortly.
- Dan
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC5)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https:/
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
http://mail-archives.apache
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC6)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC6
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 20d7e37b57b9aa47e7731595641920de268ea219
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC6
Which can be verified wi
, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:15 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC6)
>>
>> Changes since 1.7.0:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEA
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC7)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC7
This corresponds to git:
Hash:
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC
Which can be verified with the following:git tag -v RELEASE-1.
Sorry -- I missed adding the tag and git hash:
This corresponds to git:
Hash:2f202a49d8482ec2fb7700a5ec34c5d7c1adf145
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC7
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC7)
>
> Changes
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC7)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC8
This corresponds to git:
Hash:597e7795c48ab65fe57175642973481b9dc020e6
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC8
Which can be verified wit
;>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
>>
>>> * traffic_ops/app/lib/Schema/Result/SteeringView.pm
>>> * License is in twice
>>> * use strict and use warnings is also in twice
>>>
>>> It also appears the issue I brought
> - incubating in name
> - tarball builds successfully
> - git tag good
>
> —Eric
>
>> On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Hank..I don't think the double-license or double-use
>> will have any impact, but thanks for poi
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
https://lists.apache.org/th
normalize.css should be as simple as adding this in the LICENSE under
the "For the bootstrap component", since that's what is in the
bootstrap.css file.
/*! normalize.css v3.0.1 | MIT License | git.io/normalize */
And yes -- we neglected to remove the progress bar license from that
file when we
The postgresql version is still quite experimental right now. If you
are feeling adventurous, we appreciate the help in testing it, but
you may want to use 1.7.x or 1.8.x with mysql until we have the
postgresql branch (master) more stable. The master branch will not
work with mysql at all.
-
d to configure the postgres myself, but with no success so far.
>> Anyway, as I'm practically utilizing my dev environment for the first time,
>> it may be counter productive to work on an unstable branch.
>>
>> 10x,
>> Nir
>>
>>
>>
>>
>&g
the `db/admin.pl ... setup` command again..
If you still have problems, please send the command and output you're
seeing and we'll try to help move you along further..
-dan
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hi Nir,
>
> It probably is best to continue w
admin.pl injected data can live together in the same DB
> without a conflict. Is it true, or should I drop the DB / replace setup
> when moving from one env to another?
>
> Thanks again.
> Nir
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
>> sorry --
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC9)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 2301659f699948d9944cc07bc92b9f6a56bc4678
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9
Which can be verified wi
test data
- login from UI, navigating parts of UI
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC9)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0.
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
https://lists.apache.org/th
cense.
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:38 PM Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
>> Hello Incubator PMC,
>>
>> The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
>> proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
>> kindly reque
Thanks, Alex..
John -- would it be reasonable to fix this in the next release barring
any other major issues?
thanks.. Dan
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 2/15/17, 7:40 AM, "Dan Kirkwood" wrote:
>
>>Thanks, John.. I'm confus
ge effort
> (however, I can't imagine copy and pasting license contents is difficult).
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:14 PM Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Alex..
>>
>> John -- would it be reasonable to fix this in the next release barring
>> any other
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 14ef03fd251b6306e67627c935f9111efb0284af
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10
Which can be verified
+1
I put together the tarball myself, but also downloaded the tarball
and verified checksums and signature from the downloaded files. Also
built from source.
Dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release fo
We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed!
I'll send out the email to the IPMC shortly...
Thanks all..
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
>
> Changes since 1.7.
ok -- a bit premature.. I'll wait until tomorrow morning -- if you
need more time, let me know.
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed!
>
> I'll send out the email to the IPMC shortly...
&
Good thing I waited..Something went wrong with my git clone and a
bunch of changes went in from master...
-1 -- I'll get a new one in tomorrow.
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> ok -- a bit premature.. I'll wait until tomorrow morning -- if you
>
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC11). I apologize for the
confusion on RC10 -- we had a glitch in our tagging process. RC11 is
identical to RC10, but we decided to redo the process to ensure the
integrity of the release. The source tarballs are identical in
content -- o
.8.0-RC9...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC11
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Jeremy Mitchell
> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Looks like only licenses were changed.
>
The vote is now closed and RC11 passes with 5 +1 votes and no -1 votes.
I'll craft a new vote to the IPMC starting today and ending on Friday.
Thanks, all!
Dan
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
https://lists.apache.org/th
(using the
dang...@apache.org key) is here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC11/
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
> proposal to re
Hi all..I've submitted a PR
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/327) for
building using docker/docker-compose that eliminates pulling the
source code from github and instead builds from your local source
tree.
There have been questions in the past about the github connecti
+1
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote:
> thanks for doing that, Ashish. I would say go ahead and move pages to where
> they seem appropriate. That would be a great starting point. thanks again.
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Durfey, Ryan
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks
The Apache Traffic Control team would like to announce the release of
Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0 (incubating).
More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at:
http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/
The release artifacts can be downloaded here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/d
+1
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, David Neuman wrote:
> Since the Cookie Jar functionality is new to 2.0 and 2.0 is not yet
> released, why don't we just remove the `ResumeSession` method all together
> and eliminate the dependency? Otherwise we are deprecating something that
> we never formall
ughh.. I'd forgotten I'd done that in all this..
Again -- catch-22.
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Mark Torluemke wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Gelinas, Derek
> wrote:
>
>> +1 on both of these.
>>
>> > On Apr 30, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
>> efrie...@cis
o as a
> dependency, which is difficult since few package managers have a modern Go
> package. Goose is MIT,
> https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary suggests we can, yes?
>
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
>> ughh.. I'd f
+1 here as well..
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
wrote:
> I am all for one less tool to use. Also I think it will lower bar to bringing
> more people into our project if they don’t have to sign up for the ASF JIRA
> separately.
>
> —Eric
>
>> On May 17, 2017, at 10:5
oking at it.
>>>
>>> Once post install is fixed, I will cut an RC
>>>
>>> —Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 2:35 PM, Dewayne Richardson
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>&g
> > well?
>> > > > Does anyone know of any showstopper issues that still exist?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Dave
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
>> >
by "HEAD", I meant "master"...
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> yep -- it appears that
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/commit/ad28f33fea62cc5ce2c5a7a667b8cf9f06b7b7a2
> removed the juju/persistentcookie dependency whic
yeah -- what Hank said...
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> -1 for a manual changelog - doing a compare between branches/commits in
> github is relatively simple.
>
> +1 for a scripted changelog -
> https://github.com/skywinder/github-changelog-generator - There is even a
> l
Rob removed those from master -- I just merged it. He'll be
cherry-picking for a 2.0.x PR shortly.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> by "HEAD", I meant "master"...
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>> yep
+1
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
> In
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
> Dave
> mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
> that thread if you
I'm also with Dave on using github (preferably not Jira) for tracking
this..Some enterprising individual could use the github api to
produce such a report as well showing what's being worked and what
isn't...
-dan
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Dewayne Richardson wrote:
> +1 on tracking th
Hi, Amir..
We are using Centos 7.2 for traffic ops installation, and using
docker-compose to build. Follow the instructions in `BUILD.md` (at
the top level of trafficcontrol) and then installation instructions in
`traffic_ops/INSTALL.md`.
Today is a holiday in the U.S., but I'll check email l
Hello All,
I've prepared the first candidate release for incubator-trafficcontrol
v1.8.1 (RC0)
Changes since 1.8.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.8.0...RELEASE-1.8.1-RC0
This corresponds to git:
Hash: cc56e76320f6d63f611d4070a1aca1e82d235a61
Tag: RELEAS
With 4 +1 votes and no -1 votes, this release candidate passes.
I'll send out a vote to the Incubator PMC later today.
thanks! Dan
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared the first candidate release for incubator-trafficco
unfortunately, have to -1.
Building traffic_ops from the tarball using docker-compose gives me this error:
traffic_ops_build_1 | The build area has been initialized.
traffic_ops_build_1 | Building the rpm.
traffic_ops_build_1 | error: line 26: Tag takes single token
only: Release:
+1 -- signature and hashes checked.
All components build from source tarball.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Elsloo wrote:
> +1 again. Signature and hashes validate.
> --
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
> wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've p
prove the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Dan Kirkwood
at 3:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 June 2017 at 22:12, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> DROPPED user@ list - see below.
>
>> Hello Incubator PMC,
>>
>> The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
>> proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incuba
not that I'm aware of... please do file an issue for it, though and
attach that to the PR.
thanks! Dan
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> postinstall might still be broken:
>
> Password for database server admin:
> Re-Enter Password for database server admin:
> Download Maxm
you're right -- it shouldn't.. thanks!
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> I just realized it is our cdn.conf that doesn't have the secrets in it not
> the default. Still don't think it should error. I'll fix it and submit the
> PR.
>
&
The Apache Traffic Control team would like to announce the release of
Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1 (incubating).
More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at:
http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/
The release artifacts can be downloaded here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/d
The vote passes with three +1 and no -1 votes.
Thanks!
The Apache Traffic Control (Incubating) team
+1 as well, but should `golang` be `go` instead?
I have the beginnings of a usable set of bash functions as well..
Should that go in as well? :-)
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Mark Torluemke wrote:
> Also +1 to having more TO clients, and classifying them into
> language-specific directories
I checked the signature, but didn't get Eric's key from the gpg
refresh. He's looking into that now..
Meanwhile, I'm going to build and install fresh.
btw, Eric -- the Changes section above should be:
> Changes since 1.8.1:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE
good
+ builds from source extracted from tarball
+ rpm for traffic_ops installs on clean machine
-dan
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
> I checked the signature, but didn't get Eric's key from the gpg
> refresh. He's looking into that now..
>
> Me
+1
I checked:
- git tag verified
- gpg sig is good
- checksums match source tarball
- tarball has correct name and structure
- rpms build from tarball
- traffic_ops installation and postinstall on a clean Centos7 VM
- some basic traffic_ops UI functionality
- docs no longer mention build area to d
Hi Steve,
I did the docker build setup and have been experimenting off and on
with running traffic_ops under docker as well. I'll comment on a few
things below..
-dan
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Steve Malenfant wrote:
> I'm currently in the process of testing Traffic Ops under docker and
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
