On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 11:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 1.10.2018 17:32, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
> >
> > MH> I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous
> > MH> heads up e-mails.
> >
> > So that nobody is confused by this, the python2
tl;dr: All Fedora Infrastructure systems will be updated and rebooted
over this week.
Systems that can be done outside of the planned outage.
2018-10-01 21:00 UTC Staging and downloads
2018-10-02 throughout the 'day' single proxies will be updated/rebooted.
2018-10-03 production systems including
l;dr: All Fedora Infrastructure systems will be updated and rebooted
over this week.
Systems that can be done outside of the planned outage.
2018-10-01 21:00 UTC Staging and downloads
2018-10-02 throughout the 'day' single proxies will be updated/rebooted.
2018-10-03 production systems including a
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 10:05, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2018 03:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
> >>> freeze, will these get
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 15:05, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> > I'm not able to parse this. This very thread is more information that
> > may get us to move it up in priority. Can you rephrase?
>
> I don't know what "Fedora management" values, or what is needed by the
> people who are doing the
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 15:16, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:59:24PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Just a query, Does XFCE Fedora 29 spin is removed?
> > > It is not visible here
> > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/
> > See
> > https:
I have forwarded this to the Bugzilla owner. Thank you for the research on this.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:20, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
> turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
> spammin
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 11:14, Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
> (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
> (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003). We understand the need to
> enable this, but there is an impact to workflow for
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 23:19, Qixiang Wan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is for an issue we encountered while building Ursa-Major on EPEL7
> branch [1], the build task failed due to missing libmodulemd, seems
> libmodulemd was retired on EPEL7 because it's available in RHEL7.6,
> but our buildroot is stil
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 09:39, Patrick Creech wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 07:56 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 12. 11. 18 22:37, Patrick Creech wrote:
> > > The pulp team is orphaning the pulp 2 stack in fedora's repositories.
> > >
> > > The upstream project is focusing the majority of it'
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 19:27, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone! Let's talk about something new and exciting. Since its
> first release fifteen years ago, Fedora has had a 13-month lifecycle
> (give or take). That works awesomely for many cases (like, hey, we're
> all here), but not for ever
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 11:45, wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> But there are some good cases for a longer lifecycle. For one thing, this has
> been a really big blocker for getting Fedora shipped on hardware. Second,
> there are people who really could be
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 16:03, Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:55 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > From what I have talked with in the past.. 3 years is their bare
> > minimum and 7 is their what we really want. It usually takes the
> > vendor about 3-
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 11:34, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> Absolutely. Fedora once was a pretty solid end-user distro and fun-project
> for devs. Now it has become an unstable, experimental "bleeding edge" distro
> with a more and more balloning overhead
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 07:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Matthew Miller:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:30:06PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> I love Fedora, but the idea that you can take a 3 year old Fedora and
> >> put it out on the web is just bonkers. We don't have the manp
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 12:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 22:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > > My proposal would be to make zchunk the rpm compression format for
> > > > Fedora.
> > >
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 17:20, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 5:08 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > On 11/18/18 2:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > I'm not for or against a longer Fedora lifecycle, but I think we need
> > > a stronger statement of what the problem is we're try
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Christopher wrote:
>
> Anybody know what's going on with Centos 7.6-1810?
> Some packages in EPEL depend on it, but it is apparently not yet available.
> This discrepancy is breaking yum updates for me.
>
This isn't a Fedora development issue. Please refer this to th
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 11:00, Christopher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:12 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Christopher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Anybody know what's going on with Centos 7.6-1810?
>
On 6 December 2017 at 05:33, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
>> We have solved this years ago. man alternatives
>
> alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in
> /etc/alternatives is awful and I these days with Fedora kernel
On 8 December 2017 at 11:40, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 12/08/2017 11:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Well, I'd say this works great. There's maybe a hundred or two hundred
>> proven packagers and somehow none of them decide to mess up the kernel
>> any day. In fact, the commits wh
On 26 October 2017 at 19:13, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>> twitter users could try @athimm
>
> I already sent a .@ message to that account
>
> -- Russ herrold
Did anyone receive a reply back from Axel on this? We are still seeing
rejected emails from his
On 18 December 2017 at 13:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:55:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I think we should be concerned by this kind of behaviour on the part of
>> the supplier of our default desktop browser, and we should express that
>> concern to them. Assuming
On 18 December 2017 at 15:42, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>> And in any case, a tie-in with a television-show related game is
>> clearly neither telemetry nor some kind of user interaction study. Yet
>> to me, Mozilla's response does not seem to convey understanding of this
>> at all. It basically just
On 8 January 2018 at 12:28, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:16:05AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> A significant miss here is 'testing'. Making an arch primary means we
>> need to ensure we have the necessary resources to run all the relevant
>> validation testing.
>
> Are the
On 8 January 2018 at 13:03, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 12:53 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 8 January 2018 at 12:28, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:16:05AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > > A significa
On 10 January 2018 at 08:50, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> The new mapping for nobody:nobody would be implemented in two redundant ways:
>> * as a static allocation in /etc/passwd and /etc/group managed by setup.rpm
>> * dynamically provided by the
On 10 January 2018 at 14:23, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/08/2018 10:53 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, if this firefox update was urgent, shouldn't it have been marked
urgent?
>>>
>>> Urgency is always in t
On 10 January 2018 at 14:46, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10 January 2018 at 14:23, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> >>
&
On 15 January 2018 at 15:37, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 10:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> Googling 'linux nobody uid' it appears nobody is a uid used by apps
>> that don't want to run as root. In case they got hacked the would
>> not have root privileges, but with SElinux
On 18 January 2018 at 03:28, David Demelier wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Since systemd-networkd is a mature network system daemon nowadays,
> NetworkManager can be avoided in many cases where people do not need
> desktop features.
>
> I propose to remove NetworkManager from the “Core” group and mark it
On 18 January 2018 at 13:45, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 07:32:07PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Once there is a new EPEL version out there, it is very likely both
>> pythons will be available there as well.
>
> Given that Python 2 is going EOL in about two years, I don't thin
On 20 January 2018 at 06:27, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Even if people hope next version of EL will be better in this, it doesn't mean
> that el6/el7 can be fixed easily.
>
>
> Why I'm writing this? I want to hear from you if you think it would be good to
> prohibit (or advise, or whatever mechani
On 19 January 2018 at 22:53, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 01/19/2018 10:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo
>> [koji]
>> name=Koji Repo
>> baseurl=https://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f$releas
On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> As EPEL is the only reason I stay in Fedora.. I would like to make
>> sure it doesn't cause developers that much problems. As such I would
>
On 21 January 2018 at 14:06, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 15:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists.fedoraproject.org.
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubs
On 21 January 2018 at 15:07, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 21 January 2018 at 17:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko
>> wrote:
>> > On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen
>> > wrote:
>> > [.
On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> As preface some oneliner result:
>
> 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up to
> ABI level so all this should be:
>
> a) removed
> b) replaced by %{el6} and %{el7} (and if it is anything older .. remove)
> c) i
On 22 January 2018 at 00:29, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 03:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko
>> wrote:
>
> [..]
>>
>> > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL deri
On 22 January 2018 at 12:21, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 15:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [,,]
>>
>> > OK so here you just gave me +1 for a). Thx.
>> >
>>
>> No I didn't. It is clear that our versions of English are not sy
On 21 January 2018 at 14:42, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 21 January 2018 at 14:06, Howard Howell wrote:
>> On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 15:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>> Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists
On 30 January 2018 at 03:12, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 08:31:05AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 30.01.2018 um 08:25 schrieb Petr Pisar:
> > > On 2018-01-29, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > The file create isn't allowed to return until the server has created
> the
> > > > fi
There will be an outage starting at 2018-02-11 15:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-02-11 15:00 UTC'
Reason for outage: The network switches in our PHX2 colocation
requir
On 13 February 2018 at 02:01, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> Yes: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#faq_a8
>>
>> --b.
>
>
> Quite right, it was network limited (disk vs network speed is about the
> same). Using a slower USB stick disk shows that fsync() is not working with
> a NFSv4 "async" export.
>
> But wh
On 15 February 2018 at 17:39, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 17:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> As shown at https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html, we haven't
>> had a successful compose for almost two weeks. AIUI this is mostly
>> worked out now, but it raises the questio
On 16 February 2018 at 03:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
>>> "LT" == Luya Tshimbalanga writes:
>>
>> LT> When you get a chance, would you also update the spec guideline as
>> LT> well?
>>
>> Which spec guideline did you mean? I
On 18 February 2018 at 00:46, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 15:50, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> Even before EPEL-5 was EOL, very little of Fedora would compile out of
>>
>> the box and required massive amounts of %if and other hacks to
On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to
> random
> reasons and I grepped all l
On 21 February 2018 at 02:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
>> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
>> So this may no
On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> it's pretty easy:
>
> when you don't list your BuildRequires properly you depend on luck that they
> are pulled by something else in the buildroot
>
OK I understand that, but where is the cutoff. Where as a packager
should I stop adding th
On 22 February 2018 at 02:41, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:51 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > i
On 22 February 2018 at 10:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:53:25AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> I am trying to figure out the special cases here. Why are some
>> packages more equal than others.
>>
>> In the end, I am just tr
On 3 March 2018 at 12:30, Timotheus Pokorra
wrote:
> Hello Farhad,
>
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887
>>
>> Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation you
>> are waiting for e-mails and check the web page several times but you
>> don't see any
On 3 March 2018 at 14:00, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> That is correct. They are just one of many archivers on the internet
>> that get emails from Fedora and redisplay them. [This is one of the
>> reasons why people who ask us to remove their ema
On 7 March 2018 at 05:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Recently, several users report problems with system upgrade due to rich
> dependencies that are not supported by RPM in Fedora 25, and not fully
> supported by RPM in Fedora 26 (statement 'with'). Rich dependencies are
> allowed and supported f
On 8 March 2018 at 13:38, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 17:57 +, Tom Hughes a écrit :
>>
>> No, it almost certainly means that laposte.net have announced via
>> their DNS records that emails with laposte.net addresses should not
>> be trusted unless they come direct from a l
On 8 March 2018 at 15:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 8 March 2018 at 13:38, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> I have spent this afternoon going through many of your emails and our
> logs so I could find try to figure out what to help you. Coming back
> and finding you blaming ever
On 8 March 2018 at 14:37, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 18-03-07 14:14:38, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 à 12:18 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit :
>> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
>> > wrote:
>> > > Le mercredi 07 ma
On 22 March 2018 at 17:49, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
>
On 28 March 2018 at 03:58, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 03/28/2018 06:10 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> So, is this hardware limitation something that is likely to affect other
>> packages? Is there something we could look for in how they consume
>> atomic types to tell? I would hate for us to ship so
On 29 March 2018 at 07:00, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> March 29, 2018 12:06 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, 16:24 Florian Weimer, wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/28/2018 08:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ wrote:
>>>
> Note that while GCC produces broken code, this is actually an ABI bug, and
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 08:44, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 12.10.2020 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > 2. Having subpackages like this that conflict by name is going to get
> > crazy really fast, so we need a virtual name to make RPM only permit
> > one of them
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 02:15, Subsentient wrote:
> I figure I'll add my two cents for as little as that's worth.
>
> Personally, I use extlinux with a custom, barebones configuration. On my
> EFI systems, I use syslinux EFI. I like the simplicity of syntax for
> syslinux's configuration and how s
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:33, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> >
> > There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively
> > forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are not
> > quite games including wtf (the
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 06:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11/2/20 12:33 PM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > Then there's a question how to get the documents into modules.yaml. From
> my
> > perspective, it's up to Fedora infra/releng/packaging people. Whether it
> should
> > be in dist-git, git repo (similar
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, wrote:
> The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than 30 Mo.
> Does it really worth the effort on changing all the dependent packages ?
>
>
Personally I am getting tired of this death of the buildroot by a million
cuts. Could we just 'engineer'
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 09:42, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:57:32AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, wrote:
> >
> > > The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than
> 30 Mo.
> >
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 at 02:36, Joseph D Wagner wrote:
> Forgive me if this is the wrong spot to ask.
>
> I'm doing some CPU intensive work, and I'd like to optimize a few
> packages. Even if it's only a 5% gain, it will add up over many
> hours/days of continuous runtime.
>
> Back in the day, I co
There will be an outage starting at 2020-11-11 21:00UTC,
which will last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-05-03 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
Apply updates and new kernels for all
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 17:31, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> There will be an outage starting at 2020-11-11 21:00UTC,
> which will last approximately 6 hours.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
> or r
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 10:01, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Pisar said:
> > I believe it's unlikely that somobody will adopt xinetd. It was orphaned
> > because its maintainer orphaned all his packages.
>
> Are there replacements for the old services built in to xinetd? It's a
> s
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 18:53, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Well, except, it clearly *does* work that way. We have many
> > lightly-maintained packages in practice.
>
> Do we really? Which are those packages?
>
> The one that keeps getti
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 18:37, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/15/20 7:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Implementing this does not come without drawbacks though: right now
> > resolved tries hard to use the same server if at all possible, since
> > we want to use newer DNS features if possible, but
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 19:26, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> > Because a lot of networks use routing tricks to send traffic to
> particular
> > DNS server IP addresses. They may round robin, traffic route, or other
> > methods to s
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:57, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 19.11.2020 18:34, Radka Gustavsson wrote:
> > >Rich, IRC is not being dropped, it is being bridged to modern,
> > >"IRC-native" (for lack of better word in m
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 13:29, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 13:23 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:57, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrot
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 14:25, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 14:15 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > My apologies for that misinformation. While a federated chat system is a
> > network of servers for people being social, I should not tie them in
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 02:58, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 19.11.2020 23:13, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Some packagers in Fedora do not have time to maintain the build
> dependencies
> > for the packages that they are actually interested in and have time to
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 11:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 12/3/20 7:39 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/2/20 5:45 AM, Artem Tim wrote:
> >>> How to quickly retest packages which listed here
> https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:17, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:51:45PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > It would be interesting if we had a set of use cases Fedora Server
> > actually solves. So far in this thread we've seen people use it, but
> > it reads to me like they use it to
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 10:08, Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> EPEL7 builds are not executed due to this error:
>
>
I am guessing you are talking about building packages in Fedora
Infrastructure? Do you have a koji job we can point developers to?
> DEBUG util.py:634: Traceback (
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 13:18, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Koji has an Outtage. No Idea it it's planned or a failure. According to
> https://status.fedoraproject.org/ ist should work.
>
>
The page also says that things are manually done to that page. We have to
stop working on fires to chang
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 00:29, przemek klosowski via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/16/20 5:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:28:49PM -0500, przemek klosowski via devel wrote:
>
> I was trying to make a point that we don't have a way to check the init
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 04:45, Robin Opletal wrote:
> I think this wouldn't be that much of a problem - what I think is bad is
> that CentOS Stream security updates aren't going to come before RHEL's
> will, and they will essentially be backported, at least as I understood
> it.
>
>
a) CentOS regu
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 04:14, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 16. 12. 20 v 21:56 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>
> >>> Yes, that's a real pain. Can we just add everything to Koschei instead
> >>> of having it opt-in?
> >> Thats worth considering in the new year. I would like that. :)
> >>
>
> I would apprecia
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 at 17:52, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 07:44:57PM +0100, clime wrote:
> > I think we can simply parse server-side access logs to count package
> > downloads, no?
>
> We can for our primary server, but most people get updates from mirrors
>
which we don't run
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 18:45, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> Hi!
> Just out of curiosity, why is lxd not included in Fedora?
> Thanks in advance!
>
A quick review of the development mailing lists sees the last person
mentioning that they were working on packaging LXD was in 2016, and
they only did it in
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 08:58, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:42 PM Mike Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for this headsup, I want to share some info too. I have found one
>> site https://soclikes.com/buy-instagram-mentions-user-followers, here you
>> can cheap get instagram menti
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 09:37, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 04.08.2020 13:58, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > So, how do we ban spammers from this list? CC devel-owner.
>
> Allow only CLA+1 group members to post messages.
>
I don't think mailman has any idea about group membership and I really
don
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:36, Alex Scheel wrote:
>
> I'm bumping this thread. This is still broken.
>
Please open a ticket at
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue and open new issue
with an explanation of what is broken and where you are pulling from.
If it is a fedora registry then i
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:05, Alex Scheel wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Stephen John Smoogen"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> > , asch...@redhat.com
> > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:55:17 A
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 08:58, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:16 PM wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Anaconda team has decided to deprecate use of Anaconda kernel boot
> > parameters without 'inst.' prefix. As you may already know you can
> > specify Anaconda kernel boo
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 15:58, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 12:25 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > usb_modeswitch
>
> any particular reason for usb_modeswitch be orphaned ? , i.e. is about
> no maintainer ? or about is not used anymore ?
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/li
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:39, John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> On Monday, August 31, 2020 5:46:47 AM MST Peter Oliver wrote:
> > > On Saturday, August 29, 2020 8:27:33 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > Unless systemd timers run crontab entries, crond and atd cannot be
> > > disabled.
> >
> > Why's
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 09:37, Björn Persson wrote:
> Guido Aulisi wrote:
> > IMHO we could package only the JDK and let the user use Java software
> directly from upstream.
> > Usually upstream means Apache, which is a trusted source, and Java users
> are smart enough to manage the Java packages.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 13:31, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4. The benefit we want to p
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 07:27, Mario Torre wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:04 AM Hans de Goede
> wrote:
>
> > So for this tomcat needed for testing problem, I'm thinking that we
> > might solve this in a very non Fedora way. Why not bundle the old
> > tomcat-sources with the sources which nee
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 12:53, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> > packages because we don't want to maintain those packages to a high
> > standard", it is demonstrably a
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 16:14, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> Hi, Kevin.
>
> On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 19:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szme
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 13:12, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> After upgrade of one of my servers to F33, I noticed that I can not ssh to
> one of my other servers running Debian 9 system (relatively freshly EOLed,
> I need to do something about it). On F33 I always need to:
>
> $ ssh -oPubkeyAccepte
901 - 1000 of 1221 matches
Mail list logo
