Thanks,
I've just committed your fixes for these.
Alan.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:51:05 +0100, Björn Augustsson wrote:
revision 1.153
date: 2003/02/10 13:20:11; author: alanh; state: Exp; lines: +10 -1
abort when finding a depth 30 visual and no IBM640 dac
fix up depth 555 visual for
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:23:03PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:10:16AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
If you call the ShadowFBInit2 in newport_driver.c (just tag FALSE on the
end of the arguments). Does that work for you ?
Yes, this works. Thanks! But it's
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:49:58 -0800, Nolan Leake wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 16:36, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I don't really know what the point of fbIsVirtual was.
Apps that use ShadowFBInit need to repaint when entering
the VT. We didn't have the EnableDisableFBAccess stuff
when I
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:37:45 +0100, Frank Giessler wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/19/03
at 11:14 AM, Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Here's a list of items for the RELNOTES for 4.3.0, if anyone has anything to
add to this, please send it in.
* Major OS/2 support
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:28:12PM +0100, Holger Veit wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:49:07AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:37:45 +0100, Frank Giessler wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/19/03
at 11:14 AM, Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:05:17AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:49:52AM +0100, Rob van Nieuwkerk wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:14:55AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Here's a list of items for the RELNOTES for 4.3.0, if anyone has anything
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:55:21 +, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
xc/config/cf/Imakefile now refers to date.def, and xfree86.cf includes
it, but I can't find it in the latest CVS, nor can I find a rule which
builds it on the fly.
Without this file make World does very little.
The
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 05:46:24AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
No. Will be some work to extract the CVS diff for me. So you can't
reproduce this problem with 4.3.0? I'll have a try with 4.3.0 now
before looking deeper into this issue.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:06:49 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
From: Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: xf86cfg: ERROR SIGSEGV caught
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Enrik Berkhan wrote:
Hi,
after having some problems with an R300 based ATI card (dotclocks seemed
to be too slowed by a factor of about 1.17, text mode restoral didn't
work), I've found the following:
Index: radeon_reg.h
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:32:23PM -0800, Torrey Lyons wrote:
XDarwin's generic rootless code is generally useful for anyone
implementing an X server on top of another windowing system. It was
written to abstract the implementation details of dealing with the
underlying window system. It is
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 04:01:56PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Hi Again,
I think that http://www.xfree86.org/current/BUILD.html is a
reasonable introduction to building XFree86, but suggestions for
improving that document are most welcome.
Going through the current BUILD.html
I'm gonna have a play later this week with some Trident problems.
I'll report back then.
Alan.
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
I wonder if it shows on an external monitor. If you have one, you may
try and see if the problem occurs. Maybe it's a problem with
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 07:20:57PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Is it me, or are we really shipping 1200dpi bitmap fonts as part of
XFree86?
xc/programs/Xserver/XpConfig/C/print/models/SPSPARC2/fonts/Courier.pmf
These have always been there. It's part of the Xprint server.
Alan.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:30:11PM -0600, Mark Cuss wrote:
Hello
I'm not sure if this is an X problem or not - if not, please let me know...
I have a Toshiba Satellite 2450 notebook on which I've recently installed RedHat 8.
Everything works OK, except that sometimes in X when I type (in
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:54:22PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote (in a message from Friday 4)
With the latest CVS 'fontstosfnt' doesn't build on FreeBSD on presumably
other OS's too, due to the lack of byteswap.h.
A heads up for those maintaining it, and can you
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:25:40AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
Bugzilla #434 shows a x11perf regression test between 4.3.0 and a rather
current CVS versions. The performance of some tests has gone down by
20% for a specific test, some other tests have suffered a performance
penalty of 3%.
There
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 08:40:27AM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
I just saw this on VIA's website. It looks like they just took Alan's
code and added some tv features (or perhaps just re-released his
code?). I don't know if there are already in CVS or not, but for what
it's worth here's the
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:20:16PM -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
I've recently been made aware of the XFree86 Savage driver that VIA released
and is now available on Alan Hourihane's web site. This driver is so much
superior to the one I've been maintaining that I should be embarrassed.
My
Sounds like your using an old cvsup binary with glibc-2.3. This is exactly
what I got.
You need to recompile cvsup for glibc-2.3.
I suspect as you work for RedHat, you've probably upgraded to RH9.
Alan.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:09:30PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
I had been using cvsup
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for xrender
is the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other transforms are done in
software? (my initial tests here with xfree86 4.3.0 nvidia's latest drivers
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:09, Jim Gettys wrote:
While the X server has had the XSync extension for a long time,
the operating system hooks to allow X to synchronize with
external events (e.g. vertical sync, sample clock of
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:05:42PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:55, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:09, Jim Gettys wrote:
While the X server has had the XSync extension for a long
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:24:13PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 18:11, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:05:42PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:55, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Michel Dänzer
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:50:40AM -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
Some months ago, VIA released an XFree86 Savage driver in source form that
included, among other things, a DRI driver and XvMC support.
Has that code been integrated into the XFree86 source tree? Will it make
XFree86 4.4? Or is
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in
CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five
Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority.
Harold,
I thought you already had the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
As I recall we had problems with allocating additional memory for Xv on
neomagic chips (hence the overly_mem option). As I recall there was an
issue with allocating memory beyond the limits of the blitter, similar
to the problems
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:09:05AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
As I recall we had problems with allocating additional memory for Xv on
neomagic chips (hence the overly_mem
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:07:13AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:09:05AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
As I recall we had problems with allocating
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 11:06:45AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:07:13AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:09:05AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:26:45PM -0800
Andrew,
I've just committed a patch to the trident driver to enable it.
Best use that as the basis for the neomagic work.
Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:47:06AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Well, if someone else has a chip, or wants to update and test other
drivers (but be careful with DRI enabled drivers as it needs more work
in the driver). Here's a patch to the neomagic
, Alex Deucher wrote:
I'll take a look at fixing this in the radeon driver. What needs to be
done to play nice with the DRI?
Alex
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:47:06AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Well
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:59:41AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I've actually already done it, but I'll probably leave it till after
XFree86 4.4.0.
Regarding bug 830, does this mean my users can expect to sometimes hit
these situations where XVIDEO
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:19:01PM +, Raymond Jennings wrote:
I was wondering if we could make some use of the VESA VGA extension, to set
video modes at least. That would eliminate all of the video mode problems,
such as bad offsets, out of sync, and scanline problems. The VESA standard
.
You don't have to get the latest version though either, although it's
that's best.
Alan.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:33:04PM +, Raymond Jennings wrote:
So if I got the latest version, and decided to change video modes, would it
use VESA?
From: Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes, it was committed by Egbert on 8th October.
Alan.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:49:40AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
I looked through the cvs commit archives and I never saw that the fix
for 661 was committed. I don't have the hardware so I can't test.
Alex
--- David Dawes [EMAIL
Having looked at Bugzilla #978 it shows that it's very easy to crash
the Xserver when using out-of-bounds coordinates that get mixed up when
passing in int's that get converted to short's during the client-server
conversation.
Seeing as PutImage gets pushed through the CopyArea path, I'm sure
. Can somebody try that to see if it fixes the problem?
Mark.
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Having looked at Bugzilla #978 it shows that it's very easy to crash
the Xserver when using out-of-bounds coordinates that get mixed up when
passing
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:08:03PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I don't think it's as bad as you think. It looks to me like
this comes about due to a difference in the Shm protocol. Going
against convention, xShmPutImageReq has an unsigned value for the
src X and Y location. All other
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:08:03PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I don't think it's as bad as you think. It looks to me like
this comes about due to a difference in the Shm protocol. Going
against convention, xShmPutImageReq has an unsigned value for the
src X and Y location. All other
Looking at ProcShmGetImage() there's a bunch of checking for out-of-bounds
coordinates, but ProcShmPutImage() lacks this checking.
Is this patch reasonable or too much (it does fix the problem) but I'm
wondering if the bounds are too strict for PutImage ?
Alan.
Index: shm.c
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:59:00PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
I've been catching up on the 4.4 RC1 test/bug reports after being out
of action for the last few days. Judging from the reports coming in
both here and in bugzilla, there's a good amount of testing happening,
which is great. Some
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:19:47AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
I did get lots of spurious results with the early versions of the
new xtest scripts I added to make testing easier. The latest version
(4.0.1) seems to be pretty stable now though.
I needed this to get the run.sh script to work
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:39:22PM +0800, Yukun Chen wrote:
Hi All
I am a developer from XGI Technology which is a new company stem from graphic
dpt. of Trident and graphic dpt. of Sis. Now we want to share our linux 2D driver
with open
source community. Then what should we do?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in
bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups.
Has anyone followed them up?
David,
I suspect not with XFree86's DRI drivers still being based on Mesa
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:21:42PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in
bugs.xfree86.org, including several related
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:34:40PM +1300, dave wrote:
Hi I have just go my computers up and running and am ready to
Start my X11 driver I have downloaded the latest dev-4.3.99.902
The drivers directory name will be nvxf
So can some one give a quick start help about how to enter my
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:35:23PM +1300, dave wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: help new Developer
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:34:40PM
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:38:16AM +1300, dave wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: help new Developer
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:35:23PM
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:21:32AM -0700, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
Building on FreeBSD/Alpha version 5.2 with gcc 3.3.3:
In building the world from a Wednesday morning CVS update, g_render.c
in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/glx failed to compile. The root problem
was a missing right paren,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:57:47PM +0100, David Gómez wrote:
Hi all ;),
I got an X crash with X 4.3.0, here is the error log.
By the way, are there many bugfixes in the i830 driver for the upcoming
4.4.0 release? Maybe i'm asking for a problem already fixed in CVS...
You should try it as
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:34:54PM -0800, Torrey Lyons wrote:
At 3:46 PM -0800 2/9/04, Alan Hourihane wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/x-cvs
Module name: xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/02/09 15:46:31
Log message:
797. Fix GL_VERSION string for indirect rendering (Bugzilla
#1147
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 06:20:25PM -0800, Torrey Lyons wrote:
At 10:11 AM -0800 1/28/04, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Log message:
778. Fix Multitexture problems with vertex arrays and indirect rendering
(Bugzilla #1092, DRI Project).
777. Fix SecondaryColor FogColor when indirect
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:33:24PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Just using atof() should work. Or better, add __glXAtof() to
glx_ansic.h.
Your right David. I should allow time for testing next time :-)
committed.
Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:58:38AM +0800, Yukun Chen wrote:
Hi All
For some reasons, I have to compile XFree864.2 on SELS 8.2(64bit) with
AMD64bit CPU. But when I run make WorldWorld.log on the specific dir, I just get
the error
message in my World.log file as follows:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:17:03PM +0100, Alain POIRIER wrote:
Hi,
Christian Zietz writes:
Hi,
as developer of 855patch I get a lot of feedback from people using
XFree86 on computers with i855GM graphics.
It seems like new notebooks by Dell feature a new video BIOS from Intel
Alain,
Can you try the int10 emulator ?
To do this, (re)move this file out of the way.
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a
Then XFree86 will use
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libint10.a
Which is the emulator. Does it still lockup with that BIOS call ?
Alan.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:33:41PM +0100, Alain Poirier wrote:
Le vendredi 20 Février 2004 01:33, Alan Hourihane a écrit :
Alain,
Can you try the int10 emulator ?
To do this, (re)move this file out of the way.
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a
Then XFree86 will use
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:29:32PM +0100, Christian Zietz wrote:
Hi,
Alan Hourihane schrieb:
Is there a string 'DELL' or similar in the BIOS that we can use the
function xf86ReadBIOS() to detect this buggy BIOS and skip using this
function call in this case
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:37:27PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
Christian,
thank you for the investigation. It proves that we are not to blame.
It remains to see what should be done about it. Disabling the offending
function by default for all future doesn't seem to be a good idea as
the
I'm looking to enhance the parser in XFree86 so that a lot of redundant
code in the current drivers that implement the 'mergedfb' mode can
be eliminated such that they don't have to do all the monitor munging
in the driver.
So here's two variants of the modifications to the XF86Config I'm
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:10:40PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I'm looking to enhance the parser in XFree86 so that a lot of redundant
code in the current drivers that implement the 'mergedfb' mode can
be eliminated such that they don't have to do all the monitor munging
in the driver.
So
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:57:50PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking to enhance the parser in XFree86 so that a lot of
redundant
code in the current drivers that implement the 'mergedfb' mode can
be eliminated such that they don't have
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:11:02PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
And please don't break binary compatibility with drivers who
parse the current Monitor info in the ScrnInfoRec.
Absolutely, that is a main priority, as is allowing the new XFree86 server
to still parse older XF86Config files.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:19:21PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
The current XAA has functions starting with XAA and header files
starting with xaa. To avoid namespace pollution, the second
implementation of XAA will need a different namespace. It seems
good to avoid calling it anything
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:19:21PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
The current XAA has functions starting with XAA and header files
starting with xaa. To avoid namespace pollution, the second
implementation of XAA will need a different namespace. It seems
good to avoid calling it anything
I remember that a couple of extra tests failed with Xinerama enabled.
The ones I'm seeing are XCopyArea and XCopyPlane. Are these the ones
that are expected to fail - Mark V. ?
Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
What's the current status of the new xaa ??
Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:28:39AM -0600, Mark Cuss wrote:
Hi All
I have a laptop with an Intel 82852/855GM Integrated graphics chipset. The
machine is running RedHat 9 with the new 4.4.0 X Server. I'd like to use
the XVideo extension on the machine, but xvinfo reports that no adaptors are
-
From: Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Cuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: X Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Intel 82852 Xv
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:28:39AM -0600, Mark Cuss wrote:
Hi All
I have a laptop
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:06:55PM -0600, Mark Cuss wrote:
Hello again
I have an application running on this machine that decodes MPEG-2 into a
window and then draws overlays on top of the video using a colorkey. This
works on other hardware combinations (ie - an Intel 810, anything nVidia,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:44:31PM +0200, root wrote:
I think there's a bug in the acceleration code of the s3 driver. When scrolling
(with acceleration enabled), only parts of the screen that become newly visible
really get visible, the screen doesn't scroll up. XaaNoScreenToScreenCopy
Have you tried adding
Option VBERestore false
Alan.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:37:34AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
I've checked the CVS, and found that the i810 driver up to 4_3_99_9 works
after resume, but anything after 4_3_99_9 has the same problem of
displaying black screen after apm resume.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:53:59AM +0530, Suresh wrote:
Hi,
I am using Voyager CF card for exporting display to the VGA monitor my
handheld runs Xfbdev. Can any one tell me how to configure.
The Voyager CF isn't supported by Xipaq. As for Xfbdev, it would require
a kernel driver
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:18:10AM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 05:44:14PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
CVS compile works for me since this change
revision 3.479
date: 2004/06/23
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:28:06AM -0700, Torrey Lyons wrote:
I've written up some documentation on the generic rootless layer in
Xserver/miext/rootless. What is the appropriate place and format for
this kind of documentation in the tree?
For now, I'd probably stick it into the same
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:00:22PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:43:18AM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 07:37:29PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
The schedule for the next XFree86 release -- 4.5.0 is as follows:
26 January 2005feature
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:11:38PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Has anyone tried DRI on an i810 with the current tree? I get a
ring buffer lockup almost immediately after running glxgears. This
is with the current i810 DRM module built and loaded against an
otherwise stock 2.4.24 kernel.
I've
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:27:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:20:06AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:11:38PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Has anyone tried DRI on an i810 with the current tree? I get a
ring buffer lockup almost immediately
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only
appears to build for a narrow range of kernels, and this either
needs to be fixed, or the minimum
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:40:07PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:14:59PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:52:27PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:40:07PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500
Hi Jong,
You can submit it via [EMAIL PROTECTED] or via bugzilla database at
http://bugs.xfree86.org and create an attachment with the patch.
Use the 'diff -u' command to create a unified diff makes it easier to
see the changes you made.
Thanks for your future submission,
Alan.
On Fri, Feb
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 06:15:16PM -0300, Nqnsome wrote:
Thanks a lot for the explanations, but I would like to return to the
question why the CRT works under 1024x768 and the LCD not. Can this be
related to the VESA VBE DCC that does not work on the LCD?
If you boot up on the LCD and have
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:11:48PM -0800, Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
Nqnsome wrote:
Hi,
Thanks again.
Alex Deucher wrote:
Alex is correct. Let focus on the primary display controller on
PCI:0:2:0 with Display Pipe A and Display Pipe B.
In your case you can only have PipeA=CRT and
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:39:28PM -0800, Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
I became aware of this problem few years back (since 2003). The first
time I experienced it was with a DELL laptop, and I didn't have free
time then to debug it when I actually had
Can you provide a log with that driver ?
Alan.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 12:57:38AM -0300, Nqnsome wrote:
Hi,
I tryed your driver, but could not get 1024x768 on the LCD. XFree does
not see the Built-in 1024x768 mode.
Thanks,
S?rgio
Alan Hourihane wrote:
I've already done work
Actually,
From the look of your log file, the 1024x768 mode isn't supported at all
on your LCD. And although your LCD is reported at 1024x768 it looks
like your BIOS is broken.
ModeAttributes should show 0x9b, whereas it's showing 0x9a.
That first bit is dictating whether XFree86 allows the
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:17:07PM -0300, Nqnsome wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for answering.
Christian Zietz wrote:
I still suppose that your BIOS only recognizes the LCD as a 800x600 one,
while the CRT is recognized correctly as being able to display 1024x768.
The Windows XP driver
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:51:54PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
Hi.
I've been auditing various builds and noticed that
xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/x11 is never built, let alone referenced. Is this
an oversight, or can this directory be deleted?
It could be deleted. It's essentially a
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:27:46AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:51:54PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
Hi.
I've been auditing various builds and noticed that
xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/x11 is never built, let alone referenced. Is this
an oversight, or can
Fixed.
Alan.
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:44:58 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
Latest CVS build has this problem during 'startx' ...
Symbol i830PrintModes from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o
is
unresolved!
Changes prior to May 23 is ok.
Thanks,
Jeff
I thought I'd replied to this, but maybe not.
The current CVS for the intel driver does support gamma correction
on the i865.
Alan.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:35:16AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
While i865G hardware might support gamma correction, the
XFree86 drivers for it do not. I
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 14:31 +, Barry Scott wrote:
I'm running 4.5.99.18 and having problems with supporting HDReady panels.
The HDReady panels support [EMAIL PROTECTED] typically.
Using the i810 driver on a i945G with the i915resolution hack I can
get the driver to set 1360x768 but not at
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:37 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
I'm testing the i945G driving a Hitachi panel that has a preferred mode
of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RC2 sets the refresh to 75Hz that is not allowed by the EDID. Attached
is the config created
by X -configure and the X log at logverbose 8. I
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 18:23 +0200, jf simon wrote:
Hi,
For non x86 architecture, I understand that xfree86
is able to initialize (soft boot) PCI graphic cards, by emulating the VGA
BIOS extension located on the graphic card.
Does x86 VGA BIOS emulation for powerPC works in xfree86? We
100 matches
Mail list logo
