Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

31.10.2016 22:35 Chris Murphy wrote: > [...] And if I refresh, it appears to be > downloading a lot of data all over again - I just don't know what and > have no good way to troubleshoot this, but the refresh is taking a > long time, maybe 30 minutes. That's definitely

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 22:50 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Since offline updates are the default, and packagekit downloads >> everything currently needing updating, if the user doesn't ever do a >> Restart & Install

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: >> On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 22:50 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> Since offline updates are the default, and packagekit downloads >>>

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 switchable graphics Test Day this Thursday, 2016-11-03

Yep, it's Test Day time again - most likely the final Test Day of the Fedora 25 cycle. This Thursday, 2016-11-03, will be [switchable graphics Test Day][1]! 'Switchable graphics' refers to the fairly common current practice of laptops having two graphics adapters, one low-power one for general

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 11:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 18:15 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > This is more of an issue for Workstation and the spins destined for > > desktop use, so any possible solution needs to rely on > > Anaconda/Initial Setup and each DE. >

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On 10/31/2016 02:12 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 10/31/2016 02:01 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Monday, October 31, 2016 1:45:22 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: On 10/26/2016 02:45 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:33:34 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: Debian does not build

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 15:35 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > The other thing I'm seeing is, I'll get a notification for software > updates, click on it, see the Restart & Install blue button in GNOME > Software, close/quite GNOME Software, and at some later time relaunch > GNOME Software and it says

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 18:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Huh, since F23 or so I've found the refresh button to be pretty > reliable. It does seem to actually force Software to go refresh the > metadata and download available updates, now. I think in the past it > just 'forced' a run of the

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 19:57 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I think it's a GNOME Software bug that it says up to date when it's > not. I've complained about that for years. It will happily tell you > that your freshly-installed Fedora system is up to date months after > release, before the

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG on 2016-11-01 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting for the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 28.10.2016 v 00:17 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > >> * From time to time, there is necessary to build some framework, which >> consist of several components which must be released together. >> Currently, we either temporarily break Rawhide or we are asking for side >> tag. But why not use koji

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:02:43AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:15 +0100, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > > I > > just found that the packagekit cache on my machine is about 7Gb !!! > > This has got to be a bug, please report it. There are several bug reports about

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

You can add this one https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768632 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Private Bugzilla bugs

On 10/24/2016 06:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 18:07 +0200, Jakub Filak wrote: >> I use ABRT to report crashes, I deal with ABRT reports and I'm happy >> with >> the current default. >> >> I am sorry. I understand your problem, but I don't have any good >> solution >> for

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 22:50 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Since offline updates are the default, and packagekit downloads > everything currently needing updating, if the user doesn't ever do a > Restart & Install to proceed with offline updates, i.e. they only > ever > use dnf for updates and never

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson wrote: > 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing > fairly data-hungry transactions in the background, out of the box, > without telling you about it. GNOME's is particularly bad, as it will >

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On 10/31/2016 02:01 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Monday, October 31, 2016 1:45:22 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: On 10/26/2016 02:45 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:33:34 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: Debian does not build from SCM, but directly from maintainer-uploaded

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 01:29:45PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > > You can't. You get a box of bits if you start replacing parts of the > > Workstation experience > Right, in this case you'd just have to do "gsettings set > org.gnome.software download-updates false" -- we can't possibly cope >

Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

2016-10-31 14:25 GMT+01:00 Marek Skalický : > Hi, > current situation: > EPEL6 - MongoDB 2.4.x > EPEL7 - MongoDB 2.6.x > > Upstream supports only upgrade to next major version. So from 2.4 it is > supported only to 2.6. > Therefore I kept MongoDB 2.6 in EPEL7 (even two next

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 31/10/16 13:29, Richard Hughes wrote: On 31 October 2016 at 12:55, Bastien Nocera wrote: So how do I tag a connection as unmetered with systemd-networkd? You can't. You get a box of bits if you start replacing parts of the Workstation experience Right, in this case

MongoDB in EPEL7

Hi, current situation: EPEL6 - MongoDB 2.4.x EPEL7 - MongoDB 2.6.x Upstream supports only upgrade to next major version. So from 2.4 it is supported only to 2.6. Therefore I kept MongoDB 2.6 in EPEL7 (even two next major versions are released). But MongoDB 2.6 is going to EOL (probably this

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Monday, October 31, 2016 1:42:12 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: > On 10/26/2016 02:31 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:03:20 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: > >>> However, extending Koji to support "hidden builds" is certainly a good > >>> idea. > >> > >> Trust me, it's

Re: Python packages tests directory co-ownership

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:00:58PM -0200, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > tl;dr: different packages own /usr/lib/pythonX/site-packages/tests and > different files with the same name inside that directory. > > Hi all, > > I was going through a package review and realized the package under > review owns >

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161031.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-25-20161030.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161031.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size

Python packages tests directory co-ownership

tl;dr: different packages own /usr/lib/pythonX/site-packages/tests and different files with the same name inside that directory. Hi all, I was going through a package review and realized the package under review owns /usr/lib/pythonX/site-packages/tests and some files inside the directory.

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 31 October 2016 at 13:33, Matthew Miller wrote: > This is per-user, right? Right. > How do you do it for the whole system? I guess use a dconf override to change the default for all users, e.g.

Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Marek Skalický wrote: > Hi, > current situation: > EPEL6 - MongoDB 2.4.x > EPEL7 - MongoDB 2.6.x > > Upstream supports only upgrade to next major version. So from 2.4 it is > supported only to 2.6. > Therefore I kept MongoDB 2.6 in EPEL7 (even

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 01:38:17PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > I guess use a dconf override to change the default for all users, e.g. >

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

- Original Message - > On 31/10/16 12:18, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > They're metered unless you either tag them as unmetered, or hints are > > provided > > to NetworkManager by what you're connected to. For example, Android > > tethering > > is automatically tagged as metered as

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Monday, October 31, 2016 1:45:22 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: > On 10/26/2016 02:45 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:33:34 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: > >> Debian does not build from SCM, but directly from maintainer-uploaded > >> source packages, so there is no

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 31 October 2016 at 12:55, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> So how do I tag a connection as unmetered with systemd-networkd? > You can't. You get a box of bits if you start replacing parts of the > Workstation experience Right, in this case you'd just have to do "gsettings set

Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

On 10/31/2016 09:25 AM, Marek Skalický wrote: > Hi, > current situation: > EPEL6 - MongoDB 2.4.x > EPEL7 - MongoDB 2.6.x > > Upstream supports only upgrade to next major version. So from 2.4 it is > supported only to 2.6. > Therefore I kept MongoDB 2.6 in EPEL7 (even two next major versions are >

compat-openssl10-engine_pkcs11

Hi,  In F26 with the openssl 1.1.0 rebase libp11/engine_pkcs11 will be compiled only for openssl 1.1.0. That means that there will be no engine_pkcs11 for the packages linking to openssl 1.0.x. For that I've created the compat-openssl10-libp11 package which is intended to provide just that

Re: Python packages tests directory co-ownership

On 31/10/16 14:00, Athos Ribeiro wrote: tl;dr: different packages own /usr/lib/pythonX/site-packages/tests and different files with the same name inside that directory. Hi all, I was going through a package review and realized the package under review owns

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161031.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161030.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161031.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 42 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

> On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing > > fairly data-hungry transactions in the background, out of the box, > > without telling you about it. GNOME's is particularly bad, as it

Re: Slow configure scripts

On Saturday, October 29, 2016 7:09:35 PM CET Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 27/10/16 20:19, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > On 27/10/16 17:09, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 3:23:25 PM CEST Pádraig Brady wrote: > >>> On 24/10/16 17:35, Florian Weimer wrote: > I recall some

Re: docker-compose & selinux

On 10/30/2016 02:54 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > On 10/28/2016 02:58 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> What AVC's are you seeing? > Plenty of AVC messages in the form: > > type=AVC msg=audit(1477853452.023:1338): avc: denied { setattr } for > pid=23456 comm="chown" name="app_model.MYD" dev="dm-0"

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On 10/26/2016 02:31 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:03:20 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: However, extending Koji to support "hidden builds" is certainly a good idea. Trust me, it's not. Embargoes are against the spirit of Fedora, and a general hassle for everyone

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Friday, October 28, 2016 12:17:13 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > > It is actually quite interesting, that while most of the development > > happens in Rawhide, there is less sanity checks then for the Rawhide, so > > if you screw up something in Rawhide, it will get into stable version > > and

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 31/10/16 11:41, Richard Hughes wrote: On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson wrote: 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing fairly data-hungry transactions in the background, out of the box, without telling you about it. GNOME's is

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 31 Oct 2016, at 11:41, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing >> fairly data-hungry transactions in the background, out of the box,

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 31/10/16 12:18, Bastien Nocera wrote: They're metered unless you either tag them as unmetered, or hints are provided to NetworkManager by what you're connected to. For example, Android tethering is automatically tagged as metered as Android provides a hint in its DHCP configuration. What

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

- Original Message - > On 31 Oct 2016, at 11:41, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > > On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > >> 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing > >> fairly data-hungry

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

Dne 27.10.2016 v 20:21 Orion Poplawski napsal(a): > On 10/27/2016 08:05 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? >>> Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On 10/26/2016 02:45 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:33:34 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: Debian does not build from SCM, but directly from maintainer-uploaded source packages, so there is no need to have a private SCM. Do we have a good marketing for the fact that we

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

- Original Message - > > On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing > > > fairly data-hungry transactions in the background, out of the box, > > > without telling you about

Fedora 25-20161031.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Server boot x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Server dvd x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in 25-20161030.n.0): ID: 45129 Test: arm

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 31 October 2016 at 14:56, Bastien Nocera wrote: > I'd really like the kernel to do QoS on the user's own connections. We can > know > whether downloads are interactive or not, so there is metadata available > to make this better, and not cripple interactive downloads while

Fedora Rawhide-20161031.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/101 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161030.n.0): ID: 45159 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45159 Old failures (same test failed in

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:32 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson > t.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing > > > fairly data-hungry transactions in the background, out of

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:23:58 +0200 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 7:37:32 PM CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > 3. AFAIK Fedora has no means by which it can participate in > > > embargoed updates. For this to work, I think there ought to be > > > private git

Re: Koji payload hash?

On 10/21/2016 05:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:42:02 + Christopher wrote: What is the "Payload Hash" in koji? It looks like an MD5, but of what? It's not the rpm... I've checked. Should koji be providing verification hashes for manual

Re: Koji payload hash?

On 10/31/2016 05:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 10/21/2016 05:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:42:02 + Christopher wrote: What is the "Payload Hash" in koji? It looks like an MD5, but of what? It's not the rpm... I've checked. Should koji be

Reviews Weekly

Start Date: 2016-10-24 10:08:01.487323 End Date: 2016-10-31 10:08:01.487323 Jitka Plesnikova : 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387634 perl-Devel-Gladiator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387626 perl-Term-Chrome

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 2 packages were orphaned rodent [master] was orphaned by sagitter Advanced user file manager for Linux/BSD systems

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:25 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Otherwise your description doesn't seem to square with the fact that > > most everyone sees background update downloads OOTB. > > > > Even still, in fact, kparal mentioned them happening on hotel wifi, so > > why would that be the case

Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

Hi, thanks for answers and suggestion that epel-de...@lists.fp.o would be better - so I've posted it there https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TQPBQ25T6F323WYOGNOB6XYMEZDCSFEK/ Marek ___ devel

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

Hello, I'm not sure I have all my facts straight -and by all means, please help straighten them out-, but I would like to address Adam's original proposals. This is more of an issue for Workstation and the spins destined for desktop use, so any possible solution needs to rely on Anaconda/Initial

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On 2016-10-27, Matthew Miller wrote: > Yeah, so I guess "all" is the wrong word. It'd be nice to be able to > review and override specific rpmlint errors on a per-package bases (and > maybe a process to review those overrides to prevent abuse when there's > a real

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 08:18 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > How does a connection become "unmetered"? It can't just be on interface > > type, > > as I have metered connections on all interface types, so presumably you use > > some form of web service to distinguish "metered" from "unmetered"

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:19:54PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Yeah, so I guess "all" is the wrong word. It'd be nice to be able to > > review and override specific rpmlint errors on a per-package bases (and > > maybe a process to review those overrides to prevent abuse when there's > > a real

Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

There is no version 2.8 of Mongo, they renamed that to 3.0 before release of 3.0. Just to provide a sense of the thought process other EPEL7 users might be going through here: I started researching this when I became aware that 2.6 was nearing upstream end-of-life (that is now happening

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 11:55 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 31/10/16 11:41, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 30 October 2016 at 01:26, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing > > > fairly data-hungry transactions in

Re: Koji payload hash?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/31/2016 05:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 10/21/2016 05:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:42:02 + > >> Christopher wrote: > >> > >>> What is the

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 08:18 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > How does a connection become "unmetered"? It can't just be on interface > > > type, > > > as I have metered connections on all interface types, so presumably you > > >

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:06:50AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > One of the bugs has a note I was not aware of before: there's > actually a DHCP value that can be sent by the server to denote a > metered connection. If that's actually widely respected, and set by > phone wifi AP applications and

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

- Original Message - > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 08:18 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > How does a connection become "unmetered"? It can't just be on interface > > > type, > > > as I have metered connections on all interface types, so presumably you > > > use > > > some form of web

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:23:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > For that matter, I'm fairly sure I've seen background update > downloading happen when I was using an Android wifi tether > connection. I'm pretty sure I remember it blowing my data cap one > month when I was using my laptop on the

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 15:09 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > > I think this kind of issue is really fixed the hard way, i.e. fixing > bugs and adding unimplemented features rather than just adding complex > UI workarounds. I think making it work as best as possible without interaction is great, 

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

No, there's no UI: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745747 - Original Message - > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 15:09 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > > I think this kind of issue is really fixed the hard way, i.e. fixing > > bugs and adding unimplemented features rather than just

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:12:24 +0100 Florian Weimer wrote: > On 10/31/2016 02:01 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 1:45:22 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: > >> On 10/26/2016 02:45 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:33:34 PM

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 18:15 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > This is more of an issue for Workstation and the spins destined for > desktop use, so any possible solution needs to rely on > Anaconda/Initial Setup and each DE. My $0.02 as a sometimes contributor to gnome-initial-setup: it

Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

Oops, I've copied my reply to the EPEL list as requested. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Tom Boutell wrote: > There is no version 2.8 of Mongo, they renamed that to 3.0 before release of > 3.0. > > Just to provide a sense of the thought process other EPEL7 users might be >

[Bug 1390392] perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390392 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1390392] perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390392 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1215943 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1215943=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1390392] perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390392 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.13 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[389-devel] Re: Please review 48961: Allow reset of cn=config values to default.

On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 15:58 +1000, William Brown wrote: > https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48961 > > Please read this comment for an explanation of the change, > > https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48961#comment:7 http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/configuration-reset.html Combined

[Bug 1390400] New: perl-Moo-2.002005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390400 Bug ID: 1390400 Summary: perl-Moo-2.002005 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Moo Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

[Bug 1388082] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile-2.055 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388082 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1387849] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1388282] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388282 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1388088] perl-Module-Install-1.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388088 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1390392] New: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390392 Bug ID: 1390392 Summary: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.14 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1390032] perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.79 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390032 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1390185] perl-XML-XPath-1.38 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390185 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1390179] perl-Net-CUPS-0.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390179 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1389743] perl-Encode-2.87 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389743 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[389-devel] Please review: 49025 upgrade nunc-stans to 0.2.1

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49025 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49025/0001-Ticket-49025-Upgrade-nunc-stans-to-0.2.1.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Brisbane signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Bug 1387944] perl-Tangerine-0.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387944 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1387805] perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387805 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1390402] New: perl-Role-Tiny-2.000004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390402 Bug ID: 1390402 Summary: perl-Role-Tiny-2.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Role-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1389744] perl-Hijk-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389744 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1387903] perl-Mojolicious-7.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387903 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1382923] perl-Plack-1.0042 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382923 Bug 1382923 depends on bug 1382922, which changed state. Bug 1382922 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded - Parser and builder for application/x-www-form-urlencoded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382922

[Bug 1386663] perl-Devel-Timer-0.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386663 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Object-InsideOut (perl-Object-InsideOut-4.02-7.fc26). "Bootstrap build for Math::Random::MT::Auto on ppc64 and ppc64le"

From bce197335f97d39a6ed3ab4a67f5b349fdb24a17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:39:07 + Subject: Bootstrap build for Math::Random::MT::Auto on ppc64 and ppc64le --- perl-Object-InsideOut.spec | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6

[Bug 1389608] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389608 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1390032] perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.79 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390032 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.79-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-16b4c32aaa -- You are receiving this

Re: Proposal to move things from fedora-qa.git to Pagure

On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 07:19 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hey folks! > > > > So, if no-one has any objections, I'm intending to move the contents of > > fedora-qa.git from fedorahosted to Pagure. At the same time, I think > > it'd make sense to split some things out into their own projects. My >

  1   2   >