Matthew Toseland skrev:
>> 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
> Now 140 votes.
>> Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
>> games?
I can fix a Windows helper to do this (in the same style as the other
helpers in the wininstaller).
Obviously this once again
Matthew Toseland skrev:
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Now 140 votes.
Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
games?
I can fix a Windows helper to do this (in the same style as the other
helpers in the wininstaller).
Obviously this once again raises
The top 5 uservoice items are still exactly the same. This might be partly
because it's not a front page item any more, but they continue to get more
votes.
On Monday 04 May 2009 16:33:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
Now 226 votes.
>
> As I have
The top 5 uservoice items are still exactly the same. This might be partly
because it's not a front page item any more, but they continue to get more
votes.
On Monday 04 May 2009 16:33:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
Now 226 votes.
As I have mentioned
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
> background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
> kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory
On Sunday 10 May 2009 20:50:00 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
> > that!
>
> Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
>
On Sunday 10 May 2009 20:50:00 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory very
On May 10, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
>> Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we
>> already do
>> that!
>
> Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and
> it sadly
>
On May 10, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we
already do
that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and
it sadly
doesn't
On Monday 11 May 2009 16:50:44 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 10, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we
already do
that!
Not really, since I can't
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
> that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to have
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 18:05:22 Robert Hailey wrote:
>
> On May 4, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Evan Daniel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
> > wrote:
> >> 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
> >>
> >> As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 07:16:36 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
> > >
> > > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 05:19:35 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
> >> wrote:
> >> > 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
> >> >
> >> >
On May 4, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>> 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
>>
>> As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more
>> performance.
>
> I'll reiterate a point I've made before.
>
>
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
> >
> > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> > games?
>
> Or with other filesharing services
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
>> >
>> > As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more
>
On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
> >
> > As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more
performance.
>
> I'll reiterate a point I've made before.
>
>
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 05:19:35 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20
On May 4, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more
performance.
I'll reiterate a point I've made
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 07:16:36 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 18:05:22 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 4, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
>
> As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
>
> 2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
>
> This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
>
> 3. Add a 'pause'
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
>
> I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
> nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
>
> Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
>
> I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
> nodes at work perhaps?
University students who want to connect their node in uni with one that runs
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
>
> As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
I'll reiterate a point I've made before.
While this represents a simple plea for performance, I don't think
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
I'll reiterate a point I've made before.
While this represents a simple plea for
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or video
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
nodes at work perhaps?
University students who want to connect their node in uni with one that runs
somewhere
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
3. Add a 'pause' feature.
On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more
performance.
I'll reiterate a point I've
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> > all these people?
>
> I think all people I know privately, including school and
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 16:52:57 Robert Hailey wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009 02:09:21 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> >> So we get to the question, what a freenet contact is: A friend or an
> >> aquaintance.
> >>
> >> If you
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:53:48 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
> > to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
> > sufficient,
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:53:48 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
sufficient, and
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 16:52:57 Robert Hailey wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 02:09:21 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
So we get to the question, what a freenet contact is: A friend or an
aquaintance.
If you look at myspace and
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
all these people?
I think all people I know privately, including school and university,
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
> to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
> sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> > Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
> >
> > Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
>
> It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
> are doing with it. And whom you
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
>
> which
>
> > increases the maintenance cost for toad.
>
> Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
On 4/22/09, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 13:53:45 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
>> > > other member
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:49:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>
> > So duplicating the top block is fairly important. Another weakness is that
> > the last segment in a splitfile may have much less redundancy than the
rest;
> > this can be
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
> > their closest contacts?
>
> I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> all these people?
I think all people I know
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:33:45 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> > > Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
> > >
> > > Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
> >
> > It would only let people know
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:06:48 Romain Dalmaso wrote:
> Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
>
> Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
We are talking about getting darknet connections via IRC, and yes, there is a
tradeoff. However, sending darknet refs via
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:30:02 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > > But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
> >
> > which
> >
> > > increases the maintenance cost for toad.
> >
> > Not sure I follow.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Romain Dalmaso wrote:
> Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
>
> Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you are
doing with it. And whom you are
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 13:53:45 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > > other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
> > > their closest contacts?
> >
> > I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 02:09:21 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
> > VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> > > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
> > > average 20 people they call
On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 02:09:21 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> So we get to the question, what a freenet contact is: A friend or an
>> aquaintance.
>>
>> If you look at myspace and similar sites, you'll see people with
>> hundreds of
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> So duplicating the top block is fairly important. Another weakness is that
> the last segment in a splitfile may have much less redundancy than the rest;
> this can be fixed by making the last 2 segments the same size.
Is there any
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 17:41:59 Theodore Hong wrote:
> There's a thing called Dunbar's number which supposedly represents an
> upper cognitive limit on the number of friendships that a person can
> keep track of - estimated to be around 150.
It?s probably better known as ?the monkeysphere.?
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
> VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
> > average 20 people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes
> > from, but if it's some
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 02:09:21 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
VolodyA! V Anarhist volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
average 20
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
their closest contacts?
I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
all these people?
I think all people I know privately,
Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
On 4/22/09, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 13:53:45 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Romain Dalmaso wrote:
Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you are
doing with it. And whom you are
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
which
increases the maintenance cost for toad.
Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
working
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
are doing with it. And whom you are
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:30:02 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
which
increases the maintenance cost for toad.
Not sure I follow.
They'd be
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
So duplicating the top block is fairly important. Another weakness is that
the last segment in a splitfile may have much less redundancy than the rest;
this can be fixed by making the last 2 segments the same
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:33:45 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
It would only let people know that you are
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:49:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
So duplicating the top block is fairly important. Another weakness is that
the last segment in a splitfile may have much less redundancy than the
On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 02:09:21 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
So we get to the question, what a freenet contact is: A friend or an
aquaintance.
If you look at myspace and similar sites, you'll see people with
hundreds of
friends
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber contacts
VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> 1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
>>
> If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on average
> 20
> people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes from, but if
> it's
> some scientific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three
> are
> usability.
>
> 1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
>
> Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more performance!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three
are
usability.
1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more performance!
Some
VolodyA! V Anarhist volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on average
20
people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes from, but if
it's
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
VolodyA! V Anarhist volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
average 20 people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes
from,
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 17:41:59 Theodore Hong wrote:
There's a thing called Dunbar's number which supposedly represents an
upper cognitive limit on the number of friendships that a person can
keep track of - estimated to be around 150.
It’s probably better known as “the monkeysphere.” [1]
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three
> are
> usability.
>
> 1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
>
> Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more performance!
> Some of this will clearly be from
On Monday 20 April 2009 17:12:23 sich wrote:
> Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> > Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three
are
> > usability.
> >
> > 1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
> >
> > Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more
On Monday 20 April 2009 16:24:57 xor wrote:
>
> > To deal with the issue itself more specifically: infinity0's
> > SoC will be to implement a distributed file
> > indexing/searching system.
>
> Will it be possible to make him use the WoT plugin as a base for it?
> This would make very much
> To deal with the issue itself more specifically: infinity0's
> SoC will be to implement a distributed file
> indexing/searching system.
Will it be possible to make him use the WoT plugin as a base for it?
This would make very much sense and I can help him if he needs any features.
Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three are
usability.
1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more performance!
Some of this will clearly be from frustrated long-term node operators with
fast
Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three are
usability.
1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more performance!
Some of this will clearly be from frustrated long-term node operators with
fast
To deal with the issue itself more specifically: infinity0's
SoC will be to implement a distributed file
indexing/searching system.
Will it be possible to make him use the WoT plugin as a base for it?
This would make very much sense and I can help him if he needs any features.
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three
are
usability.
1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more performance!
Some of this will clearly be from frustrated
On Monday 20 April 2009 16:24:57 xor wrote:
To deal with the issue itself more specifically: infinity0's
SoC will be to implement a distributed file
indexing/searching system.
Will it be possible to make him use the WoT plugin as a base for it?
This would make very much sense and I
On Monday 20 April 2009 17:12:23 sich wrote:
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
Top 5 suggestions on freenet.uservoice.com. Two are performance, and three
are
usability.
1. (200 votes) Release the 20 nodes barrier
Interesting that the top issue is essentially a plea for more performance!
89 matches
Mail list logo
