Am I right understand that before using Tkd I should install
Tcl/Tk ?
I tried to build simple project with dub and got error that
system do not have tcl86.DLL
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 07:33:55 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Am I right understand that before using Tkd I should install
Tcl/Tk ?
I tried to build simple project with dub and got error that
system do not have tcl86.DLL
Yes. All is explained in the dependencies section in the readme
text.
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:40:48 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Any way to see the TOC?
Hmm, not on the website yet but here it is. Each one is shown
through examples (with a few exceptions where I couldn't think of
a good example but wanted to discuss the principle behind it
anyway):
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:12:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:40:48 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Any way to see the TOC?
Hmm, not on the website yet but here it is. Each one is shown
through examples (with a few exceptions where I couldn't think
of a good example
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:19:09 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Holy s**t, that is a lot! How did you manage to fit all this in
337 pages?!
Each individual item tended to only be about 3 pages, some
shorter, a few longer (I had a fair chunk to say about ranges and
reflection, not so much to say
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:12:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:40:48 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Any way to see the TOC?
Hmm, not on the website yet but here it is. Each one is shown
through examples (with a few exceptions where I couldn't think
of a good example
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:39:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:19:09 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Holy s**t, that is a lot! How did you manage to fit all this
in 337 pages?!
Each individual item tended to only be about 3 pages, some
shorter, a few longer (I had a fair
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 15:28:01 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Everything sounds great, really can't wait. Coming from C++ I
am really interested in resource management. I still can't find
myself in non-deterministic d-tor / GC world (and recent
discussion on removal of d-tors entirely isn't
On 3/3/14, 8:37 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
As some of you might know, I've been working on a D book over the last
few months. It is now available as coming soon on the publisher's
website:
http://www.packtpub.com/discover-advantages-of-programming-in-d-cookbook/book
I just agreed with Packt to
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 12:34:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
We're publishing in about two weeks now so it won't be long
until the real thing is out anyway!
Just preordered the ebook, waiting to read that :)
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 16:17:34 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I did find file a couple issues though:
https://github.com/nomad-software/tcltk/issues/4
https://github.com/nomad-software/tkd/issues/11
Fixed.
On 5/6/2014 9:11 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:40:48 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Any way to see the TOC?
Hmm, not on the website yet but here it is.
[snip]
Sounds awesome!
tile-qt with Qt 4.8+ uses invalid pixmaps.
My fix: adding in generic/tileQt_QApp.cpp line 60, 1st line of
TileQt_CreateQApp() :
QApplication::setGraphicsSystem(native);
The native theme is not used on the scrollbars nor on the menus (and a
few other widgets).
On 05/05/2014 12:03 AM,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12708
On Sunday, 4 May 2014 at 16:07:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/4/14, 1:44 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
On Saturday, 3 May 2014 at 22:46:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/3/14, 2:42 PM, Atila Neves wrote:
gdc gave _very_ different results.
I have to say that all this discussion (more precisely the
understanding on the side of key developers) make me very upset.
It's good that Andrei agreed with impossibility of the
harebrained disallowing of the class destructors. But I was very
surprise, that so thought go to such head,
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 04:34:26 UTC, Sergey wrote:
Please, help...
I want to use D (Vibe.d) to create a web client to access the
database of medical institutions. Tell me, please, what about
the reports (report generator)? I need to upload reports in DOC
and XLS.
Thanks in advance.
On 06/05/14 02:49, Mason McGill wrote:
**I'm fairly new to D, so let me know if this belongs in another thread.**
I'd like to contribute a new feature to the DMD front-end, and I'd
appreciate some feedback on the design before I start on a pull request.
Feature:
`__traits(comment,
Am Mon, 05 May 2014 21:13:10 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com:
05-May-2014 20:57, Marco Leise пишет:
That sounds like a more complicated topic than anything I had
in mind. I think a »std.virtualmemory« module should already
implement all the primitives in a portable
On 06/05/14 05:51, HaraldZealot wrote:
Manu, can you direct me what is ARC? This abbreviation is very
misgooglly.
Automatic Reference Counting. Like regular RC but the compiler
automatically inserts calls to release/free.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 05/06/2014 08:08 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 04:34:26 UTC, Sergey wrote:
Please, help...
I want to use D (Vibe.d) to create a web client to access the database
of medical institutions. Tell me, please, what about the reports
(report generator)? I need to upload
On 06/05/14 08:07, HaraldZealot wrote:
I notice that I view only part of problem, can anybody link or describe
me completely state and problems of current garbage collection and other
resource management? It help me in finding of existence solution (at
least theoretical).
The major issue with
Good day. Sorry for my bad english. I'm trying to build the dmd
compiler to Haiku OS. At compile time get the following error:
http://itmages.ru/image/view/1652327/b501e37b
What could be the reason? Thanks.
On 6 May 2014 14:09, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/5/14, 8:19 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5 May 2014 14:09, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This is nice, but on the face of it it's just this:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:07:41 UTC, HaraldZealot wrote:
I notice that I view only part of problem, can anybody link or
describe me completely state and problems of current garbage
collection and other resource management? It help me in finding
of existence solution (at least theoretical).
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:28:20 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 05/06/2014 08:08 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 04:34:26 UTC, Sergey wrote:
Please, help...
I want to use D (Vibe.d) to create a web client to access the
database
of medical institutions. Tell me, please,
On 6 May 2014 16:28, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 06/05/14 05:51, HaraldZealot wrote:
Manu, can you direct me what is ARC? This abbreviation is very
misgooglly.
Automatic Reference Counting. Like regular RC but the compiler automatically
inserts
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:36:40 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:28:20 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 05/06/2014 08:08 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 04:34:26 UTC, Sergey wrote:
Please, help...
I want to use D (Vibe.d) to create a web client to
I found this http://xlslib.sourceforge.net/. Also, it hasn't been
updated in over about two and a half years.
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:51:07 UTC, Sergey wrote:
I found this http://xlslib.sourceforge.net/. Also, it hasn't
been updated in over about two and a half years.
Well in worse case scenario [0] its not like its not
implementable from scratch :)
Although I'd say have a go with the libs I gave
V Tue, 06 May 2014 06:51:02 +
Sergey via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com napsáno:
I found this http://xlslib.sourceforge.net/. Also, it hasn't been
updated in over about two and a half years.
This one does not work properly for large files.
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:39:19 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
a GC friendly set of D constructs where FFI is followed by
programmer guaranteed postconditions (specified by library
authors).
Btw postcondition is the wrong term. In order to be robust need
to specify how far into the GC
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 03:40:47 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 3 May 2014 18:49, Benjamin Thaut via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Am 30.04.2014 22:21, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Walter and I have had a long chat in which we figured our
current
offering of
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:33:51 UTC, iridium wrote:
Good day. Sorry for my bad english. I'm trying to build the dmd
compiler to Haiku OS. At compile time get the following error:
http://itmages.ru/image/view/1652327/b501e37b
What could be the reason? Thanks.
Have you already updated all
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 07:06:09 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:51:07 UTC, Sergey wrote:
I found this http://xlslib.sourceforge.net/. Also, it hasn't
been updated in over about two and a half years.
Well in worse case scenario [0] its not like its not
Paulo Pinto:
Java Azul VM GC was already handling 1 TB in 2010.
http://qconsf.com/sf2010/dl/qcon-sanfran-2010/slides/GilTene_GCNirvanaHighThroughputAndLowLatencyTogether.pdf
GC is not the only way of doing automatic memory management, but
this ongoing discussion steams more from D's current
Brad Anderson:
I like Adam's input range idea. It gives you the best of both
worlds, I think. It clears the conflict between ints and lengths
using an interface.
I don't like it a lot. I think I'd like two differently named
functions. I am not sure.
One last thought. If array() accepted
Mason McGill:
Other implementations can choose to always evaluate it to .
Other implementations have to give the ddostring as well.
In D modules too have a ddoc string.
Regarding comments on single variables, like this, I think they
can be ignored for the moment, and added later with the
On 05/05/2014 12:41 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Regardless, there's
nothing fundamentally limited about @safe except for operations which are
actually unsafe with regards to memory
What does 'actually unsafe' mean? @safe will happily ban statements that
will never 'actually'
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 07:34:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Paulo Pinto:
Java Azul VM GC was already handling 1 TB in 2010.
http://qconsf.com/sf2010/dl/qcon-sanfran-2010/slides/GilTene_GCNirvanaHighThroughputAndLowLatencyTogether.pdf
GC is not the only way of doing automatic memory management,
That experimental package idea that was discussed months ago
comes to my mind again. Add that thing as exp.rational and
have people report bugs or shortcomings to the original
author. When it seems to be usable by everyone interested it
can move into Phobos proper after the formal review (that
On Tue, 06 May 2014 09:56:11 +0200
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 05/05/2014 12:41 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Regardless, there's
nothing fundamentally limited about @safe except for operations
which are actually unsafe with regards to
I recently came across this article
http://www.wired.com/2014/02/julia/. On the Julia homepage there
are some benchmarks times relative to C. I know that bearophile
has mentioned Julia several times on this forum. Has anyone
compared D's vs Julia's performance as well as design features?
The major issue with the garbage collector is that it's not
guaranteed to run a collection. When a collection is run the GC
will call the destructors for the objects it collects. If
there's no guarantee a collection is run there can be no
guarantee that destructors are called. A collection
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 07:23:47 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:33:51 UTC, iridium wrote:
Good day. Sorry for my bad english. I'm trying to build the
dmd compiler to Haiku OS. At compile time get the following
error: http://itmages.ru/image/view/1652327/b501e37b
What
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 15:01:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/5/14, 2:32 AM, JR wrote:
On Sunday, 4 May 2014 at 21:18:24 UTC, Daniele M. wrote:
And then comes my next question: except for that malloc-hack,
would it
have been possible to write it in @safe D? I guess that if
not,
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 14:59:13 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-04 4:34 AM, Daniele M. wrote:
I have read this excellent article by David A. Wheeler:
http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/heartbleed.html
And since D language was not there, I mentioned it to him as a
possible
good candidate due to
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 00:30:10 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Sunday, 27 April 2014 at 05:43:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Added SbrkRegion, SimpleBlocklist, and Blocklist.
http://erdani.com/d/phobos-prerelease/std_allocator.html#.SbrkRegion
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:07:41 UTC, HaraldZealot wrote:
I have to say that all this discussion (more precisely the
understanding on the side of key developers) make me very upset.
It's good that Andrei agreed with impossibility of the
harebrained disallowing of the class destructors. But
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 18:32:30 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 17:46:35 UTC, Orvid King via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Destructors and finalizers are the same thing.
That is exactly the point that I am arguing against. That they
are confused in D (or 'unified', if you think is
On 6 May 2014 16:33, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 06/05/14 08:07, HaraldZealot wrote:
I notice that I view only part of problem, can anybody link or describe
me completely state and problems of current garbage collection and other
resource management?
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 18:08:22 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
So, instead of removing destructors why not have multiple
types? If the object is manually allocated then we can
guarantee the destructor will be called when the object is
free'ed.
But basically, since they would be different types of
Paulo Pinto:
You can think of Julia as a dynamic language similar to Python,
with optional typing and for such a young language, a quite
good JIT compiler backed by the LLVM backend.
Unlike dynamic languages, at running time all variables are
strongly typed.
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 09:11:30 UTC, Chris wrote:
I recently came across this article
http://www.wired.com/2014/02/julia/. On the Julia homepage
there are some benchmarks times relative to C. I know that
bearophile has mentioned Julia several times on this forum. Has
anyone compared D's vs
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 11:20:33 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 09:11:30 UTC, Chris wrote:
I recently came across this article
http://www.wired.com/2014/02/julia/. On the Julia homepage
there are some benchmarks times relative to C. I know that
bearophile has mentioned
On 6 May 2014 17:16, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 03:40:47 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Java Azul VM GC was already handling 1 TB in 2010.
Is D compatible with this GC? And how does it go in an environment
with 128mb of ram,
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 18:32:30 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 17:46:35 UTC, Orvid King via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Destructors and finalizers are the same thing.
That is exactly the point that I am arguing against. That they
are confused in D (or 'unified', if you think is
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 10:58:14 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 6 May 2014 16:33, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 06/05/14 08:07, HaraldZealot wrote:
I notice that I view only part of problem, can anybody link
or describe
me completely state and
On 6 May 2014 21:39, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 10:58:14 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 6 May 2014 16:33, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 06/05/14 08:07, HaraldZealot wrote:
I
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:39:45 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
The Obj-C thing as an example. Granted, it's a huge feature and
has extensive implications. The Authors have said themselves
that they agree it's not 'ready' for inclusion... so, what? It
sits and rots? I think it needs an
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:05:10 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 6 May 2014 21:39, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 10:58:14 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 6 May 2014 16:33, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
On 2014-05-06 12:04:55 +, Manu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com said:
Notably, I didn't say 'phones'. Although I think they do generally
fall into this category, I think they're drifting away. Since they run
full OS stack's, it's typical to have unknown amounts of free memory
I actually don't think finalizers are an issue in the GC, but I do
agree that there should be a way to ensure that a value is
deterministically finalized. The thing is though, that's currently
possible by simply declaring the value as a struct, unless it's been
heap allocated, in which case we do
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 11:35:53 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Please, make suggestions! It's been years, and I'm still
waiting to hear another realistic proposal.
1. Use @nogc and C++ style allocation for hard real time threads
(render logic).
2. Use segmented GC for soft real time
On 5/5/14, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 00:10:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
1. Follow the new int[n] convention:
2. Follow the [ literal ] convention:
We could combine these pretty easily:
struct Length { size_t length; }
Destructors of the first kind are usually called just
destructors and are used for resource management, and the
second kind are called finalizers. These are useful for
implementing weak references, caching, and various other things
where you don't require objects to be destroyed at a certain
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:21:55 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
As for the gaming world, I don't really have the required
experience to talk much about it. Just doing the heads up that
D GC != GC that many of us use.
I very much appreciate the links you provide about different GC
solutions, and
On Mon, 05 May 2014 20:10:35 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
So I'm looking at creation functions and in particular creation
functions for arrays.
1. Follow the new int[n] convention:
auto a = allok.make!(int[])(42);
assert(a.length == 42);
On 5/6/14, 8:23 AM, bearophile wrote:
Paulo Pinto:
You can think of Julia as a dynamic language similar to Python, with
optional typing and for such a young language, a quite good JIT
compiler backed by the LLVM backend.
Unlike dynamic languages, at running time all variables are strongly
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:25:56 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 5/6/14, 8:23 AM, bearophile wrote:
Paulo Pinto:
You can think of Julia as a dynamic language similar to
Python, with
optional typing and for such a young language, a quite good
JIT
compiler backed by the LLVM backend.
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:36:04 UTC, Orvid King via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
possible by simply declaring the value as a struct, unless it's
been heap allocated, in which case we do the best we can.
Best effort is worse than no effort...
Chris:
That would increase the security during runtime (plugins,
libraries, crackers).
Yes, and also gives almost native performance.
Bye,
bearophile
On 5/6/14, 2:37 AM, JR wrote:
Apologies for the negativity. It's not that much of a deal, but your
code will have to be very unreliant upon phobos to be completely @safe.
It's a huge deal. Most of phobos should be @safe or @trusted! Please
submit everything you find as bugs. Thanks! --
On 5/5/14, 11:07 PM, HaraldZealot wrote:
I have to say that all this discussion (more precisely the understanding
on the side of key developers) make me very upset.
This is a misunderstanding of the situation. This is brainstorming.
There has to be a public place in which ideas can be
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 11:20:33 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 09:11:30 UTC, Chris wrote:
I recently came across this article
http://www.wired.com/2014/02/julia/. On the Julia homepage
there are some benchmarks times relative to C. I know that
bearophile has mentioned
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 14:29:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/5/14, 11:07 PM, HaraldZealot wrote:
I have to say that all this discussion (more precisely the
understanding
on the side of key developers) make me very upset.
This is a misunderstanding of the situation. This is
This is a misunderstanding of the situation. This is
brainstorming. There has to be a public place in which ideas
can be discussed freely, no matter how radical.
This is another misunderstanding :)). Not radicalism upset me,
but proposal to create one more hole instead exist hole from man,
This is another misunderstanding :)). Not radicalism upset me,
but proposal to create one more hole instead exist hole from
man, that touched me solidness in code by his book. It were
surprising. But it's only emotion.
But yes, It may possible as troll mode in brainstorming.
On 6 May 2014 22:30, Michel Fortin via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2014-05-06 12:04:55 +, Manu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com said:
Notably, I didn't say 'phones'. Although I think they do generally
fall into this category, I think they're drifting
On 6 May 2014 22:17, Wyatt via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:39:45 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The Obj-C thing as an example. Granted, it's a huge feature and
has extensive implications. The Authors have said themselves
that they agree
On 5/5/14, 11:39 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 6 May 2014 14:09, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/5/14, 8:19 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5 May 2014 14:09, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
So it would be nice if you reviewed
On 5/6/14, 8:43 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 6 May 2014 22:17, Wyatt via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:39:45 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The Obj-C thing as an example. Granted, it's a huge feature and
has extensive implications.
On 5/6/14, 8:19 AM, HaraldZealot wrote:
This is a misunderstanding of the situation. This is brainstorming.
There has to be a public place in which ideas can be discussed freely,
no matter how radical.
This is another misunderstanding :)). Not radicalism upset me, but
proposal to create one
On 30/04/2014 16:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
A coworker mentioned the idea that unittests could be run in parallel
(using e.g. a thread pool).
There has been a lot of disagreement in this discussion of whether
unittests blocks should run in parallel or not. Not everyone is
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 15:48:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/6/14, 8:43 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 6 May 2014 22:17, Wyatt via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 06:39:45 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
The Obj-C thing as an
Hello,
Walter and I got asked by Packt Publishing about advertising Adam D.
Ruppe's D Cookbook on http://dlang.org/ or
http://wiki.dlang.org/Books. They'd be paying 2-5% of the royalties
depending on the ads' prominence. I estimate that would be low in
absolute numbers, and would probably
On 30/04/2014 20:23, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 18:19:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:58:34 +
Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Unit tests though, by definition (and I'm aware there are more than
On 01/05/2014 18:12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 01 May 2014 10:01:19 -0400, Atila Neves atila.ne...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 11:44:12 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 11:05:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-04-30 23:35, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 01/05/2014 08:18, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 21:49:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:09:14 +0100
Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 11:19 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Hi,
I see no problem with advertising this book if the publisher's
bussness isn't shady and the ad is only a pure (let's keep it the
D way) link - I mean no eveil spying tech behind that or
something similar.
At first look this seems to be a great work and deserves
advertising.
I hope
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 00:10:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So I'm looking at creation functions and in particular creation
functions for arrays.
1. Follow the new int[n] convention:
auto a = allok.make!(int[])(42);
assert(a.length == 42);
assert(a.equal(repeat(0, 42));
2. Follow the
On 5/6/14, 10:41 AM, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 13:25:56 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 5/6/14, 8:23 AM, bearophile wrote:
Paulo Pinto:
You can think of Julia as a dynamic language similar to Python, with
optional typing and for such a young language, a quite good JIT
compiler
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 16:13:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
Walter and I got asked by Packt Publishing about advertising
Adam D. Ruppe's D Cookbook on http://dlang.org/ or
http://wiki.dlang.org/Books. They'd be paying 2-5% of the
royalties depending on the ads' prominence. I
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 15:52:10 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 15:48:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
I can't seem to find simd on our dub site
http://code.dlang.org/search?q=simd. Did you put it there
under another name?
Andrei
I don't think it's there. I would love if it
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
Walter and I got asked by Packt Publishing about advertising Adam D.
Ruppe's D Cookbook on http://dlang.org/ or
http://wiki.dlang.org/Books. They'd be paying 2-5% of the royalties
depending on the ads' prominence. I estimate that would be low in
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 18:58:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/5/14, 11:47 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 5 May 2014 at 18:29:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
My understanding here is you're trying to make dogma out of
engineering choices that may vary widely across projects and
On 5/5/14, 5:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So I'm looking at creation functions and in particular creation
functions for arrays.
[snip]
A few thoughts on the ideas so far (awesome ones, thanks!). Credit is
implied to the respective posters.
struct Length { size_t length; }
On 7 May 2014 01:46, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/5/14, 11:39 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 6 May 2014 14:09, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/5/14, 8:19 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Chris:
That would increase the security during runtime (plugins,
libraries, crackers).
Yes, and also gives almost native performance.
Bye,
bearophile
One can argue that every modern JIT achieves almost native performance ...
--
http://dejan.lekic.org
Missed one... _
On 7 May 2014 01:46, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/5/14, 11:39 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Well, in phobos, just approve 'exp' which has been raised countless
times. I've got contributions that should be in exp, but
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 15:43:22 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I think it's safe to attribute this almost entirely to
the fact it exists in my fork where nobody will find it, rather
than
'exp', where people can still report usage experience,
feedback, and
keep me on track.
As other
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
