Am 18.07.2014 07:54, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/17/2014 9:40 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
i understand your focus on dmd - but talking about fast code and optimizing
WITHOUT even trying to compare with other compiler results is just a little bit
strange for someone who stated speed = money
The
In advancing to a reload system for Cmsed, I've built a directory
skeleton generator[0].
It supports both lua and a simpler text file syntax.
An example of this is:
# Simple skeleton descriptor
dlfile livereload.txt livereload.txt
mkdir bin
mkdir deps
dlfile deps/package.json package.json
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 17:41:59 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
BTW here's the post Andrei made on the day of with the little
notebook paper I used for a topic list and some discussion we
had in May:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/llo7i8$e4e$1...@digitalmars.com
I watched your talk and it
On 7/17/2014 11:42 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 07:54, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/17/2014 9:40 PM, dennis luehring wrote:
i understand your focus on dmd - but talking about fast code and optimizing
WITHOUT even trying to compare with other compiler results is just a little bit
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 04:40:52 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 04:52, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 7/16/2014 7:21 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
can you give an short (working) example code to show the
different resulting
assembler for your for-rewrite example - and what compilers
I've added an indirect link to my awesome-d github page where
your book is listed:
https://github.com/zhaopuming/awesome-d#books
But don't know whether that would be filtered also.
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 19:29:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:48:11 UTC,
On 07/17/2014 10:57 PM, Kiith-Sa wrote:
DSnips is a set of UltiSnips snippets for D (now with GIFs showing each
snippet in action (image-heavy))
https://github.com/kiith-sa/DSnips
This is an attempt to overhaul the D snippets I got merged to UltiSnips
(now a separate vim-snippets
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:42:38 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:37:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Put that on reddit. -- Andrei
I've tried a few times and it doesn't work.. the post appears
to me, but is invisible to everyone else. I think reddit's
silent
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 12:15:19 UTC, Mengu wrote:
i don't know how many times you tried but when i searched the
url on reddit it found 3 results.
Yeah, the top level post seems to work, but comments on other
posts, including this one, don't show up. The indirect link plan
appears to work
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 08:35:07 UTC, Puming wrote:
I've added an indirect link to my awesome-d github page where
your book is listed:
Cool, that seems to be working, thanks!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2b1uat/dconf_2014_mobile_gameserver_backend_in_d_by/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/887057894641226
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/490149592923901952
Andrei
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 08:35:07 UTC, Puming wrote:
I've added an indirect link to my awesome-d github page
Your awesome-d is awesome! Keep up the good work! :D
I didn't know this concept using github. Now I started exploring
the other awesome pages of less than awesome languages too.
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 15:09:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2b1uat/dconf_2014_mobile_gameserver_backend_in_d_by/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/887057894641226
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/490149592923901952
Andrei
On 07/14/2014 05:54 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 00:10:38 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
complete --config= too, so you could tab complete
Yeah, that would be nice. Need to add som json parsing to the bash logic. Any
suggestions on how to most easily and portably do that?
So, I
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 00:44:15 UTC, uri wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 20:57:10 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
DSnips is a set of UltiSnips snippets for D (now with GIFs
showing each snippet in action (image-heavy))
https://github.com/kiith-sa/DSnips
This is an attempt to overhaul the D
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:57:10 +, Kiith-Sa wrote:
DSnips is a set of UltiSnips snippets for D (now with GIFs showing each
snippet in action (image-heavy))
https://github.com/kiith-sa/DSnips
This is an attempt to overhaul the D snippets I got merged to UltiSnips
(now a separate
Plain text transcript of the video (typed up by me, so there may
be some errors but the bulk of it should be readable)
http://arsdnet.net/dconf-transcript.txt
I'll do an annotated HTML version when my schedule permits but
for now you can look at the plain text file there (if you don't
see it
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.4366.1405642929.2907.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Hmm. How to generate a unique id? It must be module-wide, but not
program-wide, because otherwise you get a different mangling depending
on the order of imports. It must not
On 7/17/2014 11:17 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I don't think it will affect existing code (esp. given Walter's stance
on breaking changes!). Probably the old GC-based string functions will
still be around for backwards-compatibility. Perhaps some of them might
be replaced with non-GC
On 7/17/2014 10:47 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Deferring the allocation point to the top level has the advantage of
letting high-level user code decide what the allocation strategy should
be, rather than percolating that decision down the call graph to every
low-level function.
deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 19:58:32 UTC, Tobias Müller wrote:
IMO manual memory management is quite easy. In 99% of all cases ownership
is clear to trivial.
But maybe this is just because I usually write C++ and ownership is crucial
in C++. Maybe
On 17/07/14 22:18, Dicebot wrote:
Discouraged and unmaintained is probably a better description.
How does it need maintaining?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 18/07/14 03:55, Israel Rodriguez wrote:
This man has it right. I dont think quality is a huge issue though
unless youre watching something that needs to be sensitive to the eye in
which case youtube will work just fine for these videos.
Youtube supports resolutions of 4k, I don't see the
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 09:57:09 UTC, currysoup wrote:
Just from watching a few of the DConf 2014 talks, if you want
performance you avoid the GC at all costs (even if that means
allocating into huge predefined buffers). Once you're going to
these lengths to avoid garbage collection it
On a whim I did a bit of research into the copyright of derivative
works, and to my surprise they are actually covered by an international
treaty.
This may allow for the creation of a new graphic that is a derivative
work of the current one but has a copyright held by Digital Mars.
There is
On 7/17/2014 3:59 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter's prototype[1] for removing allocations from a phobos function
(std.path.setExtension) got hung up on the naming of the function. It couldn't
keep the same name because it differed only by return type.
Walter doesn't like explicitly naming them
On 7/17/2014 4:56 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Oh dear, you'd be in for a very nasty surprise if you relied on this. ;)
When I wrote that part of the spec, it was long before these sorts of
optimizations appeared, and it never occurred to me that they would be.
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 16:28:00 UTC, Tero wrote:
Just watched Don's DConf 2014 talk where he said D has to be
ruthless about
memory inefficiency. Here's one thing that I think could help
avoid unnecessary garbage: built-in syntax for this:
import core.stdc.stdlib : alloca;
ubyte[]
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 08:49:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/17/2014 4:56 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Oh dear, you'd be in for a very nasty surprise if you relied
on this. ;)
When I wrote that part of the spec, it was long before these
sorts of optimizations appeared, and it never
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:19:04 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:58:14PM +, Chris via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 17:49:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
AFAIK some work still needs to be done with std.string;
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 06:46:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 17/07/14 22:18, Dicebot wrote:
Discouraged and unmaintained is probably a better
description.
How does it need maintaining?
I mean that if you create bug report or enhancement request for
scope classes it is quite unlikely
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 00:08:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 06:32:58PM +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:22:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Actually, I've realized that output ranges are really only
On 17/07/2014 18:56, Dicebot wrote:
It has never worked properly (opCall never got called) and being a bad
style going against language design rationale it was completely banned.
More info: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12124
Thanks for the link. We need a note in the changelog
On 17/07/2014 18:58, Dicebot wrote:
(for Unique probably disabling default constructor makes most sense)
I'm not sure about that, default construction is useful to be able to
delay resource creation:
Unique!S u1;
...
u1 = unique!S(); // factory function
To allow that but
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:13:18 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
Are those that say the GC is fine and works for 90-95% of apps
without issue just ignorant? Or are they arrogant?
...
We probably had the fortune of using operating systems written in
GC enabled system programming languages before
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:13:18 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
Are those that say the GC is fine and works for 90-95% of apps
without issue just ignorant? Or are they arrogant?
When one is writing a real time app and have the absolute
lowest chance of losing control, a STW GC is simply not
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 13:17:34 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:13:18 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
Are those that say the GC is fine and works for 90-95% of apps
without issue just ignorant? Or are they arrogant?
When one is writing a real time app and have the absolute
Dominikus Dittes Scherkl:
The very little rest is things like exceptions, delegates and
closures - because I have no idea how to use them with manual
memory management. So unfortunately I have to avoid them in RT
code.
Some closures can be avoided with scope, and some exception
allocations
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 13:53:14 UTC, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl
wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 13:17:34 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:13:18 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
Are those that say the GC is fine and works for 90-95% of
apps without issue just ignorant? Or are they
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 07:43:32 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
On a whim I did a bit of research into the copyright of
derivative works, and to my surprise they are actually covered
by an international treaty.
WIPO has treaties, but they only affect local law on the
least-common-denominator
On 7/17/14, 11:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 18/07/14 03:55, Israel Rodriguez wrote:
This man has it right. I dont think quality is a huge issue though
unless youre watching something that needs to be sensitive to the eye in
which case youtube will work just fine for these videos.
Youtube
:)) how true
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 14:25:54 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 13:53:14 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 13:17:34 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:13:18 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
Are those that say the GC is
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 15:44:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/17/14, 11:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 18/07/14 03:55, Israel Rodriguez wrote:
This man has it right. I dont think quality is a huge issue
though
unless youre watching something that needs to be sensitive to
the eye
On 7/18/14, 9:32 AM, ponce wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 15:44:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/17/14, 11:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 18/07/14 03:55, Israel Rodriguez wrote:
This man has it right. I dont think quality is a huge issue though
unless youre watching something that
On 07/18/2014 12:00 AM, Trass3r wrote:
void foo(int a, int b = a)
{
}
is illegal in C++ because order of evaluation is undefined.
But since D defines the order to be left to right couldn't it also allow
this?
It could, and I think it is an unnecessary limitation that it currently
does not.
On 7/18/2014 12:40 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
And you can always download a high-quality version from YouTube in
various formats (including the original format) using something like
ClipGrab.
But not the original non-re-encoded version.
On 7/18/2014 2:53 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 18/07/14 03:55, Israel Rodriguez wrote:
This man has it right. I dont think quality is a huge issue though
unless youre watching something that needs to be sensitive to the eye in
which case youtube will work just fine for these videos.
Youtube
On 07/17/2014 04:01 PM, Byron Heads wrote:
A Volatile(T) in stdlib seems to make a lot of sense, I am also wondering
if the implementation of shared should be done the same way (if it does
already then ignore), just use the compile to enforce shared and have it
rewrite it as Shared(T).
...
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 19:58:32 UTC, Tobias Müller wrote:
Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
...
Personally, I don't believe anyone is able to reason properly
about
manual memory management, unless they wrote 100% of their
code, and don't
work in more than one codebase.
IMO
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 08:48:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
Since there are a lot of existing lazy algorithms in Phobos
that do not follow this naming convention, either the
convention is pointless or we go through yet another round of
changing Phobos names and breaking everyone's
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 17:59:05 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
- abbrev : abbreviated: withAbbrev
abbrev actually doesn't belong in this list. I probably included
a few others mistakenly too.
On 07/17/2014 05:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* volatile has been one of the most awkward parts of the C and C++
specifications. If we're to learn of anything about it, it's we must
stay away from it. It is extremely heavy for what it provides.
...
==
I think an approach
On 07/18/2014 10:59 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
maybe use the past participle on the ones with verbs.
I vote 100% for past participle, 20% for with.
- abbrev : abbreviated: withAbbrev
Haha! We can't keep it abbreviated anymore though. Wait, what? :p
- removechars:
On 7/18/2014 11:06 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/17/2014 05:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* volatile has been one of the most awkward parts of the C and C++
specifications. If we're to learn of anything about it, it's we must
stay away from it. It is extremely heavy for what it provides.
...
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:59:03PM +, Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Yeah, I agree. I'd hate having a with prefix on everything.
Yeah, with doesn't fit everywhere, only in some places. I think
withExtension (or withExt) is a very good choice of name. It may
apply to a few other
On 7/18/2014 10:53 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
I've grepped the DMD source and currently 'shared' is a _bit flag_ set or not
set on some uint member field of the 'Type' class. I assume this is also the
main reason why adding new type qualifiers is a really unpleasant undertaking:
this is a highly
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:54:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/x1bsTNf.jpg with archive.org
http://i.imgur.com/CEFCgAi.jpg with youtube.com
Indeed the archive.org resolutions looks visibly better; my
understanding is archive.org is streaming the very mp4 content
I
On 7/18/2014 10:59 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
What do you think?
I'd leaven that proposal with the observation that functions are likely to be
lexically sorted by name. Hence, like functions should lexicographically be
adjacent to each other.
setExtension and withExtension will be widely
On 7/18/2014 1:59 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 08:49:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/17/2014 4:56 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Oh dear, you'd be in for a very nasty surprise if you relied on this. ;)
When I wrote that part of the spec, it was long before these sorts of
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 17:59:05 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 08:48:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
Since there are a lot of existing lazy algorithms in Phobos
that do not follow this naming convention, either the
convention is pointless or we go through yet
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 22:59:27 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter's prototype[1] for removing allocations from a phobos
function (std.path.setExtension) got hung up on the naming of
the function. It couldn't keep the same name because it
differed only by return type.
Walter doesn't like
On 2014-07-18 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Somehow the same DConf videos are of better quality on archive.org than
on youtube.com. Could you explain that? -- Andrei
You're streaming and not downloading from Youtube. I always download
longer video clips from Youtube. I don't want any
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 18:49:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I think it's a fool's errand to try to invent a single system
of naming
that's blindly applied across the board. We should have some
guiding
principles for common cases (like withXxx, xxxOf, verbed,
etc.)
for
On 7/18/2014 12:40 PM, Tourist wrote:
Are you planning to deprecate the non-lazy functions at some (maybe very
distant) point?
No. Phobos has already gone through multiple rounds of renaming/deprecation, all
at considerable disruption. Each one was supposed to be worth it and the last
time.
A few things to know :
- Bitrate is adaptive to accommodate for
- slow to high speed transport layer
- windowed to fullscreen image size (as for C++ you pay for what
you want :)
- resolution can be forced ( click the bottom right gear )
- The original format you upload matters : see
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 19:00:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/18/2014 10:59 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
What do you think?
I'd leaven that proposal with the observation that functions
are likely to be lexically sorted by name. Hence, like
functions should lexicographically be adjacent to
On 14/07/14 08:13, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'm among the minority that REALLY care about this, and it's clear (and it's
been made clear) that if I'm not prepared to work on it myself, then it won't
move forward.
I was one of the people who (gently, I hope) made that suggestion to you. I
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 20:35:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
General comment (not particularly directed at Tourist):
There is no such thing as the perfect set of names and the
perfect naming convention. These discussions about which of
car, auto, vehicle is more intuitive give the illusion
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:14:44PM +, Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 20:35:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
I find these interminable naming threads to be frustrating and an
impediment to progress on issues with Phobos that actually matter,
like making
On 7/18/14, 10:46 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 7/18/2014 12:40 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
And you can always download a high-quality version from YouTube in
various formats (including the original format) using something like
ClipGrab.
But not the original non-re-encoded version.
So I think
On 7/18/2014 2:14 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
It's kind of weird that you'd say that because you seem to be pretty strongly
opinionated about the naming.
It's not just this one, it comes up again and again, always spawning long
debates, and accomplishing next to nothing.
I find these
On 7/18/14, 12:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-07-18 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Somehow the same DConf videos are of better quality on archive.org than
on youtube.com. Could you explain that? -- Andrei
You're streaming and not downloading from Youtube. I always download
longer
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 22:37:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/18/2014 2:14 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
It's kind of weird that you'd say that because you seem to be
pretty strongly
opinionated about the naming.
It's not just this one, it comes up again and again, always
spawning long
std.container.Array seems to have a bug in the latest beta.
emplace fails
// Insert one item
size_t insertBack(Stuff)(Stuff stuff)
if (isImplicitlyConvertible!(Stuff, T))
{
if (_capacity == length)
{
reserve(1 + capacity *
On 07/18/2014 08:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/18/2014 11:06 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/17/2014 05:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* volatile has been one of the most awkward parts of the C and C++
specifications. If we're to learn of anything about it, it's we must
stay away from it.
On 7/18/2014 4:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/18/2014 08:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
That doesn't change the heavy effort in the semantic front end
What does this mean in detail? Is it just about the unfortunate AST
representation chosen or are there more sources of heavy effort in the front
To summarize what I think are the best ideas so far:
std.string
--
EagerLazy
-
capitalize capitalized
center centered
detabdetabbed
entabentabbed
format formatted
leftJustify
On 07/17/2014 06:27 PM, Tero wrote:
Just watched Don's DConf 2014 talk where he said D has to be ruthless about
memory inefficiency. Here's one thing that I think could help avoid
unnecessary garbage: built-in syntax for this:
import core.stdc.stdlib : alloca;
ubyte[] buffer = (cast(ubyte*)
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 22:39:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/18/14, 12:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-07-18 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Somehow the same DConf videos are of better quality on
archive.org than
on youtube.com. Could you explain that? -- Andrei
You're
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 21:26:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/18/14, 10:46 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 7/18/2014 12:40 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
And you can always download a high-quality version from
YouTube in
various formats (including the original format) using
something
On 07/18/2014 09:23 PM, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 17:59:05 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 08:48:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
Since there are a lot of existing lazy algorithms in Phobos that do
not follow this naming convention, either the convention is
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 22:39:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/18/14, 12:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-07-18 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Somehow the same DConf videos are of better quality on
archive.org than
on youtube.com. Could you explain that? -- Andrei
You're
On 07/19/2014 02:07 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/18/2014 4:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/18/2014 08:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
That doesn't change the heavy effort in the semantic front end
What does this mean in detail? Is it just about the unfortunate AST
representation chosen or are
On Saturday, 19 July 2014 at 00:31:33 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 22:39:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/18/14, 12:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-07-18 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Somehow the same DConf videos are of better quality on
archive.org than
on
On 7/18/2014 6:16 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/19/2014 02:07 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/18/2014 4:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/18/2014 08:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
That doesn't change the heavy effort in the semantic front end
What does this mean in detail? Is it just about the
On 7/18/14, 5:58 PM, currysoup wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 21:26:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/18/14, 10:46 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 7/18/2014 12:40 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
And you can always download a high-quality version from YouTube in
various formats (including the
On 7/18/14, 6:15 PM, Kiith-Sa wrote:
This. Vimeo is quite popular, quality shouldn't be a problem and people
aren't going to wait for an hour like with archive.org.
Awesome. Can you please volunteer to mirror all of dconf videos to
vimeo? Thanks.
Andrei: I'm about 90% sure you're doing
On 7/18/14, 5:31 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 22:39:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/18/14, 12:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-07-18 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Somehow the same DConf videos are of better quality on archive.org than
on youtube.com. Could you
On Saturday, 19 July 2014 at 03:37:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/18/14, 5:31 PM, Joakim wrote:
Do you increase the resolution of your Youtube videos when you
don't
like the quality that it's streaming?
I streamed at maximum resolution (720p) when taking those
screenshots.
Sorry,
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 19:02:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, it doesn't, and I don't intend to add them. I believe they
cause more trouble than they're worth. That applies to some
other optimizations I've also refused to implement, because
while legal, they mess up code that most users
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 19:06:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think it should be only one code base. SWT is actually only
one code base. They have a tool that converts between 32bit and
64bit.
Where can one obtain this tool and, hopefully, its source code?
Mike
Hello !
I'm trying to make MiniD/Croc work with dmd2 and I'm having a
problem with this code and I want to know how to dump the
generated code to understand what's happening.
How that can be done ?
debugmixin.d-mixin-15(15): Error: no identifier for declarator
char[]
-debugmixin.d
On 18/07/2014 11:39 p.m., Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
Hello !
I'm trying to make MiniD/Croc work with dmd2 and I'm having a problem
with this code and I want to know how to dump the generated code to
understand what's happening.
How that can be done ?
debugmixin.d-mixin-15(15): Error: no
On 19/07/2014 12:09 a.m., Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
Thank you so much !
That did exactly what I was looking for, but now why I'm getting that
error message ?
Any help is welcome ! Cheers !
The generated code seems to fine:
debug assert(t.stackIndex t.stackBase, (printStack(t),
While `static if` false branch does not get compiled or
semantically evaluated it still should have a valid syntax.
__FUNCTION__ gets replaced with a fully qualified name of a
function which has dot inside - illegal identifier for a
variable. This causes parser to freak out.
Hello,
So I have this big, performance critical function that takes
about 9 seconds to execute. If I add :
double[] direct = new double[2];
... at the beggining of the function, with no further reference
to this array, suddenly it takes only 8 seconds.
Any rational explaination to this? (
Archibald:
Any rational explaination to this? ( Seems unrelated to garbage
collection )
Not nearly enough info to answer. It looks fishy.
Bye,
bearophile
Maybe this can be usefull for u
https://gist.github.com/bencz/3576dfc8a217a34c05a9
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 23:04:06 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 09:01:35PM +, seany via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Data is a built in type? what includefile do
For all intents and purposes, the following code can be weakly
pure:
struct VAO
{
}
Thanks for all you answers, I think I found the problem.
The constant __FUNCTION__ was not a compiler reserved word at the
time MiniD/Croc was created and it was introduced later on dmd2,
it was clashing with it.
I renamed it to __MFUNCTUION__ and it compiles now, I'm getting
more errors of
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
