Re: Recommend: IDE and GUI library

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 23:44:47 UTC, XavierAP wrote: Still I want to be able to be able to work and debug from Visual Studio. The way I did on Windows: 1) get dlangui via dub 2) go to its folder in AppData\roaming\dub\packages and edit dub.json: * find "minimal" configuration * add

Re: Recommend: IDE and GUI library

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 23:44:47 UTC, XavierAP wrote: On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 20:00:32 UTC, thedeemon wrote: For this I found out how to clone the dependencies, sorry about that... (Only from the command line... Anyone recommends better free Windows Git gui clients than GitHub

Re: Getting underlying struct for parseJSON

On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 21:21:30 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 20:27:25 UTC, Alexey H wrote: [...] It doesn't actually generate one, it just returns a tagged union (a kind of dynamic type). [...] Superb, Adam, thank you! I need to check out inspector.

Re: Mixing libraries

On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 02:27:03 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote: Ah yes, I think you explain the difference between wrapper/binding in one of the Derelict docs. I'm currently working through a ebook on Game Dev with SFML...the examples are all C++. I don't have any trouble translating it to

Re: Recommend: IDE and GUI library

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 23:44:47 UTC, XavierAP wrote: For this I found out how to clone the dependencies, sorry about that... (Only from the command line... Anyone recommends better free Windows Git gui clients than GitHub Desktop?) TortoiseGIT maybe?

Re: Mixing libraries

On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 01:02:39 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 16:12:06 UTC, bauss wrote: There is a better binding. dsfml. You can find it here: http://dsfml.com/ DSFML technically is not a binding (even though it says such on the web site). It's a wrapper

Re: Alignment of struct containing SIMD field - GDC

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 22:15:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 19:09:24 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:34:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Simple test case would be: struct vec_struct { bool b2; struct { bool b; int8

Re: Alignment of struct containing SIMD field - GDC

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 22:15:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 19:09:24 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:34:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Simple test case would be: struct vec_struct { bool b2; struct { bool b; int8

Re: Mixing libraries

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 16:12:06 UTC, bauss wrote: There is a better binding. dsfml. You can find it here: http://dsfml.com/ DSFML technically is not a binding (even though it says such on the web site). It's a wrapper that D-ifies the SFML API. The SFML functions are not callable

Re: Recommend: IDE and GUI library

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 20:00:32 UTC, thedeemon wrote: If you're building your app with VisualD (as opposed to invoking dub externally), make sure you've set up import paths in project settings properly. Thanks. With dub everything works straight forward. I just call it blindly since

Re: Alignment of struct containing SIMD field - GDC

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 19:09:24 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:34:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Simple test case would be: struct vec_struct { bool b2; struct { bool b; int8 field; } } static assert(vec_struct.b.offsetof == 32);

Re: Recommend: IDE and GUI library

On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 22:44:55 UTC, XavierAP wrote: Hi I've looked at wiki.dlang.org/IDEs, and I see that Visual D is linked from dlang.org/download.html. Still I was looking for personal opinions and experiences beyond hard specs, I wonder if one of the IDEs is already dominant at

Re: Recommend: IDE and GUI library

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 17:37:02 UTC, XavierAP wrote: I'm trying now DlangUI on Visual D. I'm getting different errors from missing Derelict library dependencies... If you're building your app with VisualD (as opposed to invoking dub externally), make sure you've set up import paths in

Re: foreach for string[string]AA

On 02/28/2017 07:16 PM, Anton Pastukhov wrote: On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 17:16:43 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote: V Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:15:00 + Anton Pastukhov via Digitalmars-d-learn napsáno: I can't see the logic in AA foreach order. Consider this

Re: Alignment of struct containing SIMD field - GDC

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 18:34:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Simple test case would be: struct vec_struct { bool b2; struct { bool b; int8 field; } } static assert(vec_struct.b.offsetof == 32); static assert(vec_struct.field.offsetof == 64); With explicit

Libharu D binding harud unicode support

How should one use libharu d binding in unicode mode. Consider this basic example. import std.stdio; import harud; import harud.c; void main() { void errorCallback(uint error_number, uint detail_number) { writefln("err %x, %s, (num %x)" , error_number ,

Re: Alignment of struct containing SIMD field - GDC

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 06:04:32 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote: struct vec_struct { alias field this; bool b; int8 field; } In this code when you look at the generated x64 code output by GDC it seems to be doing a nice job, because it has got the offset right for the 256-bit YMM

Re: rdmd with a file with no extension

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 16:06:20 UTC, Colin wrote: When running a small D program through rdmd, it seems the file needs a .d extension to work. It looks like the file extension is enforced: https://dlang.org/dmd-windows.html#switches Looks like a feature rather than a bug... At the

Re: Recommend: IDE and GUI library

On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 06:16:08 UTC, thedeemon wrote: For me Visual-D served well for years, and for GUI on Windows I've used DFL successfully (quite nice lib, very WinForms-like, with a visual editor) and now mostly use DLangUI (on both Windows and Linux). I'm trying now DlangUI on

Re: How to enforce compile time evaluation (and test if it was done at compile time)

On Wednesday, March 01, 2017 17:02:37 Dukc via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 16:43:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > Assert is for program invariants. If the condition is true, > > your program is outright broken. > > Error: He meant that if the condition is

Re: How to enforce compile time evaluation (and test if it was done at compile time)

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 09:19:53 UTC, Christian Köstlin wrote: On 01/03/2017 00:09, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: if (!__ctfe) assert(false); ... might be the best option. That shouldn't be compiled out even in -release builds. thats a nice idea! is this happening because of

Re: How to enforce compile time evaluation (and test if it was done at compile time)

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 16:43:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: Assert is for program invariants. If the condition is true, your program is outright broken. Error: He meant that if the condition is FALSE, the program is faulty.

Re: How to enforce compile time evaluation (and test if it was done at compile time)

On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 09:16:47 sarn via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 07:41:36 UTC, Christian Köstlin > > wrote: > > As I understand the only difference between assert and enforce > > is, that > > assert is not compiled into releases? > > > > Thanks! > >

Re: Mixing libraries

On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 20:08:25 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote: Hello, Been trying to learn the Simple Fast Multimedia Library (SFML) using the Derelict bindings, and noticed some functionality is offered by both SFML and the std library (for example, sfClock and sfMutex). Is there a

rdmd with a file with no extension

When running a small D program through rdmd, it seems the file needs a .d extension to work. ``` $ ./testscript2 Error: module testscript2 is in file './testscript2.d' which cannot be read $ cat testscript2 #!/usr/bin/env rdmd void main(string[] args){ import std.stdio;

Re: foreach for string[string]AA

On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 18:16:45 UTC, Anton Pastukhov wrote: On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 17:16:43 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote: V Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:15:00 + Anton Pastukhov via Digitalmars-d-learn napsáno: I can't see the logic in AA foreach

Re: How to enforce compile time evaluation (and test if it was done at compile time)

On 01/03/2017 00:09, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 00:22:28 UTC, sarn wrote: >>> If you ever have doubts, you can always use something like this to >>> check: >>> >>> assert (__ctfe); >> >> Sorry, "enforce" would more appropriate if you're really checking. > >