[digitalradio] FCC's Riley & Cross Clarify

ons. The operational rule, Cross said, is: *"Your call sign, your responsibility."* -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://bibleseven.com/steel/cjb-steelhouse-index.html

Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM Digital Voice

r to the QSK > ability of CW which probably surpasses and other mode when you have > savvy operators in a structured net environment. > > 73, > > Rick, KV9U -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] Global Standard Re: 141A

re of Ubuntu but am using Puppy Linux >> which I believe shares most features. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] Global Standard Re: 141A

f the tunnel after all -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] 141A

2007.ZIP > <http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_23_04_2007.ZIP> > > John VE5MU -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth Limit (was Re: ARRL wake up ......)

requirement for CW ID on Digital Voice. >>> Bonnie KQ6XA -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] New 200kHz Wideband Digital Voice on 20 meters in USA?

ne. > > Hmmm... what if... these two hams started their 20m ragchew QSO on the > morning of a DX contest? > > Anyone like to set up a digi voice sked? > > ;) > > Bonnie KQ6XA -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption

To protect medical information > 10. To protect 3rd party traffic requiring confidentiality > 11. To control repeaters > 12. To shield identities of children > > I'm sure there are more reasons... but that's some of the things I > thought of in the few minutes it took to write this. > > Bonnie KQ6XA -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] Off-topic, but any help appreciated

ateway Pentium IV, 3.4 Ghz unit with 1G of RAM. No other signs of > trouble. > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of via the reflector. I > hate burning good bandwidth for OT stuff. > > Thanks in advance > Dave > KB3MOW -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E P

Re: [digitalradio] Re: the mislead about pactor and winlink in general

ely. Consequently, the term > semi-automatic control just does not exist! -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] Re: the mislead about pactor and winlink in general

artbeat and who have woven together a magnificent tiny operating system to which it is really easy to add apps. I am trying to learn the process for making what are called "DotPups". -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html Ham QTH: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] the mislead about pactor and winlink in general

l all > of next week. Seems that the cancer has return. > > John, W0JAB -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ham-macguyver/ Ham House & 10 Acres For Sale in Florida: http://mysite.verizon.net/kd4e/

Re: [digitalradio] Best mode for severe QRN?

> was a combination of weaker signals and stronger QRN. > > 73, Rick, KV9U -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Projects: ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: bibleseven.com/kd4e.html

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital Master 780

7;t have enough time to write the Windows code I need. > Just buy an (old) 1 GHz Windows 2000 system and you are in business. > > > Also it's not a port - it really needs a 100% rewrite for Linux / Mac > OS. > > Simon Brown, HB9DRV -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Projects:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital Master 780

n, HB9DRV I have it, just wanted to join in the excitement of your new program! :-) -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Projects: ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: bibleseven.com/kd4e.html

Re: [digitalradio] New Google Broadband may interest hams

Flushing Google appeals to me. Now back to serious non-April 1st discussions. :-) > Andrew O'Brien wrote: > http://www.google.com/tisp/install.html -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Projects: ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: bibleseven.com/kd4e.html

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Report of the ARRL Ad Hoc HF Digital Committee Dissenting

ecessary but blame the selfish scofflaws and not the ARRL or the FCC. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Projects: ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: bibleseven.com/kd4e.html

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Getting RFSM2400 Approved for US Hams

orth America, is very > limited. Would need to take that into account...suspect we work from > different perspectives (who doesn't?) but no need to let that impact > the goal... 73 es be well, Bill N9DSJ -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Projects: ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: bibleseven.com/kd4e.html

[digitalradio] Proposal: Non-Disaster Automatic Ops on 60M Only

e FCC, and still permit development of the mode(s). And 60M is already channelized. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] The right comms on the right spectrum

t type of a message > he was sending? > > At 07:42 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote: > >> I'm with you on that. Why the ARRL supports what is essentially long >> range Citizen's Band or Marine Band is beyond me. >> &g

[digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

t want >> them to be able to send a message back to home. >> >> We have been down this road many many time in the last 2 years >> on this list. We ain't going to take that bumpy ride again. The horse >> has been beat

[digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

rld of Ham radio that frequency- squatting could open up. Sigh. > John Bradley wrote: See below. I just nailed down a frequency, so > don't mess with it !!! *3587.5 141A(3587.3-3590.0kHz) VE5MU ALE > Canada -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital via Fldigi & Puppy [Was: Falling into the Vista trap]

p?t=12724&search_id=986459341&start=15 http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Emc_Puppy It would appear that "It's in there", as the pasta sauce ad goes, but more than that I cannot tell you. You may want to ask on the Puppy For

[digitalradio] Re: Digital via Fldigi & Puppy [Was: Falling into the Vista trap]

i.html <http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html> > download flpuppy-1.30.iso). They load the live Puppy Linux amn > Fldigi -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

[digitalradio] Re: Call for comments on open protocols

op of the neo-commercial abuse of Ham bands by automated Pactor III users. Why the nitpicking of digital and SSTV bandwidths when there is so much abuse elsewhere? Just wondering ... -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyv

[digitalradio] Re: DEX vs. MT-63 -- Linux Version?

emed like DEX was able to handle static crashes better than > other non-ARQ modes. > > 73, Rick, KV9U -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

[digitalradio] Key and Keyboard Errors

dubious keyboard skills I really need a digital mode that includes a real-time grammar & spellchecker to keep me out of typo-trouble! -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

[digitalradio] Bluetooth Remote Base? [Was: Re: Why still the W1AW CW ...]

tired of talking? ;-) Back on topic ... would it be legal to use bluetooth as the wireless link to remote base a HF rig, including operating digital modes from a PDA or laptop? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.b

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580?

t; by example yet they demonstrate selective anarchy -- precisely the thing we do not want former CBers to bring from that world into ours. To say that the message from the ARRL is muddled is an understatement. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580?

violating the voluntary bandplan and QRMing ongoing QSO's in the process earns the term "absurd". An absence of consistency will inevitably lead to CB-like anarchy as "everyone does as he or she sees as best". IMHO, YMMV ... :-) -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580?

nem attacks are silly. Using and improving CW skills requires no ARRL broadcasts -- there are hundreds of CW QSOs to copy every day -- from regular Hams across the HF spectrum. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580?

ng others and to honor voluntary bandplans but they carelessly violate both -- and unnecessarily so. If they want to operate a SW broadcasting station why not apply for a license to do so and liberate more precious spectrum for 2-way Ham communications? Ju

Re: [digitalradio] Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580?

ssary to continued freedom. (Now how do we wake up the new regime in the US Congress?) IMHO, YMMV ... -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Remotely controlled radio with full connectivity.

suggestions and conflicting opinions as to the FCC regs. Anyone out there seen an entirely wireless remote base using 440 and a Yaesu FT-897 or FT-857? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

[digitalradio] Re: Detecting Digital Modes

ed > <http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:yHpNNBnayzIJ:www.hoka.com/+hoka&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-a> > > - Similar pages > <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.

[digitalradio] Re: Detecting Digital Modes [Was: Newbie to DigitalRadio - Couple of Questions]

> All, > HOKA program can detect a lot of digital modes. > Regards, Lev (aa2aj) HOKA? What is it and where may it be found, please? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: SDR-1000

DotPup) which the user just clicks to perform the entire install. Not sure how other distros are handling this. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

[digitalradio] Re: Eliminating musical sound card problems

way towards eliminating > this phenomenon, as Windows, if I am not mistaken, generates its noise > on the primary card. > I do this on Linux in my shack. > 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguy

Re: [digitalradio] An observation on Olivia

y OK, but too close to the GA station. > 73, Rick, KV9U -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~ Announce your dig

Re: [digitalradio] An observation on Olivia

sy copy on the Georgia station. > (Presumably they are getting good copy on each other) Wonder why > this is. Perhaps you in a null off the side of the antenna pattern of the antenna being used by the Georgia station? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~~

Re: [digitalradio] PSK on AM and you get two sidebands for diversity

ell with others, generally difficult to identify and prone-to-QRM semi-auto and auto digital modes -- the restriction of those to narrow segments of the bands makes good sense. Otherwise, with a reasonable enforcement presence, the rest of the bands may be pretty wide open and all modes permitte

Re: [digitalradio] PSK on AM and you get two sidebands for diversity

#x27;t know... I'll have to do a google search on softrock > and see what it is. If that *is* what a softrock is, I > may just have to get one to play with :) > > Jose A. Amador wrote: >> Isn't that a Softrock using SDR-1000 or M0KGK software? >> &

Re: [digitalradio] NBFM Packet & Voice on HF?

> proposed at the same time left us as with the status quo -- the antiquated > regulation that doesn't fit the current technology. Can you draft a request for a sensible change? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Vista emphasizes security over compatibility

modes, you on MS and me on Linux - each seeking to communicate text and images in creative ways. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Vista emphasizes security over compatibility

---- -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Vista emphasizes security over compatibility

pps = Free Now I donate to many Linux developers because I want to support them. It is not about Free to me, it is about choice and integrity and freedom from abusive OS contracts and limitations. Back to digital radio. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~

[digitalradio] PSK on AM and you get two sidebands for diversity

> Interesting. Run PSK on AM and you get two sidebands for diversity > reception and a pilot carrier. This could make building small PSK rigs > easier... > Leigh/WA5ZNU What about DSB or NBFM, same result? -- Thanks! &am

[digitalradio] NBFM Packet & Voice on HF?

75A-1 is an AM/CW/NBFM receiver from 1946, so NBFM would appear to have once been permitted. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Computers that operate on 12 vdc

, 14.5, 16, 19, 22, 24, etc. WDYT? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E > Is there a reason we can't sart some sort of campaign to eliminate "wall > warts". I have 8 of these things laying on my desk each producing a > different voltage for a divice that could easily opera

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FNpsk

raw data files move. The program "knows" what to do after Importing the raw data. I am going back to my dBaseIII days to recall this but it should work fine. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Pe

Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital Modes and NVIS (iow, short range??? as in 300 mi or

ve to be able to do better! IMHO, YMMV ... -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital Modes and NVIS (iow, short range??? as in 300 mi or

e record > needs to be set straight. > - Rich This has already been clarified, acknowledged, and resolved. On to the rest of the legitimate concerns about SCS as a mainstay of emergency comms. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: htt

Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital Modes and NVIS (iow, short range??? as in 300 mi or

Reliable systems for distributed and unpredictable environments are not designed with rare hardware and software but with the capacity to get the job done with whatever is on hand -- The MacGuyver Principle. IMHO, YMMV ... -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E

[digitalradio] Re: HF Digital Modes and NVIS (iow, short range??? as in 300 mi or

available hardware makes far more sense under a vastly more diverse set of probable scenarios. EM is vastly better served through the enhancement of the network of commonly available modes. Such a project is under way via the LinLink project and others. IMHO. YMMV ... 73, doc KD4E > Off-list re

Re: [digitalradio] LinLink - LinLink List

> PSKMail is reaching many of the LinLink goals. > 73, Walt/K5YFW I have just subscribed. Does the "Lin" in LinLink refer to Linux? Is there a Web page with a map of the existing network and where there are needs? -- Thanks!

Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Packet BBS?

ecall 2M as the core of Packet, are 6M and 10M used much? There are tons of rigs being dumped on the market as public service agencies move to the newest Motorola (and other mfg) pie-in- the-sky technologies. We will have to backstop those fragile infrastructures eventually so why not do it partially

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

ence. I am sorry if that makes some people, especially at Microsoft, uncomfortable. 'nuff said, let's move on. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com Note: Bot

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

h Puppy Linux use that. Sure makes things tiny! Puppy also uses a smaller version of Java and about everything runs fine under it. What's the beef with Java? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bib

[digitalradio] Re: hamlib.org domain expiring in 10 days - Support Hamlib!

X License: GNU Library or Lesser General Public License (LGPL) Category: Ham Radio, Interface Engine/Protocol Translator ----- -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

> I have never met anyone who has developed multi-platform software who claims > it is as easy as those who haven't :-) > Simon Brown, HB9DRV Who said anything about "easy"? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

tten by individuals in the Linux world because hardware manufacturers fail to provide them. There is no good business reason for their failure given the millions of Linux users. It is hardly a tiny market. Anyhow, what matters is the original issue -- cross- platform apps make the best sens

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

use raw hand-coded HTML and expect Web browsers to handle it correctly. I don't have enough knowledge, nor do I have the time to acquire it, to do more than that. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.biblesev

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

duct is well-documented. It is a really dumb practice because the growing numbers of Linux users are communicating via the Internet and are refusing to buy from uncooperative hardware manufacturers -- this too is no secret. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Movement toward open digital software?

proprietary straitjacket. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com Note: Both down temporarily due to server change. ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Movement toward open digital software?

tibility problems. MS won the desktop because Bill Gates was a great salesman, not because he was a great programmer or technologist. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven

Re: [digitalradio] Movement toward open digital software?

> And Linux *still* doesn't have > a decent email/productivity application that rivals Outlook. > de Peter K1PGV Is Horde a Linux-compatible app? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

out of business. Puppy is designed as a not-for-profit enterprise so there is not bloated staff and corporate infrastructure to support. Users not stockholders drive the distro. IMHO, YMMV ... -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http

Re: [digitalradio] Movement toward open digital software?

ness, home and hobby venues so I know it can be done. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com Note: Both down temporarily due to server change. ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Movement toward open digital software?

. I have the app but haven't had time to try it on my FT-897D. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com Note: Both down temporarily due to server change. ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Movement toward open digital software?

13 It is tiny, fast, and powerful. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor versus Olivia

ble Pactor II & III under rough conditions? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] MY STATUS

> Again guys, sorry for doing this on the list. > John, W0JAB Ham radio is a family-like hobby so we are grateful for the opportunity to pray in agreement with you for healing. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Have a joy-filled New Year! ~~ Proj

Re: [digitalradio] Best 40KHz for PSK & SSB QRP on 40 & 80M?

well. I misread the ARRL chart on the wall. Guess I have to listen to my XYL KG4SBV and get those bifocals! -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Have a joy-filled New Year! ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

Re: [digitalradio] Best 40KHz for PSK & SSB QRP on 40 & 80M?

mitted in 7000 - 7025 -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Have a joy-filled New Year! ~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~

[digitalradio] Re: Best 40KHz for PSK & SSB QRP on 40 & 80M? UPDATE

e. > > I need to specify the 40KHz segments of 40 & 80M > for SSB & PSK for which I would like the device > set. > Your recommendations, please? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Have a joy-filled New Year! ~~ Projects: http:/

[digitalradio] Best 40KHz for PSK & SSB QRP on 40 & 80M?

I am getting a 40/80M Softrock QRP device. I need to specify the 40KHz segments of 40 & 80M for SSB & PSK for which I would like the device set. Your recommendations, please? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E *Have a joy-filled New Year!* ~~ Pr

Re: [digitalradio] Regional communications ?

5:00 PM when I switch the brain in standby after work... Did you mean to type "At 65 feet or so per side ..." when you referred to a full wave 80M loop rather than "At 130 feet or so per side ..."? Just wondering as it confused me for a moment. :-) -- Thanks! & 73, doc

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 14078.4 Success!

Y and the need to hold contacts long enough to do so will drive up operator skill, will weed-out the poorer modes, will encourage use of superior modes, and will encourage further development of even better modes. IMHO, YMMV ... -- Thanks! &

[digitalradio] Re: CW vs PSK = Brain vs Machine Decode

> A brain does not make radio waves, a radio > does! Gabriel, WP3BM Oddly enough I believe that the brain actually does generate modulated radio waves. Serious weak signal stuff, though! -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... enjoying a sunny CHRISTmas

[digitalradio] Re: CW vs PSK = Brain vs Machine Decode

cern, even if sent very slowly? Not important at all, just curious! -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... enjoying a sunny CHRISTmas in Florida :-) ~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~

Re: [digitalradio] GRUMBLE

case *after* the transmission has been decoded? It would be trivial to do and would remove that overhead from PSK. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythan

[digitalradio] Sweeping Signal on 3.675?

Anyone hear the sweeping signal around 3.675? Is that military stuff or some Ham mode? It is QRMing QSO's there and has been for 20 minutes or longer. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldier

Re: [digitalradio] FCC Drops Morse Code

> Ten Four, Good Buddy! > 73, Bob AA8X It has been "Ten Four, Good Buddy" on the part of 13WPM and 20WPM Hams on 75M for 40 years. So much for CW as a LID filter. Sigh. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~

Re: [digitalradio] Effective Date ? FCC Drops Morse Code

. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~ URL: bibleseven (dot) com

Re: [digitalradio] cw

ease that spectrum for appropriate 2-way communications. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~ URL: bibleseven (dot) com

[digitalradio] Re: 15 dec - New Band Chart

The black/white version: http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/Hambands_bw.pdf The color version: http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/Hambands_color.pdf -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank o

[digitalradio] Digital Signal on 7117 or 7118?

tune in that digital stuff take a llok at 7117 (7118?) and tell me what kind of sigital station it is and what call sign he is sending? It automatically comes on, even if there is a qso in progress, usually every 6 to 8 minutes. Thanks Tired of qrm Michael -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ..

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition

press than they do. That they often do not appear to understand the hobby does not testify to an absense of "caring". -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers

[digitalradio] Digital Signal on 3832.51?

Anyone else hear the LSB Digital Signal on 3832.51? Carrier is S7 here in west central Florida. ON LSB it ounds like a rushing wind. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this seas

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition

nobody complains, we (the FCC) >> don't really care what you do! -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~ URL: bibleseven (dot) com

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition

re will be no non 97.221(c)(1) and (2) stations (fully > automatic or wide band semi-automatic) that will be operating on 80 > meters in the U.S. since there will be no automatic subband available > ... unless the FCC stays their own new rule. > > 73, Rick, KV9U -- Thanks!

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition

nd so that QRMing is rare vs unavoidable. WDYT? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~ URL: bibleseven (dot) com

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Dec 15?

The problem can be overcome, Walt; it requires equipping each station > with a busy frequency detector. > 73, Dave, AA6YQ Along with the patience and self-lessness to use them. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~

[digitalradio] Re: Linux digital software -- Jlog Works!

! Hooray! NOTE: I am running it under Puppy Linux 2.11 on my laptop. I have not tested it under other versions of Linux, or Apple/Mac, or any MS version of windows. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldi

[digitalradio] Re: ARRL QRM Explains? [Was: Dec 15?]

um -- they do it themsleves! Sigh. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~ URL: bibleseven (dot) com

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition

wledge that I did over-generalize a bit, though there is little doubt among many that some modes developed by Hams should migrate to non-Ham spectrum. This would not be unprecented. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank

Re: [digitalradio] Linux digital software

rt out a couple of things on my laptop Linux install and then intend to begin loading and testing Ham apps. If you make any progress with Puppy Linux and Ham apps I'd sure love to hear about them! NOTE: The logging app runs under Java and works on Apple, Linux, and the various MS versions

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition

minate automatic and semi-automatic > operation on 80m. > > It will be interesting to see how rapidly the FCC responds to the > ARRL's late-in-the-game petition. > > 73, Dave, AA6YQ -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-)

Re: [digitalradio] PAX 2 with Linux?

Now this is a truly exciting Web site! http://pskmail.wikispaces.com/ Will have to contact the developer and ask about plans for PAX 2 or other apps. I see that he is working on APRS integration. > Is there a PAX 2 app for Linux yet? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & w

[digitalradio] PAX 2 with Linux?

h of Toronto! No decoder yet.. > Len VE3FJB -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ... in sunny & warm Florida :-) ~~~ Thank our brave soldiers this season: http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html ~~~ URL: bibleseven (dot) com

  1   2   3   >