Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-10-25 Thread esuper
I just ran into bug 1397/10777 on my Classic. The bug note for 10077 is marked won't fix and states that [w]e do not plan to implement any further enhancements to the ip3k firmware or which are targeted specifically at ip3k-based products. It still works, but don't expect much further support.

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-17 Thread bhaagensen
peterw;576232 Wrote: ...they're currently working on some user interface code improvements that target Boom/Classic/Transporter Interestring. Do you have a few more details on what these improvements are? -- bhaagensen

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-17 Thread Nonreality
Goodsounds;576359 Wrote: Hi Non. You're right, status quo is status quo. But sometimes new software versions can't be avoided when new hardware requires it. My point was, it's not hard to guess what would get tossed overboard if support of older products conflicted with needed changes

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread JonWill
Goodsounds;576353 Wrote: No doubt it's important to many customers, but I'd bet that most (your word) couldn't explain what open means. Unusually for most open software, I think that end users of SBS would notice an immediate lack if Logitech stopped operating in that way - whilst I assume

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread funkstar
Here's my take: The Boom and Receiver are based on the same platform as the SB3/Classic/SB2 so as long as those are available, the other IP3K players will also be supported. Then you have the two year warranties on the Boom and Radio, I can't see them honouring the warranties and dropping the

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread amey01
Goodsounds;576353 Wrote: Most businesses cut off support of superceded products. Most businesses certainly do not cut off support - certainly not in such a short time! The Squeezebox 3/Classic was released in 2006? That is only FOUR short years. Take my preamp (Copland CTA-305) - it too was

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread toby10
amey01;576393 Wrote: . Heck - even in IT - Windows XP was still current four years after release and is still being supported today, nine years later! Keep in mind out of warranty hardware repair of SB3's was discontinued in less than four years. Warranty hardware repair is still

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread erland
toby10;576408 Wrote: If, hypothetically, SBS 8.0 (Win 7 compatible) were to stop support for SB3's, going forward you could never update your Windows server beyond Win 7 if you want to keep using the SB3. Sure you can, you can upgrade it to a real operating system instead of continue

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread toby10
erland;576483 Wrote: Sure you can, you can upgrade it to a real operating system instead of continue encouraging MS to produce its crap. ;-) LOL :) Well, pick whatever flavor OS you prefer (MS, MAC, Linux, other?), eventually some future SBS version would not be supported on XYZ OS, in the

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread funkstar
amey01;576393 Wrote: Most businesses certainly do not cut off support - certainly not in such a short time! The Squeezebox 3/Classic was released in 2006? That is only FOUR short years. Take my preamp (Copland CTA-305) - it too was released in 2006 and not only is it still supported - IT

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-14 Thread amey01
funkstar;576515 Wrote: Audio products are quite different to consumer IT products, so I guess it depends on how you classify the SB line. It certainly does! And that is an interesting question. I personally view them as an -audio- product, but that is why I chose an example from BOTH audio

[slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread rajm
I've got a Boom and am itching to buy another device that I can plug right into my stereo. Unfortunately at the moment the Touch and (obviously) the Duet are out of my pitiful budget's reach. I can however get a deal on a squeezebox classic.Should I? I know they have been discontinued--

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread jth
You won't get an official answer, but the first player produced by Slim Devices, which predates the Classic by about 4 years, is still supported. * * past performance is no guarantee of future results -- jth jth's

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread peterw
rajm;576221 Wrote: Is there any danger I'll end up with a brick? (i.e. the SBS moving to a point where it doesn't support the classic or something similiar) Seems very unlikely to me. Not only has Logitech historically supported and enhanced older gear with new features, but they're

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread rajm
OK - good to know. Classic it is... Thanks, -R -- rajm rajm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22496 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81961

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread amey01
It may happen, but you can rest assured there'd be outcry if it was attempted. The open/compatible nature of the Squeezebox ecosystem is one of the primary things that makes the product appeal to most people. I would think Logitech understand this. -- amey01

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread Goodsounds
amey01;576349 Wrote: It may happen, but you can rest assured there'd be outcry if it was attempted. Most businesses cut off support of superceded products. Any reason to think it would or should be otherwise for Logitech? Guarantees of future compatibility are rarely provided. That it has

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread Nonreality
As long as you have a version saved that works well with the classic then you would only have a problem with new versions if they discontinued support. Maybe mysqueezedbox.com would fail but it should always work on your own library. BTW I really love my classic. -- Nonreality -IF THE RULE

Re: [slim] SqueezeBox Classic and obsolescence

2010-09-13 Thread Goodsounds
Hi Non. You're right, status quo is status quo. But sometimes new software versions can't be avoided when new hardware requires it. My point was, it's not hard to guess what would get tossed overboard if support of older products conflicted with needed changes for new stuff. Or, if doing so