Viva Agostinhos
Dúvidas em Português sobre a utilização de programas é nesta outra mailing
list
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/User-f2317346.html
Cumprimentos,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/APRESENTACAO-tp3468167p3468747.html
Sent from
carlo.strata wrote:
Hi Pedro and Tor,
What do you think about that?
I think that LibreOffice should use an Open Source compiler.
I also think that most of the LibreOffice Devs don't use the Office programs
they are developing on a daily basis as a production tool. If they did, it
would
Apparently there is a plan for a name structure (this is a part of the pyton
script included in losmoketest-0.2.tar.bz2)
It just is not being followed :)
## daily_master
DAILY_MASTER_RPM_X86_PATH =
daily/Linux_x86_Release_Configuration/master/current
DAILY_MASTER_RPM_X86_64_PATH =
Good news. The tinderboxes are being renamed following this plan
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox
A log of the successful builds can be viewed on this page
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html
One odd thing: although the Voreppe box shows in green for
.
Maybe if the words chosen are expressive enough a similar result will appear
below. If the user realizes that he might save himself and the triage people
some time by not reporting a duplicate item.
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Naming-builds
the bundled 1.0.5 version is broken
too)
Is development stopped on this extension? I find it extremely useful for
creating hybrid ODF/PDF files!
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PDF-import-extension-tp3577732p3577732.html
Sent from the Discuss
Alexandre Silveira-3 wrote
I agree with you. do you want to start a new thread on this topic ?
Start where? A new thread? I don't want to waste people's time... If this
was discussed before, what was the conclusion? I searched Nabble before
posting and couldn't find an answer...
--
Pedro
that in the future there is a separate
PDF Import extension available in the Extension repository?
In any case it needs to be fixed to work with 3.5.0 so whoever fixes
it could package it separately ;)
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PDF-import-extension
Hi all
This is how you get your FLOSS Office Suite to be used worlwide:
Offer it for free with every purchase of another software! :)
http://pdf-pro-online.com/
Merry Christmas ;)
--
Pedro
(Just in case: I'm not affiliated in any way with the company offering this
one in a lifetime promotion
italovignoli wrote
I would avoid being associated with such a company.
I had never heard of them before.
But how can you help it? If the next time they choose to offer a free copy
of LibreOffice instead of OpenOffice, is there anything TDF can do about it?
--
View this message in
e-letter wrote
Perhaps this should be considered an unfortunate cost of allowing
freedom. Assuming this organisation does not alter the source code,
the (L)GPL allows for sale of software. TDF should not be considered
liable for the naivity/simplicity of some people buying software that
is
Apparently someone decided that it was a good idea to replace the Floppy
icon.
I'm sorry I didn't get a change to vote (if there was any voting)
Personally I think that regardless if people know what a Floppy is, they
recognized that symbol as the Save icon (basically a blue square with a
white
Terry Warby wrote
What icon set are you using? I have 3.5RC1 installed under both Xubuntu
11.10 and Win7 and have the floppy icon for save in both (using the
crystal and galaxy icons).
I was using the Automatic (Tango) icon set. I guess from now on I will have
to manually switch to
Terry Warby wrote
Just did a quick check and it seams that of the icon sets I have
installed only the tango icon sets don't use the floppy icon. This was
probably covered earlier in the thread!
At least I can't find any decision or voting... That is what I'm trying to
understand.
--
Hi Charles
Charles-H. Schulz wrote
- if the icon was changed (I don't think it has, my 3.5 beta still has the
floppy icon on the mac) then it means someone provided a replacement icon.
It certainly has under Windows.
Charles-H. Schulz wrote
Again I don't remember it was the case, but
understand: I don't have a particular fetish with floppy disks. I
just think it that it doesn't make sense to change things that users rely on
just because you can.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Can-we-replace-Floppy-Disk-tp3617084p3679309.html
Sent
directly to RC1 (I missed Beta3 because it was only
available officially for 5 days)
Your answer is not very clear: does this mean the icon will change for all
platforms?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Can-we-replace-Floppy-Disk
Hi Anton
The official language for this forum is English. Although some (many?)
members understand Spanish and/or Portuguese (probably not Galego/Galician
:) ) it is usual that all emails are in English
Good luck with your Proposal ;)
Saludos,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Cor Nouws wrote
Do I remember well that we have/had the idea to choose the organisers
one year before? As to give them the opportunity to learn from the
current years organisers experience.. (Not that I think, looking at the
proposals, that experience is really lacking ;-) )
Could
Interesting news on this site
http://www.addictivetips.com/internet-tips/ibm-docs-google-docs-like-office-suite-with-advance-share-options/
- add this to the 3.0.1 release of IBM Lotus Symphony (which in a 0.0.1
release manages to change it's spreadsheet from the traditional 65K lines to
1Million
italovignoli wrote
IBM has never been involved in TDF, and has been openly bashing TDF and
LibreOffice on personal blogs of IBM employees and AOOoI mailing lists.
Sorry, but IBM is off topic here.
I am well aware of all that (IMO some IBM employees bashing TDF on their
blogs and on public
Jonathan Aquilina wrote
I am planning on offering something like that to my clients all they
would be paying for is the virtual private server. Online is where
everything is going. Pedro have you tried compiling LO from source
Michael Meeks told me how to do it and its quite simple
Hi Benjamin, all
Benjamin Horst wrote
http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/features/managing-docs-with-zimbra/
It worked pretty well in my usage, I'd use it again.
This is not even similar to Google Docs or IBM Docs. Zimbra Docs is a a
WYSIWYG tool for creating, sharing, and publishing documents
for. And I
really won't test a product just to find out that the feature that I need
Is available on the paid Professional version. I sincerely prefer to test
a Trial version which has all features but a limited time than a limited
version. I guess I'll keep waiting for LOWE :)
Kind regards,
Pedro
email to answer Italo doesn't make sense because I wasn't
attacking Apache or even IBM (IMO some IBM employees bashing TDF on their
blogs and on public mailing lists and forums, does not make it a corporate
decision ;))
I think you two should exchange private email ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View
keep all the cake) makes a LOT of sense.
But I think that more important than each house wasting time and resources
building their own version of an Office Suite, it would be much more useful
to make ODF a really compatible and superior file format.
My 2 cents ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View
Hi again Charles
Charles-H.Schulz wrote
Do you have examples? I'd be happy to hear about them, I'm sure we work
in a very similar fashion...
Of course. Here is an excellent one
http://emergedesktop.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1419
You don't work in a similar fashion ;)
Regards,
Pedro
are!) democratic.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Floppy-icon-and-meritocracy-tp3725399p3726667.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
elected by the users (to have what
you call a democratic structure) it still is pretty close to a democracy and
much more community friendly than meritocracy ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Floppy-icon-and-meritocracy-tp3725399p3726790
Sophie Gautier wrote
the size of our community makes it very difficult to manage the feedback
from our users
That is exactly what I said :)
I accept that it is difficult to have democracy in such a large community.
My argument is that FOSS is not inherently incompatible with democracy,
the floppy :) and I don't particularly like the Galaxy theme.
Thank you anyway for the suggestion!
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Floppy-icon-and-meritocracy-tp3725399p3731131.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com
v_2e wrote
I like this set of Icons I have in LibreOffice right now:
http://wombat.org.ua/LibreOffice-icons.png
and I hope it will be possible to use them in future versions of
LibreOffice. Will it?
That is the Galaxy theme from version 3.3.x and 3.4.x (which curiously is
the
Tango-with-Floppy theme :)
FYI the Galaxy theme is contained in images.zip in folder your install
folder\share\config\
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Floppy-icon-and-meritocracy-tp3725399p3734853.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list
the legacy documents
from a single Office suite instead of having to learn/teach two different
Office suites.
Makes perfect sense to me. The more I think about, the more I hope it will
become a reality!
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/IBM
even if several devs line up to implement it.
I think you are confusing community-driven with democratic as I did.
Get yourself a large cup of tea and read this topic
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Floppy-icon-and-meritocracy-tp3725399p3725399.html
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message
I also use SUMo and you are correct about the number mismatch. In fact the
version reported in the exe should be 3.5.1.2 and not 3.5.0.102
If you noticed in branch 3.4.x it was even more confusing :) Current release
3.4.6 is identified in the exe as 3.4.602.500 :)
For your information the
Help_Please wrote
Do I keep the current version I already have installed or do I revert back
to v3.4.6.x ?
If you haven't found any problems with 3.5.1.2 I think you should keep it.
Help_Please wrote
And, do you know possibly when there will be a version correction
released ? Just a
Help_Please wrote
And, do you know possibly when there will be a version correction
released ?
I submitted a bug report to bugzilla.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47840
This increases the odds of getting it fixed ;)
--
View this message in context:
Russbe wrote
For security reasons, I wish to suppress the Recent Document List when I
open a file in Writer.
I assume you asked the same question here?
http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/2298/suppress-recent-document-list
You already have an answer there.
--
View this message in
releases it is possibly time to slow down a bit and
concentrate on Quality instead of Quantity...
Just a thought...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-priorities-tp3984316.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com
)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-priorities-tp3984316p3984508.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org
are followed by a message like
ProgramX needs to reload for this change to apply. Reload now?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-priorities-tp3984316p3984738.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe
Marc Paré wrote
Would it be a good idea to organize a monthly call for a AskLibO blitz?
Obviously it would be better than the current situation :)
The main problem with AskLibO is that there are few people answering
questions on a regular basis. With few people around there are obviously
Terrence Enger wrote
I was excited when AskLibo started, only to find that OpenId is required
for using it. And the OpenId providers advertised all have impressive
terms of use, impressive as in long and daunting.
What if BrowserID was added (or replaced OpenID)?
--
View this message
) to complain... which is called a Catch 22 :)
IMO any contribution (such as exposing your opinion in a polite way) is a
valid contribution ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/AskLibO-blitzes-tp3984755p3985087.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list
the
concept of a universal login.
BrowserID seems to be the only company independent universal login. You just
need to have an email account. Any email account will do.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/AskLibO-blitzes-tp3984755p3985175.html
by Mozilla.
Compared to that, only a small portion of the information is in the hands of
Google (and that is why I deliberately don't use Chrome)
Regardless of who is involved, it appears to me that the BrowserID model
preserves more your online privacy than the OpenID model...
Cheers,
Pedro
of the existing OpenID members. But i was referring to
the concern of using a TDF OpenID on other sites and having that traffic
information shared with to all OpenID corporate members.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/AskLibO-blitzes
This request for help should be in the Users mailing list, not the Discuss
mailing list ;)
It would also save time if you had posted the sample file at AskLibO instead
of asking the same question on two sites.
For your information your document is an RTF with a wrong DOC extension
(just open it
Why does the number of columns have to be odd? If you add one more column the
problem is solved :)
If there is an absolute reason that the number of columns MUST be odd, then
all cells starting from the second row need to check if the previous two
cells are equal. You can do this with an IF
Hi all
I believe all developers agree that a .0 release is usually not a good
version to adopt (many IT people don't even consider it)
In particular version 3.6.0 is known to have serious flaws (see end of page
under Most Annoying Bugs
...
http://ftp.uni-muenster.de/pub/software/DocumentFoundation/libreoffice/testing/
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Version-3-6-0-is-Recommended-tp4000505p4001239.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions
that version 3.5.5 is the Previous
version (although there is a link to version 3.5.6 further down...)
Obviously this is none of my business, but I'm sure TDF can do better than
this at promoting this office suite...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
Hi Cor
Cor Nouws wrote
(It would be more time-efficient for you I guess, if you just send a
reminder that the page is forgotten or so, without the rest of the
writing ;-) )
Agreed. No chatting just work ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi all
Is TDF in some way related to LibreOffice Portable?
Shouldn't there be an equivalent Portable version for each stable release?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Portable-tp4009436.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list
be good if the last version of each branch was kept available
at the LO download site.
Just a suggestion for TDF to consider.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Portable-tp4009436p4009474.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list
less features. But they don't necessarily
have more bugs and they have less regressions!
I think that it is bad enough that the official download page barely
mentions that a more stable version is available, actively updated and
maintained.
I really don't understand TDF's logic...
Regards,
Pedro
from such users but bug reporting his highly valued)
And to be coherent with this only the recommended version should be
announced. Announcing versions from both branches
(http://blog.documentfoundation.org/) just generates confusion.
Just my 2 cents
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message
to decide. After all the quality of
LibreOffice should be the BoD's main concern IMO...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Portable-tp4009436p4009770.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe
of the members at best...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Rules-of-Procedure-approved-for-TDF-board-of-directors-tp4010079p4010349.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail
discussion list for the
Document Foundation board of directors. It is exactly what it means: a
discussion list FOR the TDF BoD members ONLY with open contents (anyone can
read for the sake of transparency), but not open participation.
The Discuss list is for open participation.
Cheers,
Pedro
AOO is going back in
time. See these pages for the most obvious differences
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-6-new-features-and-fixes/
and much more coming for the 4.0 release ;)
Hope this helps...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View
Italo, you are a firm defender of LibreOffice but sometimes your hate for AOO
and Rob Weir blind you and then you loose any argument.
italovignoli wrote
Do you really believe that a Mongolian who was used to use OOo in
Mongolian is happy to use AOO in English? This is just an example, but
the
occur...
Then when Version 4.1 is out (somewhere in July) this problem would already
be solved (hopefully forever :) ).
Just another 2 cents ;)
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Install-path-for-LibreOffice-under-Windows-tp4041530.html
Sent from
mention he is the expert.
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Install-path-for-LibreOffice-under-Windows-tp4041530p4042884.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h
Hi Andras
Andras Timar wrote
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Pedro lt;
pedlino@
gt; wrote:
So my question is: is there any reason that LibreOffice under Windows
does
not install to \LibreOffice\?
Not really. AFAIK it is just a legacy setting. Default install
location can be changed
for every
version change. If keeping extensions is acceptable for User extensions
(which potentially are installed by less knowledgeable users than the system
admin) why not use the same logic for extensions that affect all users in a
machine?
Please consider these facts.
Pedro
--
View
Hi all
In the sequence of this topic at the Marketing list
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Open-Xchange-to-launch-open-source-browser-based-office-suite-tp4045197.html
I share Simon Phipps' concern that the company announces a GPL Open Source
office suite which is not free for commercial
AND (most
important) those users are already too used to MS Office. It is easier to
convince new users to work with a different product than to teach new tricks
to old dogs.
In any case it's up to the TDF Directors to worry/answer your question :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context
Jonathan Aquilina wrote
Joel we are really complicating things with mingw when all one would need
to do is install visual studio and run nmake from its command line and you
are good to go.
Because MinGW is an Open Source compiler and Visual Studio is a closed
source, commercial compiler which
is no guarantee that any developer will
look at them or fix them, NOT submitting is our worst possible option :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/End-of-Life-support-for-MSO-2003-countdown-tp4050964p4051842.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list
upscope wrote
Russ .docx was 2007 onwards. What can i help with on mac?
Yes I was aware of that. If you are using LO writer, see if the document
attached to the bug report opens displays the full graphic and text.
There are graphics on almost all pages and some open completely but not
in
Hi Angela
Angela wrote
I've just recently upgraded LibreOffice on the EeePC 900 to LibreOffice
3.4.4 OOO340m1 (Build:402).
However, I now have the lower button bar that has most of the icons, like
Bold, Italic, Underline, etc. that with the updated looks of the tool bar
have become at about
Hi foberle
foberle wrote
I'm using LibreOffice Writer Version 4.0.2.2 (Build ID: 400m0(Build:2)) on
Ubuntu 12.04 64 bit.
I can confirm the same behaviour under Windows. I'm not sure if this is a
bug (it is indeed an annoyance).
The Discuss list is not the place to report bugs/ask for
Since Intel is also a TDF partner, do these optimizations also work on Intel
based PCs?
Can anyone comment on this?
If the optimizations only work on AMD powered PCs it will be impossible for
me to take advantage of it (to be honest I don't have or know anyone who has
an AMD based PC...)
--
Hi guys
After some digging I found this article
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/libreoffice-aims-to-stop-spreadsheet-pain-with-amd-gpu-optimization/
Apparently the optimizations are for the GPU.
Unfortunately these improvements won't work on my i5 based laptop or my i7
builds slower (less efficient) than non-debug?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/AMD-joins-LibreOffice-adds-GPU-grunt-to-free-software-suite-tp4064102p4067741.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail
it is better to close it?
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Clean-up-please-tp4069570p4075106.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems
Jonathan Aquilina wrote
the list is moderated. those not subscribed are usually reject instead of
released to the list.
Interesting. But SPAM still seems to get through...
In any case people with real questions don't get any feedback from this
list...
E.g.
is not for support (it isn't for discussions either,
as the name might lead you to think) and that the User list is the best
place to go (simply because there are more people there).
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Is-this-a-bug
Hi all
Just found this post
http://www.zdnet.com/office-productivity-software-is-no-closer-to-becoming-a-commodity-722091/
which is based on this Forrester report
http://www.forrester.com/Market+Update+Office+2013+And+Productivity+Suite+Alternatives/fulltext/-/E-RES102262
(unfortunately I
Hi Sophie
sophi wrote
Thanks again for pointing to the spams.
Maybe it's time for another cleaning?
Are you reluctant because most of them are about Pandora sales? :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Clean-up-please-tp4069570p4090926
Hello,
My name is Pedro and I`m writing to offer my help to build this amazing
project.
I currently work as a support engineer at Atlassian and I could help with
translations (I`m brazilian, so I can translate to portuguese), help with
documentations and with IT infrastructure if necessary
I'm not totally aware of the agreement, but if thats correct, LibreOffice
will need to have 2 portuguese versions. pt-br and pt.
Anyway, can anyone tell me how this is gonna happend? And if I can help? No
one told me that yet.
Regards,
Pedro Corá
--
ped...@gmail.com :-)
*facebook.com/pcora821
While Beta1 is already available at
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
the page still mentions Beta0.
Can someone fix that, please?
--
Pedro
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists
The builds available for Linux at
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
are only 2.3Mb in size...
Is this normal? The Windows and Mac are over 190 and 200Mb...
--
Pedro
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org
are volunteers.
The TDF BoD and the Devs need to make a decision about how to handle this.
--
Pedro
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2011-December/000623.html
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to board-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get
87 matches
Mail list logo
