On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:21:23 -0800, Ralph Edington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell, Squeezebox is COMPLETELY and TOTALLY WORTHLESS for the
advertised purpose of wireless music.
Maybe you got a bad unit.
Did you try contacting customer support?
--
http://mpeters.us/
I had similar problems which were solved by using 64 bit WEP instead of
128 bit.
I would like to report my very recent bad wireless experience and ask a
question...
I just switched over from wired mode to wireless. I bought a Linksys
WRT45G
(v2.2, firmware 3.03.6) and used all the
cool, should have a beta by the weekend, just in the process of cleaning up the files/README etc., and doing some
testing/tweaking.
Michael Peters wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:16:21 +, Al [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And also is there anyone interested in testing it when I`ve got something to
Is it possible to change the function of the Pause
button on the remote control? Currently
press-and-hold Pause stops the playback immediately, I
would like it to stop after the current track
finishes. I can always press the Power button to get
it to stop immediately.
Oh, and looking through
Ralph Edington wrote:
I would have expected Slim Devices, or any competent designer of wireless
electronics, to have provided a reasonable workaround -- dropouts,
anything -- but REBOOTING, frequently and randomly, is absolutely,
positively unforgivable.
Have you contacted [EMAIL PROTECTED] It
I have 40k at MP3 128-320kbs very quick on iTunes (1 hr scan). Slim
server takes 1 1/2 hrs to scan.
Backup solution firewire drive that I copy to once a week
and take into the office to use there.
The copying of this much data will take a good few hours but this
solution work quite
Toby,
I have exactly the same setup. Are you using the router as a modem as well?
Also do you know how to access the web interface? Is you PC already
connected wirelessly?
Drop me a mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will give you the additional
instructions that you need.
Regards,
Carl
Chris O'Shannassy wrote:
Hi;
Hopefully this can just be chalked up to my extremely limited
knowledge of perl slimserver, but the alpha version of six isn't
working for me. I've currently just extracted the files under my home
account (don't want to mess with my functioning version) and am
Hey Ralph,
Is the machine running slim server by any chance wireless? In my experience,
the squeezebox handles wireless dropouts without much problem but will
reboot if the server losses network connectivity.
My server is not wireless but the CAT5 that is plugged into it is missing
the little
Another solution is to use Gmail for your mailing lists. It has a
unique interface that closely resembles the flat-threaded forum style
that seems most popular (I prefer branching threads personally). Its
also much faster than most web applications owing to its use of
javascript moderated xml
Quoting Steinar Bjaerum [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At head-fi.org I came across this thread:
http://www4.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=106249
Any comments, Sean?
he already left comments in the very thread you have linked here.
-kdf
___
Discuss
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kdf
Sent: 25. februar 2005 18:34
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: RE: [slim] Bit-correct digital out on Squeezebox?
Quoting Steinar Bjaerum [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At head-fi.org I came
Quoting Chris O'Shannassy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi;
Hopefully this can just be chalked up to my extremely limited
knowledge of perl slimserver, but the alpha version of six isn't
working for me. I've currently just extracted the files under my home
account (don't want to mess with my
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:26:44 -0600, momerath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another solution is to use Gmail for your mailing lists. It has a
unique interface that closely resembles the flat-threaded forum style
that seems most popular (I prefer branching threads personally). Its
also much faster
Michael Peters wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:20:40 -0800, Phillip Kerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought cracking WEP was relatively easy too.
It's not cake to crack - it takes collecting data for as long as a
month or so in order to have enough to do it. Sure, it can be done,
but it's a
Quoting Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:23:14 -0500, Christopher Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My server is not wireless but the CAT5 that is plugged into it is missing
the little retaining clip (keep forgetting to replace the cable)
You can replace just the
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:34:03 +0100, Steinar Bjaerum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am thinking about playing an uncompressed WAV, recording the signal at the
digital output and comparing the recording with the original WAV.
Be careful when you are doing so - a lot of sound cards will resample
Hi all!
I just received my Squeezebox yesterday, and so far I love it!
First of all a bit about my configuration:
SlimServer 6.0a 2005-02-25, generic tarball
server machine: Dual 1.6 GHz Athlon MP, 1 GB RAM
The Squeezebox is bridged into my WLAN via an AirPort Express :)
Music playback works
Vidur Apparao wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The native WMA to wav streaming does not seem to work at all for me.
On both my Squeezebox and on SoftSqueeze (on the same machine as the
SlimServer), SlimServer gives me the following error:
Opening stream failed with error code 0x80070003
When I
Hi,
I use an audio synthesis dax decade with my squeezebox. I must first point
out that I'm extremely happy with the replay however a few weeks ago I
invited some friends round to have a listen to the squeezebox and compare it
to a couple of dedicated transports. The other transports were from dpa
Unfortunately this is probably a user error. I've had my wirelessboxsince the middle of November andthere have been maybe 3 times that ithad a blip (a couple of seconds) then restarted from where it left off. I love thisunitas now I have no need for my Sony 300 disc changer (Willing to sell
Hi;
Your comments are true enough, and I've now installed this extra
module, and am up and running. Hey, at least I know a _little_ more
about perl now A couple of comments on the installation though:
I was already running perl 5.8.5, the installation requirements for
slimserver
You're not copying the whole collection across each week are you? Just
syncing the two? (rsync or something else...) It should only take a few
hours the first time, after that it'll depend on how much has changed
but I'd be surprised if it took more than a few minutes.
Chris
Carl Maskelyne
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:28 -0600, Michael Alletto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html
Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface. Does it look like
slimserver to anyone else? And they are charging $70 for the software
only. If they are really
While I don't know that I am much help with the rest of your post, the on
thing that I would point out is that the version you are running (6.0a) is
considered alpha at best. Not that it doesn't work well, but it is not
ready
for production release.
You may consider dropping back to the current
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:28 -0600, Michael Alletto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html
Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface. Does it look like
slimserver to anyone else? And they are charging $70 for the software
only. If they are
I think if they are distributing the code outside their organization
(whether selling it or allowing download), they have to make their
source available upon request (by anyone). Even if they only have to
make it available to customers, it must be supplied under the GPL,
which would allow those
... it definitively looks like slimserver. check this out
http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_mp3beamer.html and softsqueeze screenshot on
their product page http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_java.html
it seems that MP3Beamer is using slimserver as the core streaming
server. Even port 9000 is used. I did
* Chris O'Shannassy shaped the electrons to say...
Okay and if anybody is interested, I also had similar problems with
the DBI module, (and then the 1.38 version of the DBI module which I
installed was too old, it needed the 1.46 version)
Anyway, it's all working now. (Hopefully, just
So, probably a few things to do here:
#1: someone should set up a web page (linked from SlimDevices.com, so it
hits the search engines quickly) that talks about this product by name
and how it is based on SlimServer, which is freely available. Hopefully
some of the consumers that are considering
Michael Herger wrote:
...and have a look at the Java interface. They did not even change the
name on the screenshot...
http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_java.html
wow! my original softsqueeze interface. I did a big comedy double-take
when I clicked that link
Incidentally, I just emailed the folks at LinuxDevices suggesting that
they would be doing their readers a service by noting that the MP3Beamer
software appears to be based on SlimServer, a GPLd project available for
free (after validating it with the MP3Tunes people, of course). :)
See my comments/suggestions in that thread. Jefemeister says it's
correct except for inverted amplitude. I haven't confirmed this yet -
AFAICT we have the DSP configured correctly, but if it is wrong, it's
easy to fix by tweaking the volume function.
On Feb 25, 2005, at 8:15 AM, Steinar
Quoting Andreas Huster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to play a .wav file from slimserver running on RedHat 9 to
Windows Media player on another computer. This fails with the following
entry in the log:
2005-02-25 21:54:39.2391 openSong on:
file:///home/huster/music/Mozart/test.wav
If this is user error, I'd like to be the
first to have someone show me where I've erred. At the SB will play for hours
w/o a problem; other times (and almost exclusively when when playing Internet
Radio) it will reboot and recommence playing. It's extremely annoying. My wife
will not
35 matches
Mail list logo
