Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-18 Thread Julien Valroff
Le samedi 17 avril 2010 à 14:32 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:04:35 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: [...@ > I am an idiot! I did not looked properly how the dspam.conf file is > separating each section. The script from below should work better and > will modify the created f

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-17 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:04:35 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: [...] > > For my own knowledge, would you please explain why you have chosen this > license for this script? > Ach. I have a template/skeleton that automatically adds a structure for Bash scripts and some time ago I just changed the temp

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-17 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 22:12 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > You can check the current source packages at > > http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 > > +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz > > > The "copyrigh

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-17 Thread Julien Valroff
Le samedi 17 avril 2010 à 00:46 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > You can check the current source packages at > > http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 > > +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz > > > Okay. Quickly lo

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-17 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 22:07 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:57:22 +0200 > Stevan Bajić wrote: > > You can check the current source packages at > > > http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 > > > +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz > > The control file

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: > You can check the current source packages at > http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 > +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz > Okay. Quickly looking over the scripts (not 100% understanding how things are glued together)

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Hugo Monteiro
On 04/16/2010 09:37 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > >> You can check the current source packages at >> http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 >> +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz >> >> > When is dspam.postrm su

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: > You can check the current source packages at > http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 > +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz > When is dspam.postrm supposed to run? At what stage? > Cheers, > Julien > -- Kind Regards

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: > You can check the current source packages at > http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 > +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz > The "copyright" file needs as well an update since the copyright on DSPAM has changed since t

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:04:04 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: > Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 21:57 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 > > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > > > And it's not the only one available ;) > > > > > I can imagine. It is +/- the same for Gentoo. >

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:57:22 +0200 Stevan Bajić wrote: You can check the current source packages at > > http://packages.kirya.net/debian/pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.9.0 > > +git20100416-1.debian.tar.gz The control file is the one where you have the meta information about the package and dependenc

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 21:57 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > And it's not the only one available ;) > > > I can imagine. It is +/- the same for Gentoo. AFAIK, Gentoo and Debian share the same roots, as Gentoo was founded by pe

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:38:06 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: > And it's not the only one available ;) > I can imagine. It is +/- the same for Gentoo. > There's also eg. the Python or Perl policies (for packages using Perl or > Python), other recommendations etc. > [..] > > That wouldn't bring you

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 21:28 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:21:18 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: [...] > > > > [0] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ > > > Ohhh boy. That file is big! And it's not the only one available ;) There's also eg. the Python or Perl p

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:21:18 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: > Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 19:16 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > [...] > > Have you seen my Gentoo Ebuild for DSPAM? Would the Debian package be > > in the same area? I mean function wise. The install part from the > > Gentoo Ebuild is n

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 19:16 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : [...] > Have you seen my Gentoo Ebuild for DSPAM? Would the Debian package be > in the same area? I mean function wise. The install part from the > Gentoo Ebuild is not that hard. I do not know anything about Gentoo Ebuild system, but

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:57:24 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: [...] > Unfortunately, yes, of this month - dspam has already been excluded from > the testing distribution for a few months, but will now be removed > entirely as the package is neglected by the current maintainers. > No one has informed

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 18:44 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:38:41 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 17:24 +0100, Hugo Monteiro a écrit : > > > Hi Jullien, > > > > Hi Hugo, > > > > > Sorry for bothering but i wanted to make a suggestion.

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Stevan Bajić
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:38:41 +0200 Julien Valroff wrote: > Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 17:24 +0100, Hugo Monteiro a écrit : > > Hi Jullien, > > Hi Hugo, > > > Sorry for bothering but i wanted to make a suggestion. > > Suggestions are always welcome! > > > The packages that you have available

Re: [Dspam-devel] kirya.net packages

2010-04-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 17:24 +0100, Hugo Monteiro a écrit : > Hi Jullien, Hi Hugo, > Sorry for bothering but i wanted to make a suggestion. Suggestions are always welcome! > The packages that you have available at your site are based on the GIT > version of dspam. While that is great sinc