Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Gender issues
Let's not forget that the original comment that triggered this whole
discussion was made by a woman! I don't think it was intended to be
sexist.
It's not sexist to say, In my experience, women tend to do X and would
be
better off doing Y. It may
Shevtsov
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:36 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Gender issues
Let's not forget that the original comment that triggered this whole
discussion was made by a woman! I don't think it was intended to be sexist.
It's not sexist to say, In my
Hello All,
It is not the discussion of gender issues that I find fault with. It is a very
important discussion. I find fault with the hijacking of this forum for that
discussion and the subtle bashing of academia, graduate education, scientists,
the tenure system, women in science, men in
, February 19, 2013 1:36 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Gender issues
Let's not forget that the original comment that triggered this whole
discussion was made by a woman! I don't think it was intended to be
sexist.
It's not sexist to say, In my experience, women tend
As an unemployed individual with a Masters degree and 4.5 years of
daily work experience using ArcGIS (as well as numerous other types of
experience both in the field and office including state and federal
jobs), I am still having an extraordinarily difficult time finding a
job. Is there any
Let's not forget that the original comment that triggered this whole
discussion was made by a woman! I don't think it was intended to be sexist.
It's not sexist to say, In my experience, women tend to do X and would be
better off doing Y. It may be accurate or inaccurate, but it's not sexist.
Message-
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Jane Shevtsov
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:36 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Gender issues
Let's not forget that the original comment that triggered
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:36 PM
To:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Gender issues
Let's not forget that the original comment that triggered this whole discussion
was made by a woman! I don't think it was intended to be sexist.
It's not sexist to say, In my experience
.**EDU ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of
Jane Shevtsov
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:36 PM
To:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Gender issues
Let's not forget that the original comment that triggered this whole
discussion was made by a woman! I don't think
-
From: Cynthia O'Rourke
To: Wayne Tyson
Cc: ECOLOG-L@listserv.umd.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: Science Publications Review bias prevention Re: [ECOLOG-L] So
what does the science say? ... Re: [ECOLOG-L] Gender issues
It's apparently the norm in some fields
the science say? ... Re: [ECOLOG-L]
Gender issues
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity
are revealed, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals.
However, in 2001, double-blind review was introduced by the journal
Behavioral Ecology. Following this policy
Now, I am the one who must speak up and voice my support for Yvette (and
Chandreyee). While no slight may have been intended, as a female scientist I
too experienced the responses Yvette cites - and especially the one recently
posted by Dr. Olden - as belittling and dismissive. There is
Seems to me that you completely misunderstood Dr. Olden's e-mail, who (to
my understanding) just tried to help everyone to reject sexist comments
like the one originally posted.
I am not saying that this kind of comments should not
be publicly disapproved, and probably just moving them into the
Exactly! We are now all feeding the troll. Let's talk about best
strategies to be successful. I taught myself GIS after getting my PhD
(which is in economics btw) and was very willing to collaborate, rip
my writing to shreds and re-submit to end up with grant proposals that
would be funded (note
Dear all,
I was not at all offended by Dr. Olden's advice, and, as a matter of fact,
found it very sensible.
Thanks
Chandreyee
On Feb 18, 2013, at 13:40, Leslie M. Adams leslie.ad...@comcast.net wrote:
Now, I am the one who must speak up and voice my support for Yvette (and
Chandreyee).
I disagree with you. Universities have to make the choices that are best
for them. If spousal hires would be so detrimental as your examples
suggest, they would not do them, but reality is that they work well. In
the case I am talking about, the department got extra money for the
additional
16 matches
Mail list logo
