Thank you, Keith, this is exactly what I needed to know!
Nick
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 12:54, Keith Trinity WE6R wrote:
> We use; C3,C4,C60.1uF , 50V, 10% X7R 0603Elecraft part # E530306
> It is not critical.
>
> Mouser and others have them;
>
We use; C3,C4,C6 0.1uF , 50V, 10% X7R 0603 Elecraft part # E530306
It is not critical.
Mouser and others have them;
https://www.mouser.com/c/?q=0.1%20uF%2C50V%2C10%25%2CX7R%2C0603%2CSMD
DigiKey; https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/ceramic-capacitors/60?s
FYI, it is easiest to just
I know the original KBPF3 mod kit is no longer available, but I've come
across an unmodified board that I'm considering trying to source parts for
to handle the mod myself.
I did some searching and I read that a Nichicon RL81C221MDN1KX might work
for the electrolytic cap, but I haven't found what
I purchased the KBPF3 mod kit to update my General coverage receive module. I
have a K3 purchased 10-15-14 and KBPF3 module Purchased 3-20-15. I'm confused
because my board says KBPF3 Rev. A but its an A2 and apparently the newer board
is an A3. I contacted Elecraft support and was told that
Can't speak for right/left but yes to the one with the handle.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 5:11 PM, Dauer, Edward wrote:
>
> I just ordered the KIO3B and a KBPF3 mod kit for the K3. The process of
> installing the KBPF3 mod provides access to
Ted,
On the battery replacement, it is easy, bu consider whether you really
use the real time clock on the K3 - keeping the clock going during power
down is its only use. If you do not use the internal clock, then do not
bother.
When you have the K3 open, it is an opportune time to replace
: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer,
Edward
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 2:12 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KBPF3 mod kit
I just ordered the KIO3B and a KBPF3 mod kit for the K3. The process of
installing the KBPF3 mod provides access to the small bat
I don’t think removing the side panel is necessary for these mods. But it’s
been a while. The sub-receiver is actually pretty easy to pull and reinstall.
Just follow the instructions that come with the mod kits. I’ve found the best
way to “sight” the sub receiver re-install is to first
I just ordered the KIO3B and a KBPF3 mod kit for the K3. The process of
installing the KBPF3 mod provides access to the small battery under the plastic
protective cover. The K3 is about five years old. Would it be worth replacing
that battery while I am in there, or do they last essentially
> If the KBPF3 modification compromises performance elsewhere in the
> coverage, I might be better off using my current approach: A
> home-brew transverter for 630m coverage with a 10.0 - 10.5 MHz IF
> with home-brew sharp cut off low pass filter ahead of the RF input.
The KBPF3 modification
I am considering the Elecraft modification to the KBPF3 for 630m coverage on my
K3. Is there any information published on the band pass filter performance
before and after the modification?
If the KBPF3 modification compromises performance elsewhere in the coverage, I
might be better off using
If you upgraded from KSYN3 to a-model, you got
the old unit obsolete.
Maybe you have KBPF3, too and would like to
modify it to low-frequency.
Needed 0,1uF capacitors are available in obsolete old KSYN3.
You need 3, take 6 to be sure. You may loose one or two.
The 250uF condenser is already
Yes, but in my case, I remember any mods already done since my K3 was built.
-
Chuck, KE9UW
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KBPF3-upgrade-kit-and-instructions-Corrected-tp7604292p7604306.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
However, if you are installing a KBPF3A in an existing K3 you
will still want to add the bypass capacitors to the regulators
on the main board and in the KRX3 if installed.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2015-06-25 12:34 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:23 PM, Michael Eberle
Serial number by itself doesn't by itself reliably indicate what is needed
as prior mods and options already installed bear on what is needed or not.
No way out of brainwork prior to order.
73, Guy K2AV
On Thursday, June 25, 2015, Doug doug49...@gmail.com wrote:
Amen. I agree. I also would
Hi Phil,
The errata were assimilated (er...incorporated :)
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On Jun 25, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Phil Wheeler w...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Ah, much better, Wayne: It now has all the pages referred to in the errata.
BTW, is the errata still pertinent or is it OBE?
73, Phil W7OX
On
The correct instruction sheet is now available on the order page for the KBPF3
mod kit. You may need to hit refresh on your browser to see the corrected
link.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
* * *
The long-promised KBPF3 modification kit is now available. It applies to the
KBPF3, K3 RF board, and
Ah, much better, Wayne: It now has all the pages
referred to in the errata. BTW, is the errata
still pertinent or is it OBE?
73, Phil W7OX
On 6/25/15 9:13 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
The correct instruction sheet is now available on the order page for the KBPF3 mod kit.
You may need to hit
Hmmm...
Before I order (and I am anxious to order something), I need to sit down and
check several links on the Elecraft site to figure out what I have and what
I can order to upgrade. And check the forum as well.
While the Elecraft folks are just hanging out looking for something to do
:), I
Amen. I agree. I also would like to be able to put serial number in and see
what I need or can upgrade
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:51 PM, ke9uw c-haw...@illinois.edu wrote:
Hmmm...
Before I order (and I am anxious to order something), I need to sit down and
check several
And Jean-Luk, where is 7 of 9?
N2TK, Tony
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Wayne
Burdick
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:20 PM
To: Phil Wheeler
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 upgrade kit and instructions
Hi all,
The long-promised KBPF3 modification kit is now available. It applies to the
KBPF3, K3 RF board, and optionally to the KRX3 sub receiver. It allows the K3
or K3S to receive signals in the 100-500 kHz range with good sensitivity. This
is an interesting part of the spectrum, with
For
Neither the instructions nor the errata speak to the regulator bypass
in the KRX3. The instructions do not provide information in either
bypass.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2015-06-24 8:42 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
Hi all,
The long-promised KBPF3 modification kit is now available. It applies to
Will new orders for the KBPF3 have the modification already done or
would one need to purchase both the KBPF3 and the KBPF3MDKT if they
wanted to receive 100-500 kHz?
Mike
KI0HA
On 6/24/2015 7:42 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
Hi all,
The long-promised KBPF3 modification kit is now available.
On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:23 PM, Michael Eberle mtebe...@mchsi.com wrote:
Will new orders for the KBPF3 have the modification already done…
Yes. That's the KBPF3A.
Wayne
N6KR
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
Thanks to everyone who responded to my query -- both on and off the
list. My hand has actually been forced a little on this issue, as the
KRX3 had a bad female TMP connection. It appeared distorted in shape
when I tried to replace the male connector. I then took the cover off
the KRX3 and
Just back from Dayton with my new-to-me, used K3, SN 7561. I'm in the
process of installing the KBPF3 and wondered if it is better installed
in the sub-receiver (which this unit has), or on the main board for the
main receiver. I'd appreciate any quick responses that a knowledgeable
ham
If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I guess.
I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run on both
sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself. (not
that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both
Received 3 HD15 M/F gender changers, pulled pin 11 out, attached it the end of
the KPA500 control cable, and now the KBPF3 and KPA500 work perfect! Should now
be able to use a receive only antenna on 80. My vertical is OK, but it can be
noisy.
73 DE K8CXM ... Jim
From: Jim Leder (Hotmail)
As I understand it, the way the PR6 uses the DIGOUT1 connection (pin 11)
and the way the KPA500 uses the same connection are physically
incompatible with one another.
The solution is apparently to break the connection on pin 11 to the
KPA500 - see
(Hotmail)
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:06 PM
To: Elecraft
Subject: [Elecraft] KBPF3 and KPA500
I installed a KBPF3 option, and it works OK, mostly. I also have a
PR6, so I am trying to use the BYPASS connector of the PR6. I have
pulled the jumper in the PR6, so the BYPASS would would work
I installed a KBPF3 option, and it works OK, mostly. I also have a PR6, so I
am trying to use the BYPASS connector of the PR6. I have pulled the jumper in
the PR6, so the BYPASS would would work. And it does, as long as my KPA500
cable is disconnected. When I connect the KPA500 control cable,
N1LQ-Dave:
I have the KBPF3 installed in my main receiver. I needed it to use
my K3 down on the 600m band (495-510 KHz), so having it in the main
radio is necessary for transmitting on 600m using the TEST
mode. Probably not a very common usage, but I thought to mention this.
I have the
I use the FM filter, because I had it, and it seems to work well. I have
never had the 6 Khz filter to compare it with.
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KBPF3-General-Coverage-Receive-Option-Questions-tp7569874p7569884.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 General Coverage Receive Option Questions
I use the FM filter, because I had it, and it seems to work well. I have
never had the 6 Khz filter to compare it with.
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KBPF3
Hi All,
This month I am celebrating my fifth anniversary with my K3. It has performed
flawlessly over this time …without a hiccup. My K3 was purchased without the
KBPF3 option in 2008.
Like many of you, I started my radio adventures in 1962 at the age of 12 as an
avid SWL. I recently have
Dave,
Since SW Broadcast signals are subject to fading, I would suggest you
add the KBPF3 to both the main and the subRX to give you the capability
of diversity reception. If you only want to purchase one, I suggest
that putting it in the main RX would make operation more straightforward
Is anyone using the K3 for receive on 500KHZ?
I do not have the KBPF3 installed and of course the K3
is deaf on 500KHZ, so before I order one, would like
to know if it works down that far in freq. Or is it
compromise performance compared to a good 500KHZ
receiver?
Thanks 73 Merv K9FD/KH6
Thanks to all who replied.
73,
Chuck NM1G
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by:
I am a new owner, and have much still to learn on this rig.
Do you have to install 2 of the KBPF3 Option boards in order to have both
primary and second reciever have General Coverage Receive filtering?
Mine appears to be installed in the second receiver, and throws an error if
config is set to
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of KD4NUE
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:50 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KBPF3 Option - Main and Sub Receiver
I am a new owner, and have much still to learn on this rig.
Do you have to install 2 of the KBPF3 Option boards
Welcome aboard!!
You only need the KBPF3 if you want to listen to frequencies outside the
amateur bands. My recommendation would be to remove the KBPF3 from the
KRX3 and move it to the main receiver, but if you want general coverage
RX in both receivers, then you'd need to install one on both
Maybe I've missed it or forgotten where it was but is it documented
somewhere what the RX performance is with and without the KBPF3? I've
seen where it says that you get 500Khz-30Mhz and 48-54Mhz but it then
says KBPF3 required for general coverage But how wide are the ham
band filters and
Guys,
I was wondering just how this works. Suppose one wants 9 MHz. Does one
set the band to 30M and just tune down to it? Does any of this confuse
the band selection via buttons? Alternatively if one sets the
frequency with the key pad, what band does it appear in.
I seem to recall some
In this case, I just key it in. The band will change to 30-meters and if you
cycle through the bands, the next time you hit 30-meters you will be set to 9
MHz.
BTW, I have my M1-M4 memories set to default frequencies for each band so
that M1=CW, M2=SSB, M3=Data A (PSK) and M4=AFSK-A (RTTY).
Hi Brian,
This came up and was discussed on Nov. 15, 2009 with a thread titled
K3 Firmware Req for SWL band and Using Memories Search for that
thread in the archives to read all the gory details.
The key information that's missing from the documentation is the band
edges. I determined
James
I suspect that 7.5MHz is far too close to the existing 40m bandpass
filtering for you to notice any difference between it and the KBPF3. I can't
try it here as I only have the single receiver, but if you to look around
12MHz for example I expect you would detect a significant difference.
: Sunday, December 27, 2009 11:08 PM
To: James Sarte
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 usefulness or effectiveness?
I do know that it makes a big difference on the broadcast band. Tune in a
station under 1000 kHz. It will be much louder on the antenna in jack on the
KXV3 than on the main antenna jack
If the AGC is being used, any difference would be seen in the S-meter,
not the AF output, unless you live in an extremely quiet location and
you're trying to copy 40m BC during the day.
My KBPF3 switches in at 7.385. If you turn the AF gains to minimum in
a quiet room, you will hear the relay
FWIW, mine switches in at 7410 KHz, increasing the signal by 7 or 8
dB. I compared the background noise level below and above 7410 using
the K3's internal dBV function, with AGC off.
73,
Drew
AF2Z
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:26:04 -0500, Guy. wrote:
If the AGC is being used, any difference would
Hi Guy et al,
I was more or less curious about how it worked. I do hear a relay clicking
somewhere around 7400 kHz, but I do not recall seeing or hearing an
appreciable change in s-meter readings or AF levels.
I'm sure it works fine in the lower broadcast bands though.
James K2QI
On Mon, Dec
Hello Elecrafters,
When I assembled my K3 I installed the KBPF3 module in the sub receiver
figuring that I'd use the sub for SWL. However, I was thinking about moving
it back to the main receiver in order to take full advantage of the
synchronous AM detection feature. What I noticed though was
FOR SALE: KBPF-3 General Coverage Receiver module for K3. New from Aptos, it
is $129.95; yours for $95 and I ship CONUS. Contact off list, please: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
73,
Cary, K4TM
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You
When I ordered my K3 and accessories I did not order the KBPF3 because I thot
that was to add general coverage receive Now, I am thinking it is a
bandpass filter to filter OUT non-ham band signals. That I need, so another
order if my latter idea is correct.
What is the function of the
Hi Charles,
When I ordered my K3 and accessories I did not order the KBPF3
because I thot that was to add general coverage receive
Correct.
Now, I am thinking it is a bandpass filter to filter OUT non-ham
band signals.
No. It is a filter to allow non-ham frequencies.
What is
+0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 Hi
Charles, When I ordered my K3 and accessories I did not order the KBPF3
because I thot that was to add general coverage
I'm considering adding a KBPF3 to my growing order list but I am curious as
to what is the range of frequencies that are covered with this filter. Did
I miss seeing it when I searched the Elecraft site?
Nelson, K8DJC
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has
57 matches
Mail list logo