[Emc-developers] circular-blend-arc-alpha

I am intending to test the new arc-blending with my Sherline mill by engraving pcb's. I am using Lubuntu 12.04 with the 3.4.55-rtai-2 kernel and LinuxCNC-2.6.0~pre. I am not sure if I should be trying circular-blend-arc-alpha or 3d-blend-arc-techdemos. 3d-blend-arc-techdemos makes ok but

Re: [Emc-developers] circular-blend-arc-alpha

it. If you go back to commit 7709c21 from the 27th - I know that built. sam On 12/30/2013 09:01 PM, phill carter wrote: I am intending to test the new arc-blending with my Sherline mill by engraving pcb's. I am using Lubuntu 12.04 with the 3.4.55-rtai-2 kernel and LinuxCNC-2.6.0~pre

Re: [Emc-developers] circular-blend-arc-alpha

! Rob On Dec 30, 2013 10:46 PM, phill carter phill.car...@oztime.com.au wrote: Thanks Sam, I'll give it a bash. Cheers, Phill On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 21:09:58 -0600 sam sokolik sa...@empirescreen.com wrote: and you do want to use circular-blend-arc-alpha.. sam On 12/30/2013

Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending

I ran the arc-arc test after changing Y3 in lines 3 7 to Y2 and Y-3 in line 6 to Y-2 to better suit the envelope of my mill. Using 2.6 standard it ran ok, using 2.6 with arc-blend when running line 6, it jumped to line 7 when it reached Y0 rather than Y-2. Screenshots at

Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending

at that corner is not supposed to happen. I'm going to run that test again on my machines to confirm. What commit are you building on? I had to do a roll-back of some changes a few days ago, so that could be contributing to this issue. -Rob On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:18 AM, phill carter

Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending

be contributing to this issue. -Rob On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:18 AM, phill carter phill.car...@oztime.com.auwrote: I ran the arc-arc test after changing Y3 in lines 3 7 to Y2 and Y-3 in line 6 to Y-2 to better suit the envelope of my mill. Using 2.6 standard it ran ok, using 2.6

Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending

ARC_BLEND_OPTIMIZATION_DEPTH = 50 ARC_BLEND_SMOOTHING_THRESHOLD = .75 On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 7:43 PM, phill carter phill.car...@oztime.com.auwrote: I tried Sam's file and there was no difference in completion times on my machine... http://imagebin.org/285347 http://imagebin.org/285348 Is my

Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending

, it lets you be more gentle to the machine without sacrificing top speed on short segments. On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 8:56 PM, phill carter phill.car...@oztime.com.auwrote: Max_velocity is 12.5 which equates to 750mm/min, My base thread is 40uS, the sherline mill has 1mm lead screws and I

Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending

life for the motors and screws. What sort of work do you typically do on your mill? Do you any part programs that could be challenging for the planner? If so, it would be great to add to the test library. On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, phill carter phill.car...@oztime.com.auwrote: I

Re: [Emc-developers] Initial tests of circular arc blending

I'm still a few steps away from surface mount yet. All the gcode I have has probing for variable z height, I'll rip the probing out of one and post it. On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:48:47 -0500 Robert Ellenberg rwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, phill carter phill.car

Re: [Emc-developers] Beta release of circular arc blending

Using the following extract from a pcb file I get these completion times in seconds: G64 G64 P0.05 G64 P0.05 Q0.05 2.6 standard17 9 9 2.6 c-b-a-beta 16 16 9 https://www.dropbox.com/s/pusrhn2faspxp7r/circle-from-pcb.ngc with

Re: [Emc-developers] Discuss: patch submissions

I read this document http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Todo-2.6 and I am getting many of the warnings noted in 1.2.7. whenever I build master. I followed this http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?LinuxCNC_On_Ubuntu_Precise (using Lubuntu). Cheers, Phill On Sun, 12 Jan 2014

Re: [Emc-developers] Discuss: patch submissions

Kuzminsky [mailto:s...@highlab.com] Sent: Monday, 13 January 2014 10:26 AM To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Discuss: patch submissions On 01/12/2014 04:09 PM, phill carter wrote: I read this document http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Todo-2.6 and I am getting many of the warnings

Re: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC on Debian Jessie, Linux 3.16.7, RTAI 5.0-test1

I gave it a quick try last night, latency was on par with my Wheezy install, around 15000. Every time I open LinuxCNC I get the RTAPI: ERROR: Unexpected real-time delay on task 1. My normal base thread is 35000, I kept increasing this up to 10 but continued to get the error. I will see if

Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Retire git.linuxcnc.org and move primary git to GitHub

If you place it inside quotes ("object.properties") it is not perfect but does reduce the number of results considerably. Cheers, Phill Sent with K-9 Mail On 18 May 2017 5:01:06 pm AEST, andy pugh wrote: >On 18 May 2017 at 04:08, Jeff Epler wrote:

Re: [Emc-developers] A halmeter enhancement

Original message From: Gene Heskett Date: 5/3/20 8:19 pm (GMT+10:00) To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Emc-developers] A halmeter enhancement Greetings all;I never made it to the garage today as I had a bad time with leg cramps in the night so didn't get a

Re: [Emc-developers] A halmeter enhancement

Original message From: Gene Heskett Date: 5/3/20 9:43 pm (GMT+10:00) To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] A halmeter enhancement On Thursday 05 March 2020 04:30:18 Phill Carter wrote:Phill, I appreciate the help when I did find

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

Buildbot seems to have stopped plus there are a lot of failed builds. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

[Emc-developers] Axis Startup

There have been several reports of Axis starting minimized in some Linux distributions. I have recently noticed this behaviour in a distribution with muffin as the window manager. According to this thread

Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot

Thank you and good luck. > On 1 Feb 2020, at 2:59 pm, Sebastian Kuzminsky > wrote: > > I'm working on a buildbot upgrade, in order to support Debian Buster > builds. There will be plenty more failures this weekend... > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 19:22 Phill Carter wrote:

Re: [Emc-developers] Looking to make hex offset list for NML status shared memoryr

There may be some helpful info in this thread on the forum > > On 17 Feb 2020, at 10:35 am, Johannes Fassotte > wrote: > >

[Emc-developers] Buildbot Documentation

I have been getting 403 Forbidden on the http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/doc/ page for several days. The http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/ page could do with a bit of updating. I would be happy to modify it if I was pointed in the

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

The Buildbot seems to be asleep. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot

Sorry, I think I messed up my timezone calculations… Cheers, Phill. > On 17 Jan 2020, at 11:38 am, Sebastian Kuzminsky > wrote: > > On 1/16/20 5:32 PM, Phill Carter wrote: >> The Buildbot seems to be asleep. > > It looks fine to me, what problem are you seeing?

Re: [Emc-developers] Doublestep

> On 9 Jan 2020, at 11:54 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > Why is it that the driver uses step_space = 0 to activate doublestep, > rather than using reset = 1 ? Could it be because of the different types of stepper control? Cheers, Phill ___

[Emc-developers] Outputs with cutter compensation

I have just noticed that I cannot set outputs like M62, M67 etc.while cutter compensation(in my case G41.1) is on. Is there any particular reasoning behind this? Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Emc-developers] Outputs with cutter compensation

> On 15 Apr 2020, at 9:21 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 06:17, Phill Carter wrote: >> >> I have just noticed that I cannot set outputs like M62, M67 etc.while cutter >> compensation(in my case G41.1) is on. Is there any particular reasoning

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 Feature Freeze

> On 17 Apr 2020, at 12:09 am, andy pugh wrote: > > Is everything that should be in 2.8 currently in 2.8? > > I would like to freeze it a bit harder on Friday night, then have a > really good look at clearing the tagged bugs over the weekend. There is a component named ohmic.comp in master

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

2.8 packages or docs don't appear to have been built since April 10 ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

[Emc-developers] Buildbot - master branch

master branch packages and docs don’t appear to have updated since 2020-04-03 ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Document errors

Thanks for that, another case of not seeing the forest for the trees... > On 21 Apr 2020, at 2:21 am, John wrote: > > A fixed width of 1000 may be your issue. > > JT > > On 4/18/20 7:43 PM, Phill Carter wrote: >> A forum user posted some PDF doc errors in t

[Emc-developers] Document errors

A forum user posted some PDF doc errors in the way some graphics appear: > They do appear ok in the HTML docs:

Re: [Emc-developers] New 2.8 Release Manager

> On 3 Apr 2020, at 9:57 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 23:01, John Thornton wrote: > >> Is there a way to do a test release just to see if we have all our ducks >> in a row? > > I tried to create a test-ISO before Christmas, but found that I didn't > know how to get the

Re: [Emc-developers] New 2.8 Release Manager

> On 4 Apr 2020, at 6:58 am, Sebastian Kuzminsky > wrote: > > On 4/3/20 1:40 PM, John Thornton wrote: >> Indeed I have two machines running Ubuntu 10.04... if it ain't broke don't >> fix it. > > Noted! > > 2.8 doesn't build on Ubuntu 10.04, 2.7 is the last LinuxCNC release that we >

Re: [Emc-developers] New 2.8 Release Manager

mn.com.au > > > > On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 08:00, Phill Carter wrote: > >> >> >>> On 4 Apr 2020, at 6:58 am, Sebastian Kuzminsky >> wrote: >>> >>> On 4/3/20 1:40 PM, John Thornton wrote: >>>> Indeed I have two machines

Re: [Emc-developers] New 2.8 Release Manager

> On 4 Apr 2020, at 9:36 am, Sebastian Kuzminsky > wrote: > > On 4/3/20 3:59 PM, Phill Carter wrote: >>> On 4 Apr 2020, at 6:58 am, Sebastian Kuzminsky >>> wrote: >>> I would *love* to standardize on Debian and not support all the >>> off-shoot

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

I cannot access the discs directory nor the waterfall Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] New 2.8 Release Manager

> On 2 Apr 2020, at 5:08 am, andy pugh wrote: > > I have had a brief discussion with Moses, the current 2.8 Release > Manager and he has said that he is more than happy to relinquish the > reins. > > So, we need a new release manager. > > Does anyone know what the process is for deciding on

[Emc-developers] missing userspace component

Yesterday I moved a userspace component named pmx485.py from the plasmac configurtion directory to src/hal/user_comps and included some documentation. When I build locally the documents build fine and the component ends up in the bin directory and all runs well. I did an update from Buildbot

Re: [Emc-developers] missing userspace component

> On 29 Apr 2020, at 10:25 am, Phill Carter wrote: > > Yesterday I moved a userspace component named pmx485.py from the plasmac > configurtion directory to src/hal/user_comps and included some documentation. > > When I build locally the documents build fine and the

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

Buildbot ppears to be asleep. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Third-Party GUIs.

> On 2 May 2020, at 9:38 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 00:32, Phill Carter wrote: > >> If we link to one site then we may as well link to every known site that has >> a LinuxCNC compatible GUI > > That is what I am proposing, yes. > &g

Re: [Emc-developers] Third-Party GUIs.

I think so too. > On 2 May 2020, at 4:29 am, Chris Morley wrote: > > I think we should just worry about/concentrate on, linuxcnc rather then other > projects. > > > From: andy pugh > Sent: May 1, 2020 12:17 PM > To: EMC developers > Subject: [Emc-developers]

Re: [Emc-developers] Third-Party GUIs.

> On 2 May 2020, at 9:28 am, John Thornton wrote: > > Actually I would just link to the QtPyVCP web site qtpyvcp.com > > JT > If we link to one site then we may as well link to every known site that has a LinuxCNC compatible GUI Cheers, Phill > On 5/1/2020 4:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

Re: [Emc-developers] Third-Party GUIs

> On 2 May 2020, at 5:32 pm, Reinhard wrote: > > On Samstag, 2. Mai 2020, 08:22:05 CEST Jared McLaughlin wrote: >> In my opinion, linuxcnc should be more like a distro that >> you install packages on. The UI's should be packages that are not >> maintained by the main development team. > >

Re: [Emc-developers] Third-Party GUIs

> On 2 May 2020, at 8:13 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 10:15, Phill Carter wrote: > >> I really don't see a problem with having the UI's as part of LinuxCNC > > Many folk already complain that LinuxCNC is too difficult to set up. I > think that

Re: [Emc-developers] startup of linuxcnc and axis

> When axis comes up, it has the size given from the window-manager. Then after > a short delay it shrinks to the tiny size. > May be, its possible to set the size of the main window earlier, so that it > accepts the size given from window-manager? you can set the size of Axis with the

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

Buildbot seems to be down Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc on the rpi4, kernel Q

uname: Linux pi4 4.19.97-v7l+ #1294 SMP Thu Jan 30 13:21:14 GMT 2020 armv7l GNU/Linux From  http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1650.rip-buster-rtpreempt-rpi4/builds/169/steps/environment-report/logs/stdio Original message From: andy pugh Date: 7/5/20 10:16 pm

[Emc-developers] Buildbot home page

I took the liberty of editing the Buildbot home page to reflect the release of 2.8 It may be previewed here: > Cheers, Phill.

Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot problems?

> On 1 Sep 2020, at 9:48 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 00:20, Phill Carter wrote: > >> Is it too lateyet to add anything to 2.8? > > Yes. > But I don't think that 2.8.1 will be that long in coming. There is a > lot more Spanish translation

Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot problems?

> On 1 Sep 2020, at 8:38 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 17:56, andy pugh wrote: > >> Four of the builders are failing runtests, but it isn't so much the >> tests that are failing as LinuxCNC itself. > > I have just realised that the three failed builds after my failed >

Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot problems?

> On 1 Sep 2020, at 6:27 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 00:52, Phill Carter wrote: > >> Thanks, I forgot to change the install instructions in the PlasmaC manual to >> reflect the change to 2.8 > > The online docs are always the latest, so t

Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot home page

Original message From: andy pugh Date: 8/9/20 7:29 pm (GMT+10:00) To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot home page On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 04:34, Phill Carter wrote:>> I took the liberty of editing the Buildbot home page to reflect the release

[Emc-developers] Buildbot Stopped

The Buildbot seems to having a lazy lunch. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Buster and F-~Engrave / True-Type-Tracer

> On 5 Sep 2020, at 4:52 am, andy pugh wrote: > > The Debian Wheezy repository contains a few applications in addition > to LinuxCNC. > Should these also be included in the Debian Buster repository, or are > these abandoned projects? I see F-Engrave is available from Scorchwoks so probably

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

Buildbot appers to be be asleep. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8.0-pre3

> On 25 Aug 2020, at 11:04 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 01:53, Phill Carter wrote: > >>> It seems that the message mentions 3.9.8 because I was looking at the >>> Stretch build, Buster suggests 4.3.0. >>> Does anyone have the time to

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8.0-pre3

> On 25 Aug 2020, at 5:40 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 08:31, Phill Carter wrote: > >> Sorry Andy but I really am out of my depth with this. For most of the items >> I don't even know where to begin looking. > > Neither do I. > > --

Re: [Emc-developers] Gmoccapy Lathe Macro Config

> On 26 Aug 2020, at 5:43 am, andy pugh wrote: > > One of the sim configs for Gmoccapy includes my lathe macros, which > use a GUI based on a multi-layer SVG file. > This depends on python-rsvg which is not included in Buster. > > I have packported it via the LinuxCNC repo. > > Should I put

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8.0-pre3

> On 25 Aug 2020, at 10:44 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 01:31, andy pugh wrote: > >> It looks like we can quieten another warning there by changing the >> Standards-Version in control.top.in. >> But is that something you can just do if you don't even know what the >>

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 release update.

The RPi deb seems to have a convoluted name (linux-image-4.19.71-rt24-v7l+_4.19.71-rt24-v7l+-4_armhf.deb) http://linuxcnc.org/dists/buster/base/binary-armhf/ > On 15 Aug 2020, at 9:01 am, Chris Morley wrote: > > installed. > Whatever terminal came default. > Chris > >

[Emc-developers] Python3 Master Build

I have hit a roadblock trying to build master with python3 I have a VM created with the 2.8 Buster ISO and changed the default python to python3. When I try to build master I get this in the terminal in the ./configure stage: checking python version... OK checking version of python libraries...

Re: [Emc-developers] Python3 Master Build

s/820 > <https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/820> > > I know mostly that discussion for 2.9 > > On 23/9/20 2:16 pm, Phill Carter wrote: >> I have hit a roadblock trying to build master with python3 >> >> I have a VM created with the 2.8 Buster ISO

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

The Buildbot appears to be hung. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Remove PDF Docs? (Was: DEB for linuxcnc HTML documentation)

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 7:06 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 20:10, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: >> >> I've made a deb with the HTML documentation of linuxcnc 2.8.0 > > I know that you were not suggesting that we remove the PDF docs, but I > would like to expand the discussion in

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 release update.

23:51:17 Phill Carter wrote: > > sudo apt install opencv, could not locate opencv on raspbian 10.4 for > armhf. > > raspbian for armhf isn't using x11, but wayland, so my tools to search > are limited to aptitude But thats using tactical nukes without warning > labels. And i

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 release update.

> On 4 Aug 2020, at 8:45 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 04:51, Phill Carter wrote: > >> They seem to require: >> python-pyqt5 >> python-pyqt5.qsci >> python-pyqt5.qtopengl >> python-pyqt5.qtsvg >> opencv >> >> O

Re: [Emc-developers] Confused by Asciidoc

> On 12 Aug 2020, at 7:57 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/tree/andypugh/spanish_docs > The only thing different I see is that plasma-cnc-primer has: :lang: es :toc: at the top and

Re: [Emc-developers] Confused by Asciidoc

> On 12 Aug 2020, at 8:18 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 11:16, Phill Carter wrote: > >> :lang: es >> :toc: >> >> at the top and plasmac-user-guide doesn't > > Hmm, maybe it won't cross-reference to a document in a different la

Re: [Emc-developers] Confused by Asciidoc

> On 12 Aug 2020, at 8:47 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 11:22, Phill Carter wrote: > >>> (It seems like the Plasmac guide hasn't actually been translated) >> >> That is embarrassing, I didn't even notice... > > Actually, that see

Re: [Emc-developers] Confused by Asciidoc

> On 12 Aug 2020, at 8:47 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 11:22, Phill Carter wrote: > >>> (It seems like the Plasmac guide hasn't actually been translated) >> >> That is embarrassing, I didn't even notice... > > Actually, that see

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 release update.

I tried the ISO and it installed fine on a VM. I did notice the qtvcp sims don't run out of the box, they require some packages and their dependencies. I was able to start them all after the following were installed. They seem to require: python-pyqt5 python-pyqt5.qsci python-pyqt5.qtopengl

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

The package builds for 2.8 Buster Rpi4 are failing. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

Buildbot appears to have stopped. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 Situation

I don't really understand the need to rush it out right now. I know it has been a long time coming but if it seems this bug can be fixed in the foreseeable future we may as well wait a bit longer. If folk need 2.8 it is really not too difficult to get. > On 10 Jun 2020, at 8:35 am, Rod

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 Situation

How many are deterred from trying linuxcnc because its so dated? I didn't realize we into looking at it from a marketing angle and 2.8 is not dated and is easy to get. > On 10 Jun 2020, at 8:35 am, Rod Webster wrote: > > We have at > least one manufacturer wanting to adopt it. Well maybe

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 Situation

> On 11 Jun 2020, at 12:54 pm, Rod Webster wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 12:33, Reinhard >> wrote: >> >> If other users have similar experiences, then a lot of precious developer >> time >> has been wasted on releases, that don't have much importance. >> I believe, that developer

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 Situation

If an individual or a business wants to contract a developer to do work for them then I don't see a problem with that. They can then choose whether or not they would like to contribute that back to the LinuxCNC project although it would be preferable if they did so. I don't think that LinxCNC

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 release update.

> On 16 Aug 2020, at 4:22 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 08:48, Phill C wrote: > >>> Using the terminal on the ISO - I can't right click and paste - anyone else >>> find this? > >> Yep, same here. > > I just tried this and it seems fine. > > Can you confirm _which_ .iso

[Emc-developers] PREEMPT_RT version string

I think it would be worthwhile adding this commit into 2.8 https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/3742a36808198969c6eaba79c0ae92788dcc0aab Cheers, Phill. ___

Re: [Emc-developers] Help!

> On 16 Aug 2020, at 9:41 am, andy pugh wrote: > > I am starting to feel that I might have bitten off more than I can chew here. > > Does anyone have any idea why _some_ packages fail and others seem OK? > > http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/grid > > I would like to see green all the

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

Buildbot appears to be asleep Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

[Emc-developers] BuildBot

Buildbot seems to have been asleep for a while. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Proposal: Stop supporting Py2 and GTK2 in Master.

> On 12 May 2021, at 4:28 pm, Chris Morley wrote: > > > On 2021-05-11 11:01 p.m., Phill Carter wrote: >> >>> On 12 May 2021, at 3:47 pm, Chris Morley wrote: >>> >>> I copied this from github (and added to): >>> >>> I don

Re: [Emc-developers] Proposal: Stop supporting Py2 and GTK2 in Master.

> On 12 May 2021, at 3:47 pm, Chris Morley wrote: > > I copied this from github (and added to): > > I don't think anyone really thinks we can/should keep supporting py2 in the > future. > The real questions are how/when will we transition - as the transition will > be very disruptive. >

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc-dev dependencies

> On 24 May 2021, at 8:19 am, andy pugh wrote: > > Is there a good reason not to have all the build-time dependencies as > dependencies for linuxcnc-dev? This would mean that apt-get install > linuxcnc-dev would install all that is needed to run "make" I don't know but originally I thought

[Emc-developers] Buildot Homepage

I have attached an update homepage for the Buildbot. It can be viewed for correctness here: > ___ Emc-developers mailing list

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

Buildbot has a lost slave. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

[Emc-developers] Dependencies

I inadvertently pushed this commit that adds QtVCP dependencies for packaging when I meant to submit it as a PR. Should I undo it then submit as a PR?

[Emc-developers] Buildbot Asleep

Buildbot seems to not want to leave 2021. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Buildbot Asleep

Haha, me too. :) > On 3 Jan 2022, at 12:15 pm, Sam Sokolik wrote: > > I don't understand why any one or thing would want to stay in 2021.. > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2022, 6:59 PM Phill Carter wrote: > >> Buildbot seems t

Re: [Emc-developers] How to contribute?

> On 10 Feb 2022, at 4:14 pm, Andy Howell wrote: > > > On 2/9/22 14:46, andy pugh wrote: >> On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 20:21, Andy Howell wrote: >> >>> My background is in c/c++ development under UNIX/Linux. I know bit of >>> python. I don't have the experience to work on the low level

Re: [Emc-developers] OPINION: Setting Cannon's default G64 to something safer

> On 1 Jun 2022, at 11:29 am, Chris Morley wrote: > > Forum discussion here: > https://forum.linuxcnc.org/20-g-code/46023-simple-rectangle-has-a-radius-on-all-edges-strange?start=0 > > Gist: > Often users are surprised by linuxcnc's corner rounding with the default > setting of G64. > I

Re: [Emc-developers] Driver changes in a stable branch?

>> I have cherry-picked the changes needed to make it work with 2.8.3 in >> the branch "outm_for_2.8" and initial tests by people who actually >> have a 7i86S look promising (I don't have one to test with) > > Does no-one really have any opinion on this? My only concern is that if 7i96s support

Re: [Emc-developers] cam align

FWIW I have tried the /configs/sim/axis/qtvcp/qtvcp_tabs sample on a 64bit Pi4 and it works. raspberrypi:~ $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) Release:11 Codename: bullseye raspberrypi:~ $ uname -a

Re: [Emc-developers] Time to split 2.9 and master?

> On 21 Sep 2022, at 6:59 am, andy pugh wrote: > > Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag? I have some plasmac work that I would like to push before that happens. It should be completed by the end of this month. I also have a question regarding packaging.

Re: [Emc-developers] linuxcnc on raspberry pi bullseye?

> On 15 Sep 2022, at 4:53 am, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > > Hi folks, with all the attention that newer distros have been getting > lately, I'm looking in to running LinuxCNC On the Bullseye version of > Raspberry Pi OS (aka Raspbian) on a Raspberry Pi 4B. > > It looks super

Re: [Emc-developers] Time to split 2.9 and master?

> On 23 Sep 2022, at 9:39 am, Rod Webster wrote: > > I think integrators and users don't want to be continually installing new > versions of Plasmac et al. > Plasmac has only ever existed in the development branch. First a private > fork, then 2.8, then 2.9 > There are updates to it on an

Re: [Emc-developers] feed hold ?

There is a motion.jog-inhibit pin in 2.9 and later > On 5 Dec 2022, at 7:16 am, Chris Morley wrote: > > Yes it was miss named but it was meant to stop all motion. Only a thread pass > would finish. Which you could certainly argue was wrong too. > > After I realized the name was bad it was

  1   2   >