Hello Group:
I have a question regarding multi-band devices. How can I characterize
materials (shielded enclosure and other components in the enclosure) for
absorption of certain RF?
thank you in advance.
vijay wani
--
To
I read in !emc-pstc that eric.lif...@ni.com wrote (in OF7DD27236.F196CE
48-on86256b14.006b5...@natinst.com) about '24 Mo. Warranty for the EU',
on Fri, 30 Nov 2001:
The definition of Consumer in this directive is leading people at my
company to believe it only applies to a finished product for
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in
200111301943.laa15...@epgc196.sdd.hp.com) about 'Mains Cords in the UK
and the fuse rating', on Fri, 30 Nov 2001:
The length of the cord will affect the voltage at
the load end of the cord.
More significantly, its resistance affects
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Maxwell chris.maxw...@nettest.com wrote
(in 83d652574e7af740873674f9fc12dbaa675...@utexh1w2.gnnettest.com)
about 'LISN Calibration', on Fri, 30 Nov 2001:
reference CISPR 16 or EN 55016
I don't think there is an EN55016.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own
The definition of Consumer in this directive is leading people at my
company to believe it only applies to a finished product for non-commercial
or personal/private use.
It appears to not apply to devices bought and used for profession/trade
applications; which is nearly all of the products
John's concern (see attached email at the end) is on target, but there
is a solution.
I have the isolation transformer wired so that line and neutral from the
wall outlet connect to the primary side. The windings ratio then
provides a step-up so that I get 230VAC across the secondary (this is
For an IT product there is a restriction in the use of mains cords with a
cross
sectional area of 0.75mm2 for units up to 6 amps when the cord is greater
than
2m in length (EN60950: 2000 section 3.2.5)
I am curious as to the hazard that is prevented by
this length
Steve,
En55024 calls out IEC 61000-4-2 but specifies 4 Kv contact and 8 kv
air discharge both with acceptance criteria B
Assuming Data processing equipment performance Criteria B is:
Failures which can be recovered by read and write retries are
permissible
I read in !emc-pstc that Patrick Lawler plaw...@west.net wrote (in
5sef0uc2qlad6kdjq2fi0e0v76ju6vj...@4ax.com) about 'LISN Calibration',
on Fri, 30 Nov 2001:
I ran into that exact problem (a floating power source) a few years ago.
Anyone who benefited from the 'Rational Manger' or
There has been a lot of discussion on the extended EU warranty issue.
Perhaps I missed it but, does anyone have the chapter verse of this
new requirement (dirrective # or OJ reference).
When does it take effect, Is the entire EU involved ???
Are non-voting countries following the EU lead ???
Hi Stephen,
Yes, table 1 outlines 4kV contact and 8kV air, Criterion B. Section 4.2.1
also goes on to clarify where (or where not) to apply either contact or
air discharges and how many to apply.
Regards,
Jeff Bailey
Compliance Engineering
SST - A Division of Woodhead Canada
Phone: (519)
Hi Richard,
Gefährdungen or Gefaehrdungen is the German wird for Danger (Peril)
This form is the plural form, singular is Gefährdung, the noun is
Gefahr.
Word for word pedantic translation would give something like
endangering.
If it is for a manual translation, Danger is the best choice,
I read in !emc-pstc that J.Feldhaar j.feldh...@telejet.de wrote (in
3c07a71c.3878c...@telejet.de) about '2nd one: EMI receiver overhead -
diagram', on Fri, 30 Nov 2001:
There is a lot more to this issue, but at the
moment I'm looking only for this picture with the curves for the
amplitude
I ran into that exact problem (a floating power source) a few years ago.
The conducted emissions test results on a power supply at an outside lab were
4-5dB higher than our precompliance bench in-house.
I sent the LISN's back to the manufacturer for performance verification, and
they were fine.
Richard
A German colleague of mine says he doesn't recognise this word, it doesn't
exist in German as far as he knows. He says it could mean something like a
thing that could cause danger. If you could put the word into context,
perhaps by supplying any surrounding text, he says he will try to
'Gefährdungen' is the plural 'die Gefährdung' meaning endangering or
imperiling
I'm not sure there is a good English equivalent, 'endangerings' is the
litteral translation.
David
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Phillips [mailto:step...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:57
Thanks to everyone that replied. My OCR mispelled the word. Once corrected,
it does translate as danger.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
-Original Message-
From: helmut.hi...@alcatel.de [mailto:helmut.hi...@alcatel.de]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:45 AM
Hi Richard,
Gefährdung means in English: danger or hazard in general; in special
e.g. radiation hazard
a very good dictionary is free available under:
http://dict.leo.org/
best regards
Helmut Hintz
richwo...@tycoint.com@majordomo.ieee.org on 30.11.2001 02:32:55 PM
Please respond to
Hi List Members,
I would like to develop an in-house standard that references all relevant
microwave standards for test and measurement equipment or ATE.
Does anyone have info on these related standards titles and numerical
designations?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
I know the answer is go buy the darn standard, I thought I had it, but
cant seem to find it.
I have a simple question though and I know someone has the answer.
In EN50024 what is the requirement for ESD.
Is it 4kV contact and 8 kV air, Criterion B???
Regards,
Stephen Yow
GE Fanuc Automation
I'm just guessing, but one detail that may have impeded your search
(assuming you were searching in English, not German, French, etc.) is that
in UK English, warranty/warranties is/are _usually_ called
Guarantee/Guarantees.
It is a good general point to bear in mind when searching EU and other
I have a few questions for the gurus in the group regarding cable
calibration for emissions and immunity tests
1. what is the preferred step by step procedure for cable calibration using
a sig. gen. and spectrum analyzer?
2. Is there any standard that outlines the procedure?
3.Does the procedure
Almost certainly the answer will be found in BS1363 Part 1,
Specification for rewirable and non-rewirable 13A fused plugs.
(I assume you are referring to UK plugs, as I don't know of
any other plug with a fuse).
My copy of BS1363 is rather old, but there is a table which shows
a 3A (5A) fuse
I recommend that you get copies of BS 1362 and all parts of BS 1363 from
BSI. You may also want to get a copy of EN 60799.
Regards,
+=+
|Ronald R. Wellman|Voice : 408-345-8229 |
|Agilent Technologies
I don't carry my various language conversion dictionaries
in my briefcase anymore, since spec's have come in
English for many years now.
But I think it might mean (in some form) Danger; spelled
differently though (die Gefaehrdung: danger, hazard, peril,
accident risk).
Try:
Can someone please tell me what the word Gefäedungen means in English?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web
How do you keep your violin from getting stolen?
Put it in a viola case.
I play violin -- I think the obsession stems from the inability of anyone
to understand why the Stradivarius sound is so unique - I'm sure all
musician - engineers have at one point wanted to build their own instrument
Andy,
I believe that this is still at the discussion stage.
At the moment, each EU country has its own set of
consumer protection laws. In most cases, the
warranty, which is usually 12 months, is part
of the product marketing, rather than an
obligation. This usually gives the consumer
rights
Did anyone take a look at 61010 standard for measuring etc. equipment.
This standard (if I read well) allows for 1.8 mm clearance and 0 creepage
on PCB material (regardless CTI) between hazardous 230 V and
ground if enclosed into a IPx5 or better enclosure (creating Pollution
degree 2).
This
Erwin
Briefly, only PCs, PC monitors and television receivers can be classified as
Class D. For exact details I'm afraid you will have to purchase the
standard.
Chris Colgan
Compliance Engineer
TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
*Tel: +44 (0)1480 415 627
Andy,
I'm not sure, but the Directive you may be referring to is 1999/44/EC.
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1999/en_399L0044.html
Kind regards,
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Veit, Andy
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:22 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC Internet Forum'
Subject: 24
Try RS documentation especially the booklet:
Measuring EMI and wanted signals.
It was published quit a long time ago, but they might want to make you
a copy...
Your headroom is exactly equal to their numbers.
regards
Gert Gremmen
-Original Message-
From:
Andrew,
Hi-Pot OK ink stamp is unacceptable to most NRTLs and European test
agencies. Keep up with the paper record.
Imagine this scenario:
A production line employee is applying a 100% voltage but forgets to put the
equipment on/off swich in the ON position (ie not subjecting the whole
I read in !emc-pstc that SEOW,ERWIN-SP (HP-Singapore,ex6) erwin-
sp_s...@hp.com wrote (in BB63B56B6F7FD747B48FA66E4F63A20C44877F@xsg06.
sgp.hp.com) about 'Amendment -14 of to EN/IEC61000-3-2', on Fri, 30 Nov
2001:
I just recently found out that there was an amendment 14 for the harmonics
I read in !emc-pstc that Tania Grant taniagr...@msn.com wrote (in
oe248k8rbkxga7zywr41...@hotmail.com) about '24 Mo. Warranty for
the EU', on Thu, 29 Nov 2001:
You mean, we can't provide a 5 or 10 year warranty??? Will this
fall under the CE marking Directive?? Do we have to sign
You mean, we can't provide a 5 or 10 year warranty??? Will this fall under
the CE marking Directive?? Do we have to sign a Declaration of Conformity???
Personally, I think the Directive directors are nuts in this case. I can see
a warranty document going on and on for pages and pages,
Gentlemen,
This discussion sounds better than a PDQ Bach concerto! I am getting an
education here!
taniagr...@msn.com
- Original Message -
From: Pettit, Ghery
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:42 PM
To: 'Ehler, Kyle'; 'Aschenberg, Mat'; Pettit, Ghery; 'John Woodgate';
Hi All,
I just recently found out that there was an amendment 14 for the harmonics
standards. Can any one explain to me the exact details of it?
Thanks in advance!
Erwin Seow
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
Ouch! That is one expensive Louisville Slugger. Unless, of course, it was
a Linton plastic Bassoon, in which case that's all it was good for ;)
-Original Message-
From: Ehler, Kyle [mailto:keh...@lsil.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:08 PM
To: 'Aschenberg, Mat'; 'Pettit,
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB
mhpeibnilmegecbaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: SV: Revised EMC
standards and CE Declarations.', on Thu, 29 Nov 2001:
On the CENELEC web they say regarding EN61000-6-1: Note:Supersedes EN
50082-1:1997. What you are
40 matches
Mail list logo