the appropriate EMC characteristics for such locations.
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 19 October 2016 08:05
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
;
> Sylvae in aeternum manent.
>
> From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@ieee.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 6:29 PM
> To: John Woodgate <jmw1...@btinternet.com>
> Cc: IEEE EMC PSTC <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industria
2016 5:25 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
My understanding has always been based on the Class and Group designations in
CISPR 11 / EN 55011 for ISM equipment
and
> Associates Rayleigh England
>
> Sylvae in aeternum manent.
>
> From: Kortas, Jamison [mailto:jamison.kor...@ecolab.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 3:35 PM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-ind
mailto:jamison.kor...@ecolab.com>
jamison.kor...@ecolab.com>
Cc: IEEE EMC PSTC < <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
My understanding has always been based
bstation, for example?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jamison
>
> From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@ieee.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 11:25 AM
> To: Kortas, Jamison <jamison.kor...@ecolab.com>
> Cc: IEEE EMC PSTC <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Subject: Re: [PS
.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
My understanding has always been based on the Class and Group designations in
CISPR 11 / EN 55011 for ISM equipment (based on the 2009 edition):
5.3 Division into classes
Class
]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:04 AM
To: John Woodgate <jmw1...@btinternet.com>; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
>The 'prohibition' also results in no requirement for warning notices to t
Rayleigh England
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
From: Kortas, Jamison [mailto:jamison.kor...@ecolab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 8:01 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
Thanks all – at least I am n
amison [mailto:jamison.kor...@ecolab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 8:01 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
Thanks all – at least I am not the only one unsure.
I am trying to establish
Nix [mailto:d...@ieee.org]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 18 oktober 2016 18:25
> Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial
> for EMC testing purposes
>
> My understanding has always been based on the Class and Grou
.
-Jamison
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:44 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
For Europe, the sources are the Generic standards, which
From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 5:25 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
My understanding has always been based on the Class and Group designations in
CISPR 1
printing, think about the environment.
Van: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@ieee.org]
Verzonden: dinsdag 18 oktober 2016 18:25
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial
for EMC testing purposes
My understanding has always been based
ling companies will do with it.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: Kortas, Jamison [mailto:jamison.kor...@ecolab.com]
Sent: 18 October 2016 16:53
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial
for EMC testing purposes
Thank y
, etc.?
Thanks,
-Jamison
From: John Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:31 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC testing purposes
You often get heavy electrical machinery
My understanding has always been based on the Class and Group designations in
CISPR 11 / EN 55011 for ISM equipment (based on the 2009 edition):
> 5.3 Division into classes
> Class A equipment is equipment suitable for use in all establishments other
> than domestic and
> those directly
Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:31 PM
To: 'John Woodgate' <jmw1...@btinternet.com>; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial
for EMC testing purposes
You often get heavy electrical machinery in
]
Sent: 18 October 2016 16:10
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial
for EMC testing purposes
No, because light industry premises are often very close to residential
premises, get power from the low-voltage supply and broadcast
Hi John,
Would this be applicable for Light Industrial equipment as well?
Thank you.
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:49 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for
EMC
t;; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial
for EMC testing purposes
Hi John,
Would this be applicable for Light Industrial equipment as well?
Thank you.
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October
For Europe, 'industry' means heavy industry - large machines, high-power
electrical installation, not powered from the public low-voltage supply. No
broadcast radio or TV receivers likely to be within 30 metres.
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO - Own Opinions Only
22 matches
Mail list logo
