RE: Lithium battery coin cell shipping restrictions

2009-01-13 Thread Barker, Neil
Lauren
 
Here it is, http://www.tadiranbatteries.de/eng/downloads/. As you will see, it
is the German website that has the information, but don't worry, it is a
multilingual website.
 
Be careful, because the regulations changed effective Jan 1st, so you may
still see some incorrect information from some sources. The main difference
seems to be a different treatment for Lithium-Ion batteries compared to
Lithium Metal batteries. A copy of the IATA Regulations is well worth the
investment and you can get them in either hard copy or on CD-ROM; not a great
deal of money.
 
Best regards
 

Neil Barker

Manager

Central Quality

 

e2v

106 Waterhouse Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 2QU, England

Tel: +44 (0)1245 453616

Mobile:   +44 (0)7801 723735

Fax:+44 (0)1245 453571

 www.e2v.com http://www.e2v.com/ 

 

P Consider the environment: do you really need to print this e mail?

 




From: lauren_cr...@amat.com [mailto:lauren_cr...@amat.com] 
Sent: 12 January 2009 17:52
To: Barker, Neil
Subject: RE: Lithium battery coin cell shipping restrictions



Neil, 

Do you have a link you could share for Tadiran? I looked at their US website
and couldn't find the info you mention. 

Regards, 
Lauren Crane 
Product Regulatory Analyst
Corporate Product EHS Lead
Applied Materials Inc.
Austin, TX 512 272-6540 [#922 26540]

The content of this message is Applied Materials Confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient and have received this message in error, any use or
distribution is prohibited. Please notify me immediately by reply e-mail and
delete this message from your computer system. Thank you.

Save paper and trees!  Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail. 






Barker, Neil neil.bar...@e2v.com 
Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org 

01/05/2009 09:23 AM 

To
Daniel Roman dan.ro...@dialogic.com, emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
emc-pstc@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG 
cc
Subject
RE: Lithium battery coin cell shipping restrictions



  



Dan 
  
For a coin cell, you are typically talking fractions of a gram, not grams. For
shipping purposes you can ship cells/batteries equivalent to 3 or 4 AA size
cells/batteries. Individual batteries only become a problem at C size and
above. 
Some of the best information that I have found is on the Tadiran Batteries
website; they seem to have explained all the international shipping
regulations in simple terms with data for all cell/battery sizes. 
  
Neil Barker 
Manager 
Central Quality 
  
e2v 
106 Waterhouse Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 2QU, England 
Tel: +44 (0)1245 453616 
Mobile:   +44 (0)7801 723735 
Fax:+44 (0)1245 453571 
 www.e2v.com http://www.e2v.com/  
  
P Consider the environment: do you really need to print this e mail? 
  





From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Roman
Sent: 05 January 2009 15:09
To: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Lithium battery coin cell shipping restrictions

Happy new year to all! 
  
DOT 49 CFR Parts 171, 172, 173, and 175 concerning the shipment of lithium
batteries is in effect now.  Not being a battery or shipping expert, I’m
having a little trouble defining exactly the scope and definition.  My
interpretation has been that these batteries are not within the scope of this
requirement based on reading Part 171, but customers are asking additional
questions based on vague information from shipping companies’ web sites so
I’m looking for further clarification. 
  
Are the coin cells that are typically used on computer motherboards for the
real time clock in scope?  I’ve looked at a couple of battery manufacturers
web sites trying to find out how many grams of lithium are in the typical 2032
battery but have not had much luck. 
  

-- 
Dan Roman, N.C.E.
Product Regulatory Engineer
Dialogic Research Inc.
1515 State Rt. 10
Parsippany, NJ 07054-4538
*mailto:dan.ro...@dialogic.com mailto:dan.ro...@intel.com 
*Voice: +1 973-967-6485  Fax: +1 973-967-6262
Intranet: http://compliance.eicon.com/ http://compliance.py.intel.com/ 
Internet: http://www.dialogic.com http
//www.intel.com/design/network/products/telecom/index.htm  


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

Requirements in Ghana

2009-01-13 Thread Anders Svensson B
Dear experts, 

Anyone who knows the requirements for Ghana for EMC, Product Safety, SAR,
Radio, environmental etc. 

The product have WLAN 802-11 b/g and GSM 850/900/1800/1900 bands and UMTS band
FDDI/II and V functionality. 


All input is welcome! 


Best regards 
Anders 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread James, Chris
http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3

 

Entered into force 7/1/09

 

If the interpretation of Annex I (3) (below) is the same as RoHS where
consumer covered B2B professional products also then we have another party to
go to... :-( 

 

3. Consumer equipment

Radio sets

Television sets

Videocameras

Video recorders

Hi-fi recorders

Audio amplifiers

Home theatre systems

Musical instruments

And other equipment for the purpose of recording or reproducing sound or
images, including signals or other

technologies for the distribution of sound and image other than by
telecommunications

 

 

 

 

Chris

 



This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended
recipient, delete this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on this message
is strictly prohibited. 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




RE: Electrical product recall

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Xe
John,

My primary concern is for Europe.  It seems US has lots of 
information/guidelines.

Scott


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: 2009年1月13日 01:20 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Electrical product recall

In message 496b73b1.04686e0a.6145.c...@mx.google.com, dated Tue, 
13 Jan 2009, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:

It is a quite common terms in the industry and mostly related to safety 
hazard.  We would like to establish a process for the product recall.  
Is there any important rules or guidance to follow for a meaningful and 
absolutely necessary recall?

Are you concerned with product recall in Europe? The rules are different 
form those in USA, of course, just to make things exciting.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




Re: Electrical product recall

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 496c8c92.09876e0a.1d10.7...@mx.google.com, dated Tue, 13 
Jan 2009, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:

My primary concern is for Europe.  It seems US has lots of 
information/guidelines.

People have already posted details of the European system. Do you need 
any further information?
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message f49bf8e684bc6c4188d1d63513c4ca07068a9...@sparrow.dolby.net, 
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, James, Chris c...@dolby.co.uk writes:


If the interpretation of Annex I (3) (below) is the same as RoHS where 
consumer covered B2B professional products also then we have another 
party to go to... L

There is a similar interpretation issue with the last phrase of Article 
2 subsection 1. However, a UK trade association has received from the 
British Ministry concerned an indication that 'professional' products 
not intended for use in the home are NOT within the scope.

However, the Regulation lumps 'office' with 'household', so there is 
another way in which the wording is ambiguous and, if we believe the 
Ministry, misleading.

You may notice that 'hi-fi recorders' are listed. Immediately begin to 
manufacture 'lo-fi recorders'!
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





RE: Electrical product recall

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Xe
Nick,

Many thanks for your useful information for European markets.

Scott


From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk] 
Sent: 2009?~1??13?? 03:06 AM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Electrical product recall

There is information at the following sites which will be of assistance to
you:

http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/index_en.htm

http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consumers/Safety/products/unsafe-notificatio
n/index.html

Somewhere in this lot there is a guidance document which provides a 
basis for an assessment of whether a recall is necessary. I can send 
you a copy if you cannot find it in the links on the above pages.

At a seminar in November last year, we were told that this guidance 
is being revised and a new model for assessment has been agreed. 
Heaven only knows if/when this might make it out into the public 
domain.

Nick.


At 00:45 +0800 13/1/09, Scott Xe wrote:
It is a quite common terms in the industry and mostly related to 
safety hazard.  We would like to establish a process for the product 
recall.  Is there any important rules or guidance to follow for a 
meaningful and absolutely necessary recall?

Thanks and regards,

Scott
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to LT;mailto:emc-p...@ieee.orgemc-p...@ieee.orgGT;

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstchttp://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc
-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: 
http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.htmlhttp://listserv.ieee.org/
request/user-guide.html
List rules: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.htmlhttp://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules
.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas LT;mailto:emcp...@ptcnh.netemcp...@ptcnh.netGT;
Mike Cantwell LT;mailto:mcantw...@ieee.orgmcantw...@ieee.orgGT;
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher LT;mailto:j.bac...@ieee.orgj.bac...@ieee.orgGT;
David Heald LT;mailto:dhe...@gmail.comdhe...@gmail.comGT;

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




RE: Electrical product recall

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Xe
Hi Ron,

 

Thanks for your useful information and helpful guidance.  What is a compliance
engineer?  Is it responsible for ensuring the products in compliance with all
legal requirements?

 

Scott

 

From: Pickard, Ron [mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com] 
Sent: 2009年1月13日 03:54 AM
To: Nick Williams; Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Electrical product recall

 

Nick,

The operational guidelines link for businesses (for dangerous consumer
products) to which you refer is at: htt
://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/guidelines_business_en.htm. It's stated
to be new there, but the actual linked document is dated 2004, so I guess
we’ll have to wait for the revised edition.

 

Scott,

As others from the hoards of us legally unwashed have given sound advice and
good references for your company to develop a recall plan, the recall plan
that your company develops may likely have to pass scrutiny with your legal
dept/management and some likely legal/contractual issues. Also, googling
“safety recall plan” should give you several links for you to understand
what a recall plan will look like and how to develop one.

 

I hope you find this useful, but please note that I am a compliance engineer
and in no way resemble a lawyer, attorney, barrister, counsel(or), legal
eagle, ambulance chaser, etc, etc. Therefore, the above is not legal advice
and should not be considered as such. If it was, I would be charging you at
least $500/hr (with a retainer).

 

Best regards,

 

Ron Pickard

ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com 


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Nick Williams
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:06 PM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Electrical product recall

 

There is information at the following sites which will be of assistance to you:

 

http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/index_en.htm

 

http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consume
s/Safety/products/unsafe-notification/index.html

 

Somewhere in this lot there is a guidance document which provides a 

basis for an assessment of whether a recall is necessary. I can send 

you a copy if you cannot find it in the links on the above pages.

 

At a seminar in November last year, we were told that this guidance 

is being revised and a new model for assessment has been agreed. 

Heaven only knows if/when this might make it out into the public 

domain.

 

Nick.

 

 

At 00:45 +0800 13/1/09, Scott Xe wrote:

It is a quite common terms in the industry and mostly related to 

safety hazard.  We would like to establish a process for the product 

recall.  Is there any important rules or guidance to follow for a 

meaningful and absolutely necessary recall?

 

Thanks and regards,

 

Scott

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 

emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 

e-mail to LT;mailto:emc-p...@ieee.orgemc-p...@ieee.orgGT;

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-ps
chttp://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions: 

http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user
guide.htmlhttp://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: 

http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.ht
lhttp://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas LT;mailto:emcp...@ptcnh.netemcp...@ptcnh.netGT;

Mike Cantwell LT;mailto:mcantw...@ieee.orgmcantw...@ieee.orgGT;

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher LT;mailto:j.bac...@ieee.orgj.bac...@ieee.orgGT;

David Heald LT;mailto:dhe...@gmail.comdhe...@gmail.comGT;

 

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

 

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net

Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org

David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: 

RE: Electrical product recall

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Xe
Ted  Brian,

 

Thanks for good information.

 

Scott

 

From: Ted Eckert [mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com] 
Sent: 2009年1月13日 01:09 AM
To: Scott Xe; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Electrical product recall

 

Hello Scott,

 

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission has guidance on recalls.  The
following link has the CPSC Recall Handbook, a Recall Checklist and a link to
assistance from non-CPSC sources.

http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/corrective.html

 

I also recommend that compliance engineers have at least a basic understanding
of product liability law.  I recently participated in a workshop from Perkins
Coie that I highly recommend, although I am sure there are other very good
programs available.

http://www.perkinscoie.com/events/eventslist.aspx?Upcoming=true

 

In general, you need good legal advice and you should work with legal counsel
well versed in this area of practice.  

 

Ted Eckert

Compliance Engineer

Microsoft Corporation

ted.eck...@microsoft.com

 

The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.  I am an engineer and not an attourney; information provided is for
general reference only.

 

 

From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:46 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Electrical product recall

 

It is a quite common terms in the industry and mostly related to safety
hazard.  We would like to establish a process for the product recall.  Is
there any important rules or guidance to follow for a meaningful and
absolutely necessary recall?

 

Thanks and regards,

 

Scott

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




RE: Electrical product recall

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Xe
John,

I have received the useful information and guidelines from Rapex for Europe
 CPSC for USA for my start and appreciate all the responses from the group.

Scott


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: 2009?~1??13?? 09:00 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Electrical product recall

In message 496c8c92.09876e0a.1d10.7...@mx.google.com, dated Tue, 13 
Jan 2009, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:

My primary concern is for Europe.  It seems US has lots of 
information/guidelines.

People have already posted details of the European system. Do you need 
any further information?
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




Re: Electrical product recall

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 496c9a27.04686e0a.0f20.b...@mx.google.com, dated Tue, 
13 Jan 2009, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:

 What is a compliance engineer?  Is it responsible for ensuring the 
products in compliance with all legal requirements?

Most probably, although a compliance engineer and a mass engineer would 
resonate beautifully. (;-)
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





RE: Electrical product recall request

2009-01-13 Thread Pickard, Ron
Scott et al,

 

To answer your question, typical of the case that most, if not all, of the
subscribers of this forum can attest, electronic products are subject to
government and industry regulations concerning product safety, electromagnetic
noise radiation/immunity and wireless/wired telecommunication. Compliance
engineering is a term to describe the engineering activities to ensure that
products conform to these regulations. Mostly compliance engineering focuses
its attention on published regulatory and industry standards, ensuring that
products are in compliance with those regulations. Regulatory standards are
those adopted by national governments and are almost exclusively mandatory.
Industry standards (Bluetooth, GSM, UMTS, Wibree, RS-xxx, EIA/TIA, etc.) are
those standards where compliance may be needed but are not legally mandatory.
And in some instances, such as the EU and the US, there is a need to review
and interpret government legislation such as the EU’s Directives and the
US’s Code of Federal Regulations. In that aspect, compliance engineering
does mimic the legal profession.

 

In the limited amount of time that I have today, I wanted to quickly answer
your question in a nutshell and hope that the above has adequately answered
your question. And, if anyone cares to interject, add or correct the above in
any way, please do.

 

Best regards,

 

Ron Pickard

ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com 



From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:42 AM
To: Pickard, Ron; 'Nick Williams'
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Electrical product recall

 

Hi Ron,

 

Thanks for your useful information and helpful guidance.  What is a compliance
engineer?  Is it responsible for ensuring the products in compliance with all
legal requirements?

 

Scott

 

From: Pickard, Ron [mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com] 
Sent: 2009年1月13日 03:54 AM
To: Nick Williams; Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Electrical product recall

 

Nick,

The operational guidelines link for businesses (for dangerous consumer
products) to which you refer is at: htt
://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/guidelines_business_en.htm. It's stated
to be new there, but the actual linked document is dated 2004, so I guess
we’ll have to wait for the revised edition.

 

Scott,

As others from the hoards of us legally unwashed have given sound advice and
good references for your company to develop a recall plan, the recall plan
that your company develops may likely have to pass scrutiny with your legal
dept/management and some likely legal/contractual issues. Also, googling
“safety recall plan” should give you several links for you to understand
what a recall plan will look like and how to develop one.

 

I hope you find this useful, but please note that I am a compliance engineer
and in no way resemble a lawyer, attorney, barrister, counsel(or), legal
eagle, ambulance chaser, etc, etc. Therefore, the above is not legal advice
and should not be considered as such. If it was, I would be charging you at
least $500/hr (with a retainer).

 

Best regards,

 

Ron Pickard

ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com 


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Nick Williams
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:06 PM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Electrical product recall

 

There is information at the following sites which will be of assistance to you:

 

http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/index_en.htm

 

http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consume
s/Safety/products/unsafe-notification/index.html

 

Somewhere in this lot there is a guidance document which provides a 

basis for an assessment of whether a recall is necessary. I can send 

you a copy if you cannot find it in the links on the above pages.

 

At a seminar in November last year, we were told that this guidance 

is being revised and a new model for assessment has been agreed. 

Heaven only knows if/when this might make it out into the public 

domain.

 

Nick.

 

 

At 00:45 +0800 13/1/09, Scott Xe wrote:

It is a quite common terms in the industry and mostly related to 

safety hazard.  We would like to establish a process for the product 

recall.  Is there any important rules or guidance to follow for a 

meaningful and absolutely necessary recall?

 

Thanks and regards,

 

Scott

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 

emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 

e-mail to LT;mailto:emc-p...@ieee.orgemc-p...@ieee.orgGT;

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-ps
chttp://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/http://www.ieee-pses.org/


RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread Brian O'Connell
Annex V 
 

From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
James, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:35 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby
power

http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3

=
 
Chris

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




[Bulk] RE: Requirements in Ghana

2009-01-13 Thread Pickard, Ron
Hi Anders,

 

You should be able to find what you’re looking for on Ghana’s National
Communication Authority (NCA) website at http://www.nca.org.gh/index.asp.

 

Ghana’s Ministry of Communication’s website might also be useful at
http://www.moc.gov.gh/.

 

IHTH.

 

Best regards,

 

Ron Pickard

ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com 



From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Anders
Svensson B
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Requirements in Ghana

 

Dear experts, 

Anyone who knows the requirements for Ghana for EMC, Product Safety, SAR,
Radio, environmental etc. 

The product have WLAN 802-11 b/g and GSM 850/900/1800/1900 bands and UMTS band
FDDI/II and V functionality. 

 

All input is welcome! 

 

Best regards 
Anders 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




RE: Electrical product recall request

2009-01-13 Thread Price, Edward
 





From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of 
Pickard, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:56 AM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Electrical product recall  request



Scott et al,

 

 Compliance engineering is a term to describe the engineering 
activities to
ensure that products conform to these regulations.  In that aspect, compliance
engineering does mimic the legal profession.

 

 

Ron Pickard 

 

Ron:

 

In companies where there is a specifically designated Compliance Engineer,
what do you see as the trend in the depth of knowledge of such an engineer?
Does this person hold technical responsibility for issues of safety, EMC,
ROHS, etc, as you would expect of an engineer? Or is the scope so broad that
the person acts more like a manager or coordinator of other specialists
(designers and possibly outside vendors), more toward the lawyer end of the
scale?

 

Regards,

 

Ed Price
ed.pr...@cubic.com blocked::mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com  WB6WSN
NARTE Certified EMC Engineer
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Applications
San Diego, CA  USA
858-505-2780
Military  Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty

 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




MTBF calculation HALT method versus MIL HDBK 217 method

2009-01-13 Thread Kbalasubramanian
Dear Experts,

  Is it possible to do accelerated life testing and calculate MTBF
through that? Are there any labs offering this service? What will be
correlation between MIL HDBK 217 method of MTBF calculation and HALT
method? Which one will be reliable and reasonable?

Sincerely                                                          
 SCM
Microsystems (India) Pvt. Ltd.
K. Balasubramanian                   
                        Modules 0506,
0507  0508, D – Block,

Manager – Hardware      
                                    South 
Wing,

TIDEL Park,
Tel : +91 44 42931391                 
                       #4, Rajiv
Gandhi Road,(formerly Canal Bank Road)
Fax :+91 44 
22540029                                       
 Taramani,
Chennai – 600113. India

E-mail:kbalasubraman...@scmmicro.co.in          Web : 
http://scmmicro.com
‘This email and any attachment may contain confidential information and are
intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). If you have received
this information in error, you are prohibited from reading, copying,
distributing and using the information. If you are not a named addressee or
otherwise an intended recipient you are requested to immediately notify the
sender and to delete this email and all attachments from your system.’

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread Lauren_Crane

What I find troubling in this new reg is the last line of the definition for
equipment in scope..(ref art 2.1) 

also when marketed for non-household or non-office use; 

This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of does this
regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to be integrated as a
component of industrial equipment? 

Why do these EU parties always leave me with a hangover? 

Regards, 
Lauren Crane 
Product Regulatory Analyst
Corporate Product EHS Lead
Applied Materials Inc.
Austin, TX 512 272-6540 [#922 26540]

- external use - 

Save paper and trees!  Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail. 






James, Chris c...@dolby.co.uk 
Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org 

01/13/2009 06:35 AM To
emc-p...@ieee.org 
cc
Subject
First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power



  



http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3 http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3  
  
Entered into force 7/1/09 
  
If the interpretation of Annex I (3) (below) is the same as RoHS where
consumer covered B2B professional products also then we have another party to
go to... :-( 
  
3. Consumer equipment 
Radio sets 
Television sets 
Videocameras 
Video recorders 
Hi-fi recorders 
Audio amplifiers 
Home theatre systems 
Musical instruments 
And other equipment for the purpose of recording or reproducing sound or
images, including signals or other 
technologies for the distribution of sound and image other than by
telecommunications 
  
  
  
  
Chris 
  



This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended
recipient, delete this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on this message
is strictly prohibited. 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html  

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net mailto:emcp...@ptcnh.net 
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org  

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org 
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com mailto:dhe...@gmail.com  

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




Re: Electrical product recall request

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 
9d04b979323dcd428297dda95108893e0120c...@bb-corp-ex2.corp.cubic.cub, 
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Price, Edward ed.pr...@cubic.com writes:

In companies where there is a specifically designated Compliance 
Engineer, what do you see as the trend in the depth of knowledge of 
such an engineer? Does this person hold technical responsibility for 
issues of safety, EMC, ROHS, etc, as you would expect of an engineer?

Such an arrangement is very likely to lead to conflict over safety and 
EMC issues between the Compliance Engineer and the product design 
engineers.

Safety and EMC should be *designed in*, and I think most here would 
agree, so the responsibility for compliance should rest with the 
designers. The Compliance Engineer manages the compliance testing and 
the training and updating of the design engineers as standards change 
(and maybe improve!).

Or is the scope so broad that the person acts more like a manager or 
coordinator of other specialists (designers and possibly outside 
vendors), more toward the lawyer end of the scale?

With regard to RoHS and WEEE, yes, the Compliance Engineer has to ensure 
that designers, purchasers, quality managers and suppliers are aware of 
the requirements and to ensure that systems are in place to prevent 
violations.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 001801c97593$6e3291e0$d600a...@tamuracorp.com, dated Tue, 
13 Jan 2009, Brian O'Connell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes:

Annex V 

What Annex V?
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread James, Chris
Lauren,

I have subsequently been in contact with DEFRA the UK body overseeing EuP and
whilst they cannot offer a legal binding opinion their representative has
offered this:

 

“During discussions it was also made clear that it was not the intention of
this measure to capture professional equipment (although it does not
specifically say this in the measure). So the key issue will be for you to
decide whether your products are intended to be used in a domestic environment
or whether they are intended to be installed and used by professionals.”

 

Chris 

 

 



From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
lauren_cr...@amat.com
Sent: 13 January 2009 15:48
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

 


What I find troubling in this new reg is the last line of the definition for
equipment in scope..(ref art 2.1) 

also when marketed for non-household or non-office use; 

This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of does this
regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to be integrated as a
component of industrial equipment? 

Why do these EU parties always leave me with a hangover? 

Regards, 
Lauren Crane 
Product Regulatory Analyst
Corporate Product EHS Lead
Applied Materials Inc.
Austin, TX 512 272-6540 [#922 26540]

- external use - 

Save paper and trees!  Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail. 



 




James, Chris c...@dolby.co.uk 
Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org 

01/13/2009 06:35 AM 

To

emc-p...@ieee.org 

cc

 

Subject

First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

 

 

 

 

 

  




http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3 http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3  
  
Entered into force 7/1/09 
  
If the interpretation of Annex I (3) (below) is the same as RoHS where
consumer covered B2B professional products also then we have another party to
go to... :-( 
  
3. Consumer equipment 
Radio sets 
Television sets 
Videocameras 
Video recorders 
Hi-fi recorders 
Audio amplifiers 
Home theatre systems 
Musical instruments 
And other equipment for the purpose of recording or reproducing sound or
images, including signals or other 
technologies for the distribution of sound and image other than by
telecommunications 
  
  
  
  
Chris 
  



This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended
recipient, delete this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on this message
is strictly prohibited. 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 
of08f7b138.78ed5165-on8625753d.00566e0d-8625753d.0056c...@amat.com, 
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, lauren_cr...@amat.com writes:

This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of 
does this regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to 
be integrated as a component of industrial equipment?

It does mean that, and I don't think it's ambiguous in the case of 
consumer products 'adopted' for professional use. 'Professional' 
products NOT marketed for household use are not included, but the 
coupling of 'office' with 'household' in the text does create further 
uncertainty.

First consider whether a 'stand-by' mode is really necessary. Also, 
provide a switch that really DOES turn everything off, including the 
charger for the battery-backed up clock. (;-)
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread Kunde, Brian
This reminds of a situation that occurred many years ago where the US
Air Force had a contract with a computer company to supply then with
hundred of thousands of PCs. Because they were to be used by the
military, they only had to meet the FCC Class A emissions requirements.
The problem was that as old computers were replaced by newer faster
computers, many of these old computers ended up in people's homes. As
interference complaints stated coming into the FCC, a change in the
status quo occurred and from that time on all PCs or any product that
could be used in a residential environment had to be Class B even though
it was not the intended initial use or market. 

So whenever I see these kind of ambiguity regarding household and
professional equipment, I wonder if the intent is to insure that a
product likely to be used in a household meets all the desired
requirements. 

It wasn't that many years ago it was assumed that any device with a
network interface would never be used in a home.  But today, many homes
have networks. So, it would be difficult to identify something as
professional when the definition of the type of devices used in a home
is constantly changing. 

IMHO,
The Other Brian




From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:07 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

In message 
of08f7b138.78ed5165-on8625753d.00566e0d-8625753d.0056c...@amat.com, 
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, lauren_cr...@amat.com writes:

This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of 
does this regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to 
be integrated as a component of industrial equipment?

It does mean that, and I don't think it's ambiguous in the case of 
consumer products 'adopted' for professional use. 'Professional' 
products NOT marketed for household use are not included, but the 
coupling of 'office' with 'household' in the text does create further 
uncertainty.

First consider whether a 'stand-by' mode is really necessary. Also, 
provide a switch that really DOES turn everything off, including the 
charger for the battery-backed up clock. (;-)
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

LECO Corporation Notice:  This communication may contain confidential 
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by 
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error.  Thank  you.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 
0ed66cd2c9bd0a459d54fb9119a60567d55...@mailserver.lecotc.com, dated 
Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:

So, it would be difficult to identify something as professional when 
the definition of the type of devices used in a home is constantly 
changing.

Predicting the future is not now allowed in Europe, because of the lead 
content of the crystal balls is far in excess of RoHS limits.

In many EMC situations, the same issue arises. No-one can actually stop 
someone installing a 10 kW variable-speed drive for his private 
wind-tunnel in his garden. The best the law and regulations can do is to 
take account of the manufacturer's intentions for the product. It's not 
too loose a control; if the product isn't available from sources 
frequented by the general public, the manufacturer is clearly not 
intended to sell to the general public. The odd bod who nevertheless 
buys one is still subject to FCC or EMC Directive requirements about 
actual interference.

For example, until recently I had five oscilloscopes in my house.(;-)
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





Predicting the Future - Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread Lauren_Crane

Predicting the future is not now allowed in Europe, because of the lead 
content of the crystal balls is far in excess of RoHS limits. 

Thanks for that, John. You've just made my day bearable. 
Regards, 
Lauren 

- external use - 

Save paper and trees!  Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail. 






John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org 

01/13/2009 12:00 PM To
Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com 
cc
emc-p...@ieee.org 
Subject
Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power



  



In message 
0ed66cd2c9bd0a459d54fb9119a60567d55...@mailserver.lecotc.com, dated 
Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:

So, it would be difficult to identify something as professional when 
the definition of the type of devices used in a home is constantly 
changing.

Predicting the future is not now allowed in Europe, because of the lead 
content of the crystal balls is far in excess of RoHS limits.

[snip - lec]

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread Gert Gremmen
The distinction was made, IMHO, as consumer products
are more likely to be produced in large numbers, so 
The impact of the regulation will be larger.

I believe *your* focus should be directed towards:
can my design be used in such amounts that
a considerable amount of otherwise spoiled energy
can be saved, and can a small effort on our companies 
side contribute to the energy wealth of future generations 

and then decide if you will voluntarily meet she specs
of this directive, even if you are not targeted
directly.

And as John says:

consider whether a 'stand-by' mode is really necessary. Also, 
provide a switch that really DOES turn everything off, including the 
charger for the battery-backed up clock. (;-)

And if you are convinced that any energy problem will soon
be resolved by engineering (which is not unlikely), think of our current
dependency of oil for producing electricity, and the costs
associated with defending our interests in the middle east.

I want to emphasize -dear moderators- that this is not an invitation to
go 
Politics on this list, but can be shown to be a mere fact.


Gert Gremmen


Van: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens Kunde, Brian
Verzonden: dinsdag 13 januari 2009 18:31
Aan: John Woodgate; emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby
power

This reminds of a situation that occurred many years ago where the US
Air Force had a contract with a computer company to supply then with
hundred of thousands of PCs. Because they were to be used by the
military, they only had to meet the FCC Class A emissions requirements.
The problem was that as old computers were replaced by newer faster
computers, many of these old computers ended up in people's homes. As
interference complaints stated coming into the FCC, a change in the
status quo occurred and from that time on all PCs or any product that
could be used in a residential environment had to be Class B even though
it was not the intended initial use or market. 

So whenever I see these kind of ambiguity regarding household and
professional equipment, I wonder if the intent is to insure that a
product likely to be used in a household meets all the desired
requirements. 

It wasn't that many years ago it was assumed that any device with a
network interface would never be used in a home.  But today, many homes
have networks. So, it would be difficult to identify something as
professional when the definition of the type of devices used in a home
is constantly changing. 

IMHO,
The Other Brian




From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:07 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

In message 
of08f7b138.78ed5165-on8625753d.00566e0d-8625753d.0056c...@amat.com, 
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, lauren_cr...@amat.com writes:

This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of 
does this regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to 
be integrated as a component of industrial equipment?

It does mean that, and I don't think it's ambiguous in the case of 
consumer products 'adopted' for professional use. 'Professional' 
products NOT marketed for household use are not included, but the 
coupling of 'office' with 'household' in the text does create further 
uncertainty.

First consider whether a 'stand-by' mode is really necessary. Also, 
provide a switch that really DOES turn everything off, including the 
charger for the battery-backed up clock. (;-)
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

LECO Corporation Notice:  This communication may contain confidential
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received
this by mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error.  Thank
you.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in 

RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread Jim Hulbert
Article 4 refers to the management system set out in Annex V.

Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:54 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

In message 001801c97593$6e3291e0$d600a...@tamuracorp.com, dated Tue,
13 Jan 2009, Brian O'Connell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes:

Annex V 

What Annex V?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 
72b8947772cf0948adaa9853631663fb28537c8...@pbi-namsg-02.mgdpbi.global.pv
t, dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jim Hulbert jim.hulb...@pb.com writes:

Article 4 refers to the management system set out in Annex V.

I don't see any problem. Article 4 says:

The procedure for assessing conformity referred to in
Article 8(2) of Directive 2005/32/EC shall be the internal
design control system set out in Annex IV to Directive
2005/32/EC or the management system set out in Annex V
to Directive 2005/32/EC.

Annex V is in the cited Directive.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread Brian O'Connell
So the document called COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1275/2008
of 17 December 2008 is not the EuP Directive but references it,
and is intended to revise the EuP Directive ?

And the document called DIRECTIVE 2005/32/EC OF THE EUROPEAN
PARLIMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL is the EuP, and contains the 'Annex
V' to which the former is refering to ?


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
John
Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:49 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding
standby power

In message
72B8947772CF0948ADAA9853631663FB28537C8710@PBI-NAMSG-02.MGDPBI.g
lobal.pv
t, dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jim Hulbert jim.hulb...@pb.com
writes:

Article 4 refers to the management system set out in Annex V.

I don't see any problem. Article 4 says:

The procedure for assessing conformity referred to in
Article 8(2) of Directive 2005/32/EC shall be the internal
design control system set out in Annex IV to Directive
2005/32/EC or the management system set out in Annex V
to Directive 2005/32/EC.

Annex V is in the cited Directive.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




Anechoic Chamber: Pass-through vs. Bulkhead

2009-01-13 Thread cmanderson
EMC Gurus, 

We have a Space Saver chamber that we bought used and installed ourselves. 
When we installed it, we ran our antenna (signal) cabling through a
pass-through along with our fiber optics.  Today, someone mentioned that we
ought to have at least our antenna cable connected through a bulkhead so that
the cable shielding was terminated on the chamber.  When we went to
disassemble the chamber when we bought it, there were no bulkheads for
anything.  Are the bulkheads necessary?  Does anyone else use a pass-through
for the antenna cable?  It doesn't seem to have had an effect on measurements,
but I still have a lot to learn so hopefully someone can share some wisdom.

Thanks, 
Chris Anderson 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 003801c975c4$ff12c5f0$d600a...@tamuracorp.com, dated Tue, 
13 Jan 2009, Brian O'Connell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes:

So the document called COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1275/2008 of 17 
December 2008 is not the EuP Directive but references it,

Yes.

 and is intended to revise the EuP Directive ?

No, it adds product-family specific detail to the general texts in the 
Directive. It supplements the Directive, rather than revising it.

And the document called DIRECTIVE 2005/32/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIMENT 
AND OF THE COUNCIL is the EuP, and contains the 'Annex V' to which the 
former is refering to ?

Yes.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





Re: Anechoic Chamber: Pass-through vs. Bulkhead

2009-01-13 Thread John Woodgate

In message 
44724788633d3042a64174bea5c59f3004bc2...@ntxboimbx21.micron.com, dated 
Tue, 13 Jan 2009, cmander...@micron.com writes:

Today, someone mentioned that we ought to have at least our antenna 
cable connected through a bulkhead so that the cable shielding was 
terminated on the chamber.  When we went to disassemble the chamber 
when we bought it, there were no bulkheads for anything.  Are the 
bulkheads necessary? 

Probably. Apart from RF considerations, there is a safety issue. If 
there were a high-current fault near the chamber, there might be a 
hazardous voltage developed between the shield of the antenna cable and 
the items grounded to the chamber.

In USA, the voltage might be more hazardous to the equipment than to any 
humans in the area.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com





Re: Anechoic Chamber: Pass-through vs. Bulkhead

2009-01-13 Thread Ken Javor
Any metal conductor penetrating the test chamber enclosure must be filtered or
grounded in order to avoid polluting the test chamber ambient. With coax, you
use a grounded feedthrough connector to achieve that. Failing that, you can
use a stuffing tube type feedthrough, but you must peal back the insulation
over the coax and stuff enough steel or bronze wool to adequately ground the
shield. Or use two pieces of coax connected via barrel type adapters within
the stuffing tube and make sure you ground the barrel(s).
 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261





From: cmander...@micron.com
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:50:15 -0700
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Conversation: Anechoic Chamber: Pass-through vs. Bulkhead
Subject: Anechoic Chamber: Pass-through vs. Bulkhead

EMC Gurus, 

We have a Space Saver chamber that we bought used and installed ourselves. 
When we installed it, we ran our antenna (signal) cabling through a
pass-through along with our fiber optics.  Today, someone mentioned that we
ought to have at least our antenna cable connected through a bulkhead so that
the cable shielding was terminated on the chamber.  When we went to
disassemble the chamber when we bought it, there were no bulkheads for
anything.  Are the bulkheads necessary?  Does anyone else use a pass-through
for the antenna cable?  It doesn't seem to have had an effect on measurements,
but I still have a lot to learn so hopefully someone can share some wisdom.

Thanks, 
Chris Anderson 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com 




RE: MTBF calculation HALT method versus MIL HDBK 217 method

2009-01-13 Thread Brian O'Connell
HALT has no veracity for MTBF; but use of the process can effect MTBF 
calculations where the standard is other than MH217.



From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
kbalasubraman...@scmmicro.co.in
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:42 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: MTBF calculation HALT method versus MIL HDBK 217 method

Dear Experts,

  Is it possible to do accelerated life testing and calculate MTBF
through that? Are there any labs offering this service? What will be
correlation between MIL HDBK 217 method of MTBF calculation and HALT
method? Which one will be reliable and reasonable?

Sincerely   SCM
Microsystems (India) Pvt. Ltd.
K. Balasubramanian

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com




RE: Anechoic Chamber: Pass-through vs. Bulkhead

2009-01-13 Thread Price, Edward
 
 




From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
cmander...@micron.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:50 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Anechoic Chamber: Pass-through vs. Bulkhead



EMC Gurus, 

We have a Space Saver chamber that we bought used and installed 
ourselves. 
When we installed it, we ran our antenna (signal) cabling through a
pass-through along with our fiber optics.  Today, someone mentioned that we
ought to have at least our antenna cable connected through a bulkhead so that
the cable shielding was terminated on the chamber.  When we went to
disassemble the chamber when we bought it, there were no bulkheads for
anything.  Are the bulkheads necessary?  Does anyone else use a pass-through
for the antenna cable?  It doesn't seem to have had an effect on measurements,
but I still have a lot to learn so hopefully someone can share some wisdom.

Thanks, 
Chris Anderson  

 

The traditional technique with a shielded enclosure was to have a specially
designated penetration port. This was usually a thick plate of aluminum or
tin-plated steel, about 16 x 16 x 1/4, mounted to the side of the chamber
like a picture on a wall. The plate covered a 12 x 12 hole cut into the
chamber wall and was bolted around its perimeter to chamber wall. There's
nothing magical about those dimensions, they are simply convenient.

This provided an access panel that could be customized for the special needs
of an EUT. Did the EUT need cooling water, visual observation, optical
stimulus, compressed air, a waveguide port, big multiconductor I/O cabling;
you could machine and equip a panel as needed without ripping into the chamber
itself. You could keep several special port covers for recurring unique jobs.

The penetration port was a way of organizing your use of the chamber. Thus,
there is no real need to use one. You are free to run every penetration as you
want, but the many possible problems with this (control of grounds,
preservation of shielding effectiveness, crosstalk, safety) will probably make
you wish you had used designated penetration ports. (I have 3 penetration
ports on my chamber, one primarily for emission testing, another primarily for
immunity testing, and the third as an I/O port to a second smaller shielded
chamber typically used to contain the EUT support equipment. I once built a
penetration port for the transfer of jet turbine gas out of a chamber.)

More to your specific question, John Woodgate has pointed out the issue of
safety (RF can travel along the ungrounded shield, possibly toasting you or
your equipment or radiating into the environment, although this is more of an
issue in military testing than in commercial testing). The ungrounded coax
cable could just as well allow external RF (radio stations or noise from your
own test and support equipment) to get into the chamber and be taken for
emissions from the EUT.

Ken Javor talked about my favorite technique of grounding the coax without
breaking the continuity by use of a packing gland or stuffing tube, but he
didn't say why you might want to go to this trouble. Let me add a few words
here. The easiest way to ground your coax as it penetrates the chamber wall
(hopefully at a penetration port) is to use a female-female bulkhead
feedthrough fitting. These are cheap and easily replaced when worn or damaged.
The down side is that they are always a slight impedance discontinuity, and
will create loss at extremely high frequencies and with high power, present a
small concern of voltage breakdown or localized heating.

If you use the packing gland method, you do not break the coax structure, and
eliminate a pair of male-female connections. I use this on an ultra low-loss
coax that I use for emission testing up to 18 GHz. The same techniques would
also be a good choice for conveying high-power RF into the chamber (but those
of you who are pushing 3 kW into your chamber have probably already heard of
this technique).

Bottom line is; ground that coax, no matter how you do it (well, don't use a
pigtail strap with alligator clips). It's simply good engineering practice.

 

Ed Price
ed.pr...@cubic.com blocked::mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com  WB6WSN
NARTE Certified EMC Engineer
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Applications
San Diego, CA  USA
858-505-2780
Military  Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send