Re: NSA fun

2003-09-18 Thread Cortland Richmond
John Harrington wrote: I'm having some fun with an NSA measurement. I get a swing of 8dB between 30MHz and 45MHz horizontally polarized. At 30 MHz I get too little attenuation (i.e. I receive too much of the transmitted signal) and at 45MHz too much attenuation. The rest of the frequency

SV: EN 60945

2003-09-18 Thread am...@westin-emission.no
Agree with you Sam. I can not see that you have to install IEC60945 approved equipment into a bass boat. And far as I understand, IEC60945 only applies for equipment placed in IMO ships. Bass boats are not IMO ships .. But it could happened that your client who manufactures fish locating

Re: NSA fun

2003-09-18 Thread hansm
Ferrites on both tx and rx cables. Also, don't forget the pads at the antennas as they reduce sw. I had to use both the ferrites and 6 dB pads to eliminate swings, which were obviously not due to site geometry but cabling issues. The back edge of the OATS on the transmit side can also affect your

RE: NSA fun

2003-09-18 Thread michael.sundst...@nokia.com
Have you tried ferrites on the tx coax? Also move the tx coax around, I'll bet it will be worked out with coax placement? Michael Sundstrom NOKIA TCC Dallas / EMC of: (972) 374-1462 cell: (817) 917-5021 amateur call: KB5UKT From: ext John Harrington

RE: EN 60945

2003-09-18 Thread Sam Wismer
Amund, Thanks for the information. I can understand and appreciate the importance of that on ocean going vessels. However, I don't mean to be cynical, but is a bass boat considered to have what equates to a bridge on a cruise ship or ocean liner? After all, this is a bass boat used on a

RE: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread Bailey, Jeff
Hi Ken, You could try www.belden.com, a few clicks and I found a few that may fit your specifications. I'd send web addresses to the product specs that I found, but the way their website functions doesn't provide a link for each page that you look at so it just won't work... Good luck,

SV: EN 60945

2003-09-18 Thread am...@westin-emission.no
Hi Sam, Quote IEC60945: This standard specifies minimum performance requirements, methods of testing and required test results for general requirements which can be applied to those characteristics common to all equipment described hereunder: a) shipborne radio equipment . b)

NSA fun

2003-09-18 Thread John Harrington
Hello All I'm having some fun with an NSA measurement. I get a swing of 8dB between 30MHz and 45MHz horizontally polarized. At 30 MHz I get too little attenuation (i.e. I receive too much of the transmitted signal) and at 45MHz too much attenuation. The rest of the frequency range is good

Re: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread Ken Javor
Almost perfect - just one conductor short :-( From: neve...@comcast.net Reply-To: neve...@comcast.net Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:14:57 + To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: need shielded cable For example: http://www.ethernetrail.com/Datasheets/Flex_cable.pdf Neven

EN 60945

2003-09-18 Thread Sam Wismer
Hello Group, Been a while…… Hope all has been well with everyone. I have a client who manufactures fish locating equipment designed to be used on recreational vessels such as your standard bass boat. My client has been getting his equipment tested to EN 60945 because it used in the

RE: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread Charles Grasso
Hi Neven, Yes - A shielded telcomm cable is the way to go I agree. From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of neve...@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:58 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: need shielded cable

RE: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread neve...@comcast.net
For example: http://www.ethernetrail.com/Datasheets/Flex_cable.pdf Neven Hi Neven, Yes - A shielded telcomm cable is the way to go I agree. -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of neve...@comcast.net

Re: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb8f3e46.4ed4%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'need shielded cable' on Thu, 18 Sep 2003: It is available as a custom product at a cost of about $3 K for a spool. But I need just a little to see how well it works, and

Re: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread neve...@comcast.net
Would a cable with four twisted pairs + shield work? If yes, you may consider CAT5 (5 twisted per inch) or CAT3 (3 twists per inch) shielded Ethernet cable. They come in AVG 24 and 26 sizes, stranded and colid, with foil and/or braided shield. I am not sure what manufacturer carries what

RE: IEC 60320 connector and cable

2003-09-18 Thread Barker, Neil
Having referred to the standard, The keyway(s) have nothing to do with current rating. They relate to the temperature rating of the connector. 10A connectors are rectangular with two bevelled corners only for standard conditions. They have a single keyway on the longer side for 'hot' conditions,

Top Heavy Loads - DOT

2003-09-18 Thread POWELL, DOUG
Greetings all, I have very little experience with Dept. of Transportation and DOT shipping requirements. In this case, I have a pallet with very a tall, top-heavy load. Excluding considerations for dock and truck door heights, are there testing requirements for determining if a load is too

RE: IEC 60320 connector and cable

2003-09-18 Thread Barker, Neil
Thanks, John. Yes, I know that, but it wasn't completely clear whether this was professional equipment or otherwise. Also, it may not be a requirement but it is still good practice if it makes sense to do so. Best regards, Neil -Original Message- From: John Woodgate

Re: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread Ken Javor
It is available as a custom product at a cost of about $3 K for a spool. But I need just a little to see how well it works, and they won't do a sample. I was specifically looking for something off-the-shelf. For evaluation purposes the number of conductors doesn't matter as long as it is

Re: IEC 60320 connector and cable

2003-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Barker, Neil neil.bar...@e2vtechnologies.com wrote (in 4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e2453808a52...@whl17.e2v.uk) about 'IEC 60320 connector and cable' on Thu, 18 Sep 2003: Incidentally, unless there is a good reason by virtue of the installation instructions for supplying

Re: fan question

2003-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter L. Tarver peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com wrote (in nebbkemlgllmjofmopleeeffelaa.peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com) about 'fan question' on Thu, 18 Sep 2003: OTOH, if a double fault scenario seems plausible, you may wish to perform the testing for your own edification,

Re: IEC 60320 connector and cable

2003-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Neil Helsby nei...@solid-state-logic.com wrote (in 20030918.10200...@mis.configured.host) about 'IEC 60320 connector and cable' on Thu, 18 Sep 2003: The cable colour codes are obviously different but it seems that the connector is also physically different What is the

RE: fan question

2003-09-18 Thread marko.radoji...@nokia.com
Back at a former employer, we were fond of saying that there was a difference between Safe and Compliant. These scenarios are perfect illustrations. If there is a dormant fault in your equipment which could mask a safety hazard, that is Compliant but not Safe. I personally would try and reduce

Re: fan question

2003-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Brian O'Connell boconn...@t-yuden.com wrote (in f7e9180f6f7f5840858d3db815e4f7ad1f2...@cms21.t-yuden.com) about 'fan question' on Thu, 18 Sep 2003: And, extrapolating from Mr Woodgate's comments on this thread, am I gold-plating safety tests? Well, yes, in

RE: fan question

2003-09-18 Thread Peter L. Tarver
Amen. The test house might attempt to invoke the forward to a standard, if it contains text that provides them an out, where there is clear engineering rationale and a very specific risk of a hazard being evaluated not anticipated by the standard. Even so, the sand beneath their feet would be

RE: fan question

2003-09-18 Thread Brian O'Connell
Good People A related question: Are vents on different sides of the test unit each blocked individually, or is the blocking of ALL vents considered the Single Fault Condition? And, extrapolating from Mr Woodgate's comments on this thread, am I gold-plating safety tests? luck, Brian

RE: IEC 60320 connector and cable

2003-09-18 Thread John Allen
Hi Folks From memory, you can find a dual (HAR/NRTL)certified 60320 male-to-female extension cord set (as used within cabinets for power distribution) using a dual-certified cord because these use a HAR cord and are classified by NTRLs as a special construction for the particular purpose, but

Re: PSTN + Signal Cable

2003-09-18 Thread j...@aol.com
In a message dated 9/18/2003, Dan Roman writes: Assuming your talking about 60950 and the signal lines are SELV you only need basic insulation, not reinforced, between TNV-3 and SELV. Distance through insulation does not come into play, just the dielectric test and voltage rating of the wire

RE: PSTN + Signal Cable

2003-09-18 Thread Roman, Dan
Alex, Assuming your talking about 60950 and the signal lines are SELV you only need basic insulation, not reinforced, between TNV-3 and SELV. Distance through insulation does not come into play, just the dielectric test and voltage rating of the wire in this case. Dan Roman dan.ro...@ieee.org

RE: IEC 60320 connector and cable

2003-09-18 Thread Barker, Neil
Neil, I think that you have already answered your own question. The reason that a moulded power lead (cord) assembly is not dual certified is because of the different cable specifications (not necessarily just the insulation colours, but may include flammability ratings, and voltage ratings),

IEC 60320 connector and cable

2003-09-18 Thread Neil Helsby
We supply a mains power lead (cord) with moulded IEC 60320 connector and stripped ends. When we know the destination of the product, we enclose the correct one for Europe or USA otherwise two cables are packed. The cable colour codes are obviously different but it seems that the connector is

Re: fan question

2003-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Gibling, Vic vic.gibl...@e2vtechnologies.com wrote (in 4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e245380946d...@whl17.e2v.uk) about 'fan question' on Thu, 18 Sep 2003: A view of an international test house considers two simultaneous faults if one is 'invisible' to an operator. The

RE: fan question

2003-09-18 Thread John Allen
Hi Folks In the days when I was testing professional disk/tape systems regularly for HP, I often gave them a very hard time by blocking the fan(s), sealing the enclosure slots with masking tape and then running the worst case duty cycle in a test corner until temperatures stabilised. Dependent

RE: PSTN + Signal Cable

2003-09-18 Thread Barker, Neil
Hi Alex, In my view the dielectric strength test and insulation thickness are not alternative solutions but must be met concurrently. I don't think that you would get an accredited test house to concur with your solution, but it may be worth asking the question. I have found that most test

Re: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb8e63cb.4e7f%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'need shielded cable' on Wed, 17 Sep 2003: I am looking for a five conductor overall shielded cable. The wires need to be stranded and very small gauge, AWG 26 or smaller.

PSTN + Signal Cable

2003-09-18 Thread Alex McNeil
Hi Colleagues, Does anyone foresee a problem if I route the PSTN and Signal wires within the same cable? I am thinking of a particular application where the above scenario would fit well in my design. I ensure that the 1.6mm (and 2.0mm for re-inforced insulation) spacing requirement is met on

Re: need shielded cable

2003-09-18 Thread GARY MCINTURFF
Ken, The foils you describe probably isn't going to work under rugged conditions. The foil will split and crack axailly after with a few flexing of the cable. Foil shielded and coiled keyboard cables are a good example. The coil was there to take up the slack but still allow the user to