RE: Open Frame EMI Filters

between the exposed hazardous voltage components and the accessible surfaces in finished product would have to be adaquate. Of course, if you are just producing the filter that is not your concern! Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- POWELL, DOUG doug.pow...@aei.com wrote

Re: warning label overkill?

testing. Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- Robert Macy m...@california.com wrote: Isn't there a little wire basket that keeps the cork in? Once that's removed, it's essentially an armed explosive device. I've been at parties where people removed the wire retainers

RE: Compressed Air. Pneumatics, Safety requirements

a compressor or vacuum pump it is an already approved component (to this standard)! EN 1012-1 will not give general safety requirements for the pneumatic system at large. Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- Russell, Ray ray_russ...@gastmfg.com wrote: Greetings Israel

re: Article to UL

is not unique? Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- Barry Ma barry...@altavista.com wrote: Chaz, Why do they call UL a non-profit organization? Barry Anritsu Co. From: Grasso, Charles (Chaz) gra...@louisville.stortek.com, on 11/24/99 1:23 PM: Forgive

RE: NRTL acceptance

the above was not to wordy, and was helpfull. Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- Gorodetsky, Vitaly vgorodet...@canoga.com wrote: George, You would further clear confusion if you would comment on the following. Let's say, TUVR and MET are both NRTLs. On the other

Re: NRTL acceptance

. Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- Tac Pham tp...@hcpower.com wrote: Hello all, Would the NRTL program be a big plus for the ITE certified component, such as power supply??? Tac Pham HC Power, inc. I tried to recall NRTLs that were approved for asessments

RE: NRTL acceptance

as part of integrated projects. I can fill you in on the Gory Details if you wish. Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- Gorodetsky, Vitaly vgorodet...@canoga.com wrote: George, Do I have to feel sorry about opening this Pandora's Box (I seem to originate this turn in discussion)? I

RE: NRTL acceptance

Hi all! I believe that we at TUV Rheinland are in the final stages of approval to be able to issue Canadian approvals. My understanding is that the approval process is complete but we are still getting the our mark trademarked. We may have this done early next year. Frank West Sr. Engineer

RE: NRTL acceptance

Hi all! I hope you were referring to Missouri in the best positive light. As you know, the Missouri ethic of denying everything until it is shown to them, hits them upside the head, and sits down to dinner with them makes for the best compliance engineers. Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland

Re: FW: Compressed Air. Pneumatics, Safety requirements

Good Morning Israel! You want to purchase a copy of EN 983:1996. This standard is Safety of Machinery, Safety of Fluid Power Systems, Pneumatics. This standard explains in detail the requirements for pneumatic systems on industrial machinery. Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA

Re: Earth Potential Equalizing

email me if you need specific data. Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA --- Janne_Engström janne.engst...@ivtg.se wrote: Hi all, We are manufacturing heating equipment for industrial use. Our equipment is one part in an in line setup of machines. We are required, by one

Re: Harmonized Standards

standards and are required to be enforced. All others aren't. Thanks, Frank West -Original Message- From: Jim Eichner jeich...@statpower.com To: 'EMC-PSTC - forum' emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 5:32 PM Subject: RE

Re: CE mark self certification

competent body) can issue both. Forgive me for being trivial. Frank West frankw...@earthlink.net -Original Message- From: John Juhasz jjuh...@fiberoptions.com To: 'Biggs, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, NA)' bigg...@gemischova.ge.com; 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org List-Post: emc-pstc

LEDS as Lasers under A11, 60950

Thanks for everyone's response. The consensus seems to be that everyone is pretty much ignoring this issue because it just doesn't make sense. However, as one response pointed out, it is in the standard and we must respect the standard. At this point, I am inclined to ignore the issue as

LED Reqs under A11 to EN60950

would have to be labeled as a class 1 laser device, and list EN60825 as one of the standard it complies to. This really seems excessive for a simple LED used for, as an example, power on indication and so forth. Thanks in advance Frank West TUV Essen

Re: water-cooled electrodes

accumulate from a worst case leak (meaning no water accumulation). I hope this helps. Frank West Regulatory Engineer TUV Essen Of course, these are my opinions, not those of TUV Essen. - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail