Gene,
Never ever wrap static sensitive semiconductors in foil. The point of the
pink or black antistatic materials is to 'slowly' conduct the energy from
the device or your fingers. Foil is a great conductor and you are more
likely to damage them wrapping them in foil than just handling them
On 01/31/2016 08:50 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The cro-magnun filling the order has no clue about the care and feeding
> of mosfet transistors, so the 10 pack I ordered were arranged as 2 rows
> of 5, with the legs interdigitated, bound in scotch tape as a slab to
> fit nicely in a China Post
On Sunday 31 January 2016 11:34:46 Fox Mulder wrote:
> Am 31.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> > On Sunday 31 January 2016 07:48:43 Fox Mulder wrote:
> >> Am 30.01.2016 um 02:10 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> >>> On Friday 29 January 2016 16:52:58 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 29 January
On 1/31/2016 6:51 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016, at 06:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 31 January 2016 13:43:50 Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>>> I can't imagine why you'd buy commodity semis from a Chinese
>>> source when there are great distributors like Digi-Key and
>>>
On Sunday 31 January 2016 14:16:17 John Dammeyer wrote:
> Gene,
> Never ever wrap static sensitive semiconductors in foil. The point of
> the pink or black antistatic materials is to 'slowly' conduct the
> energy from the device or your fingers. Foil is a great conductor and
> you are more
On Sunday 31 January 2016 13:43:50 Jon Elson wrote:
> On 01/31/2016 08:50 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The cro-magnun filling the order has no clue about the care and
> > feeding of mosfet transistors, so the 10 pack I ordered were
> > arranged as 2 rows of 5, with the legs interdigitated, bound
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016, at 06:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 31 January 2016 13:43:50 Jon Elson wrote:
>
> > I can't imagine why you'd buy commodity semis from a Chinese
> > source when there are great distributors like Digi-Key and
> > Mouser, that are quite happy to serve small orders.
On Sunday 31 January 2016 11:34:46 Fox Mulder wrote:
> Am 31.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> > On Sunday 31 January 2016 07:48:43 Fox Mulder wrote:
> >> Am 30.01.2016 um 02:10 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> >>> On Friday 29 January 2016 16:52:58 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 29 January
cpp, the c preprocessor can do the macro expansion
does not have to get C handed to it
also commonly available on linux distros
tomp
On 02/01/2016 12:27 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> I was thinking about using "m4". It is a macro processor that is already
> on every Linux/Unix system and I think
yes the search is great, the delivery is quick & selection very good
CAVET
make sure you have all the parts ordered
then wait a while and see if the list is still complete
several times i found one small item missing
and ended up paying a second shipping charge
hard to do when its a rush fix for
On 31.01.16 18:51, John Kasunich wrote:
> I find this rather confusing. Mouser is meh, but IMHO Digikey's search
> engine is simply outstanding.
+1
Being able to simultaneously select for multiple parameters, such as
package, voltage, speed, etc., is a quick way to suitable parts. Then
click on
Eric Altman, author of sendmail said that he received "a lifetime of
loathing for the use of m4." m4 could probably do it, but it will be the
most obtuse, write only code imaginable. Been there, done that, have the
scars.
jerry
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Chris Albertson
Hi Jon,
I can buy 100 pieces at $8.622 each in Cdn. which is about $6.15US or
$862.20 Cdn total ($615.00 US).
http://www.digikey.ca/product-detail/en/DSPIC30F5011-20I%2FPT/DSPIC30F5011-2
0I%2FPT-ND/691581
The US site lists 100 pieces at $5.67 US or $567; a difference of $48.
I second that love for Digikey. It's easier for me to buy from them 9.000
km away from them, than going to a local store here in my country. I
usually have the parts in 4 or 5 days and everything is well packed. Also
the search engine and order placement is great.
A question about pricing on
On Sunday 31 January 2016 18:51:22 John Kasunich wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016, at 06:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 January 2016 13:43:50 Jon Elson wrote:
> > > I can't imagine why you'd buy commodity semis from a Chinese
> > > source when there are great distributors like Digi-Key
On Sunday 31 January 2016 19:10:14 Dave Cole wrote:
> On 1/31/2016 6:51 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016, at 06:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Sunday 31 January 2016 13:43:50 Jon Elson wrote:
> >>> I can't imagine why you'd buy commodity semis from a Chinese
> >>> source when
I was thinking about using "m4". It is a macro processor that is already
on every Linux/Unix system and I think all Macs too.
m4 will copy its input to its output except when it sees a macro which it
will expend. while expanding a macro it can run any shell program or use
it's own features. So
On 01/31/2016 06:34 PM, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote:
> A question about pricing on FPGAs, and just out of my curiosity. Why is it
> the most expensive ones cost over 50k dolars? I know they have great
> paralelism capabilities and a lot of IOs but god those are expensive!
>
>
Well, seems their only
In Canada we pay in Canadian dollars and the prices of the parts are
suitably inflated past just the exchange rate. There is no minimum and
shipping is a flat $8. I'm on Vancouver Island and FedEx delivers the
Digikey stuff overnight unless there's been some sort of weather delay.
There is no
On 01/31/2016 05:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Both of the above have minimum orders for me that are quite costly for a
> 10 pak of anything in the transistor 10 cent to 5 dollar price range.
Hmmm, I guess I order enough stuff at a time that I totally
forgot there's a minimum order!
But, if you
On 01/31/2016 11:10 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
> In Canada we pay in Canadian dollars and the prices of the parts are
> suitably inflated past just the exchange rate. There is no minimum and
> shipping is a flat $8. I'm on Vancouver Island and FedEx delivers the
> Digikey stuff overnight unless
I can very well understand Gene's feelings :-) This method of fastening
chucks was used before self-centering chucks were introduced, chucks
weren't supposed to be changed a lot at all. It has been used on
dividing heads longer than on lathes and has long been replaced by the
camlock system.
> On 29 Jan 2016, at 22:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> fits the rim of the flange, and are tapped for 3
> 6mm studs that come thru 3 holes in the flange.
There is a variant on that that is a DIN standard, with the important
difference that the holes in the flange are keyhole
On 01/30/2016 11:33 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> As I said, running this app as I type... Yes you can sign up for free use
> under one of two cases
> 1) Student or Educator, gets three free years and can sign up again after
> that
> 2) Business that does under $100K per year gets one free year
Am 31.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> On Sunday 31 January 2016 07:48:43 Fox Mulder wrote:
>
>> Am 30.01.2016 um 02:10 schrieb Gene Heskett:
>>> On Friday 29 January 2016 16:52:58 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 29 January 2016 15:01:16 Fox Mulder wrote:
> Am 29.01.2016 um 04:49
I used to create my gears with a bit of php but then is became obvious
that the same maths could be done in gcode, one less step, so the
preamble in the gcode has a tooth qty/whatever is needed for that
class of work.
Dave Caroline
Greetings;
I had asked about them prior to ordering some hexfet transistors from
their site.
The cro-magnun filling the order has no clue about the care and feeding
of mosfet transistors, so the 10 pack I ordered were arranged as 2 rows
of 5, with the legs interdigitated, bound in scotch tape
On Sunday 31 January 2016 07:48:43 Fox Mulder wrote:
> Am 30.01.2016 um 02:10 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> > On Friday 29 January 2016 16:52:58 Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Friday 29 January 2016 15:01:16 Fox Mulder wrote:
> >>> Am 29.01.2016 um 04:49 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> On Tuesday 26 January
On 1/30/2016 9:03 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> What are people here using to create G-code? I am looking for options.
>
> I'm new to CNC and trying to develop a work flow. I'm making small parts
> (most fit in a 3" cube) for robot manipulators. These can be designed
> for easy manual
On 01/31/2016 02:57 AM, craig wrote:
> I use Java, where I have a rich set of mathematical tools to write code
> to write and manipulate arrays of "pseudo code" and routines to generate
> g-code from the pseudo code.The "pseudo code" has the advantage of
> being easily manipulated with
On 01/30/2016 08:57 PM, craig wrote:
> I use Java, where I have a rich set of mathematical tools to write code
> to write and manipulate arrays of "pseudo code" and routines to generate
> g-code from the pseudo code.The "pseudo code" has the advantage of
> being easily manipulated with java
31 matches
Mail list logo