On 8/24/2016 8:52 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 August 2016 19:58:39 andy pugh wrote:
>
>> On 25 August 2016 at 00:27, Dave Cole wrote:
>>> I sense an automotive presence in that carriage... looks like a
>>> timing chain! :-)
>> It is, from a Yamaha R1 in
On 25 August 2016 at 10:30, Dave Cole wrote:
>>> It is, from a Yamaha R1 in fact.
> Well that will last forever!
Indeed, the one in my bike has done 100,000 miles running a lot faster
and at far higher load than it will see in the lathe.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a
On 8/24/2016 11:25 PM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> I have a gantry router with 2x X motors. I'm using the "gantry"
> component.
>
> Installing homing switches. Got the Y working right off the bat.
> I can see the X1 and X2 switches trigger in HAL Scope so I'm good
> to go. This is a wide
On 8/25/2016 10:03 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 14:43, Dave Cole wrote:
>> You have a bike with 100K miles??I didn't know that was possible!
> Not only that, I still take it on track days in the fast group.
Wow...
Dave
On 8/25/2016 5:56 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 10:30, Dave Cole wrote:
It is, from a Yamaha R1 in fact.
>> Well that will last forever!
> Indeed, the one in my bike has done 100,000 miles running a lot faster
> and at far higher load than it will see
On 25 August 2016 at 14:43, Dave Cole wrote:
> You have a bike with 100K miles??I didn't know that was possible!
Not only that, I still take it on track days in the fast group.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the
That isn't at all unheard of in BMW circles, a bit more rare with other bikes,
but not necessarily because they aren't capable of it.
Here, if you see a bike on the highway in the rain it seems like 95% of the
time the guy is on a BMW.
What is impressive is that he accomplished those miles in
Greetings;
Trying to carve the toolpost support for the little monster, on the
little monster. I had it lopsided in the chuck, roughly centered on the
QC's bolt hole. But that meant the chuck jaws were turned around and I
couldn't get to the bottom 9/16 of an inch because of flying jaws . I
Manual toolchanging here.
I have a wireless tool setter already wired in, and an XHC-HB04 wireless
pendant. I'd like to press the "Probe-Z" button and have it zero the work
coords on the touch.
But, just to complicate things, I'd really like to have this deadman, so you
must hold down the
On 25 August 2016 at 17:38, wrote:
> Which would mean the joints are racked by 0.15" and will forever be locked
> like that because future moves are in axis mode, not joint mode.
So, you are saying that you want to square a gantry to non-square switches?
Use JA, you know
OK, well the gantry man page says:
"All controlled joints track the commanded position (with a per-joint offset)
unless in the process of homing. Homing is when the commanded position is
moving towards the homing switches (as determined by the sign of search-vel)
and the joint home switches
On Thursday 25 August 2016 12:35:40 R.L. Wurdack wrote:
> ""Make"" magazine a while back had a nice table of glues vs
> applications that I found useful.
>
> Dick
>
I just spent half an hour clicking "more" without finding it.
Thank you for trying.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gene
On 25 August 2016 at 17:22, wrote:
> But, just to complicate things, I'd really like to have this deadman, so you
> must hold down the Probe-Z button or it will abort the process immediately
> and fail to set the Z-home.
You could consider driving motion.enable to
On Thursday 25 August 2016 09:43:53 Dave Cole wrote:
> On 8/25/2016 5:56 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> > On 25 August 2016 at 10:30, Dave Cole
wrote:
> It is, from a Yamaha R1 in fact.
> >>
> >> Well that will last forever!
> >
> > Indeed, the one in my bike has done
What's that mean? Does it just drive both in tandem until both switches are
TRUE, then call it homed? That wouldn't work, I need independent homing for
sure.
Not sure what the Probotix code is saying but I'll try it out later:
# join the home switch signals so that both switches have to be
On 8/25/2016 11:00 AM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> What's that mean? Does it just drive both in tandem until both
> switches are TRUE, then call it homed? That wouldn't work, I need
> independent homing for sure.
No, it doesn't just drive both motors. It stops the first motor to
hit the home
On 8/25/2016 11:38 AM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
>
> So I guess it does do that. Now if one home was physically
> installed where it trips 0.53" before physical end-of-travel, if
> this were NOT the gantry axis I'd just give its final machine coord
> as 0.53" and its machine coord is correct
""Make"" magazine a while back had a nice table of glues vs applications
that I found useful.
Dick
- Original Message -
From: "Gene Heskett"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 9:25 AM
Subject: [Emc-users] Silly Q about glues
Here is the .hal i'm using with the gantry comp.
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/forum/47-hal-examples/30818-gantry-hal-example
//Peter
2016-08-25 18:10 GMT+02:00 Charles Steinkuehler :
> On 8/25/2016 11:00 AM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> > What's that mean? Does it
I floundered around with other components while trying to set this up, and was
told "WTH are you doing just use 'gantry'". So I went with gantry component,
and it's worked ok. But if I need something else, I'm open to it.
I have the RT version of LinuxCNC. Will that update with this JA stuff
On 25 August 2016 at 18:29, wrote:
> Can we have a combination of HAL and .ngc be set to this:
> Logic #1:
> if (button & !isProbing), then set isProbing=TRUE, execute myProbe.ngc, and
> set isProbing=FALSE when it returns
> and Logic #2:
> if(!button & isProbing), then
On 25 August 2016 at 19:41, John Thornton wrote:
> A couple of vids showing my testing of JA
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OtWNuLWfwc
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgNLd6A34Vo
They both claim to be using the gantry component?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a
On Thursday 25 August 2016 12:55:23 Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > Setting up the start-stop and done settings in my gcode, I had a
> > good pressure on it, and had cleaned the face of the chuck with
> > acetone, s
Having "messed with" both the gantry component and thanks for writing
that and JA now Master. I much prefer JA homing. Much more straight
forward to me.
A couple of vids showing my testing of JA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OtWNuLWfwc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgNLd6A34Vo
JT
On
On Thursday 25 August 2016 14:38:19 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 25 August 2016 12:55:23 Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Gene Heskett
> >
>
> wrote:
> > > Setting up the start-stop and done settings in my gcode, I had a
> > > good
I'm trying the G38.2 z-probe in an ngc call. I keep getting an error "Probe
move on line 6 would exceed joint 2's negative limit".
Problem seems to be that G38.2 uses the current coord system. I've got the
Z-home working now, and machine coords knows the furthest it can go, whereas
the
26 matches
Mail list logo