On 05.01.2012 06:29 John Clark said the following:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Craig
Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Sure, our belief in simulations can make them seem quite realistic
to us. That doesn't make them real though.
And so simulators join a long long long list of things
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
If to talk about Galileo, then it would also good to remember Feyerabend
(for example Against method). Feyerabend has studied the way Galileo has
made science a lot and his conclusion:
The church at the time of Galileo was much more
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
If to talk about Galileo, then it would also good to remember
Feyerabend
(for example Against method). Feyerabend has studied the way
Galileo has made science a lot and his
On 06 Jan 2012, at 17:54, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
If to talk about Galileo, then it would also good to remember
Feyerabend
(for example Against method). Feyerabend has studied the
Bruno,
I have recently finished listening Prof Hoenen's Theorien der Wahrheit
where he has also reviewed Feyerabend's Science in a Free Society. Today
I wanted to learn more about that book and have found in Internet
Paul Feyerabend, 1975
How To Defend Society Against Science
On 1/6/2012 1:23 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 05.01.2012 06:29 John Clark said the following:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Craig
Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Sure, our belief in simulations can make them seem quite realistic
to us. That doesn't make them real though.
And so
On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
If to talk about Galileo, then it would also good to remember
Feyerabend
(for example Against method). Feyerabend has studied the way
On 06.01.2012 20:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
...
This statement contradict to a normal scientific world view but it
is based on
On 1/6/2012 11:26 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 20:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
...
This statement contradict to a normal
On 1/6/2012 10:14 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Bruno,
I have recently finished listening Prof Hoenen's Theorien der Wahrheit where he has also
reviewed Feyerabend's Science in a Free Society. Today I wanted to learn more about that
book and have found in Internet
Paul Feyerabend, 1975
How To
On 06.01.2012 20:35 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 11:26 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 20:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
On 1/6/2012 12:07 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 20:35 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 11:26 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 20:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following:
On Fri, Jan
On 06.01.2012 21:15 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/6/2012 12:07 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
I do not know, I cannot exclude that German authorities have some
censorship in Internet (or Google censors its content to Germany)
but when I run Google scholar
http://scholar.google.com/
and
On 1/6/2012 12:37 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Whatever the numbers I'm sure you take my point that the number of
citations has very little to do with the correctness or importance of
an author. Nobody cites Isaac Newton in physics papers anymore.
Brent
Run Isaac Newton in the Google Scholar
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
This does not mean that everybody has to agree with him [Feyerabend] but
a statement about an idiot looks exaggerated.
If one can not use the word idiot to refer to someone who says things
like The church at the time of
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
In fact I do agree often with John Clark, but then he exaggerates also
very often the point.
I've told you a million times I never exaggerate.
The church was asking to Galileo to present his view as a theory or
Black hole evaporation. I am thinking about some work by Hawking.
Could you point me towards it? I know Hawking conceded a bet on this
recently but I'm not sure why.
But $any* true erasing of information is forbid in any theory where QM
applies universally. Unitary evolution cannot erase
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Only one reason, we can't make a good enough simulation for that because
we don't have enough INFORMATION.
If our contemporary knowledge of physics is so complete, then that should
be all the information we need.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
But you are right, Feyerabend is no idiot. He is insightful. He knows
that reputation in philosophy is most easily gained by taking a position
contrary to common wisdom.
If Feyerabend believed what he said about Galileo
On 1/6/2012 18:57, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Jan 2012, at 11:02, acw wrote:
Hello everything-list, this is my first post here, but I've been
reading this list for at least half a year, and I'm afraid this post
will be a bit long as it contains many thoughts I've had on my mind
for quite some
On Jan 6, 10:33 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Only one reason, we can't make a good enough simulation for that because
we don't have enough INFORMATION.
If our contemporary knowledge of physics is so
21 matches
Mail list logo
