You cannot dance at two weddings as they in Texas. There are sometimes
situations where things, I have to tell you, render themselves as Manichean,
sorry to say. Sometimes, its they hand that we are dealt and are forced to
play. Why have wars, if we don't have the tenacity and the
On 5 July 2014 05:51, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/4/2014 1:36 AM, LizR wrote:
On 4 July 2014 18:16, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
This kind of classification is fine as far as distinguishing believing
god doesn't exist from failing to believe that god does exist.
On 6 July 2014 14:36, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Hey, I'm just a flying monkey, anyways. The most fearful thing in the
movie were not the monkeys or the witch, but the tornado at the beginning,
which at a young age I knew was real. Nyuck!
I agree
On 05 Jul 2014, at 10:00, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 12:05 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Tyson is not
On 05 Jul 2014, at 00:38, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Well, my question is, are you automatically, dismissing jihadi
terrorism as a chimera, a false threat, a non-issue?
Jihadi terrorism is a real threat, no doubt on this. But the point is
that there are growing evidences that
On 04 Jul 2014, at 23:36, meekerdb wrote:
It merely degenerates to the
self-sufficient micro-evolution of some aggregation of physical
primitives; whatever is not entirely micro-physical is a further
attribution *from the perspective of some implicit theory of
knowledge*. To put it baldly,
On 04 Jul 2014, at 20:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/4/2014 9:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 Jul 2014, at 19:46, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/3/2014 8:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Only a pseudo-scientist would say that the science progresses
have put any threat on the non literal reading of any
On 06 Jul 2014, at 05:18, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/5/2014 5:08 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 July 2014 06:27, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Ok, maybe it's mostly a matter of semantics. I don't exclude
things as not
existing just because they are not part of the primitive ontology.
But
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 Jul 2014, at 05:18, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/5/2014 5:08 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 July 2014 06:27, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Ok, maybe it's mostly a matter of semantics. I don't exclude things as
not
Sure, even under Bush, Terror won, for the simple fact he was reluctant to even
name the enemy. Terrorism is a method, and not a person, and as you point out,
and BHO and his party, come from a nuanced, progessivist, view, of focusing on
a 'social democracy' which provides goods and services
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:08 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
All of these studies reference externally received radiation
No they do not. The primary source of natural background radiation is Radon
gas and people breathe it. Radon is
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
IIUC, the occupational acceptable limits are based on studies of
survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (who actually received a range of
different exposures, depending on how screened they were at the time of
the
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 11:46 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: American Intelligence
You cannot dance at two weddings as they in Texas. There are sometimes
situations where
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:06 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Sure, even under Bush, Terror won, for the simple fact he was reluctant to
even name the enemy. Terrorism is a method, and not a person, and as you
point out, and BHO and his party, come
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 10:41 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:08 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 10:46 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: How dangerous is radiation?
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Russell Standish
You do know the concept of asymmetrical warfare? I didn't say you have to agree
with it, but please, acknowledge that historically its a strategy that has
legs. So dismissing a few thousand fighters as a zero threat is insane. It
would be insane if we ignore a re-purposed jihad against the US.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 12:17 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: American Intelligence
You do know the concept of asymmetrical warfare?
I lived through the actuality of
On 7/6/2014 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
That's the whole point and burden of my analysis.
So on that basis I disagree that the same kind of thing can be done
in a physical theory. On the comp assumption, by contrast, belief in
a truth and acting as if true, in conjunction with their truth
At least in Western democracies, ISTM that politics and ideologies are in
general kept away from children to a far greater extent than religion is
(in religious households). Obviously you have some ideology taken in via
the behaviour of parents - if they are status and wealth seeking, or
heavily
So you never would support the use of US military forces under any
circumstances, is this correct? Secondly, theres nothing more
fascist,then a cadre of billionaires controlling the dem party. These
boys out Koch the Koch's and one would be hedge fund manager and
Marxist billionaire, George
In Robert Heinlein's vericose veined, juvenile novel, Starship
Troopers, the right to vote was earned through service in an all
volunteer military. I Never liked Heinlein's preachiness, and
stridency, because, meh, if that was his mythical society of the 24th
century, whats the real
On 7/6/2014 2:37 PM, LizR wrote:
At least in Western democracies, ISTM that politics and ideologies are in general kept
away from children to a far greater extent than religion is (in religious households).
When I six I learned the U.S. is a democracy. I demanded personal freedom and vote on
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:27 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/6/2014 2:37 PM, LizR wrote:
At least in Western democracies, ISTM that politics and ideologies are in
general kept away from children to a far greater extent than religion is
(in religious households).
When I six
On 7 July 2014 10:17, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
In Robert Heinlein's vericose veined, juvenile novel, Starship Troopers,
the right to vote was earned through service in an all volunteer military.
I Never liked Heinlein's preachiness, and stridency,
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
So you never would support the use of US military forces under any
circumstances, is this correct?
You don't get to define my position for me in extreme terms that suit your
26 matches
Mail list logo
