On 01 Mar 2012, at 19:39, acw wrote:
On 3/1/2012 18:16, meekerdb wrote:
But the 1p view of this is to be
conscious *of something*, which you describe as the computation seen
from the inside. What is it about these threads through different
states that makes them an equivalence class with
On 01 Mar 2012, at 19:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2012 10:23 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2012, at 17:54, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2012 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Feb 2012, at 21:05, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:59 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Comp says the exact
On 01 Mar 2012, at 22:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Mar 1, 7:34 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 29 Feb 2012, at 23:29, Craig Weinberg wrote:
There is no such thing as evidence when it comes to
qualitative
phenomenology. You don't need evidence to infer that a clock
doesn't
On 3/1/2012 7:37 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/1/2012 9:27 AM, Bob Zannelli wrote:
The Relativity of Existence
Authors: Stuart Heinrich
On Mar 1, 8:12 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
You do assume, though, that brain function can't be replicated by a
machine.
No, I presume that consciousness is not limited to what we consider to
be brain function. Brain function, as we understand it now, is already
a
On Mar 2, 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 01 Mar 2012, at 22:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
There is no such thing as evidence when it comes to
qualitative
phenomenology. You don't need evidence to infer that a clock
doesn't
know what time it is.
A clock has no
On 3/2/2012 1:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2012, at 19:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2012 10:23 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2012, at 17:54, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2012 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Feb 2012, at 21:05, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/29/2012 10:59 AM, Bruno
On 02 Mar 2012, at 18:03, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Mar 2, 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 01 Mar 2012, at 22:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
There is no such thing as evidence when it comes to
qualitative
phenomenology. You don't need evidence to infer that a clock
doesn't
know
On 02 Mar 2012, at 19:17, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/2/2012 1:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2012, at 19:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2012 10:23 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2012, at 17:54, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2012 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Feb 2012, at 21:05,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The question is If I throw a coin, what is the probability that I see it
becoming a flying pig. In front of the UD, that question is not trivial.
In this thought experiment the meaning of the word I is not obvious and
in fact the
On Mar 2, 2:49 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 02 Mar 2012, at 18:03, Craig Weinberg wrote:
There is no such thing as evidence when it comes to
qualitative
phenomenology. You don't need evidence to infer that a clock
doesn't
know what time it is.
A clock has no
On 2/28/2012 8:20 PM, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Dear Stephen,
A thing that I often ask myself concerning MMH is the question about
what is mathematical and what is not?. The set of real numbers is a
mathematical structure, but also the set of real numbers plus the
point (1,1) in the plane is.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 8:12 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
You do assume, though, that brain function can't be replicated by a
machine.
No, I presume that consciousness is not limited to what we consider to
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Let me ask a question to everybody. Consider the WM duplication, starting
from Helsinki, but this time, in W, you are reconstituted in two exemplars,
in exactly the same environment. Is the probability, asked in Helsinki,
On Mar 2, 7:46 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 8:12 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
You do assume, though, that brain function can't be replicated by a
machine.
No,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 2, 7:46 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 8:12 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
You do
On Mar 2, 9:41 pm, Terren Suydam terren.suy...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, maybe it's ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger
Or this...
http://www.alternet.org/health/154225/would_we_have_drugged_up_einstein_how_anti-authoritarianism_is_deemed_a_mental_health_problem
--
You received this
On 2/29/2012 9:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Feb 2012, at 13:50, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/28/2012 5:19 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/2/28 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
mailto:stephe...@charter.net
On 2/28/2012 10:43 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Comp substitute
On 3/2/2012 10:17 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Mar 2, 9:41 pm, Terren Suydamterren.suy...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, maybe it's ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger
Or this...
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand your argument from the very beginning. I debate people
about it all week long with the same view exactly. It's by far the
most popular position I have encountered online. It is the
conventional wisdom
20 matches
Mail list logo
