[Quran 16:68-69]
68 And inspired your Lord to the Bee that Take [second person female
singular] among the mountains houses, and among the trees, and in what they
construct
69 Then/ Moreover eat [second person feminine singular] from all the
fruits, and follow [second person female singular
On 03 May 2014, at 09:15, Kim Jones wrote:
On 3 May 2014, at 4:59 pm, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will do as separate threads, insha'Allah (if God wills)
Samiya
More than likely as YOU YOURSELF choose to. It's the height of
sophistry to give the Unknowable credit
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 03 May 2014, at 09:15, Kim Jones wrote:
On 3 May 2014, at 4:59 pm, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
Will do as separate threads, insha'Allah (if God wills)
Samiya
More than likely as YOU YOURSELF
That's quite interesting. I assume Arabic is a language in which there are
not normally masculine and feminine forms of nouns, since that would mean
that there was a 50-50 chance of happening to get it right simply by luck.
(For example, I'm sure the French would be overjoyed if all tables turned
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Telmo, I admire your self-control in 'religious' topics. Do you indeed
have a well fitting definition of religious?
Dear John,
I don't have a good definition. I do have a distinction though: good
religious feelings come
Bruno (excuse me!) - what is the difference between
* stable patterns of information, e.g. perception...*
and::(your ontological existence?, 'explained' as):
* the primitive objects that we agree to assume to solve or formulate some
problem, and the phenomenological, or epistemological
On Fri, May 2, 2014 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
John asks: Name one scientific fact in the Bible or the Koran that you
wouldn't expect members of a Bronze Age tribe in 1500BC to know.
1. More than one stomach in a honey bee's body
2. Description of human embryo which
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2014 8:15 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Evolution from Scripture
On Fri, May 2, 2014 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of you may be interested in taking a look at my new book, recently made
available at amazon.com. It is:
TRONNIES
The Source of the Coulomb Force
And
The Building Blocks of Universes
Just go to amazon.com, click “books” and search for
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries, but you
couldn't term the Hindu faith as pacifist either. In the 20th century the
political movement that had atheism at its core, was the Marxist ideology, and
how many tens of millions did it destroy, 70 mil, 100? Not a
On 02 May 2014, at 20:21, Samiya Illias wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 02 May 2014, at 05:35, Samiya Illias wrote:
Evolution and Creationism are generally considered to be opposing
world views. This article attempts to prove from
Without peaking at your books, let me ask, what issues in physics do they
address or explain?
-Original Message-
From: John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, May 3, 2014 1:24 pm
Subject: RE: TRONNIES
Some of you may be
On 02 May 2014, at 22:56, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/2/2014 8:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 May 2014, at 21:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/1/2014 2:18 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Someone said:
So what does existence mean besides stable patterns of
information, e.g. perception of the Moon,
On 03 May 2014, at 11:46, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Telmo, I admire your self-control in 'religious' topics. Do you
indeed have a well fitting definition of religious?
Dear John,
I don't have a good definition. I do have a
Take a peak.
I believe I address every major issue in physics, from the internal structure
of an electrons, photons, and protons to the Big Bang, inflation, gravity and
anti-gravity, electricity, magnetism, what preceded the Big Bang, the recycling
of universes, the Higgs boson (and the
On 03 May 2014, at 16:38, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno (excuse me!) - what is the difference between
stable patterns of information, e.g. perception...
and::(your ontological existence?, 'explained' as):
the primitive objects that we agree to assume to solve or
formulate some problem, and the
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:22 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Evolution from Scripture
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries, but you
couldn't
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries, but
you couldn't term the Hindu faith as pacifist either. In the 20th century
the political movement that had atheism at its core,
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 9:05:29 PM UTC+1, John Ross wrote:
Take a peak.
I believe I address every major issue in physics, from the internal
structure of an electrons, photons, and protons to the Big Bang, inflation,
gravity and anti-gravity, electricity, magnetism, what preceded
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 9:14:41 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 May 2014, at 16:38, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno (excuse me!) - what is the difference between
* stable patterns of information, e.g. perception...*
and::(your ontological existence?, 'explained' as):
* the primitive
Well sir, you've come to the right place, if you want to test your ideas.
Speaking for myself, I don't have the time to read even the books at the
top of my pile, much less speculative physics books. So you would do me and
the rest of the list a favor if you could try to summarize your ideas.
On 4 May 2014 15:20, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
I have forwarded your query to an expert in Arabic Grammar. Your quote
from Wikipedia is correct. What I can inform you, based on my
understanding, is that the pronoun 'ha' used in the verse is for female
singular with a plural
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:14:59 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: wrote:
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries,
but you couldn't term the Hindu faith as pacifist either. In the
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2014 15:20, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
I have forwarded your query to an expert in Arabic Grammar. Your quote
from Wikipedia is correct. What I can inform you, based on my
understanding, is that the
24 matches
Mail list logo
