Why we shouldn't develop machines with general AI.
Brent
Forwarded Message
A contribution to a discussion we were having a couple of weeks ago:
https://www.wired.com/story/will-ai-achieve-consciousness-wrong-question/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 2/20/2019 1:23 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 12:16:31 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
On 2/20/2019 8:42 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 7:09:10 AM UTC-7, John Clark
wrote:
>/Newton "explained"
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 12:16:31 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2019 8:42 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 7:09:10 AM UTC-7, John Clark wrote:
>>
>>
>> >* Newton "explained" *
>>
>>
>> Why did you put explained in quotation marks? If
On 2/20/2019 8:42 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 7:09:10 AM UTC-7, John Clark wrote:
>/Newton "explained" /
Why did you put explained in quotation marks? If you can predict
what something is going to do then you've explained it, the
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 9:14:35 AM UTC-6, PGC wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 11:39:21 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 15 Feb 2019, at 20:43, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, February 15, 2019 at 12:01:26 PM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 2/19/2019 11:06 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 8:16:51 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
On 2/19/2019 5:10 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*What you wrote makes no sense. It fails to explain why motion
occurs in the absence of force. AG *
So
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:42 AM wrote:
>
*> QM better illustrates the justification for quotes. Many interpretations
> that make the same predictions. AG *
>
Yes, many interpretations of Quantum Mechanics make the same predictions,
so at least for now which interpretation (explanation) you use
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 7:09:10 AM UTC-7, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> >* Newton "explained" *
>
>
> Why did you put explained in quotation marks? If you can predict what
> something is going to do then you've explained it, the better the
> prediction the better the explanation. I don't
On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 11:39:21 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 15 Feb 2019, at 20:43, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 15, 2019 at 12:01:26 PM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 15 Feb 2019, at 16:12, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday,
> >* Newton "explained" *
Why did you put explained in quotation marks? If you can predict what
something is going to do then you've explained it, the better the
prediction the better the explanation. I don't know what else the word
could possibly mean. And in science no explanation is perfect,
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 12:30:01 AM UTC-7, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 1:06:25 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 8:16:51 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/19/2019 5:10 PM,
11 matches
Mail list logo