On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:33:06 PM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 3:15 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> > *Y**ou can only use Born's rule in any world where an ensemble of
>> measurements occurs. But you've admitted that no such ensemble can exist in
>> any
> On 4/28/2022 10:45 AM, John Clark wrote:
>
> Exactly what axiom would that be? It can't be the Born rule because that
> is not an axiom, that is an experimentaly derived fact.
>
> If I take some experimental result as granted, then it is an axiom, in my
system. If you think we need to be
On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:49:03 PM UTC+3 meeke...@gmail.com (Bent)
wrote:
> In unitary evolution per the Schroedinger equation there are no "paticular
> universes", there's only a ray in Hilbert space. Multiple universes is a
> FAPP viewpoint. But so is wave-function collapse.
>
I
On 4/28/2022 10:45 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:25 PM Alan Grayson
wrote:
/> The unresolved problem is that if you're using the frequentist
interpretation of probability, you must count and compare the
number of outcomes for each measurement possibility, but
On 4/28/2022 4:48 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:57 PM Bruce Kellett
wrote:
/> An important component of Everett's idea was that quantum
evolution was unitary./
Any idea that does not conform with quantum evolution being unitary is
an idea that does not conform
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 3:15 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
> *Y**ou can only use Born's rule in any world where an ensemble of
> measurements occurs. But you've admitted that no such ensemble can exist in
> any world.*
No, I did NOT admit that no ensemble of measurements can exist, what I said
was
On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:21:59 PM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:04 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> >> Exactly what axiom would that be? It can't be the Born rule because
>>> that is not an axiom, that is an experimentaly derived fact.
>>>
>>
>From what data?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:04 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
>> Exactly what axiom would that be? It can't be the Born rule because that
>> is not an axiom, that is an experimentaly derived fact.
>>
>
> *> The axiom that additional trials in this world,*
>
No world can have more than one trial because
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/scientists-make-miracle-material-breakthrough-to-revolutionise-solar-power/
[Philip Benjamin]
According to City University of Hong Kong (CityU) and Imperial College
London “Revolutionizing solar power” through Perovskite (calcium titanium oxide
On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:46:22 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:25 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> *> The unresolved problem is that if you're using the frequentist
>> interpretation of probability, you must count and compare the number of
>> outcomes for
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:25 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> The unresolved problem is that if you're using the frequentist
> interpretation of probability, you must count and compare the number of
> outcomes for each measurement possibility, but you can't do this without
> knowing that the outcomes
On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 5:48:44 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:57 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> *> An important component of Everett's idea was that quantum evolution was
>> unitary.*
>
>
> Any idea that does not conform with quantum evolution being
After a three year shutdown to make an upgrade the LHC has started up
again, it should be able to start doing science again in late June, by
coincidence just about the same time that the Webb telescope will be able
to start doing science. Thanks to the upgrade the LHC's detectors will be
much more
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:57 PM Bruce Kellett
wrote:
*> An important component of Everett's idea was that quantum evolution was
> unitary.*
Any idea that does not conform with quantum evolution being unitary is an
idea that does not conform with experimental evidence and thus has been
proven
14 matches
Mail list logo
