to 10 places.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross wrote:
I have not dealt with Mercury's orbit.
This is one of the most
John Ross wrote:
Another solution is for you to ignore my comments, or maybe me yours.
This isn't just about me personally not being interested in your posts, it's
about the discussion of your alternative physics ideas being *off-topic*
on this list, just as much so if you came here and
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross wrote:
Another solution is for you to ignore my comments, or maybe me yours
-
From: Jesse Mazer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:55:43 -0400
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross wrote:
Another solution is for you to ignore my comments, or maybe me yours.
This isn't just about me personally
Tom Caylor wrote:
I am entertained by the discussion with John Ross, and can think of more
entertaining questions for him (such as how about travelling by firing a
neutrino gun at objects that you want to travel to? sorry I couldn't help
it), but I believe it is off topic.
For those who
why the electromagnetic chart
should stop at about 4 or 5 mev?
-Original Message-
From: Russell Standish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 5:39 PM
To: Stephen Paul King
Cc: everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:02
07, 2005 4:30 PM
To: John Ross; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
This means that beta decay proves your model wrong.
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Stephen Paul King' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday
To: everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
As I understand it a photon is a luxon as is a gluon and a neutrino
is a tardyon.
Hal Ruhl
At 04:49 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
I think the beta decay model is wrong where it predicts neutrinos are
basically different from photons
: Hal Ruhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:50 PM
To: everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
As I understand it a photon is a luxon as is a gluon and a neutrino
is a tardyon.
Hal Ruhl
At 04:49 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
I think the beta decay model
, 2005 10:49 PM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
I think the beta decay model is wrong where it predicts neutrinos are
basically different from photons. I understand neutrinos travel at the
speed of light. Only photons travel at the speed of light.
-Original Message-
From: Saibal Mitra
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:11:04AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
* Only photons travel at the speed of light. (Except my tronnies that
usually go faster than the speed of light.)
Who says? Any massless particle will travel at the speed of light.
--
*PS: A number of people ask me about the
Message-
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross:
Thanks for the response.
Yes my theory involves a lot of math. Have you read my patent
application
Name one.
-Original Message-
From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:27 PM
To: John Ross; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
There are a lot of experiments that have detected neutrinos and verified
their properties (which
of neutrinos is in the range of 300 mev!
-Original Message-
From: Russell Standish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:00 PM
To: John Ross
Cc: 'Hal Ruhl'; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
According to special relativity, anything with a positive
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7050/full/436467a.html
-Original Message-
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Saibal Mitra' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:34:26 -0700
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
Name one.
-Original
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:04 PM
To: John Ross
Cc: 'Stephen Paul King'; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:11:04AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
* Only photons travel at the speed of light. (Except my tronnies
@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
I think the beta decay model is wrong where it predicts neutrinos are
basically different from photons. I understand neutrinos travel at the
speed of light. Only photons travel at the speed of light
I'm sure you saw something else :-)
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Russell Standish' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Hal Ruhl' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 01:40 AM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
I say a neutrino
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 01:43 AM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
I say any massless particle that has a charge supporting a Coulomb force
must travel at the speed of light or faster because the Coulomb force
travels at the speed of light and a charged massless particle
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
Thanks for the response.
Your reference quotes Professor Feynman in part as follows:
So that is the end of that theory. 'Well,' you say, 'it was a good one,
and I got rid of the mathematics for a while. Maybe I could invent a
better one.' Maybe you can, because
John Ross wrote:
To the best of my knowledge and belief, my theory successfully predicts
all known experimental knowledge of physics, chemistry and optics and
does so better and simpler than any other theory. I am working on a
list of predictions of new things that can be proved
]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7050/full/436467a.html
-Original Message-
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Saibal Mitra
I don't believe it.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Paul King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:45 PM
To: everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
Dear John,
There is replicated evidence that neutrinos have a non-zero mass. It
is
very
'; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
Faster than light effects lead to violations of causality. There are
very stringent experimental constraints against such effects.
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Russell Standish' [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:27 PM
To: John Ross; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
There are a lot of experiments that have detected neutrinos and verified
their properties (which are completely different from photons).
--
*PS: A number
obtain its energy by capturing the entron of a high energy photon.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Mazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
John Ross wrote:
To the best of my
Thanks for the paper relating to detection of low energy neutrinos.
However, according to my model, neutrinos are very, very high energy
photons (off everybody's chart, except mine).
Therefore, if my model is correct, then low energy neutrinos would
merely be the photons we are familiar with and
This means that beta decay proves your model wrong.
- Original Message -
From: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Stephen Paul King' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:35 AM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
Thanks for the paper relating
PROTECTED]
To: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Stephen Paul King' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
Neutrinos are fermions with spin 1/2. Photons are bosons with spin
0. This is about as chalk and cheese as you can
John Ross wrote:
Thanks for the paper relating to detection of low energy neutrinos.
However, according to my model, neutrinos are very, very high energy
photons (off everybody's chart, except mine).
Therefore, if my model is correct, then low energy neutrinos would
merely be the photons we
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Stephen Paul King' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
Neutrinos are fermions with spin 1/2. Photons are bosons with spin
0. This is about as chalk
31 matches
Mail list logo
