My programmer husband respectfully points out that the harmony - such as it
is - wasn't pre-established, but put together by a load of software
engineers.
On 22 November 2013 23:59, Roger Clough wrote:
> Pre-established harmony ? Computers programs exhibit pre-established
> harmony.
>
>
> Dr.
On 9/30/2012 8:43 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Thanks for the very interesting video.
Hi Alberto,
I agree. Roger Penrose is one of my favorite theorists.
Concerning Platonia and Contingia, there are much to say if we
introduce natural selection, the only well know creative process.
T
Thanks for the very interesting video.
Concerning Platonia and Contingia, there are much to say if we introduce
natural selection, the only well know creative process.
The world of Platonia, in terms of natural selection, is the peak of the
"fitness landscape" (FT). The FT is the point of perfec
no
Roger , rclo...@verizon.net
8/17/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
everything could function."
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-14, 15:02:45
Subject: Re: pre-esta
ver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-14, 15:02:45
Subject: Re: pre-established harmony
Dear Roger,
It was not Bruno that wrote what you are attributing to him below. It was
me. I think that he might appreciate that you make attributions correctly. Let
me fix the attributions.
On 8/14/2012
On 8/16/2012 7:00 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
[SPK] You do not have an explanation of interactions in COMP
[BM]
I have only the quantum logic. This does not change the vaility of the
reasoning. You reason like that, Darwin theory fail to predict the
mass of the boson, and string theory ignore the
On 15 Aug 2012, at 21:09, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/15/2012 5:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
OK. The ontological primary medium is given by any universal
system. I have chosen arithmetic to fix the thing.
OK, you chose arithmetic. But my claim is that is only one of an
infinite number
On 14 Aug 2012, at 20:55, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/14/2012 6:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Aug 2012, at 07:26, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/13/2012 9:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Aug 2012, at 20:05, Stephen P. King wrote:
Does the measure cover an infinite or finite s
t>
8/14/2012
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Bruno Marchal <mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>
*Receiver:* everything-list <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
*Time:* 2012-08-13, 09:19:40
*Subject:* Re: pre-established harmony
On 12 Aug 2012, at 20:0
, at the epistemological
level, but to invoke them when searching an explanation is not
convincing if you don't explain them too.
Bruno
Roger , rclo...@verizon.net
8/14/2012
- Receiving the following content -----
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-13, 09:19
fe is also a mirtacle as was painting the Mona Lisa.
Roger , rclo...@verizon.net
8/14/2012
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-13, 09:19:40
Subject: Re: pre-established harmony
On 12 Aug 2012, at 20:05, Stephen P. King wrot
On 14 Aug 2012, at 07:26, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/13/2012 9:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Aug 2012, at 20:05, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Roger,
I will interleave some remarks.
On 8/11/2012 7:37 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
As I understand it, Leibniz's pre-established
On 8/13/2012 9:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Aug 2012, at 20:05, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Roger,
I will interleave some remarks.
On 8/11/2012 7:37 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
As I understand it, Leibniz's pre-established harmony is analogous to
a musical score with God, or
On 13 Aug 2012, at 17:55, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
When this cowboy has to write a score, there are always the
constraints of what client/audience expect; even if they expect
breaking a set of conventions.
But the actual writing, the 1p experience of it, is out of my
control. If I
When this cowboy has to write a score, there are always the constraints of
what client/audience expect; even if they expect breaking a set of
conventions.
But the actual writing, the 1p experience of it, is out of my control. If I
am afforded conditions to be allowed to be open for surprise, this
On 12 Aug 2012, at 20:05, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Roger,
I will interleave some remarks.
On 8/11/2012 7:37 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
As I understand it, Leibniz's pre-established harmony is analogous to
a musical score with God, or at least some super-intelligence, as
compos
Hi Roger,
I will interleave some remarks.
On 8/11/2012 7:37 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
As I understand it, Leibniz's pre-established harmony is analogous to
a musical score with God, or at least some super-intelligence, as
composer/conductor.
Allow me to use the analogy a bit
As I understand it, the Leibniz's rational for advocating the
pre-established harmony idea was Newton's discovery of conservation of
momentum. Descartes knew that energy was conserved, but not momentum.
This would have permitted a non-physical mind to alter the trajectories of
particles in the mi
18 matches
Mail list logo
