On 03 Jan 2011, at 06:29, Kim Jones wrote:
On 03/01/2011, at 11:39 AM, David Nyman wrote:
The whole issue of "where will I find myself" after duplication is in
any case very curious. Deciding "who I am" and "where I am" can only
be post-hoc on the basis of present experience in the context
On 02 Jan 2011, at 17:58, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 02.01.2011 17:29 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 13:09, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Remember that with comp, we can never know that we are awake. But we
can always know that we are dreaming or sharing a dream. The
expe
On 02 Jan 2011, at 18:01, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 11:31, silky wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Brian Tenneson
wrote:
In the case of a TOE, the model IS reality.
Okay, I won't reply further, this has become irrelevant noise.
I suspect the
On 02 Jan 2011, at 19:38, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Also, the expression "superstring are made of numbers" is unclear.
If computationalism is correct the expression "made of" has no
sense. Things are not made of something, they are dreamed by
(infinities) of computation. The physical worl
On 3 January 2011 09:09, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Indeed. Even without the movie graph, but with any of Tegmark multiverse
> levels, that 1-indeterminacy comes to play. With the movie graph, our
> relative proportion depends on all computational histories, and this makes
> ourself multiplied by inf
On 03 Jan 2011, at 12:31, David Nyman wrote:
On 3 January 2011 09:09, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Indeed. Even without the movie graph, but with any of Tegmark
multiverse
levels, that 1-indeterminacy comes to play. With the movie graph, our
relative proportion depends on all computational histori
Ah, ok. Well, as your friend checked my proof, what I was/am working
on is an effective theory.
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 18:01, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 11:31, silky wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:31 PM,
On 1/3/2011 4:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 Jan 2011, at 12:31, David Nyman wrote:
On 3 January 2011 09:09, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Indeed. Even without the movie graph, but with any of Tegmark
multiverse
levels, that 1-indeterminacy comes to play. With the movie graph, our
relative propo
on 03.01.2011 10:26 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 17:58, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 02.01.2011 17:29 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 13:09, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Remember that with comp, we can never know that we are awake. But
we can always
9 matches
Mail list logo
