On 16 May 2012, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 16, 10:41 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2012, at 19:44, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 15, 1:03 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But a deterministic world, if rich enough to add and multiply,
and
thus to contain universal inter
Can Perfect Vacuum as a ' Nothing' as ‘ an Infinite Space’ as
an Absolute Reference Frame have Concrete Physical Properties ?
Socratus
=.
One Concrete Physical Properties of Vacuum is Absolute Zero.
What is Absolute Zero ?
Classic Physics says: It is a dead space.
Quantum Physics says: It is not
On May 17, 12:01 am, John Clark wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote
>
> > > I don't say that [the free will noise] means you're not deterministic,
>
> I would be glad to hear you say that except that according to illogical
> Weinbergian logic just because something is no
2012/5/17 Craig Weinberg
> On May 17, 12:01 am, John Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Craig Weinberg >wrote
> >
> > > > I don't say that [the free will noise] means you're not
> deterministic,
> >
> > I would be glad to hear you say that except that according to illogical
> > W
On May 17, 5:49 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 16 May 2012, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 16, 10:41 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> On 15 May 2012, at 19:44, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >>> On May 15, 1:03 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> >> But a deterministic world, i
On May 17, 7:57 am, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
> > That's true, but they don't care whether they output or not. It's not
> > driven by their own intention. They won't EVER discover a printer that
> > is sitting right next to them without having drivers loaded and
> > configured to even connect.
>
>
arXiv:1205.2720 [pdf]
Title: Why there is something rather than nothing: The finite,
infinite and eternal
Authors: Peter Lynds
Ronald
On May 15, 5:33 pm, John Mikes wrote:
> Brent:
> did I say .
> "I am *conscious of infinite complexity???"
> *If so, I used the word in a different meaning: like
On 17 May 2012, at 14:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 17, 5:49 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 May 2012, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 16, 10:41 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2012, at 19:44, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 15, 1:03 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But a
On 5/17/2012 8:42 AM, ronaldheld wrote:
arXiv:1205.2720 [pdf]
Title: Why there is something rather than nothing: The finite,
infinite and eternal
Authors: Peter Lynds
Hi Ronald,
Thank you for posting this reference. After reading the paper I
find that I agree with it 100% but would point o
On 5/17/2012 9:50 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 14:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 17, 5:49 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 May 2012, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 16, 10:41 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2012, at 19:44, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 15, 1:0
On May 17, 9:50 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 17 May 2012, at 14:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > On May 17, 5:49 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> On 16 May 2012, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >>> On May 16, 10:41 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 15 May 2012, at 19:44, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 17, 10:57 am, "Stephen P. King" wrote:
Nice! I read your reply after I posted, it's cool that we seem to be
independently thinking along the same lines.
Craig
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, se
On 17 May 2012, at 18:04, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 17, 9:50 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 14:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 17, 5:49 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 May 2012, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On May 16, 10:41 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2012,
On May 17, 2:04 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Sense and matter is what I search an explanation for. You start at the
> finishing line.
That's why you are looking at it upside down. There isn't an
explanation for explanation. It is both the start and finish line.
>
>
>
> >> You could take any unive
Why didn't you just ask me in the first place? It's easy.
"Nothing" (noun) is intrinsically unstable. Think about it. It takes an
infinity of energy to maintain a perfect Nothing. So Nothing breaks up into its
components.
There. You can all rest easy now.
Cheers
Colin
-Original Message-
15 matches
Mail list logo
