Re: Ten top-of-my-head arguments against multiverses

2013-01-02 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 31 Dec 2012, at 19:52, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:20:44 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 Dec 2012, at 14:05, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Bruno Marchal and Brian, Bigness can only limit physical entities (those extended in space), but is irrelevant with

Re: Re: Re: The two basic theologies

2013-01-02 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg So what's good for one may be evil for another. No surprise there. That's why an overriding referee or judge (God) is necessary. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/2/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Roger Clough
ROGER: There are two opposing forces in the universe, those which enhance life, which we call Good, and those which diminish life, which we call Evil. CRAIG: I can't relate to cut and dried ideas of Good and Evil or enhancing or diminishing of life. It seems completely disconnected from

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Telmo Menezes
In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest of society instead of our own self-interest. I believe they have two main sources: 1) Biological evolution. In the long term, the DNA of the

Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy

2013-01-02 Thread Roger Clough
Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy As to tornadoes, there are various views, usually part of Theodicies. Here's the view I prefer, that of my mentor, Leibniz, explained in his Theodicy, which Voltaire took up in his unfair and totally misinformed criticism, the

The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-02 Thread Roger Clough
I forgot add that that's why Leibniz called this The best of all possible Worlds. Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy As to tornadoes, there are various views, usually part of Theodicies. Here's the view I prefer, that of my mentor, Leibniz, explained in his

Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Telmo Menezes Then we pretty much agree. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/2/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Telmo Menezes Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-02, 07:08:41 Subject: Re: Re:

Re: Re: Re: The two basic theologies

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:29:55 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg So what's good for one may be evil for another. No surprise there. That's why an overriding referee or judge (God) is necessary. Why would the relativity of value necessitate some kind of referee? Any

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:39:17 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: ROGER: There are two opposing forces in the universe, those which enhance life, which we call Good, and those which diminish life, which we call Evil. CRAIG: I can't relate to cut and dried ideas of Good and Evil or

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote: Chemotherapy Good or Evil? Better than nothing for most people having some disease. Worst than THC injection, plausibly for the same group of people. Here the Evil is only in the fact that minorities hides information from the majority, and

Galileo, Inchofer, and Popper

2013-01-02 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
A nice quote from Galileo by John L. Heilbron that shows: 1) One could trace the falsifiability to Jesuits of Galileo's time. 2) It could be a link between falsifiability and theology. p. 318 ‘However, false is not useless. The motion supposed by Copernicus can be employed in calculations,

Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-02 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/2/2013 8:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote: I forgot add that that's why Leibniz called this The best of all possible Worlds. Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy As to tornadoes, there are various views, usually part of Theodicies. Here's the view I prefer, that of my

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote: Chemotherapy Good or Evil? Better than nothing for most people having some disease. Worst than THC injection, plausibly for the same group of people. Here the Evil is

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 4:08 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest of society instead of our own self-interest. I believe they have two main sources: 1) Biological

Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that the world down here, that God created, is necessarily imperfect, so, as they say crap happens. This is because things can't be good everywhere at the same time. So there is no heaven.

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Jan 2013, at 13:08, Telmo Menezes wrote: In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest of society instead of our own self- interest. I believe they have two main sources: 1)

Re: Galileo, Inchofer, and Popper

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 10:34 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: A nice quote from Galileo by John L. Heilbron that shows: 1) One could trace the falsifiability to Jesuits of Galileo's time. 2) It could be a link between falsifiability and theology. p. 318 ‘However, false is not useless. The motion supposed by

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 11:13 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote: Chemotherapy Good or Evil? Better than nothing for most people having some disease. Worst than THC injection,

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 11:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I am not so sure about that. Most humans would be more happier just knowing than more humans can be happier (if it is not their neighbors). I think that some problem comes from too much altruistic dreams, and few awkward real practice, but they keep

Conputer Code In String Theory Supersimetric Equations

2013-01-02 Thread alexalex
Hello ! HNY and sorry if this has been posted again! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLvXaclRlHs http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0051 Doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block code, first invented by Claude Shannon in the 1940's, has been discovered embedded WITHIN the equations of

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 11:13 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote: Chemotherapy Good or Evil? Better than nothing for

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 12:46 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 11:13 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 7:08:41 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote: In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest of society instead of our own self-interest. I believe they have two

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:58:45 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 12:46 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 11:13 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 1:06 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:58:45 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 12:46 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 11:13 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 4:12:38 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 1:06 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:58:45 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 12:46 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On

Re: Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 8:13:20 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy This is because things can't be good everywhere at the same time. Thus evil and catastrophes are probabilistic. Why not? If evil and catastrophes are

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 2:24 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: That really has nothing to do with Evil though, except in sloppy reasoning. True Evil is about intentionally initiating social harm. Getting smallpox is not evil, it is just unfortunate. Giving someone blankets known to be infected with smallp On the

Re: Conputer Code In String Theory Supersimetric Equations

2013-01-02 Thread Richard Ruquist
Here is a lay description: http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/is-the-universe-a-computer-new-evidence-emerges Is the Universe a Computer? New Evidence Emerges. March 22nd, 2012 Share on twitterShare on google_plusoneShare on tumblrShare on emailMore Sharing Services I haven’t posted in a

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:21:27 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 2:24 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: That really has nothing to do with Evil though, except in sloppy reasoning. True Evil is about intentionally initiating social harm. Getting smallpox is not evil, it is just

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread meekerdb
On 1/2/2013 5:24 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:21:27 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 2:24 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: That really has nothing to do with Evil though, except in sloppy reasoning. True Evil is about intentionally initiating social harm.

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-02 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 9:11:07 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 5:24 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:21:27 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 2:24 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: That really has nothing to do with Evil though, except in sloppy

Re: The two basic theologies

2013-01-02 Thread John Clark
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: A Theology for Atheists There are two opposing forces in the universe, those which enhance life, which we call Good, and those which diminish life, which we call Evil. Yes, the particle accelerator physicists at CERN