On 20 Mar 2014, at 18:01, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:16:19 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:09:39 AM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
It formed increasingly high-level associations between bundles of
sensory data, eventually also
On 20 Mar 2014, at 00:37, Ronald Held wrote:
Assuming chaotic inflation there is no consensus that the multiverse
is past infinite but some papers have try to show it is do.
Interesting. Have some links or references? Thanks.
Bruno
Ronald
--
You received this message because you
On 20 Mar 2014, at 23:07, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:12:33 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
It looks like you have not yet grasped the UDA.
My post was not about the UDA; your comments are appreciated but
they miss the mark widely.
You post was not on UDA, but I
Spud,
If only dead wood is cut for firewood and cooking you are just recycling a
sustainable resource. Unlike coal and oil, firewood quickly and sustainably
regenerates. And basically burning dead wood is just speeding up the
natural process of the decay of dead trees.
So burning dead wood
Spud,
But reducing human overpopulation IS the main problem facing the planet,
the ecosystem, and the human species itself.
Assuming that increasing technology will somehow solve the problem is, I
fear, naive. It is precisely the use of more and more powerful technology
that has resulted in
You are picking up the inconsistencies given off by the Greens (red greens) and
the ruling class that funds them.
If we are doomed as even he NASA funded report assures us, then what's the use?
If the calamity is not upon us, then we have time to rationally develop and
install the clean and
I fear the control they want only exist in your mind... You should
consult... seriously.
You live in a delusional paranoia.
2014-03-21 12:20 GMT+01:00 spudboy...@aol.com:
You are picking up the inconsistencies given off by the Greens (red
greens) and the ruling class that funds them.
If we
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:16 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Tackling thing technically will save lots or preaching, in emails, and
public speaking. For example, if you cook all your food by wood-gathering,
you are more likely to disrupt the forests by your gatherings. If you have
access to
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Edgar L. Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
Spud,
But reducing human overpopulation IS the main problem facing the planet,
the ecosystem, and the human species itself.
Assuming that increasing technology will somehow solve the problem is, I
fear, naive. It is
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
The thing I most want to know about RCP4.5 is what RCP stands for,
Google seems to think it's Rich Client Platform but that doesn't sound
quite right. It must be pretty obscure, Wikipedia has never heard of RCP
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
The thing I most want to know about RCP4.5 is what RCP stands for,
Google seems to think it's Rich Client Platform but that doesn't sound
quite right.
Well, as far as the impact of the extremely wealthy, on our politics, I would
simply point to this Obama-friendly blog, which has been spun off from the
Washington Post, also Obama friendly.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/barach-obama-tech-ceos-nsa-104881.html?hp=l1
- a few other
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:19 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
The thing I most want to know about RCP4.5 is what RCP stands for,
Google seems to think it's Rich Client Platform but that doesn't sound
2014-03-21 17:52 GMT+01:00 Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:19 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
The thing I most want to know about RCP4.5 is what RCP stands for,
Google
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:48:30 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:01:43 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:16:19 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:09:39 AM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
It
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
The thing I most want to know about RCP4.5 is what RCP stands for,
2014-03-21 17:59 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
The
Jesse,
Sure, I'm well aware of these predictions, but my point is that many
necessary global resources are being rapidly depleted by just the current
human population, so even that is not sustainable.
In general the standard demographic predictions don't pay much attention to
the dwindling
On Friday, March 21, 2014 1:04:46 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:48:30 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:01:43 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:16:19 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux
On Friday, March 21, 2014 12:42:13 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm not so much interested in defining CTM, as in exploding the
assumptions from which CTM and other mechanistic, information-theoretical
models of consciousness arise.
OK. Would you mind defining which assumptions
On 18 Mar 2014, at 22:33, LizR wrote:
Am I right in assuming that in a quantum mechanical universe you can
trace the history backwards?
Absolutely not because in Quantum mechanics 2 very different states can
evolve into the exact same state.
John K Clark
--
You received this message
Bruno, I have read several over the years but do not save them. Here is the
latest one that I read:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1599
Ronald
Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:37:52 PM UTC-4, ronaldheld wrote:
Assuming chaotic inflation there is no consensus that
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:00 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 Mar 2014, at 22:33, LizR wrote:
Am I right in assuming that in a quantum mechanical universe you can
trace the history backwards?
Absolutely not because in Quantum mechanics 2 very different states can
evolve
Are you still interested in talking about metabiology?
http://www.axiompanbiog.com/Pages/Metabiology.aspx
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:10:42 PM UTC-5, thermo wrote:
Chaitin is currently drafting some attemps on metabiology and biological
evolution of creativity. I read the latest:
At first sight it seems to me a bad model starting from good stuff.
A better model would take algorithmic complexity into account, and living
beings as algorithms that utilize universal induction to predict sequences
in the environment (using solomonoff theory of universal induction).
Fitness
On 3/21/2014 9:59 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
mailto:allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
mailto:johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM,
On 21 Mar 2014, at 20:17, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:00 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 Mar 2014, at 22:33, LizR wrote:
Am I right in assuming that in a quantum mechanical universe you
can trace the history backwards?
Absolutely not because in
On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:18, bs...@cornell.edu wrote:
Are you still interested in talking about metabiology?
http://www.axiompanbiog.com/Pages/Metabiology.aspx
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:10:42 PM UTC-5, thermo wrote:
Chaitin is currently drafting some attemps on metabiology and
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 21 Mar 2014, at 20:17, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:00 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 Mar 2014, at 22:33, LizR wrote:
Am I right in assuming that in a quantum mechanical
On 21 Mar 2014, at 20:00, John Clark wrote:
On 18 Mar 2014, at 22:33, LizR wrote:
Am I right in assuming that in a quantum mechanical universe you
can trace the history backwards?
Absolutely not because in Quantum mechanics 2 very different states
can evolve into the exact same state.
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: The situation at Fukushima appears to be deteriorating
On 3/21/2014 9:59 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24
On 21 Mar 2014, at 20:14, ronaldheld wrote:
Bruno, I have read several over the years but do not save them. Here
is the latest one that I read:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1599
Ronald
Thanks Ronald, I will take a look.
Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:37:52
Others worth a look:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.0589 Is Eternal Inflation Past-Eternal? And What
if It Is? Susskind
http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0571 Eternal Inflation, past and future Aguirre
-Gabe
On Friday, March 21, 2014 2:14:41 PM UTC-5, ronaldheld wrote:
Bruno, I have read several over the
I agree with JM on this, because it appears that the higher the quality of
life, the tendency is for selecting reduced family sizes. But turning away from
technology and somehow using it sustainably, would, I believe wind up with a
redistribution of wealth, just using the tech we have now, and
I understand where you're coming from, Telmo, and yes, the most recent study
from a NASA sponsored climate analysis does indicate that we are doomed (their
wording not mine) and I disagree of course. Reducing energy consumption can get
us through the short term, but the intermediate term, and
On Friday, March 21, 2014 2:11:17 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Friday, March 21, 2014 12:42:13 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm not so much interested in defining CTM, as in exploding the
assumptions from which CTM and other mechanistic, information-theoretical
models of
37 matches
Mail list logo
