You are picking up the inconsistencies given off by the Greens (red greens) and 
the ruling class that funds them.
If we are doomed as even he NASA funded report assures us, then what's the use?
If the calamity is not upon us, then we have time to rationally develop and 
install the clean and phase out the dirty.
If the calamity is not upon us, we also have time to save the forests and the 
seas by technical means.
But rather then address the problem directly, and seriously, the 
environmentalists, billionaires and their pols demand control.
The control is rule over the serfs, not to better the serfs lives, or sustain 
the seas and forests, using rational technical means. 
To quote the mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emmanuel, "A crisis is a bad thing to 
waste." 
To wit: If you have a broken toilet, get it fixed, rather than make a law about 
toilet use. 



-----Original Message-----
From: LizR <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Mar 20, 2014 9:23 pm
Subject: Re: The situation at Fukushima appears to be deteriorating


Spudboy100,

I'm not sure where you're coming from. You seem to agree that there is a 
looming environmental / resources problem, and that we should use technology to 
make a transition to more renewable energy sources and so on. And you agree 
that we should ideally reduce the population long term (the rate at which the 
population of a country rises appears to be inversely proportional to how well 
educated and equal-opportunities women are, by the way). So in other words you 
sound like an environmentalist ... apart from the way you keep fulminating 
against some idea you have that Greenies are secretly plotting to take over the 
world. It's all a bit confusing.





On 21 March 2014 13:59,  <[email protected]> wrote:

Edgar, understood. But this shouldn't be the top of our priority, unless we are 
spreading homo sapiens to various parts of the solar system where humanity, and 
biomes, can be sustained for a very long time. Getting away from science 
fiction, there are things we can do until this golden interplanetary age. I 
don't see that a Paul Ehrlich response is a good way to go, or even achievable 
at this point. Hence, I'd prefer the technology path, rather than adopting 
China's one child policy. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>

Sent: Thu, Mar 20, 2014 7:52 pm
Subject: Re: The situation at Fukushima appears to be deteriorating




Spud,


The best, likely the only, way to protect the environment is to drastically 
reduce human overpopulation. Down to pre-industrial levels would be a good 
target ~half to 1 billion...


Anyway if we don't do it ourselves the environment will do it for us...


Edgar




On Thursday, March 20, 2014 7:43:35 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
You have a point, Edgar, and you yourself do not have a bad effect on the 
environment. However, a billion and one half fellow firewood gatherers, might 
have a more profound impact, and they may do a bit more than chopping then you 
do. Following Maslow's hierarchy of needs, when peoples standard of living 
improves, they start demanding a cleaner environment, and worry more about 
wildlife. You are doing the good because you choose to. Others are forced to 
gather firewood and chop trees. I hope nobody advocates permanent poverty as a 
method to protect the environment. 
 
Mitch

Spud,


Using firewood properly done does NOT disrupt the forest. I've used firewood 
for heating most of my life including currently. I use only dead trees from my 
own property (16 acres), not taking any with nesting holes. Only very rarely do 
I cut a live tree when it's clearly on its last legs or very 

...


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to