On 13 Jan 2014, at 20:27, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/13/2014 7:17 AM, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:17:13 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 1/10/2014 10:49 AM, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 4:25:04 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
As you've explained it above your theory
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:41 PM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 1/13/2014 9:23 AM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
>> Jason,
>>
>> You'd have a snowball's chance in hell in publishing a paper there
>> withOUT academic affiliation...
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>
> Yeah, arXiv was once pretty open but it got so many papers it's
Brent,
Thanks for the suggestions and encouragement. It's been on my 'to do list'
and posting here is helping to clarify the presentation of some of my ideas
towards that end.
Edgar
On Monday, January 13, 2014 3:41:17 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
> On 1/13/2014 9:23 AM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> >
Matti Pitkannen's VIXRA, an alternative to ARXIV
-Original Message-
From: meekerdb
To: everything-list
Sent: Mon, Jan 13, 2014 3:42 pm
Subject: Re: A Theory of Consciousness
On 1/13/2014 9:23 AM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> Jason,
>
> You'd have a snowball's chan
On 14 January 2014 01:08, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> Telmo,
>
> I don't know what the "universal dovetailer" is...
>
Well, find out. Then you'll be in a position to discuss the matter sensibly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
T
On 1/13/2014 9:23 AM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Jason,
You'd have a snowball's chance in hell in publishing a paper there withOUT academic
affiliation...
Edgar
Yeah, arXiv was once pretty open but it got so many papers it's started to require a
'sponsor' to vouch for new posters. Which is not
On 1/13/2014 7:17 AM, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:17:13 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 1/10/2014 10:49 AM, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 4:25:04 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
As you've explained it above your theory makes a rock just as consc
On Jan 13, 2014, at 11:23 AM, "Edgar L. Owen" wrote:
Jason,
You'd have a snowball's chance in hell in publishing a paper there
withOUT academic affiliation...
I've published there without any academic affiliation.
Jason
Edgar
On Monday, January 13, 2014 11:33:42 AM UTC-5, Jason w
Jason,
You'd have a snowball's chance in hell in publishing a paper there withOUT
academic affiliation...
Edgar
On Monday, January 13, 2014 11:33:42 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
>
> Edgar,
>
> The most well known is the arxiv. It is run out of cornell university.
> Their website is arxiv.org
>
>
Edgar,
The most well known is the arxiv. It is run out of cornell
university. Their website is arxiv.org
Jason
On Jan 13, 2014, at 7:59 AM, "Edgar L. Owen" wrote:
Telmo,
Thanks for the explanation, though it doesn't seem very applicable
to actual reality...
I would be very interest
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:17:13 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
> On 1/10/2014 10:49 AM, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 4:25:04 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>> As you've explained it above your theory makes a rock just as conscious
>> as a brain. I'm
>> sure you must hav
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> Telmo,
>
> Thanks for the explanation, though it doesn't seem very applicable to actual
> reality...
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHALAbstract.html
> I would be very interested in where one can submit papers with
Telmo,
Thanks for the explanation, though it doesn't seem very applicable to
actual reality...
I would be very interested in where one can submit papers without an
academic affiliation if you could provide names or links. Have you
submitted to any?
Best,
Edgar
On Monday, January 13, 2014 8:5
Hi Edgar,
> I don't know what the "universal dovetailer" is...
Not to worry, I'm sure not a lot of people do outside of this mailing list... :)
Independently of your own theory, it's an interesting concept. Bruno
might explain better, but it is basically an algorithm that executes
all conceivabl
Telmo,
I don't know what the "universal dovetailer" is...
Again, for the nth time, my theory has nothing to do with "comp" or "UD".
It's a completely different theory. Just go by what I say and don't assume
any similarities. It's possible there are some but I'll leave that up to
others...
Edg
Hi Edgar,
> My theory of consciousness is made considerably clearer in detail in my book
> on Reality if you want to get the full story :-)
>
> The answers to some of your questions:
>
> Sure dreams are real, like everything is, but their reality is that they are
> dreams. Actually mind is continu
On 1/10/2014 10:49 AM, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 4:25:04 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
As you've explained it above your theory makes a rock just as conscious as
a brain.
I'm
sure you must have a more subtle theory than that, so I'll ask you the same
thing I
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 4:25:04 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
> As you've explained it above your theory makes a rock just as conscious as
> a brain. I'm
> sure you must have a more subtle theory than that, so I'll ask you the
> same thing I asked
> Bruno, if I make a robot what do I have to
Telmo,
My theory of consciousness is made considerably clearer in detail in my
book on Reality if you want to get the full story :-)
The answers to some of your questions:
Sure dreams are real, like everything is, but their reality is that they
are dreams. Actually mind is continually actively
Hi Edgar,
Ok, I'll bite :)
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> All,
>
> I'll present a brief overview of my theory of consciousness from my book on
> Reality here. If anyone is interested I can elaborate.
>
> To understand consciousness we first must clearly distinguish betwe
On 1 January 2014 14:19, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> Liz,
>
> It's easy to demonstrate that consciousness is NOT its contents by the
> simple mental exercise of meditation in which the contents of consciousness
> are diminished to the point of vanishing. The more consciousness is emptied
> of individu
Liz,
It's easy to demonstrate that consciousness is NOT its contents by the
simple mental exercise of meditation in which the contents of consciousness
are diminished to the point of vanishing. The more consciousness is emptied
of individual contents, the clearer and brighter it becomes. Theref
Dear John, Please don't consider me an opponent. I merely call them how I
see them, and expect others to do likewise. I have often been wrong and
accepted that fact (and I expect others to (occasionally) do the same). I
only come to the conclusion slowly and reluctantly and after thorough
testing (
Dear Edgar, you use words in your nicely flowing text that raise questions
in my 'mind'(?) while reading them.
*Consciousness "ITSELF"?* what may be your take on consciousness (not
itself)? I mean: the term Ccness as used by diverse authors in diverse
contexts applied to their ways of thinking. (A
On 12/31/2013 7:09 AM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
All,
I'll present a brief overview of my theory of consciousness from my book on Reality
here. If anyone is interested I can elaborate.
To understand consciousness we first must clearly distinguish between consciousness
ITSELF and the contents of c
Hi Edgar,
Here's a question for you. Imagine a newborn baby, but a la The Matrix, you
substitute computer-generated sense information for his actual senses,
using a neural jack type of interface. Does the baby grow up conscious? It
seems that your answer for that would have to be no.
Terren
On
On 1 January 2014 04:09, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> All,
>
> I'll present a brief overview of my theory of consciousness from my book
> on Reality here. If anyone is interested I can elaborate.
>
> To understand consciousness we first must clearly distinguish between
> consciousness ITSELF and the co
Interesting!
Samiya
On 31-Dec-2013, at 8:09 PM, "Edgar L. Owen" wrote:
> All,
>
> I'll present a brief overview of my theory of consciousness from my book on
> Reality here. If anyone is interested I can elaborate.
>
> To understand consciousness we first must clearly distinguish between
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
