On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 09 Oct 2012, at 19:27, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:09:57 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I think Brittany and Abby are two single individual persons.
On 09 Oct 2012, at 19:27, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:09:57 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I think Brittany and Abby are two single individual persons.
I do too, but we can see that there is much more behavioral
synchronization that we would expect from two sin
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:09:57 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I think Brittany and Abby are two single individual persons.
>
I do too, but we can see that there is much more behavioral synchronization
that we would expect from two single individual persons.
Then there are th
On 08 Oct 2012, at 18:02, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Have a look at the first few minutes of this show with conjoined
twins Abby and Brittany:
http://tlc.howstuffworks.com/tv/abby-and-brittany/videos/big-moves.htm
You can see that although they do not share the same brain they
clearly share as
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 6:32:19 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:
>
> Hi Craig Weinberg
>
> The subjective aspect (Firstness), some of which apparently each twin has,
> is
> not shareable, only descriptions of it (Thirdness) are shareable.
>
Maybe not in these twins, but in these other, brain
Hi Craig Weinberg
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
10/9/2012
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-08, 12:02:27
Subject: Conjoined Twins
Have a look at the
Hi Craig Weinberg
The subjective aspect (Firstness), some of which apparently each twin has, is
not shareable, only descriptions of it (Thirdness) are shareable.
Firstness.
What is shareable is Thirdness. What cannot be shared is Firstness.
Thirdness is the description of
Roger Clough, rclo.
On Monday, October 8, 2012 12:58:59 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
>
> May I suggest that entangled BECs in their brains may allow for more
> or less instant communication of thoughts, but that one or the other
> may be able to disentangle and have independent thoughts, or have
> independent thought
On 10/8/2012 12:58 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
May I suggest that entangled BECs in their brains may allow for more
or less instant communication of thoughts, but that one or the other
may be able to disentangle and have independent thoughts, or have
independent thoughts that are instantly communi
May I suggest that entangled BECs in their brains may allow for more
or less instant communication of thoughts, but that one or the other
may be able to disentangle and have independent thoughts, or have
independent thoughts that are instantly communicated and disagreed
with. Just a shot in the dar
10 matches
Mail list logo
