> On 15 May 2018, at 21:52, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 10:52:51 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
> https://edwardfeser.blogspot.fr/2018/05/godel-and-unreality-of-time.html
>
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 10:52:51 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
> https://edwardfeser.blogspot.fr/2018/05/godel-and-unreality-of-time.html
>
The Gödel universe is a net rotating universe. The whole spacetime is
rotating, which means the Kerr effect dominates over standard gravitation.
https://edwardfeser.blogspot.fr/2018/05/godel-and-unreality-of-time.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:30 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/31/2012 10:48 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The problem is to explain also why the entropy of the early universe was
so low. If you just accept that this is the case and also don't bother
about the very distant
On 03 Aug 2012, at 01:43, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Evgnii,. The question is that the mind is not the brain in the same
way that Microsoft Word running in a computer ins not the computer.
The intuitive notion of location of our self, our mind behind de
eyes and thus inside the skull is not
Alberto,
I have one more question.
On 31.07.2012 11:08 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
On 30.07.2012 11:19 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
...
Let us say that there is some conglomerate of atoms. When it
Evgenn
I have not much time this week. I just added a paragraph below. I will ask
this with more detail later:
2012/8/2 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
Alberto,
I have one more question.
On 31.07.2012 11:08 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30
Evgnii,. The question is that the mind is not the brain in the same way
that Microsoft Word running in a computer ins not the computer. The
intuitive notion of location of our self, our mind behind de eyes and thus
inside the skull is not a mere derivation of the fact that the brain is
located
On 8/2/2012 4:43 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
We think thar our self is in the head because in this way we control better ourselves
and we can react to inmediate dangers better.( That is why fighter pilots, that need
heavy feedback and agile movements fly with their machines, while the spy and
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
On 30.07.2012 11:19 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
What do you mean by the world of the mind is different form the
phisico-mathematical world? Is this as by Descartes res cogitans vs. res
extensa?
As you said, it
On 30 Jul 2012, at 19:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/30/2012 2:19 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The Boltzman brains , according with what i have read, are
completely different beasts. Boltzman pressuposes, that , since no
random arrangement of matter is statistically impossible, and
Boltzman
On 31 July 2012 10:08, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Materialism is a monism but has a hidden dualism that is converted back
into monism by the process of avoiding delicate questions, for example the
nature of perceptions and the nature of the suppossedly external
phenomenons
Citeren Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 30 Jul 2012, at 19:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/30/2012 2:19 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The Boltzman brains , according with what i have read, are
completely different beasts. Boltzman pressuposes, that , since no
random arrangement of matter is
Hi Alberto,
On 31 Jul 2012, at 11:08, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
On 30.07.2012 11:19 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
What do you mean by the world of the mind is different form the
phisico-mathematical world? Is this
Thnks Bruno, Specially your agreement on dualism make me feel more
confident.
2012/7/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
Hi Alberto,
On 31 Jul 2012, at 11:08, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
On 30.07.2012 11:19 Alberto G. Corona
The problem is to explain also why the entropy of the early universe was
so low. If you just accept that this is the case and also don't bother
about the very distant future, there is no problem. But if you assume that
time goes on from the infinite distant past and/or to the infinite distant
On 7/31/2012 8:36 AM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 30 Jul 2012, at 19:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/30/2012 2:19 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The Boltzman brains , according with what i have read, are completely different
beasts. Boltzman pressuposes,
On 7/31/2012 10:48 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The problem is to explain also why the entropy of the early universe was so low. If you
just accept that this is the case and also don't bother about the very distant future,
there is no problem. But if you assume that time goes on from the
Alberto,
Thank you for your answers. I will make one comment now. I plan to read
Schneider on molecular machines (thanks for the link) and then I may
make more comments.
On 31.07.2012 11:08 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30 Evgenii
2012/7/31 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 7/31/2012 10:48 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The problem is to explain also why the entropy of the early universe was
so low. If you just accept that this is the case and also don't bother
about the very distant future, there is no problem. But if
Evgenii : I thank you for your questions, since It helps me to re-examine
and clarify my position.
2012/7/29 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
On 29.07.2012 11:28 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
These psycho-philosophical arguments like the one of John Ellis are
what in evolutionary
On 7/30/2012 2:19 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The Boltzman brains , according with what i have read, are completely different beasts.
Boltzman pressuposes, that , since no random arrangement of matter is statistically
impossible, and Boltzman demonstrated it in certain conditions (ergodic
On 30.07.2012 11:19 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
Evgenii : I thank you for your questions, since It helps me to
re-examine and clarify my position.
2012/7/29 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
On 29.07.2012 11:28 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
These psycho-philosophical arguments
actually
proved was not the unreality of time; for Reality is what which is
incontrovertible to all intercommunicating observers. What McTaggart
proved was the non-existance of an observational stance that might
allow all moments of time to be apprehended simultaneously. His work
can be seen
cast aspersions upon McTaggart, but what he actually
proved was not the unreality of time; for Reality is what which is
incontrovertible to all intercommunicating observers. What McTaggart
proved was the non-existance of an observational stance that might
allow all moments of time to be apprehended
PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Now I have found the original paper by McTaggart in Internet:
http://www.ditext.com/mctaggart/time.html
...
Dear Evgenii,
Never would I cast aspersions upon McTaggart, but what he actually
proved was not the unreality of time; for Reality is what which
On 29.07.2012 11:28 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
These psycho-philosophical arguments like the one of John Ellis are
what in evolutionary Psychology is called an explanation based on
proximate causes.
I guess that science is based on observation and hence it might be good
to define
John Ellis McTaggart
The Unreality of Time
Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17 (1908): 456-473
I have learned about the McTaggart's A- and B-series from John Yates.
http://www.ifsgoa.com/
Now I have found the original paper by McTaggart in Internet:
http://www.ditext.com
On 7/28/2012 4:23 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
John Ellis McTaggart
The Unreality of Time
Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17 (1908): 456-473
I have learned about the McTaggart's A- and B-series from John Yates.
http://www.ifsgoa.com/
Now I have found the original paper
29 matches
Mail list logo