The ADC is hard coded to create a Universal Distribution Group, so this
is normal. The reason you need a native mode domain is so that when the
store.exe process tries to upgrade the distribution group to a security
group, the process will actually succeed (since USGs can only exist in a
native
Mark,
What's preventing you from using UPN's in a FE/BE topology ?
Regards
Mylo
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 17:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA access
I don't think it is possible but sure one someone will figure
Could you not create a child domain that is Native?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 08:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Public Folders
The ADC is hard coded to create a Universal Distribution
Group, so this is
Of course. Either that, or remove DLs from public folder permissions
beforehand!
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
belatedly let me comment that I've done this several times in a test
environment and the one thing I overlooked was the backup device; I still
cannot get an Onstream tape device to perform properly under W2K.
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave
I wish I knew! Haven't investigated that hard just yet as people are still
used to down-level logon names so it's not been an issue.
All suggestions welcome.
Cheers
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 09:34
To: Exchange
the upgrade went perfect. our dlt backup device is operating correctly.
Thanks for the info.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: in-place upgrade to W2K (NOT Exchange 2000)
You are missing the 'restore key change' required after an offline backup
restored.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: csr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 March 2002 01:10
To:
I suspect you're trying to join the existing site when you install Exchange;
you need to create a new server in a new organisation and site where you
keep the names identical; I presume you've isolated a domain controller and
can install exchange under the same user as your original server. Once
I was thinking of that but the client has no more dollars to spend at this
time. I let him know that it is preferred method.
- Original Message -
From: Myles, Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:34 AM
Subject: RE: OWA access
When installing into a 5.5 site, should the ADC show an automatically
generated config connection from the install?
Many Thanks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
IIRC, only after you've actually installed the Exchange 2000 server into
the 5.5 site, e.g. you could install the ADC, perform ForestPrep and
join the 5.5 site, then create the ordinary ADC connection agreements,
and the Config CA still won't be there at that point.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
Ok, the Config_CA is not there anymore, just my connection agreements, AD is
replicating ok. Can send messages between Ex2k servers in site, but not to
5.5 servers in site. The GAL is populated with my 5.5 AD info but mail
not passing between 5.5 E2K in the same site.
-Original
I suppose a tell tale problem is that if I go into my 5.5 administrator
progs on a 5.5 server, expand the servers tree, the 2 newly added E2K
servers are not listed.
What went wrong?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 13:57
To: Exchange
That's not ADC; did you join them to the site during install? It should have
prompted for the name of the 5.5 server and the service account/password.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:08 AM
Subject:
Yes, first time. I ended up having to un-install exchange 2000, then
re-install at a later date. It did not ask me a second time when I
re-installed, not that I undid the forest prep domain prep, I just
un-installed E2K.
It only asked me at forest prep time originally.
-Original
Does anyone know how to save a list of users from User manager into Word ???
I need to save the entire list of ALL users in the domain ?
Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd
London Road Henley Road
Teynham Paddock Wood
Kent
Use Global.exe from the Resource Kit and output it to a text file.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT User list
Does anyone know how to save a list of users from User manager into
That part of installation is no different than 5.5's installation; if it
didn't ask you for the name of an existing 5.5 server, then the
username/pass, you somehow skipped the screen that asks if you want to join
the site.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
No, it's not the Outlook journal.
Try searching through www.microsoft.com/technet. I always had better luck
with that one as opposed to support.microsoft.com altough they both seem to
retrieve articles from the same source. I did a search on exchange message
journaling and this article
Like you, we don't use it where I work, but UPN testing was part of FE/BE testing
before our Ex2K rollout and I don't recall any problems. You would, in principle, need
to enable basic authentication on all front-end and back-end servers a \ as the
default domain name.
Cheers
Mylo
For the record, the answer is yes. You can stop the IS, restore the
DIR.EDB, delete the PRIV.EDB and PUB.EDB and start the IS. You'll start
with a blank database. All of your mailbox definitions are in DIR.EDB so
essentially you'll be starting with blank mailboxes.
BUT, follow the fine advice
It sounds more like he had a Config CA first time round, but
uninstalling Exchange 2000 removed it (which I guess it would, since
that process would remove the SRS?) My question is whether the Config
CA would be re-created when you reinstall Exchange 2000? Never tried
it.
Neil Hobson
Are you able to create a new SRS using Exchange System Manager? see Q255285
This will create a Config CA for your site.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 14:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC - Config
Good Morning,
I'm running Exchange 5.5/4 (NT4.0/6a). I'm having problems sending
e-mail to a specific domain, spectra.ca or spectraesolutions.com. Any
e-mail to those domains sits in my IMS outbound queue. They can send to
me but when I reply I run into the same problem. I've contacted
Re-reading the Exchange 2000 Front-end and Back-end Topology document on
the Technet CD, I found the following line: -
When authenticating against a front-end server, the user name must be
entered in the format domain/user name.
Are you proxying through the authentication to the back-end
Can you run an nslookup and resolve their MX record? Can you telnet to
port25 of their email server?
How to Telnet
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q153119
How to NSLookup
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q203204
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And
Can you post the entire NDR please?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 15:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Host Unreachable
Good Morning,
I'm running Exchange
Can you telnet to port 25 on their server? Works fine from here. Your DNS
must be pooched.
FYI:
spectra.ca
Non-authoritative answer:
spectra.ca MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.spectra.ca
mail.spectra.ca internet address = 24.85.12.237
Serdar Soysal
-Original
Yes, sounds like it. It assumed a new site and did not ask me. If I try
and create a new SRS, it only lists my 5.5 servers. When I choose a 5.5
server and authenticate it says the server is not available.
How do I get my Config_CA back post 2000 installation? It does not matter
if I must
I can get there from here.
See if you can telnet to their mail server (mail.spectra.ca) FROM the
exchange server. If you cant, you probably have some DNS issues.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:48 AM
To: Exchange
When trying to access a mailbox via OWA (Exch 5.5 sp4) with a user's
account, I get the following error: OWA was unable to get to your inbox.
However, if I use the Username/PW of the Administrator, I can open the
mailbox fine. This problem seems isolated to only a couple of users and
I've
Have you checked to make sure this user has Logon Locally privileges to the
machine running OWA? Sounds like a security issue on these few users.
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I'm not at the site where I can ping from the Exchange server but I will
give that a shot this afternoon. I have been having some intermitant DNS
issues so that must be it. Thanks to all that replied. Scott.
I can get there from here.
See if you can telnet to their mail server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott:
I tried it from my PC and I couldn't telnet or ping that
machine.
It returns a COULD NOT FIND HOST error.
Robert J. Razler, Esq.
Approvals Manager
Heritage Building Group, Inc.
Suite A-100
3326 Old York Road
Furlong, PA 18925
Did you try from an exchange server?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Bob Razler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 16:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Host Unreachable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Yes, the account was working properly until last week. Nothing has changed
except her ability to access her account using OWA. If I create another
mailbox and set her as the Primary NT account, it works fine...
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Louis:
No. But I am on the same network and behind the same firewall.
I did not receive the same error when pinging or telneting to my
server at home.
Robert J. Razler, Esq.
Approvals Manager
Heritage Building Group, Inc.
Suite
Forget the ping, it may well be discarded by a firewall. Telnet to the
remote mailserver on port 25 by typing this into the command line...
telnet mail.spectra.ca 25
if that fails try
telnet 24.85.12.237 25
if that works, look at your DNS. If it fails, phone your ISP.
Dan.
Have you tried the steps in the following?
XADM: Exchange 2000 Won't Install Properly Joining a Mixed Site [Q313601]
Otherwise I think we need a little more information as to what you have
already done since you keep dropping snippets into the conversation that
negate what we have just spent
Never mind I found it. But does this work for Exchange 2000?
Saul
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Newsgroups
Posted At: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:56 PM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand
Subject: RE: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand
How do you
Thanks Dan, I meant to say telnet. It's been a long week and it's only
Tuesday!
Forget the ping, it may well be discarded by a firewall. Telnet to the
remote mailserver on port 25 by typing this into the command line...
telnet mail.spectra.ca 25
if that fails try
telnet
O ... Pandoria's Box
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand
Never mind I found it. But does this work for Exchange 2000?
Saul
I was having the same issue yesterday, and so far today. Was able to telnet
into the exchange server at the other end. The consultant that was helping
me, contacted the ISP on the other end and he said there was a problem in
how they were pointing to the email server.
These problems sure can be
Yes, I followed a few Q's, it wanted me to change the LDAP ports on my
existing 5.5 servers.
I changed them to 379. It let me create the SRS. Replication has started
and some tanked up mail has now been delivered from 5.5 to 2000. The E2K
servers are now showing up in the 5.5 Admin tools on
Oh NO! The 60's strike again! Get out the love beads and blowout kits!
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK. telnet mail.spectra.ca 25 works fine.
Robert J. Razler, Esq.
Approvals Manager
Heritage Building Group, Inc.
Suite A-100
3326 Old York Road
Furlong, PA 18925
215.794.0550, ext. 117
www.heritagebuildinggroup.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP
I betcha she can login to her original mailbox if she puts in her SMTP
address as opposed to her username (alias).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Vauge OWA
Nope, tried that :)
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Vauge OWA Error
I betcha she can login to her original mailbox if she puts in her SMTP
address as opposed to her
Can I run Forest and Domain Prep on AD and not install exchange2k until
later?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
You can run them anytime.
If you have a large enterprise with remote DC's, it's best to leave some
time.
William
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Prep
Can I run Forest and Domain
Tell me if I'm right or not. Basically the forest and domain prep extend
the AD schema to allow Exch2k to do its stuff. What about public folders?
Should I set the CA up for public folders now?
_
List posting FAQ:
Yep.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Prep
Can I run Forest and Domain Prep on AD and not install
exchange2k until later?
Absolutely.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Prep
Can I run Forest and Domain Prep on AD and not install
exchange2k until
later?
Yes
- Original Message -
From: Mike Woodruff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:40 PM
Subject: Prep
Can I run Forest and Domain Prep on AD and not install exchange2k until
later?
Forestprep extends the schema.
Domainprep is about permissions.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Tell me if I'm right or not. Basically the forest and domain prep extend
Um... go for it!
Seriously, you run forestprep first. It extends the schema for the entire
forest. Then you run domainprep for EACH domain that will host exchange
and/or exchange enabled objects.
William
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
We've just started getting this error recently with our Exchange 5.5 sp4
servers; it seems whenever a user tries to move multiple or single e-mails
to an .pst file (personal folder) onto a local hard drive, they get the
following error:
Can't move the items. Some items could not be moved. They
Hi. I'm new to the group so if this has already been asked please forgive
me. I used the windows update function on my Windows 2000 machine and
since then have not been able to administer our exchange server (5.5) with
it. I get the message:
A connection could not be made to the Microsoft
The phone numbers in our country have just got a new digit added to the
current 6, I would love to try and write a script to add the extra digit
depending on the first digit of the current number (eg. case first number
when = 3 then add 9 to the number case when 4 then add 8, etc)
Can someone
I have a W2K (SP2) dual home machine as a single server on a small LAN.
This machine is also an Xchg2k (SP2) + Web server with one static public
IP and one assigned, registered domain name (e.g. domain.com). Since I
have to provide I-net access to users, I'm using ISA server for web
sharing and
I have a W2K (SP2) dual home machine as a single server on a small LAN. This
machine is also an Xchg2k (SP2) + Web server with one static public IP and
one assigned, registered domain name (e.g. domain.com). Since I have to
provide I-net access to users, I'm using ISA server for web sharing and
While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I would not
discount the backup and restore method, where you do the whole move within
one day. I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method and it works fine, but
the downside is that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have
It isn't just Public Folders permissions assigned to a distribution list
but also nested distribution list. Right?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I've come a cropper before by entering the wrong Alias on the mailbox
properties
Check what this is for these mailboxes, and enter it as the mailbox name on
the OWA login page
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 16:25
To: Exchange
Try exporter.exe from www.systemtools.com. It is freeware an has the ability
to export all interesting informations from an windows domain.
mit freundlichen Grüssen
Frank Markgraf
LTG Mailänder GmbH
Tel. +49 711 8201 9156
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wernerstrasse 119-129
70435 Stuttgart
We had a similar problem last week - we could receive mail from anybody and
send mail to most domains, but there were a number of domains we couldn't.
Our problem turned out to be a black hole router at an upstream provider.
You might check this article for a good lead:
If you've already run the performance optimizer you might want to ask you AV
vendor about the error.
-Original Message-
From: Wojcinski, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: crazy error
We've just started
Which OS ?
- Original Message -
From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:44 AM
Subject: Script - Phone # Change
The phone numbers in our country have just got a new digit added to the
current 6, I would
In Outlook? www.slipstick.com. In Exchange, directory export, massage in
Excel and import.
-Original Message-
From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Script - Phone # Change
The phone numbers
Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is
Antivirus. Groupshield or Norton?
-Original Message-
From: Wojcinski, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 7:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: crazy error
We've just started getting this error recently with our Exchange 5.5 sp4
servers; it seems whenever
Where I see this most commonly is when you restart any AV software (NAV,
Groupshield, take your pick). the AV locks the Attachment table so as to
scan it and once it is completed then you can move your messages again. If
this is likely just wait for the AV software to do it's job.
If this is
I'm looking for a Server Log Consolidation program (preferrably free), that
will allow me to gather the Application, Security System log files from
all my Exchange 5.5 servers into a central repository and filter them for
warning and error messages.
I've searched MSKB and Google, but nothing
What does Technet say? It's a very specific error you're talking about.
You've got to be able to find some Q articles about that. You can even go
to www.eventid.net if you want.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: JoJoSoLiS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002
What does Technet say? It's a very specific error you're talking about.
You've got to be able to find some Q articles about that. You can even go
to www.eventid.net if you want.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:59
http://www.tntsoftware.com/products/ELM3/ELM30/
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server Log Consolidation
I'm looking for a Server Log Consolidation program
How about the product from the same people you recommended earlier?
http://www.systemtools.com/somarsoft/ Dumpevt works great. I have it run in
a scheduled batch file.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:20 PM
To:
Cuz I'm TNT.
Oy Oy Oy.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server Log Consolidation
http://www.tntsoftware.com/products/ELM3/ELM30/
-Original Message-
From: Blunt,
LOL Duh! Thanks Andy. :0)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server Log Consolidation
How about the product from the same people you recommended earlier?
So you can run it even after the exchange server has been installed?
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
You can run them anytime.
No, that would be fdisk.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
So you can run it even after the exchange server has been installed?
-Chris
-Original Message-
Yes. Anytime.
If those permissions get whacked, rerunning domainprep can repair them.
Heck, you can run it for fun. In fact I'm running it right now! You can
schedule it to run while away. You can run it from the GUI. You can run it
from the command line.
You can run it from your house.
Again? Sure.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
So you can run it even after the exchange server has been
installed? -Chris
-Original Message-
This is kind of a strange one to be asking, I think I know what the problem is but am
looking for advice on the best workaround.
I am running E2k SP2 with clients using Outlook 2000. Each of my users has a notebook
running W2k Server and is in their own workgroup (not part of my domain). We
Ha ha your funny..with your talent why are you in the comedy
industry and not the comic circuit?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
No, that
Hi Folks,
We are looking for any software or idea for to create one image of my
Exchange Server. We want to prevent if my exchange Server is unavailble or
failed it can be recover with all my data completed.
We want tohave the data update on line automatically on the image(like
replication)
Have they set their authentication method to 'none' in the Microsoft
Exchange Server service properties (on the advanced tab)? If not, have them
do that.
-Original Message-
From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange
Anybody else getting these? Second one I've gotten in as many days. Ugh!
Steve C.
- Original Message -
From: internet.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:03 PM
Subject: Your membership on exchange has been put on hold
This email message is to
Hi Folks,
We are looking for any software or idea for to create one image of my
Exchange Server. We want to prevent if my exchange Server is unavailble or
failed it can be recover with all my data completed.
We want tohave the data update on line automatically on the image(like
replication)
We have about 500 distribution lists in our site. All of them have the
Expansion Server set to Any server in a site. I noticed that when I do a
restore of the database to one of our test servers (disaster recovery
testing), I do not see any of the distribution lists. What would be the best
way to
Hijacked thread alert
http://www.marathontechnologies.com/
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Authentication issues
Importance: High
Hi Folks,
We are looking
No offense , but your security structure seems completely upside down. You
give them admin access to their own machines, yet do not let their machines
be part of the domain? What an administrative nightmare.
-Original Message-
From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
His connection is not finding the exchange server.
Can he ping it by FQDN?
William
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Working Offline From Exchange Server
Dear All,
I have half a
Something like Double Take
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=111
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange replication or Imge
Importance: High
Hi Folks,
We are
Like clustering?
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange replication or Imge
Importance: High
Hi Folks,
We are looking for any software or idea for to create one image of my
Well Sir, you obviously have the writing skills I need to take my show on
the road. My agent will be contacting you.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Ha ha your
Exchange agent?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Well Sir, you obviously have the writing skills I need to take my show on
the road. My agent will be contacting you.
The ones I get start I wish your membership was on hold . . .
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Your membership on exchange has been put on hold
Anybody else getting
Ha ha.why don't you just keep on topic asshole
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Well Sir, you obviously have the writing skills I need to
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
