Email policies are best left to your HR and legal department. Generally, you
should only be involved when it comes to putting the policy in place.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
- Original Message -
From: Mark Peoples [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Do I need to tick the box on the addresses tab of the SMTP connector
Allow messages to be relayed to these domains?
I have one org and have multiple smtp addresses and they can come in at
any of three of our worldwide smtp connectors (all e2k servers).
The recipient policies for all smtp
If you double-click the log entry in the event viewer, it tells you how
to fix the problem.
-Original Message-
From: MATTSON, Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:05 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Really annoying when you disable
or click your heels twice.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
If you double-click the log entry in the event viewer, it tells you how
No, we are not behind a firewall.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List
We want this feature to deter users from using the GAL as a mass
distribution point. We don't want to advertise everyone's email address
in the organization, but we want users to be able to query for the
address of someone they know.
Yes, you have no bananas.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: content type that is not supported
No, we are not behind a firewall.
I'm in the process of upgrading my NT4.0 SP5 / Ex.5.5 SP4 server to Windows
2000 as a member server.
It is also a BDC in my domain -- the only remaining nt4.0 server. Why? It
is the last stone to be turned over - in order
for my domain to go native under W2k. Also, in-order to make sure that
When I move a user to 2k from 5.5, how long should it take before the user
should be able to login? Do I have to wait for the recipient update service
to run or something?
_
List posting FAQ:
Never mind. I answered my own question. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox move
When I move a user to 2k from 5.5, how long should it take before the user
Q278966
- Original Message -
From: Varghese, Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:10 AM
Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Anyone have any info on this or am I SOL?
Thank in advance.
Wilson
Sounds like an excellent reason to deploy OWA as your organization's
email client.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:24 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: RE: Query but not view GAL
Subject: RE:
That's an excellent answer. Unfortunately, that wasn't the question.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:09 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Subject: Re:
What was the original NDR again?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: content type that is not supported
No, we are not behind a firewall.
Based on the info you gave I would say no. Are you having any NDR stating
relaying not allowed?
- Original Message -
From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:31 AM
Subject: Routing multiple domain names internally
Do I
Usually this is called by a firewall not allowing all smtp extensions. For
Cisco you have to remove the Fixup option for port 25. Sounds like something
is blocking. You mean your open to the outside world? Or are you behind an
ISA server?
If not then the NDR's are the least of your problems.
I could prolly get an old build that would run ;)
~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
|-+---
|
I don't see the rest of the thread, but is LDAP an option? You should be
able to restrict it to the number of items returned.
~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling
Whoa! Big word! Brain overload! I gotta go home and sleep this off.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5
Unequivocally, no
This is a reach. I think rules wizard is limited to 32 because that is the
size limit of RPC packets. Are you having RPC issues?? It's a WAG
- Original Message -
From: Bashir Malekzada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:49 AM
Read what you wrote carefully. You are talking about impacting all of YOUR
users to eliminate the effects of another company being infected with a
virus. What will happen when the next KLEZ-like virus comes out and starts
spoofing the new email ids?
The only thing you can do is to inform
We all went to the bar and forgot to invite you.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test to see if the list is live...
Haven't seen any activities today.
Andrew,
We've been pretty happy with ESE API as well.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI For Exc
hang e 5.5
ESE
I am working in a lab environment so I can get more familiar with Exch2k
and OWA and I have run into a stumper. I have gotten OWA to work
before, but that was when Exch2k was a DC as well. In this case I built
the DC and Exch2k as separate machines and I can't seem to get the
authentication to
Every person on this list has an eMail policy. The policy can range from we
don't enforce anything to Legal makes us be the eMail Gestapo and Thought
Police. Even if you don't have a stated, written policy you still have a de
facto policy in place then.
My personal druthers? 200 MB mailbox
Wer have all died and gone to MS Heaven!!! All praise Bill Gates...
Ophs!!! It sure is hot - perhaps it not Heaven after all...
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test to
Yeah, but all iMacs and Sun Workstations run Windows XP here. Oh look,
somebody's installing Windows ME on that mainframe. Let's go look.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange
Once again, the explanation (from the development team) is:
The limit is imposed by RPC. An RPC packet can only be 32k.
Rules are requested through MAPI as a single folder property.
There is no facility to stream such a property across RPC packets.
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original
Your right this means you can't see the DC. Make sure your default domain
settings are correct.
- Original Message -
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Exchange 2000\OWA question
I am working in a
Besides in Heaven we wouldn't keep getting these blue screens and having to
load rollup patches.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test to see if the list is live...
Wer
Thanks. Yes I know that clients (Outlook) talk MAPI but for some reason I
thought the 2 (RPC and Rules LIMIT) was tied together.
- Original Message -
From: Julian Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: Rules
I agree,
Make a list of technical limitations based on your environment (hardware) and send it
to legal/HR so they can convert it to something only they will understand :=)
Items you want to have some sort of limits on:
Mailbox Max Size
Internal Message max Size
External Message max Size
And no more answering questions like, What do you think most was your best
job experience?
- Original Message -
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: Test to see if the list is live...
I enabled clear text and set the default domain to the correct domain
(under directory security for the default website), but still no juice.
To test I went to http://server1/exchange/account and it comes up with
the Username and Password prompt. If I put in just the account and
password the
The problem is in your IIS server area. Can you logon using a different
client OK. Check host headers for HTTP virtual server so they match the
client browser is using.
- Original Message -
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01,
I know I already asked this question but there has to be someone out there
that has the same problem as me. We recently purchased to new pcs with
office xp sb. Outlook 2002 for some reason doesnt have the FROM field when
you create a new message. Ussusally you go to view and click from button
Open a new message, View From Field. If its not there then I would think
that maybe your aren't running on corporate /workgroup mode.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I am trying to enable the PassEncryptedZips registry value for Groupshield
4.5 sp1, which allows password encrypted zip files to be received. The
readme says only to create a string value. The Cert.mil site says to create
a DWORD value and set it to 1. I've tried both and after restarting the
its 2002 did away with internet mail only.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: From field
Open a new message, View From Field. If its not there then I would think
that maybe your
Try setting the dword to 0 and see if that does the trick.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groupshield, PassEncryptedZips clarification
I am trying to enable the
Not that I know of
Bashir Malekzada
AOptix Technologies , Inc.
(408) 583 1130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Rules Wizard
This is a
Is it installed in Tener mode?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: From field
its 2002 did away with internet mail only.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric
Nope i checked that already. Its in David mode.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: From field
Is it installed in Tener mode?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
Oh, In that case, Im betting that you have WordMail enabled and that if you
create a new email, then click on the little down arrow on the Options
button then you will see the From Field.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002
Any david is my God!!!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: From field
Oh, In that case, Im betting that you have WordMail enabled and that if you
create a new email, then click on
Disable them by changing their password
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Anyone have any info on this or am I SOL?
Thank in
July is the target date
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?
Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for the
service pack.
Anyone seen anything
RC1 should come out mid-May
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?
Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for the
service pack.
Anyone seen
I still bet that it's the destination server not supporting 8bitmime.
You can turn off this ESMTP verb on Exchange, Q257569. This Q article
shows how to do it for Exchange 2000 version of SMTP, not the base
Windows 2000. I did not read the Q you referenced, but I know the one I
listed above
What is the rule trying to do EXACTLY.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
I checked the user doesn't have any other rule set besides a different user
tried to
The user wants the server to reply with AOptix - Product Information Request in the
subject and some text in the body to all messages send to that user mailbox and with
AOptix - Product Information Request in the subject.
That is it.
Bashir Malekzada
AOptix Technologies , Inc.
(408) 583 1130
Use CleanSweep from the Resource Kit to clear the ruleset. Then try
again.
- Original Message -
From: Bashir Malekzada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
The user wants the server to reply with
There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was
being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of
certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier
certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before
graduation
Depends what you want to do now doesn't it. I'm an E-mail
Administrator. I have an Exchange server and an iPlanet Mail server. I
should know about Windows 2000, Active Directory, SMTP, Exchange,
iPlanet, Sun, etc. Having an understanding of TCP/IP is nice, but I
don't need to know how to
Multiple, varied, certifications seems to make more sense in terms of
flexible career options.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question
As a recruiter, I would agree. There's no substitute for experience.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
Could we rephrase this? How about:
Which went to a
Don't invite that speaker again.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question
There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to
The reply message must be too big.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
This happens when they try this rule and have the server to reply...
Bashir Malekzada
the problem is fiting all those letters after your name on your business
card and then having room for something really useful like your e-mail
address and phone number
;-)
bill
Alphabet soup anyone
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
If you want to do messaging\AD stuff.get the MS certs.
If you want to do Cisco stuffget the Cisco certs
If you want to do bothget both.
If you are going to go get a job working with AD\Exchange 2ka Cisco
cert won't get you as far as the MS certs (with regards to that stack of
Unpainted brick.
John Allhiser CCNP MCSE
Network Engineer
Generali Reassurance
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question
Shiminy. Get a CCIE if you want the
Does the IM client work on exch2k fo rthe macs?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get a refund!
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question
There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was
being discussed at
Let me rephrase that:
Lets see you've been out of college for 3 months and have your MCSENext
or
Let see you've been out of college for 3 months and have your CCIENext
See the difference..
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Tell me about it.. Look at all the letters I have...
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, May 01,
Shiminy. Get a CCIE if you want the most impressive one. But be
prepared to beat your head upside a few brick walls during the process.
Get an MCSE if you work with MS stuff. Get the simple CCNA if you're
into basic routing.
There really is no best cert out there. Horses for courses and all
Could we rephrase this? How about:
Which went to a braindump or bootcamp got his paper certification
with no real-world experience would you be quickest to lock out of your
server room for fear that he might touch something?
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Dunno. What does MS's web site say about this?
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: IM Client
Does the IM client work on exch2k fo rthe macs?
Can't find anything. Will keep looking though.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IM Client
Dunno. What does MS's web site say about this?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin,
Do YOU even remember what all those letters stand for anymore? ;0)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
Tell me about it.. Look at all the
So test it, silly.
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: RE: IM Client
Can't find anything. Will keep looking though.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky
Sure do.. I have a website that details my never ending Quest for newer,
and better certifications to make me smarter.
Some day I might even learn to type.. ... . .. .
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
Why U No Answer my X10?
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IM Client
So test it, silly.
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
I did on the only mac client I could find. I just wanted to see if there
was an add-in or something. Guess not. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IM Client
So test
Depends on what you want to be when you grow up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question
There is a big sqaubble
I have a user that has a messed up .PST file. I can open all the mail however mail
after than a certain date ( anything older than 2 years)cannot be moved or deleted. I
ran the inbox repair tool (scanpst.exe) and it didn't fix it. Any help
would be appreciated.
Thanks much.
Matt
How big is this PST?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messed up PST
I have a user that has a messed up .PST file. I can open all the mail
however mail after than a certain
Check to be sure that the mailbox is not overlimit, and if not then do what
Missy said!
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
The user wants the server to reply
You often have to run scanpst multiple times, alternating with scandisk on
the volume where the pst lives.
Don't spend too much time tho - there is a Very Good Reason why PST=BAD.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:57 PM
260MB
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messed up PST
How big is this PST?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002
Do what Lori says...and rememberPSTs=BAD
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messed up PST
260MB
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Restore from backup.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:56 PM
Subject: Messed up PST
I have a user that has a messed up .PST file. I can open all the mail
however mail after than a
A place to find some starting material is at sans.org and cert
Jim Liddil
-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RE: slight OT - SMTP Policy
I agree,
Make a list of
I believe you are correct, and it's just one more thing that's wrong with
this world.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification question
As an unemployed IT person, I'd say get
You mean restore from the user's backup that they maintain and test
frequently.
Right?
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Messed up PST
Restore from backup.
- Original
Mongo no backup pst.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messed up PST
You mean restore from the user's backup that they maintain and test
frequently. Right?
-Original
Mongo S.O.L.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messed up PST
Mongo no backup pst.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you
do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I
really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$,
Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were
That's because there are more moron IT recruiters out there than there are
qualified professionals.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification question
As an
So to you the lack of a MCSE means they werent interested in educating
themselves?
Sheesh.
Sounds like you need some education yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
IT recruiters are the downfall of our industry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification question
That's because there are more moron IT
The whole Mongo comment made my day!! I can't quit laughing!!
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May
Shiminy. I was with ya until you hired the MCSE instead of me.
- Original Message -
From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM
Subject: RE: Cerification question
That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the
Not venture capital firms?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification question
IT recruiters are the downfall of our industry.
-Original Message-
From:
This argument is like a Missouri wedding: all relative.
John Allhiser CCNP MCSE
Network Engineer
Generali Reassurance
(Kansas side)
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
So because you had a paper MCSE, and a very little experience, you chose
to say that they were lazy because they didn't have their MCSE? Don't
follow the logic.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Exchange
No cause it was the IT recruiters that hired the paper qualified
employees for the failed .coms
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification
I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my
first exchange book just yesterday by a friend. Have not had the time to
read them. Yet I have worked with installs as large 30,000 users in
exchange, As a hired consultant. Yesterday I added a few new T1's to a
few of the
Thank You!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my
first exchange book just yesterday by a
Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is
capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the
question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an
answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be
careful
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
