But according to them it is not their problem
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 13 May 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bounced mail
That's their internal (private) dns namespace.
-Original Message-
From: Roger
Ken/Christian,
If you have any more questions then my brief summary just email me
offline/direct and I will try to help.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL
Cheers Christian saves me from digging it out again.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Christian Schlosser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 01:56
To: Exchange
And they say that the world is small (I believe them to many coincidences
like this happen).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Dear User Group
We are getting Event ID 12002 in the Application event log of one our Exchange 2000
Servers. In the event log there is the message Error 8004010F-8000 occurred while
processing message from '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
The symptom of the problem is that any one that receives
Exch5.5 Sp4, Outlook 2000
Is there a way to allow OOF to the internet for just one user?
Dale L. Orr
Network Administrator
DoD Polygraph Institute
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Not really. Though, you could set up another server with a separate IMS
just for him/her.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orr, Dale
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Monday Brain-death Question
This came up under two scenarios:
I had someone who wanted to use our exchange server under a disaster
recover scenario (small company).
I had someone with their own domain and wanted to be able to have the
freedom of making up any mail address at their domain and have it go to
their mailbox.
Folks,
Though I've installed Exchange 5.5 (1998 Select copy) on to Windows
2000 server (SP2 plus windows update) several times I'm now getting a
failure 0xc002041c (the requested control is invalid for the service -
unable to stop the System Attendant).
Removing and
Nah, he ain't that special.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monday Brain-death Question
Not really. Though, you could set up another server with a separate IMS
just for
Peter,
Just wondering how is he going to get his Outlook to resolve against a
calendar PF with a third party utility?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter
This comes up all the time in the hosting business. A lot of customers who
are coming from other solutions (IPSwitch Imail, Rockliffe MailSite for
example) are very used to this feature and really miss it in Exchange. Also
they usually relatively do not want to pay for extra mailboxes if they can
They set something up and forgot about it.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bounced mail
But according to them it is not their problem
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier
Check the IP address of mailhub.securemail.net.au -- 192.168.1.1
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 10:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bounced mail
Hi All
Maybe one of you almighty Guru's can shed some light on this
GFI MailEssentials
Tumbleweed (former WorldTalk WorldSecure Server)
MimeSweeper
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 9:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Adding disclaimed footer to all mail messages
FAQ do search from
Dear List Members,
There were two links given below.
Most of you have commented on the helicopter game.
I prefer the gun shooting game.
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi guys,
apparently there is a way to download films off the net and burn them on
a CD to be played in a DVD player?
Any tips welcome.
K/
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Buy them in a store or head to the theater.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:58
How does this affect Exchange ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 May 2002 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: completely OT
Hi guys,
apparently there is a way to download films off the net and burn them
I would say morpheus or kazaa would work for you
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: completely OT
Hi guys,
apparently there is a way to download films off the net and burn them
Films on Video CD. You will have to search for some undesirable sites that
will be crammed with pop ups.
my friend gave me a copy of a recent film on the weekend. They dont work on
Playstation 2's DVD player though.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
It doesn't.thus the OT in the subject line
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Stone
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: completely OT
How does this affect Exchange ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
ooops... got me there...
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 May, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: completely OT
Her DVD player sits next the exchange server in the comms room.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT
Or the ever-popular imsext.dll.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Adding disclaimed footer to all mail messages
GFI MailEssentials
Tumbleweed (former WorldTalk WorldSecure
All,
I have messages that users are calling me about that say they have been
delayed. When I look in the Message Tracking System the last thing
logged is:
SMTP: Messages Submitted to Categorizer
Does anyone know why or how this happens?
How do I get them delivered?
Rick
I have a large movie collection in a PST file, which I access across the
network.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 May 2002 16:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: completely OT
How does this affect Exchange ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
At about 1.5 gigs per movie that must be one scary PST!!!
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson,
Daniel
Sent: Monday, May
Is it normal to see a bunch of domains under the default smtp virtual
server queues. we were using a smarthost but our interent comapny screwed
everythign up. now i am using DNS to send messages. I see IMS (Server)
domain msg sent to. they stay there for maybe 10 minutes then disappear.
just
that's how Exchange 2000 works
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Default SMTP server
Is it normal to see a bunch of domains under the default smtp virtual
server queues. we were
Yeppers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Default SMTP server
Is it normal to see a bunch of domains under the default smtp
virtual server queues. we were using a
Basically it means you're waiting on AD to give Exchange the location of the
mail server the mailbox resides on or what action to do with the mail. It's
waiting on a response from AD.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:25
If you're thinking about deploying content filtering software you must have
one of the following:
1. 1-2 hours a day of free time
2. Enough budget to hire a part-time employee
The content filtering product is only as good as how much time you spend
refining your rules. Very boring and shtty
My client has a contacts folder that is constantly growing, right now there are about
2500 contacts listed. He would like to create a distribution list to send a mass
email, but does not want to select each contact (individually) to be a member as there
are too many of them. I need to know
Export his contacts to a CSV file then import the data you need into a
spam auto sender program.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
I used to do this myself, but not with that man contacts.
Word of warning, you cannot put drop the contacts into a new container for a mailing
list. Also, I only had around 300 ppl in a list that corrupted constantly. I
continually had to rebuild (by hand) the mailing list. Eventually I
Hello,
We had this problem with E2K and SP1, after an inplace upgrade from 5.5 .
It only occurred to Email sent to Distribution Groups that had restrictions on who
could send to the DGs. Once the restrictions were removed from the effected lists the
stuck Email would flow out of the
As long as you set the Exchange alias the same as the user's NT logon,
Outlook 2002 will auto create the profile for you. Use the Custom Install
Wizard to define your install. Page 16 and 17 of the wizard allow you to set
what you want Outlook to do with the profile.
-Original Message-
Thanks for the idea, I will look in the archives, and our scenario is a
bit different, but the same error, we have a newly installed Windows2K
and Exchange 2K sp2 system and it has nothing to do with Groups or
Lists,
Thanks again,
rick
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange List
We are having a problem with our clustered internet mail service not
responding with a proper fully qualified domain name. Using telnet to
connect to port 25 to the virtual server we get the following:
220 EMTEST-1 ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
5.5.2653.13)
ready
We
Yes.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could
do
Merak looks good. Similar to Imail but with more features.
Do you know if it is a good performer?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
I
Are you sure about the nature of your problem?
In what way is the banner your server prevents when another server connects
to it related to your ability to send outbound mail to other servers?
--
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244
When the country falls into chaos,
The site that is rejecting our email reports that they are rejecting it due
to the lack of a fully qualified domain name. The reject message they get is
as follows:
504 email-1: Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname.
They have also added us to http://www.rfc-ignorant.org list.
Sounds like an OS issue. Do you have a DNS suffix configured in your TCP/IP
settings?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FQDN Problem on Clustered exchange 5.5
The site that
In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside mail server
(they're running Merak Mail). Their mail server answers, but when I try to send an
HELO, with each character I hit I get a 502 5.5.1 command unrecognized -- after
about 8 tries I get a disconnect and a too many
Speaking of Imail, I have seen some Imail servers running on crappy
hardware, on Win2KPro, hosting more than 10,000 mailboxes and still
delivering decent performance.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Exchange
yes
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FQDN Problem on Clustered exchange 5.5
Sounds like an OS issue. Do you have a DNS suffix configured in your TCP/IP
settings?
-Original
Give us info:
Source IP
Destination IP
So we can cross check it
From: David Florea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 02:43:50 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Telnet troubleshooting
In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside mail
SMTP and POP only makes a HUGE different on what performance you can get
out of a server.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
My domain is privateconsulting.com at 208.187.29.85. Target domain is geostarcorp.com
at 141.209.244.5. When I check both sites on www.checkdns.org, both mail servers
appear to be operating normally. The original issue I was checking was that
geostarcorp is claiming privateconsulting.com's
Dunno. Something in and around Q275931 perhaps?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FQDN Problem on Clustered exchange 5.5
yes
-Original Message-
From: Chris
When your server makes a connection, it sends the entire command and
carriage return (that is HELOCR) in a single packet. When you make a
connection via Telnet and start keying in the command, the other server
receives each keystroke in a different packet.
It seems like the receiving server
I can connect fine to both servers from my sendmail gateway. I've seen something like
what you describe when going through a badly configured firewall.
Jerzy
From: David Florea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 04:40:59 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
That makes sense, thanks. I've got a call in to their admin.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Telnet troubleshooting
When your server makes a connection, it sends the entire
Our Imail servers do POP3, IMAP, HTTP, and SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
SMTP and POP only makes a HUGE different on what performance
Is there a way to disable maling list feature in Merak?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
I really like Merak mail.
We have an exchange 200 server (sp2) on win2k (sp2) on Win2k domain A and
an exchange 5.5 (sp4) on windows nt4 (sp6) on NT domain B. Both servers
are in the same site/org.
When an exchange 5.5 recipient sends email to an exchange 2000 recipient
he gets an ndr stating recipient name is not
What kind of connector do you have for the two servers to talk to
each other? You could setup an internet mail connector between
both servers for communication. Other than that I would check the
addressing between the two. Sounds like what is being delivered is
not what the receiving server is
Sounds like a DNS or DDNS error. Can't happen with DHCP, so . . .
maybe the static address is associated with something else?
maybe the name you like is misspelled?
else
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:42 PM
Jim,
Remember categorizer = AD lookup :)
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Categorizer
Basically it means you're waiting on AD to give Exchange
Very good in small deployments (250 or so users.). I can't speak of its
scalability.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based
I've had this problem and it was because the mail couldn't go to the next
server inline, in my case it was through our outbound gateway. If the mail
can't reach its next destination it will stay in the categorizer. Check to
see where you mail goes next and you might find your culprit.
Is there a way to direct all mail addressed to a recipient that does not
exist in my domain to a common mailbox.
I dont mind if the sender gets a NDR but I want the whole message sent to
an administrative mailbox, in case it is important and needs to be
directed to a valid mailbox.
Hope someone
Is it possible for Exchange 2K to route any mail addressed to unknown
recipients to a specific mail box. What I am trying to do is have all
mail addressed to my domain, but not to a valid recipient in my domain,
sent to a mailbox from where it can be processed and checked for
importance - sent to
Is it possible for Exchange 2K to route any mail addressed to unknown
recipients to a specific mail box. What I am trying to do is have all mail
addressed to my domain, but not to a valid recipient in my domain, sent to
a mailbox from where it can be processed and checked for importance - sent
to
Is it possible for Exchange 2K to route any mail addressed to unknown
recipients to a specific mail box. What I am trying to do is have all mail
addressed to my domain, but not to a valid recipient in my domain, sent to
a mailbox from where it can be processed and checked for importance - sent
to
Is it possible for Exchange 2K to route any mail addressed to unknown
recipients to a specific mail box. What I am trying to do is have all mail
addressed to my domain, but not to a valid recipient in my domain, sent to
a mailbox from where it can be processed and checked for importance - sent
to
Wha? But... Whyever for? Do they alternate between MAPI and POP
access?
One of the first things we have taught in the past in Outlook classes in
the companies I've worked at: how to make Outlook subfolders.
I am curious.
W
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
How much money do you have?
There is no feature within Exchange that allows for such a synch.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: URGENT
Sounds like an RPC failure between NT and Win2k with Q311401. This
generally happens when you have mismatched encryption levels and NT 4
and Win2k are unable to negotiate 56 bit encryption. See if the issue
is resolved by uninstalling Q311401 or contact Microsoft and request
hotfix Q322051.
70 matches
Mail list logo
