We have some big users. They get charged for 2 seats.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Service Providing
ASP licensing is under $5
Doesn't SBS 2000 (I know SBS 4.5 did) have a 'special' ERTN that is put in
the Internet connector?
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Errington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 August 2002 16:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, ISA and ISDN
Not with Exchange 2000,
Not that I am aware. I read the Q251700 posted earlier and it states that
you have to use RRAS, but I am currently using ISA - can the 2 co-exist
safely on the same SBS2000 box?
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 09:20
To: Exchange
I recently used exmerge to move a 5.5 information store from a small business
server to a new machine with the full version of exchange. Now we have a
very strange problem where you can only delete single items at a time.
If you select multiple mails and try to delete them from the deleted
If I dont stop eating these donuts, it wont be long before I am charged for
two seats.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Service Providing
We have some big
Or you'll be so big you'll get your own personal zip code. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 28 August 2002 12:24
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange Service Providing
Subject: RE: Exchange Service Providing
If I dont
Add a rule in Outlook that CCs every response to the Chief Exec.
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to copy owner of a mailbox automatically
Hi Guys
My deputy chief exec. has
Service packed? Performance Optimizer Run? Any AV Software on the server?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: strange deletion problem
I recently used exmerge to move a 5.5
With my own mailman!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Service Providing
Or you'll be so big you'll get your own personal zip code. ;-)
-Original Message-
Thanks Paul for the reply. I already tried deleting the form cache, but
it did not help, neither did creating a new Outlook profile. Only
creating a new Windows profile solves the problem. Any idea?
Best Regards
Nizar El-Assaad
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
Indeed, we are serving WINS for out clients
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win9x and Outlook/E2k
You are serving WINS, correct?
Those 9x clients need it.
-Original
Are you serving lunch?
Whats your account lockout policy? What is the Logon Network Security set
to in Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win9x and Outlook/E2k
Once or twice a day my SMTP connector (exch2k sp3) that sends and
receives internet mail to a smart host (Mail sweeper for SMTP) logs this
event (below) and can't connect to the smart host for about a minute or
so. I know it is not a network issue. We are not running any server
level AV on the
On Wed August 28 2002 13:29, Andy David wrote:
Service packed? Performance Optimizer Run? Any AV Software on the server?
sp4,plus latest patches, yep, Norton Corporate Edition (edb log and chk
files are excluded,) Norton Corporate edition for Exchange in mapi mode
Serving breakfast, come back at noon and I'll have lunch.
Account lockout policy was bumped way up for unsuccessful as a temporary
solution to try allievate the problem. Logon Nework Security is set to
NT Password.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
My first thought in these matters is to always disable , and if necessary,
remove the AV and see if that alleviates the problem.
I dont use Norton myself, so I am not familiar with its particular distinct
issues, but there are many on the list who are.
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Looks like you are looking in the right place. I like both KVS's and
Legato's solutions. Here are a couple other companies that you may want to
take a look at:
CC Data Software announced Version 2.5 of e-MARC, its electronic records
management solution. e-MARC 2.5 includes a server-based
To clarify, this is an Exchange 2000 implementation?
If so, perhaps this will help you out. If not, let me know and I'll take a
closer look. Essentially, you need to look under Recipient Policies and on
the Mailbox Management tab of the server object. See below:
The Exchange Server Mailbox
Hi
In exchange hell!
Exchange 2000 server died, have tried multiple times to recover with no
luck.
Server failed disaster recovery now onto alternate recovery method.
Help!
Don
_
List posting FAQ:
I had a similar problem on small business server 4.5 (which runs exch 5.5)
after a disaster recovery. I fixed it by backing up the mailbox to pst,
deleting the mailbox, then re adding it and importing the pst file.
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm running exchange 5.5. I need to setup an X400 connector. I'm not sure
all of all of the settings that need to be applied. Do I need to know the
exact site that I'm connecting to? Is there a wildcard character I can
use Please advise
Yes!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: can not send to some domains ...
What about DNS? Can you resolve the address OK
- Original Message -
Hello all,
Does anyone know how to make a form in outlook 2000 to
automatically have in the from line an address another email address than
the users email address. I have a user here that wants to always send out
as a DL address in his own mailbox, so im trying to create a form
This isn't much information to be able to much of anything for you.
What SP are you on?
What have you done so far?
What are your trying now?
How many SG's are we talking about?
Did you try the \disasterrecovery switch?
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Don
Reply To:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the info. I appreciate it.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MS Exchange Archiving Software
Looks like you are looking in the right place. I like
ASP licensing is really that low?, that'd be cool. Still trying to get
information on our MSDN license. Apparently we don't have a sales rep, but
I'll go find us one.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
newbie question...
we have a user that wants to install outlook 2000 on their home machine
access our exchange server using his road runner connection instead of the
dial-up into the network. It fails, can't find the server. He can telnet
to port 25, however. So, it appears you have to be
Bring up your Frequently Used Fields chooser. From the Outlook form design
window choose Form | Field Chooser. Then in the Field Chooser, select
Frequently Used Fields from the drop-down menu.
Add the From field to your form. Then, right-click the From field and
choose Properties. Go to the
I have a query.
I've created a mailbox for our warehouse department to use for recording stock
deliveries, which
is available for all corporate users to access, which is also backed up by an email
address, that they
can use to request stock receipts etc. The problem is that most users see an
Its not a problem at all. That is by design. Would you really want just
anyone to be able to connect to your servers from the internet.
If this is what you want to do, invest in a VPN.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:06
First, back-up. Why are you setting up an X.400 connector? Is this a
connector to an X.400 system or to another Exchange site? If it is an
Exchange site, why must you use an X.400 connector versus SMTP or a native
site connector?
I'm running exchange 5.5. I need to setup an X400 connector. I'm
Remember that port 25 is for sending and receiving mail between servers.
The question is whether or not they can connect to either pop3 or IMAP
for client to server communications. This depends on whether or not
you've enabled these protocols on the server, and also, obviously, if
they are
All,
Quick quesiton. Does Instant Messaging for Exchange 2000 require that you
install Advanced Server? Please let me know.
Thank you,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have a firewall?
You would need to open up various ports on it to allow direct access to
Exchange from another network. The ports required for the various
MAPI/NetBIOS/etc. operations (from Outlook) are different from those
required for SMTP (which is server-to-server and has nothing
Ahh, you could log into the mailbox and set up delegate permissions
(Tools/Options/Delegates).
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Properties
I
Is this a hosted customer or your business server? The general[1] answer to
the 'best solution' is to implement VPN. For hosting providers, adding your
domain to the domain suffix search order might resolve the issue if the DNS
name of the server = the netbios name. Otherwise, an LMHOSTS file
How much is she willing to spend on a solution?
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to copy owner of a mailbox automatically
Hi Guys
My deputy chief exec. has access to
Anyone else ever get this? Whenever a user clicks the logout button in OWA,
I get the following event in my syslog:
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: W3SVC
Event Category: None
Event ID: 36
Date: 8/28/2002
Time: 10:06:12 AM
User: N/A
Computer:
$20 says running the performance optimizer again, for the first time,
resolves it.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange deletion problem
On Wed August 28 2002
Try using the ip instead of the Hostname in outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:06 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: server access
Subject: server access
newbie question...
we have a
Call PSS or let us know where you are so we can suggest a local Exchange
consultant and have him/her contact you with their hourly rates.
-Original Message-
From: Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange 2000
STFW
-Original Message-
From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help
I'm running exchange 5.5. I need to setup an X400 connector.
I'm not sure all of all of the settings that need to be
applied. Do I
Is this an Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 server. The issue is probably one
of the port mapping that occurs between an Outlook client and an Exchange
server being blocked by your firewall.
Here is the info for Exchange 5.5 on how to resolve this:
Ed, in other words... just switch it to one of the ex2000 servers in the
site and let it rock roll. Not a problem?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Last Ex.5.5
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Properties
I have a query.
I've created a mailbox for our warehouse department to use
for recording stock
And just because you do this, not anyone and their brother can connect to
your Exchange server regardless of whether or not you have a VPN because
they are still going to need to logon and validate their account on the
network.
Mongo good password guesser.
-Original Message-
From: Greg
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 15:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: server access
And just because you do this, not anyone and their brother can connect
to your Exchange
server regardless of whether or not you have a VPN
Oops. logoff.asp (https://owaserver/exchweb/bin/usa/logoff.asp)
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36
Anyone else ever get this? Whenever a user
STFW? or did you mean STFM
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
STFW
-Original Message-
From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:45
Thanks Chris. That is indeed the case. Everything else I read seemed to
imply that the defaults were just that, and that the user settings
overrided the defaults.
Thanks,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:21 PM
I absolutely meant the former. Took me 0.63 seconds to get the results.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
STFW? or did you mean
Sorry, it is E2K. this is just for our company employees, although,
hosted customers will have to be handled in the future. Did try the IP
instead of the hostname.
Thanks for the quick response. :-)
Our firewall is locked down, so the opening the ports or the VPN sounds like
it should solve my
Anyone ever get an event id 9127 when attempting to rebuild the OAL in
Exchange 2000 system manager. I've looked at kb Q312250 and 318237.
I'm running in a mixed mode with an E2k Server joined to a 5.5
organization. Any thoughts?
Jason Cook
Network Administrator
J.H. Ellwood Associates
[EMAIL
On Wed August 28 2002 16:21, Chris Scharff wrote:
$20 says running the performance optimizer again, for the first time,
resolves it.
Show Me The Money!
..
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
On Wed August 28 2002 14:33, Hayward, Simon wrote:
I had a similar problem on small business server 4.5 (which runs exch 5.5)
after a disaster recovery. I fixed it by backing up the mailbox to pst,
deleting the mailbox, then re adding it and importing the pst file.
D'oh.I had a feeling
Well I remember the first x400 connector I setup. Like learning to tie a
fancy nautical rope knot for the first time.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
I absolutely
Thanks I will take a look at them. As for the second issue, I had not
seen
Q296841. We are using Veritas for backup but I believe it is Datacenter.
Steve Iadarola
_
List posting FAQ:
it worked thanks alot man now i have to figure out how to make a shortcut on
his tool bar
RICH
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: outlook forms/sendas
Bring up your Frequently
Q231174
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook forms/sendas
it worked thanks alot man now i have to figure out how to make a shortcut on
his tool bar
RICH
No... You'll need IIS, of course, which is required for Exchange 2k
anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:12 AM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange and Instant Messaging
Subject: Exchange and
Thank you very much Ryan. I was reading the help notes on E2k about IM.
And it said before you install IM. That you you need Adavanced Server and
IIS 5.0. I just never heard of needing that. That's why I wanted to make
sure.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Hi,
I've been having problems sending email to users in a domain called
houstonfearless.com
The IMC queue states Network error during host resolution.
I did some troubleshooting and it seems like the domain does not have an MX
record.
I'm running Exchange 5.5. SP4 that is using DNS to send email
what does NSLOOKUP tell you. I do not have access to check for you.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No MX Record ?
Hi,
I've been having problems sending email to users in a domain
One does not absolutely need a MX record to receive mail.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No MX Record ?
Hi,
I've been having problems sending email to users in a domain called
This is the result of the NSLOOKUP
set type=any
houstonfearless.com
Server: aiim-dom1.aiim.org
Address: 10.0.0.8
Non-authoritative answer:
houstonfearless.com
primary name server = houstonfearless.com
responsible mail addr = admin
serial = 26
refresh = 900
How does Exchange 5.5 handle mail in the absence of an MX record ?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
One does not absolutely need a MX record to receive mail.
ok, I have been on the list for a little while, and I have seen all
kinds of OWA questions. I now have the weirdest thing going on.
Setup:
W2K SP2 Forest all domains except root (placeholder) native
E2K SP2 Native mode
All users have http enabled
FEBE topology
some users can get to OWA
RFC2821
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
How does Exchange 5.5 handle mail in the absence of an MX record ?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k
can you make custom NDR's? or change the text of current ones?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
It'll be there @ MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange deletion problem
On Wed August 28 2002 16:21, Chris Scharff wrote:
$20 says running the performance
When I expand the public folders tree in Exchange 2000 systems manager,
I see no folders. Any reason?
Jason Cook
Network Administrator
J.H. Ellwood Associates
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
312 782-7493 x. 152
DISCLAIMER!
The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and is
intended
What I have heard in the past from this group is no. Search archives.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?
OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in
Uses Cname record in this case I believe.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
How does Exchange 5.5 handle mail in the absence of an MX record ?
-Original
They all use the same browser and revision?
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA .. .. .. .. .. .. ARGH!
ok, I have been on the list for a little while, and I have seen all
No you cannot.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?
OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k can
you make custom NDR's? or change the
I did look up the RFC...and am soliciting a response from this list since it
wasn't much help in resolving my problem.
Here is an excerpt from the RFC that doesn't apply to my Exchange server :
The lookup first attempts to locate an MX record associated with the name.
If a CNAME record is found
Hmm. I have a very similar situation except that my organization
doesn't run any firewalls, VPNs, ISA, or any other type of security
except for what is on each individual server and I still have this same
issue.
What makes my work workstation act differently towards my Exchange 2000
server
thanks Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook forms/sendas
Q231174
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August
5.5 requires an mx record to send mail. This is not RFC behavior IMO. E2k
does not require it and uses the a record if an mx record is not
present.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Perhaps their server is trying to do a reverse lookup on you and its
failing.
Can you manually telnet to their mail server from yours?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX
If you know how to write code, you can.
Just my $.02 US
Back to test the latest version of my DNS RBL blocking script for the
Windows 2000 SMTP Service ;-)
Cheers:Siegfried runat=server /
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August
You should either reconsider your decision to have port 137 opened or
install the latest Microsoft Security patch:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
ity/bulletin/MS02-045.asp
Quote from NT Bugtraq:
quote
It was bad enough in theory, but now a script-tot
Thanks Jennifer. I too was wondering what the RFC would have to do with
this.
So basically I have to inform the organization to put in an MX record in
their DNS or no Exchange 5.5. server will be able to send them email ?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL
The RFC has everything to do with it.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Thanks Jennifer. I too was wondering what the RFC would have to do with
this.
So basically
Yes I can telnet to their mail server. I used their A record and could
telnet to it.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Perhaps their server is trying to do a
Interesting. I have never heard that before. 5.5 requires an mx record?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
5.5 requires an mx record to send mail. This
Ah, yes, Ex2KSP3 on W2KSP3. Did all that, set the policies under
Recipient Policies, set the options on the Mailbox Management tab of the
server, then started Mailbox Manager. Being unfamiliar with what was
supposed to happen when I started Mailbox Manager, I 'accidentally'
started it multiple
Look at your IIS settings and add the domain name to it, so they are not
prompted to enter a domain, unless you have multiple domains.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exch55sp4. What's the simpliest way to setup a user to be able to send
email that they don't want to receive replies (ie like a one way thing).
Thanks ... Jim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Make a rule that automatically deletes all mail that's delivered to the
Inbox?
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non-reply email
Exch55sp4. What's the simpliest way to setup a
Yeah, that will work. But for mass mailings, I was wondering if there was a
more server sided solution that didn't issue an NDR or require deleting the
replies.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange
Use Delivery Restrictions tab on the mailbox Properties page.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Brady, James
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non-reply email
Exch55sp4. What's the
Look at your IIS settings and add the domain name to it, so they are not
prompted to enter a domain, unless you have multiple domains.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Send from an account with the reply address is the SMTP address of a
distribution list/group with no members.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brady, James
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
This will work ... Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Non-reply email
Send from an account with the reply address is the SMTP address of a
distribution list/group
Multiple domains. All connect to one server for OWA and it does FE for
all the servers across various domains across the country.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
Yes, which is the only reason we upgraded our relay servers recently.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Interesting. I have never heard that before. 5.5 requires
Wonderful. I have never seen that stipulation. Whoda thunk?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Yes, which is the only reason we upgraded our relay servers
I believe a 553 NDR means you goofed-up some part of the address
formatting (i.e., added a space, used something other than the @ sign, et
cetera).
-Original Message-
From: Welton, Gene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
how'd you discover this?
find it in the lab?
a cursory check of the usual resources against the likely keywords reveals
no mention of this item.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
