Did you configure a mapi profile in Outlook prior to running exmerge?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Oh great I alrady installed it
luck to you) for examples of my previous successes.
/humor-challenged
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
Dls can't be owners
of my (in)famous attempts at humor. Please see the archives
(and good luck to you) for examples of my previous successes.
/humor-challenged
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04
Not for my talented developers.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field..
Is it that complicated?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
You don't. However I'm sure there are a number of 3rd party gateway products
which can be configured to do this. www.mail-resources.com has a list of
potential candidates. That'll block a fair amount of potentially legitimate
mail as well.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Coleman
No such information is currently publicly available.
-Original Message-
From: Herb, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: end of life / support from Microsoft
hi,
can someone please point me to
The recipient doesn't want mail from your domain and or IP address for some
reason. Possibly you are an open relay or your IP block is suspect or one of
your users has really pissed of their mail admin.
-Original Message-
From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You have name resolution issues (all of your users have a problem if they
have to hit retry).
-Original Message-
From: Guy Swartwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
Eh? What are you replying to?
-Original Message-
From: mike dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Did the sink get regsitered correctly? is it enabled? an
Eh? What are you replying to?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
check it with the event sink administration module from
Eh? What are you replying to?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
check it with the event sink administration module from
The SMTP service needs to be restarted. Does it work? Yes, to the extent
that the code is developed. It won't add disclaimers to MSTNEF messages
though unless the samples have been changed (haven't checked).
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
There are a number of high availability solutions listed at
www.mail-resources.com in the weblinks section including pimp hatEMS/pimp
hat. What are the actual requirements and how does DoubleTake not meet
those?
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
evaluation in order to not be blinded by the
sunshine and light the vendors espouse.
And like Missy, I like the Marathon Technologies solutions if for no reason
other than they've been at this game a lot longer than the other players and
have earned a good reputation during that time.
--
Chris Scharff
There is if you use Ximian Evolution.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMAP Contacts
Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server
for a user through
A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a
battery[1], it's OK to have it on.
[1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should
have the cache disabled.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Try www.slipstick.com.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Any products for syncronizing SQL server database
with Exchange p ublic folders?
Hi We have a SQL
You're mixing protocols with name resolution. Apples and oranges kina. With
the proper DNS configuration, your users should be able to connect just
fine.
-Original Message-
From: Irwan Hadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange
will be disabled.
Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance
drops using large raid 5 sets with a san.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange
Set default to contributor (much like the method of subscribing a PF to this
list described in the FAQ).
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Chaos
Create a DNS entry for mail.company.com and have the users add company.com
to their DNS suffix search order if it isn't there already. If this box is
exposed to the internet then requiring VPN would be the wisest and safest
strategy though.
-Original Message-
From: David Wright
Manually added it how?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
All,
I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from
,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
, not MessageOne, makes Outlook Plus Pak.
MessageOne, not Messageware, keeps Chris Scharff off the
streets of Austin.
-Original Message-
From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:45 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permission
After liberal application of ThE sTiCk[tm] to whoever was responsible for
the server, I'd probably follow the steps in Q185457.
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr.
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/11/2002 6:35 PM
Subject: 55. IS = 16GB
How would one go about recovering from a IS that
Again, I blame the American public school system for what will likely be a
lifelong handicap for the poor man.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates
There .stm file being larger than the .edb file is not necessarily
indicative of a problem.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: JPC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:27 PM
To: Exchange
Tom... Notice the sent date.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Andy Webb answered this question very
the database. Performing an offline
defragmentation under any other circumstances may actually hurt database
performance.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday
Yes.[1]
[1] For additonal information, reference the FAQ.[2]
[2] Outlook? www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/4/2002 7:58 PM
Subject: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Microsoft says it isn't possible
.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
Your proposed answer would have been technically and
factually inaccurate.
I'm curious as to why
of other
Exchange forums you might try. You'll find a heavy overlap of the top
contributors in those forums as well, but who knows... You might get lucky
and someone will tell you there is no link or do a ton of work to satisfy
your seemingly idle curiosity.
Chris Scharff
MVP Exchange
Is it filled in at My Computer | Properties | Network Identification |
Properties | More?
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Installing an IMC on a 5.5 Server
I am trying to
appreciate you trying to get involved in the
conversation but please read the actually posts before joining in.
Thanks,
Joe Rojas
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC
If you have a problem with asking questions as a
form of learning that is ok, but it doesn't mean everyone
thinks that way.
Actually, I'm a big fan of the Socratic method. I tend to use it quite
often. In fact, I think my koans[1] do a nice job of incorporating it into
the lessons. I've
My conclusion is that you should work on your skills related to asking a
technical question. No, one doesn't need to know the answer to a question to
be able to formulate a question about it. Sometimes that even hinders the
process. I'm still learning about Exchange daily, and still ask the odd
I don't think so, but you could test it and see. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders
He's also trying to tell me that the BCC
Are you planning to resinstall Exchange on this server?[1]
[1] Idle curiousity, I'm not actually planning on contributing much since
the initial question defies any useful answer.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002
Perfmon will be your friend initially. There's no reason this should be slow
offhand, so pinpointing the bottleneck may take a bit of poking about.
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).
-Original Message-
From:
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Right, if it blocked messages with XXX in the message body, it might be
important to know that if you work for the Texas Chili Parlor. But without
access to those default rules o the ability to edit them, for some
organizations that means not using them (which means more time manually
building
What's driving the domotion of the server to a member server?
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/9/2002 4:50 PM
Subject: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange
I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on
NT 4
I have no idea what you heard.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/8/2002 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
I thought I heard there was a really limited featured Exchange 2000
install if you didn't have AD. Am I wrong?
Skipping the fact this question has already long since been resolved; that
it isn't E2K is obvious from the post and for any version of Exchange prior
to that the answer is the same.
Don't worry David, I blame the American public school system for failing to
teach you to read critically.
Your proposed answer would have been technically and factually inaccurate.
I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since I've worked with
thousands of Exchange organizations without a sheet detailing this
information). Perhaps if you had a goal you were trying to achieve with
5 years ago, I would have been shocked and amazed that anyone could be
offended by using the word niggardly in the appropriate context. Go figure.
Since the points here have the same value as those in 'Whose line is it
anyway' everyone is of course welcome to draw their own conclusions.
combo of Exchange 5.5
running on 2000 or NT4.0 you can think of. Plus we are
installing new servers and migrating to E2K. One thing is I
will cringe if anybody asks me if I ever did any disaster
recovery work.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear
out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has
someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the
5MB number an off the cuff statistic?
-Original Message-
Too little information to provide a consise answer. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Communication
Okay, I am getting knee deep into a conversion from Exchange
Right, wouldn't want to follow any of those best practices in the FAQ. The
answer to this particular question is detailed extensively in the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail
servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies
have
be no limit. As I said at the beginning -- it
is all related to the type of business, IMHO.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
At my last gig
VPN.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc.
while offline (in meetings, on
Some hotfixes can have this effect as well, which underscores the need for
well documented change control.
-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Backups and Service Packs
+5 multiple haiku on a Friday.
-1 for thread which could be construed as anti-Semitic.
+15 for Haiku which doesn't call my sexuality into question.
-Original Message-
From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:58 PM
To: Exchange
: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 16:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Uninstall the one of them which is Exchange aware and make
sure the other is not scannign the Exchange directories... Any change?
-Original Message
Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Nope. Your women.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Ouch, I've jest been classified as a desperate newbie
If the same user tried to log into the backend server directly using OWA,
are they successful?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/4/2002 8:10 AM
Subject: OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup
anyone here experienced this kind of problem. i'd
Uninstall the one of them which is Exchange aware and make sure the other is
not scannign the Exchange directories... Any change?
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
You can throw a rock from where the pony express starts and hit Kansas. Tie
the telegram to it.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
As soon as the
Exchange offline defrags are rarely if ever necessary. Is there a compelling
reason to have diskkeeper within 100 miles of the server?
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
no. But
the reality is that this server is also used as file server.
Jim Liddil
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience
Sounds like the connection limit has been reached on the IMS.. You might try
increasing the maximum number of connections allowed and msking sure that
your java application is appropriately closing connections when it is
through.
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL
Both can be resolved post haste if anyone wants to pony up 10k a year for me
to host the list.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Account suspended, again
And
Apple System 7.2 and OS/2 with Dingleberry Backup 4.9 Beta 3.
-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/3/2002 7:07 PM
Subject: RE: backup failure
What software are you using?
-Original Message-
From: paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
software. The problem is simple
you
are a F Ahole and you should kill yourself immediately! Or tell me where
you
are and I will gladly do it for you.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Ask your backup vendor. If the full online backup completes without
reporting corruption, but the brick level fails with a corruption error, it
would seem that one of them is wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/2/2002 3:54 AM
Subject: FW: Corrupt
Dig out rpcping and see if that helps isolate the issue.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5
after W2K patch
Arrhhh... as I
You can control what versions of the client can log onto the server, setting
that to a value which excludes all clients would probably achive what you
are looking for... Don't have the Q handy though.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Has it ever worked? Base don the information provided support.microsoft.com
is about as far as one can narrow it down in terms of suggestions.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MS
Well, you can use my off the cuff standard of 4k each for the first 10 users
and 2k for every user thereafter of _available_ bandwidth. It's worked OK
for me so far.
-Original Message-
From: ed Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:28 PM
To: Exchange
I see nothing wrong with it as long as the proper files and directories are
excluded, especially in the case of E2K where IIS is a requirement on every
box. Assuming a properly provisioned box, I don't really see a downside to
the practice.
As to the point of it being nonsense not to... well, I
No, we're all lying to spite you.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5
after W2K patch
So you are all honestly telling me that
Add the address used as the from address in the spam messages to an empty
DL.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anything I can do?
Anything I can do?
CRAFTY SPAMMING -
You've got bad contacts at Microsoft then because that's certainly not the
case.
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: server access
To quote Microsoft, This is by
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this.
Doctor: Then don't do that.
Physician's billing department: That'll be $179.
-Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Loops in Exchange 5.5
* Install the Exchange 2000 version of the Active
Directory Connector
Make sure it's the SP3 version.
* Reconfigure the Internet Mail Connector to use the new server;
I'd remove the IMS since there's not really a way to configure it to use the
other server per se.
*
It really depends, there's insufficient data here to give a good answer to
that question.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000
I will be creating a brand
If you don't know what the KM service is, odds are high you aren't using it.
I'd follow the Ed Crowley Move Server method described in the FAQ, based on
the information provided, I don't see a reason not to.
-Original Message-
From: Lewis, Erik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Outlook? www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to save replies in delegate's inbox
A better explanation of my problem, Exchange 5.5
server and outlook 2000
I don't believe the everyone group needs send as and receive as rights on
the information store object, someone has been changing things... Perhaps
the reason someone set those permissions is listed in your change log. On my
mailbox store, the everyone group has inherited Create named
Is this a hosted customer or your business server? The general[1] answer to
the 'best solution' is to implement VPN. For hosting providers, adding your
domain to the domain suffix search order might resolve the issue if the DNS
name of the server = the netbios name. Otherwise, an LMHOSTS file
How much is she willing to spend on a solution?
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to copy owner of a mailbox automatically
Hi Guys
My deputy chief exec. has access to
$20 says running the performance optimizer again, for the first time,
resolves it.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange deletion problem
On Wed August 28 2002
Call PSS or let us know where you are so we can suggest a local Exchange
consultant and have him/her contact you with their hourly rates.
-Original Message-
From: Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange 2000
STFW
-Original Message-
From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help
I'm running exchange 5.5. I need to setup an X400 connector.
I'm not sure all of all of the settings that need to be
applied. Do I
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Properties
I have a query.
I've created a mailbox for our warehouse department to use
for recording stock
STFM
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
STFW
-Original Message-
From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:45 PM
It'll be there @ MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange deletion problem
On Wed August 28 2002 16:21, Chris Scharff wrote:
$20 says running the performance
It's not just that the site is missing an Mx record, they also lack a valid
PTR for their A record. The number of domains which so poorly manage their
DNS is thankfully small, relatively speaking.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August
Can I stop someone from using my administrator SMTP address?
Yes, just surrender any and all domain names you own.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Q251700
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Errington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000, ISA and ISDN
Hi,
Are there any how-to's out there that tell you how to make a
SBS2000 server bring up the
For quite some time.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Disaster Recovery Issues
Sounds like a call to PSS is in order.
-Original Message-
I think that would depend on how the user was moved. What's the last
modified date on the objects in question?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Manager in E2k
You could look at it on the IMCDATA/Out directry if it's there, or you could
enable logging if you want to catch future events.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pulling email
You could do it via ADSI or if you're running Exchange 5.5, you could use
oh crap I've got old timers disease.. That there tool that I think was on
Bork 2 which automated the polulation of DLs using ADSI.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
ADSI Scripting for System Administration, Thomas Eck.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Adding mailbox with VBScript
I've hit a dead-end in my searching, so here goes:
Can
1001 - 1100 of 2387 matches
Mail list logo
